gcc archive
date index for October, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

October 31, 2004
23:03 Re: GCC 3.5.0? Jakub Jelinek
21:17 Re: GCC 3.5.0? Diego Novillo
21:12 GCC 3.5.0? Sam Lauber
20:56 Re: Optimizer suggestions for 4.x Andrew Pinski
20:54 Re: Cross-Compilation Problems Peter Barada
20:49 Optimizer suggestions for 4.x Sam Lauber
20:37 Cross-Compilation Problems Sam Lauber
19:46 Re: warning: 'bi$ptr2' is used uninitialized in this function Andrew Pinski
19:43 warning: 'bi$ptr2' is used uninitialized in this function Toon Moene
18:22 Re: GCC 's quoting typographic conventions Robert Dewar
15:21 Re: Request for Steering Committee: official release criteria for4.x Dan Kegel
14:47 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Jan Hubicka
14:36 Nine new ACATS failures on HEAD Richard Kenner
13:02 Re: GCC's branding strategy (Was: New GNU-GCC logotype) Bernardo Innocenti
11:01 Re: Windows Port #2 Robert Dewar
10:20 Re: Request for Steering Committee: official release criteria for 4.x Steven Bosscher
07:10 Re: Unable to cvs get gcc Gerald Pfeifer
06:57 Re: GCC cvsweb incompatible with MSIE Aaron W. LaFramboise
06:53 Re: GCC cvsweb incompatible with MSIE Frédéric L. W. Meunier
05:33 Re: Request for Steering Committee: official release criteria for4.x Aaron W. LaFramboise
05:26 re: Request for Steering Committee: official release criteria for4.x Dan Kegel
04:35 General permission to XFAIL? Aaron W. LaFramboise
02:44 GCC cvsweb incompatible with MSIE Aaron W. LaFramboise
00:47 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Andi Kleen

October 30, 2004
23:16 Re: Windows Port #2 Aaron W. LaFramboise
23:13 Re: New Port Suggestion Aaron W. LaFramboise
22:31 New Port Suggestion Sam Lauber
22:28 Re: GCC 's quoting typographic conventions Gabriel Dos Reis
22:20 Windows Port #2 Sam Lauber
21:26 Re: "4.0" in known-to-fail field Daniel Berlin
21:07 GCC 's quoting typographic conventions Paul Schlie
20:13 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Zack Weinberg
20:01 Re: GCC's Unicode use [was Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc] Geoffrey Keating
19:59 Re: "4.0" in known-to-fail field Mark Mitchell
19:52 Re: Python frontend? Colin Douglas Howell
19:49 Re: "4.0" in known-to-fail field Daniel Berlin
19:33 "4.0" in known-to-fail field Mark Mitchell
19:27 GCC 3.4 branch frozen Mark Mitchell
19:11 Re: GCC's Unicode use [was Re: Compile performance of Linuxkernels in mainline gcc] Paul Schlie
19:02 Re: Python frontend? Mark Mitchell
18:56 Re: GCC's Unicode use [was Re: Compile performance of Linux kernelsin mainline gcc] Joseph S. Myers
18:48 GCC's Unicode use [was Re: Compile performance of Linux kernelsin mainline gcc] Paul Schlie
17:28 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Giovanni Bajo
17:09 Re: Some numbers on gcc compiling itself Steven Bosscher
16:21 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Joseph S. Myers
16:10 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Giovanni Bajo
16:00 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin Nathan Sidwell
15:56 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Daniel Berlin
15:31 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin Andrew Pinski
15:28 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin Nathan Sidwell
15:20 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Joseph S. Myers
15:02 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Andi Kleen
14:49 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Giovanni Bajo
14:41 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Andi Kleen
14:25 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Andreas Schwab
14:17 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Andrew Pinski
14:11 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Andi Kleen
14:09 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Andrew Pinski
14:07 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Andi Kleen
13:49 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Andrew Pinski
13:48 Re: Some numbers on gcc compiling itself Giovanni Bajo
13:44 Re: Some numbers on gcc compiling itself Steven Bosscher
13:29 Re: Some numbers on gcc compiling itself Giovanni Bajo
13:17 Some numbers on gcc compiling itself Steven Bosscher
12:27 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Scott Robert Ladd
10:56 Request for Steering Committee: official release criteria for 4.x Giovanni Bajo
10:37 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Steven Bosscher
10:29 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Giovanni Bajo
09:50 First GCC-GNU logotype style proposal. Turbanov Vladislav Dmitrievich
09:41 Re: Fw: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) <smaller version for gcc@gnu.org> Turbanov Vladislav Dmitrievich
09:36 Fw: Fw: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) <smaller version for gcc@gnu.org> Turbanov Vladislav Dmitrievich
09:26 Re: Fw: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) <smaller version for gcc@gnu.org> Turbanov Vladislav Dmitrievich
07:45 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Andi Kleen
07:28 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Zack Weinberg
07:15 Re: Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc + code size Andi Kleen
07:14 Compile performance of Linux kernels in mainline gcc Andi Kleen
03:27 Re: Fw: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) <smaller versionforgcc@gnu.org> Colin Douglas Howell
03:05 Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog tree-ssa-operands.c config/d ... Geoff Keating
02:53 Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog tree-ssa-operands.c config/d ... Andrew Pinski
02:39 Re: Fw: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) <smaller versionfor gcc@gnu.org> Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
00:28 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-10-26) Mark Mitchell
00:22 Re: RFC: subreg fixing (extract_bit_field or simplify_subreg) Aldy Hernandez

October 29, 2004
23:13 gcc-3.4-20041029 is now available gccadmin
22:33 Re: Fw: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) <smaller versionfor gcc@gnu.org> Colin Douglas Howell
22:28 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin Andrew Pinski
22:08 O(1) PHI argument look-up Kazu Hirata
21:50 Re: Fw: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) <smaller version for gcc@gnu.org> Steven Bosscher
21:19 Re: Fw: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) <smaller versionfor gcc@gnu.org> Bernardo Innocenti
21:18 Global Scheduling Algorithm. Balaji V. Iyer
21:02 Re: Fw: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) <smaller version for gcc@gnu.org> Joe Buck
20:57 Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin Matt Austern
20:26 Python frontend? John
20:02 Re: Fw: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) <smaller versionfor gcc@gnu.org> Aaron W. LaFramboise
18:11 Re: Fw: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) <smaller version for gcc@gnu.org> Turbanov Vladislav Dmitrievich
17:35 RE: Fw: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) <smaller version for gcc@gnu.org> Dave Korn
17:31 Re: Fw: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) <smaller version for gcc@gnu.org> Turbanov Vladislav Dmitrievich
17:22 Re: Fw: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) <smaller version for gcc@gnu.org> Joe Buck
16:47 Re: Fw: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) <smaller version for gcc@gnu.org> Turbanov Vladislav Dmitrievich
16:28 Re: Fw: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) <smaller version for gcc@gnu.org> Joe Buck
14:36 Re: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) Turbanov Vladislav Dmitrievich
13:36 Re: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) Gerald Pfeifer
13:36 [RFC] Rotating register allocation for swing modulo scheduling. Feng Wang
13:30 [3.4] gctest fail on rawhide Christian Joensson
12:42 Re: C vs. C++ parsers and the __attribute__ syntax Etienne Lorrain
12:40 Fw: New GNU-GCC logotype (Concept Look v 1.0) <smaller version for gcc@gnu.org> Turbanov Vladislav Dmitrievich
12:21 Re: Removing unspecified template parameters from error messages Gabriel Dos Reis
11:52 Re: Removing unspecified template parameters from error messages Theodore Papadopoulo
11:38 Re: Removing unspecified template parameters from error messages Gabriel Dos Reis
10:11 Removing unspecified template parameters from error messages Theodore Papadopoulo
06:01 Re: PR target/16482: first scheduling pass on SH4 tm_gccmail
04:10 Re: RFC: subreg fixing (extract_bit_field or simplify_subreg) Richard Henderson
03:17 Re: Fw: I would like to suggest help. Gerald Pfeifer
02:44 Re: PR target/16482: first scheduling pass on SH4 Kaz Kojima
01:15 verify_ssa failure in ACATS test Richard Kenner
01:13 emit_group_{load,store} and failing CXG ACATS tests on x64-64 Richard Kenner
01:11 Re: PR target/16482: first scheduling pass on SH4 Alexandre Oliva
00:22 Re: RFC: subreg fixing (extract_bit_field or simplify_subreg) Aldy Hernandez
00:20 Re: RFC: subreg fixing (extract_bit_field or simplify_subreg) Aldy Hernandez

October 28, 2004
23:32 Re: RFC: subreg fixing (extract_bit_field or simplify_subreg) Geoffrey Keating
23:23 Re: [analysis] PR target/17990: reload produces unaligned stackreference tm_gccmail
19:41 Re: RFC: subreg fixing (extract_bit_field or simplify_subreg) Aldy Hernandez
18:43 Re: RFC: subreg fixing (extract_bit_field or simplify_subreg) Ulrich Weigand
18:31 Re: RFC: subreg fixing (extract_bit_field or simplify_subreg) Aldy Hernandez
18:10 Re: RFC: subreg fixing (extract_bit_field or simplify_subreg) David Edelsohn
18:04 Re: RFC: subreg fixing (extract_bit_field or simplify_subreg) David Edelsohn
18:04 Re: RFC: subreg fixing (extract_bit_field or simplify_subreg) Richard Henderson
18:03 Re: RFC: subreg fixing (extract_bit_field or simplify_subreg) Ulrich Weigand
17:58 Re: Compiling GCC for linux with no /usr/include Joe Buck
17:53 RFC: subreg fixing (extract_bit_field or simplify_subreg) Aldy Hernandez
16:53 Re: New Ada RTS failure overnight Daniel Berlin
16:51 Re: Compiling GCC for linux with no /usr/include Casey Allen Shobe
16:41 Re: Compiling GCC for linux with no /usr/include Paul Jarc
16:33 Compiling GCC for linux with no /usr/include Casey Allen Shobe
15:58 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-10-26) Andrew MacLeod
15:31 Re: Ada mainline bootstrap failing on x86 and x86_64 Daniel Berlin
15:01 New Ada RTS failure overnight Richard Kenner
13:47 Re: Ada mainline bootstrap failing on x86 and x86_64 Daniel Berlin
11:43 Re: Should make check always run the java tests? Paolo Bonzini
09:53 Re: Ada mainline bootstrap failing on x86 and x86_64 Eric Botcazou
05:44 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Joe Buck
05:23 Get yourself a Domain Name! -UTMO allbritton27
05:15 Re: Force usage of PLT (on powerpc)? Alan Modra
03:09 Re: Force usage of PLT (on powerpc)? Geoffrey Keating
02:38 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Jeffrey A Law
01:29 Re: Ada mainline bootstrap failing on x86 and x86_64 Daniel Berlin
00:28 Re: Ada mainline bootstrap failing on x86 and x86_64 Daniel Berlin
00:22 Re: Your change to emit_group_{load,store} Alan Modra
00:09 Re: Problem with use of TYPE_SIZE in tree optimizers Richard Kenner
00:07 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Benjamin Kosnik
00:06 Re: Problem with use of TYPE_SIZE in tree optimizers Joseph S. Myers

October 27, 2004
23:58 Re: Problem with use of TYPE_SIZE in tree optimizers Andrew Pinski
23:49 Re: Ada mainline bootstrap failing on x86 and x86_64 Andrew Pinski
23:41 Problem with use of TYPE_SIZE in tree optimizers Richard Kenner
23:32 gcc-3.3-20041027 is now available gccadmin
22:51 Re: PR middle-end/18160 Richard Henderson
22:36 Re: PR middle-end/18160 Adam Nemet
21:47 Re: Should make check always run the java tests? Tom Tromey
21:10 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Mike Stump
21:04 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Joe Buck
20:25 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Chris Lattner
19:39 Re: gcc front end help Mike Stump
19:29 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Steven Bosscher
19:13 Re: Ada complex accuracy fail on x86_64 only (works on x86) Richard Kenner
19:02 Ada complex accuracy fail on x86_64 only (works on x86) Laurent GUERBY
18:57 Ada mainline bootstrap failing on x86 and x86_64 Laurent GUERBY
18:45 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Chris Lattner
18:45 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Daniel Berlin
18:42 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Geoff Keating
18:35 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Chris Lattner
18:35 Re: Should make check always run the java tests? Daniel Jacobowitz
18:35 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Chris Lattner
18:34 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal David Edelsohn
18:34 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Geoff Keating
18:26 RE: GCC IMA & general future proposal Chris Lattner
18:12 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Matt Austern
18:10 Re: C++ g++.dg/parse/parse3.C test Diego Novillo
18:05 Possible problem with COMDAT symbol resolution Richard Smith
18:04 Re: C++ g++.dg/parse/parse3.C test Matt Austern
17:56 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Jeffrey A Law
17:53 Re: Your change to emit_group_{load,store} Aldy Hernandez
17:50 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Daniel Berlin
17:49 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Jan Hubicka
17:48 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
17:29 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Jan Hubicka
17:03 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Kenneth Zadeck
17:02 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Scott Robert Ladd
16:58 Re: C++ g++.dg/parse/parse3.C test Richard Henderson
16:50 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Giovanni Bajo
16:47 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Giovanni Bajo
16:43 Re: Performance Gcc 3.3.1 VS 2.95.1 Joe Buck
16:38 Re: PR middle-end/18160 Richard Henderson
16:30 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Steven Bosscher
16:26 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Scott Robert Ladd
16:25 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Giovanni Bajo
16:24 Re: C vs. C++ parsers and the __attribute__ syntax Ulrich Weigand
15:40 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal David Edelsohn
15:28 Force usage of PLT (on powerpc)? Chris Kirby
15:26 Re: C vs. C++ parsers and the __attribute__ syntax Joseph S. Myers
15:22 Re: auto-vectorization Dorit Naishlos
15:18 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Daniel Berlin
15:16 Unable to cvs get gcc Victor Eijkhout
14:54 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Scott Robert Ladd
14:51 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Scott Robert Ladd
14:47 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Frank Ch. Eigler
14:06 Re: C vs. C++ parsers and the __attribute__ syntax Ulrich Weigand
14:03 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Richard Guenther
13:58 Re: [help] Problem with fixincludes? Bruce Korb
13:41 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Jan Hubicka
13:40 Re: stale pooma src for testing gcc in 'POOMA build and test guide'? Gerald Pfeifer
13:38 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Joseph S. Myers
13:33 Re: C vs. C++ parsers and the __attribute__ syntax Joseph S. Myers
13:31 Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal Kenneth Zadeck
13:27 Re: An error in http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html Gerald Pfeifer
13:14 C vs. C++ parsers and the __attribute__ syntax Ulrich Weigand
13:05 Re: stale pooma src for testing gcc in 'POOMA build and test guide'? Richard Guenther
13:01 Re: stale pooma src for testing gcc in 'POOMA build and test guide'? Gerald Pfeifer
12:54 gcc 3.4.2 compile output Roger Wilco Base Station
12:37 Re: Performance Gcc 3.3.1 VS 2.95.1 Mike Capp
12:09 Should make check always run the java tests? Bradley Lucier
09:54 Re: PR middle-end/18160 Eric Botcazou
09:49 Re: PR middle-end/18160 Joseph S. Myers
08:52 GCC IMA & general future proposal Geoff Keating
08:48 [help] Problem with fixincludes? C Jaiprakash, Noida
07:32 Re: Performance Gcc 3.3.1 VS 2.95.1 Yingqi(Richard) XIAO
07:04 gcc front end help HAN,GUOLING
06:31 Re: PR middle-end/18160 Adam Nemet
06:04 Incorrect ChangeLog entry Mark Mitchell
04:10 Re: Performance Gcc 3.3.1 VS 2.95.1 Joe Buck
01:48 Re: C++ g++.dg/parse/parse3.C test Mike Stump
01:22 Re: Your change to emit_group_{load,store} Aldy Hernandez
01:12 Re: Your change to emit_group_{load,store} Dale Johannesen
01:08 Re: Your change to emit_group_{load,store} Alan Modra
00:55 Re: Your change to emit_group_{load,store} Aldy Hernandez
00:48 Use of REDUCE_BIT_FIELD in NOP_EXPR case Richard Kenner
00:31 Re: Your change to emit_group_{load,store} Dale Johannesen
00:24 C++ g++.dg/parse/parse3.C test Matt Austern
00:02 Re: PR middle-end/18160 Andreas Schwab

October 26, 2004
23:57 Re: Your change to emit_group_{load,store} Aldy Hernandez
23:29 Re: PR middle-end/18160 Adam Nemet
23:15 Re: Your change to emit_group_{load,store} Aldy Hernandez
23:04 Re: Your change to emit_group_{load,store} Andrew Pinski
22:55 Re: Your change to emit_group_{load,store} Richard Kenner
22:51 Re: Your change to emit_group_{load,store} Aldy Hernandez
22:51 Re: PR middle-end/18160 Dale Johannesen
22:49 Re: PR middle-end/18160 Richard Kenner
22:47 Re: Your change to emit_group_{load,store} Richard Kenner
22:46 Performance Gcc 3.3.1 VS 2.95.1 Yingqi(Richard) XIAO
22:44 Re: PR middle-end/18160 Richard Henderson
22:36 Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0(041024) on MICO sources Karel Gardas
22:36 Re: PR middle-end/18160 Adam Nemet
22:27 Re: Your change to emit_group_{load,store} Aldy Hernandez
22:23 gcc 3.3.4 build on OSX 10.2.8 Darwin 6.8 e j mansky
22:12 surprises in xfail support Janis Johnson
21:35 Re: compilation error of gcc to build a cross-compiler Janis Johnson
20:27 Re: PR middle-end/18160 Richard Henderson
20:26 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Steven Bosscher
20:22 Re: PR middle-end/18160 Adam Nemet
20:09 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Pablo Mejia
20:08 Re: Bug 18064 and covariant returns Mark Mitchell
19:52 Re: PR middle-end/18160 Richard Henderson
19:36 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Steven Bosscher
19:33 PR middle-end/18160 Adam Nemet
19:29 Re: Status of <toplev>/README.SCO? Joe Buck
19:14 Re: Cross compilers without assemblers (rant) Mike Stump
19:06 Re: RFC on potential operand/operator processing simplification. Paul Schlie
18:57 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Mike Stump
18:54 Re: Your change to emit_group_{load,store} Richard Henderson
18:20 Status of <toplev>/README.SCO? Diego Novillo
17:58 Re: Your change to emit_group_{load,store} Aldy Hernandez
17:50 Your change to emit_group_{load,store} Richard Kenner
17:38 re: RFC on potential operand/operator processing simplification. Richard Kenner
17:20 RE: gcc 3.3.2/mips/mabi=64 undefined refs to __udivti3 and__umodti3 Eric Christopher
17:12 re: RFC on potential operand/operator processing simplification. Paul Schlie
17:04 RE: gcc 3.3.2/mips/mabi=64 undefined refs to __udivti3 and__umodti3 Gary Funck
16:06 Invalidation of bitmap iterator by clearing bits - Intentional or not? Daniel Berlin
15:54 Fw: I would like to suggest help. Turbanov Vladislav Dmitrievich
15:46 Re: A latent bug - use of BRANCH_EDGE on trees. Devang Patel
14:53 Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0(041024) on MICO sources Daniel Berlin
14:51 Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0(041024) on MICO sources Daniel Berlin
14:49 Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0(041024) on MICO sources Diego Novillo
14:48 compilation error of gcc to build a cross-compiler carole verdon
13:40 Re: Strange (wrong?) aliasing outcome Andrew Haley
13:27 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-10-26) Andrew MacLeod
13:26 Re: Strange (wrong?) aliasing outcome Michael Veksler
12:57 Re: auto-vectorization James A. Morrison
10:48 Re: Strange (wrong?) aliasing outcome Andrew Haley
10:25 Bug 18064 and covariant returns Nathan Sidwell
09:13 auto-vectorization James Cloos
07:29 Re: request for opinion on alternative operand/operator classification Kai Henningsen
07:28 GCC Status Report (2004-10-26) Mark Mitchell
06:32 [analysis] PR target/17990: reload produces unaligned stack reference Uros Bizjak

October 25, 2004
23:53 Re: gcc 3.3.2/mips/mabi=64 undefined refs to __udivti3 and__umodti3 Eric Christopher
23:43 gcc 3.3.2/mips/mabi=64 undefined refs to __udivti3 and __umodti3 Gary Funck
22:20 wishlist: -mcpu=host or -mcpu=native Steven G Johnson
21:53 Re: request for opinion on alternative operand/operatorclassification/promotion approach Andreas Schwab
21:43 RFC on potential operand/operator processing simplification. Paul Schlie
21:31 Re: request for opinion on alternative operand/operator classification/promotionapproach DJ Delorie
21:30 Re: request for opinion on alternative operand/operator classification/promotion approach DJ Delorie
21:18 Re: request for opinion on alternative operand/operator classification/promotionapproach Robert Dewar
21:15 Re: request for opinion on alternative operand/operator classification/promotion approach Zack Weinberg
20:47 Re: request for opinion on alternative operand/operatorclassification/promotion approach Paul Schlie
20:41 Re: Strange (wrong?) aliasing outcome Michael Veksler
20:26 Re: request for opinion on alternative operand/operator classification/promotion approach Zack Weinberg
20:12 request for opinion on alternative operand/operatorclassification/promotion approach Paul Schlie
20:11 Re: [c++] RFC: partial C99 designated-initializers support Kai Henningsen
19:51 Option processing by gcc.c et al. Toon Moene
19:37 Re: Cross compilers without assemblers (rant) Per Bothner
19:25 Re: Cross compilers without assemblers (rant) Zack Weinberg
19:00 Re: Attacking quadratic behaviors associated with SWITCH_EXPR Zdenek Dvorak
18:07 Re: Attacking quadratic behaviors associated with SWITCH_EXPR Kazu Hirata
17:51 Re: Attacking quadratic behaviors associated with SWITCH_EXPR Kazu Hirata
17:41 Re: Attacking quadratic behaviors associated with SWITCH_EXPR Andrew MacLeod
17:31 Re: Strange (wrong?) aliasing outcome Richard Henderson
17:26 Re: Attacking quadratic behaviors associated with SWITCH_EXPR Daniel Berlin
17:17 Re: Attacking quadratic behaviors associated with SWITCH_EXPR Kazu Hirata
16:53 Re: Attacking quadratic behaviors associated with SWITCH_EXPR Zack Weinberg
16:37 Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0(041024) on MICO sources Kenneth Zadeck
16:03 Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0 (041024) on MICO sources Jan Hubicka
15:38 Re: Problem to construct a gcc cross-compiler for a powerpc target Ken Wolcott
15:30 Re: Problem to construct a gcc cross-compiler for a powerpc target carole verdon
15:29 Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0(041024) on MICO sources Daniel Berlin
15:25 Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0 (041024) on MICO sources Jan Hubicka
15:20 Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0(041024) on MICO sources Karel Gardas
15:13 Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0(041024) on MICO sources Daniel Berlin
14:56 Re: 3.3.2 collect2 on AIX with .so libraries David Edelsohn
14:55 Re: 3.3.2 collect2 on AIX with .so libraries David Edelsohn
14:52 Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0(041024) on MICO sources Diego Novillo
14:51 Re: 3.3.2 collect2 on AIX with .so libraries Albert Chin
14:47 Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0 (041024) on MICO sources Richard Guenther
14:46 Re: 3.3.2 collect2 on AIX with .so libraries David Edelsohn
14:42 Re: 3.3.2 collect2 on AIX with .so libraries Albert Chin
14:35 Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0 (041024) on MICO sources Steven Bosscher
14:25 Re: Cross compilers without assemblers (rant) Per Bothner
14:19 Re: 3.3.2 collect2 on AIX with .so libraries David Edelsohn
14:08 3.3.2 collect2 on AIX with .so libraries Albert Chin
14:05 Re: Ada patches Daniel Jacobowitz
14:00 Re: libcpp built by host compiler? Daniel Jacobowitz
13:55 Re: Attacking quadratic behaviors associated with SWITCH_EXPR Kazu Hirata
13:01 Re: Problem to construct a gcc cross-compiler for a powerpc target Andrew Pinski
13:00 Compilation performance of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0 (041021) ontramp3d-v3 Richard Guenther
12:57 Problem to construct a gcc cross-compiler for a powerpc target carole verdon
12:49 Ada patches Arnaud Charlet
12:01 Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0 (041024)on MICO sources Karel Gardas
11:59 Re: new gcc-3_4-e500-branch Gerald Pfeifer
10:50 Re: Strange (wrong?) aliasing outcome Michael Veksler
10:30 Strange (wrong?) aliasing outcome Andrew Haley
08:54 Re: constructing webs from ssa. Michael Matz
06:26 libcpp built by host compiler? Aaron W. LaFramboise
06:18 Re: constructing webs from ssa. Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
03:15 Re: A latent bug - use of BRANCH_EDGE on trees. Ben Elliston

October 24, 2004
20:12 Re: A latent bug - use of BRANCH_EDGE on trees. Zdenek Dvorak
20:09 Re: A latent bug - use of BRANCH_EDGE on trees. Steven Bosscher
20:05 Re: A latent bug - use of BRANCH_EDGE on trees. Kazu Hirata
20:01 Re: A latent bug - use of BRANCH_EDGE on trees. Zdenek Dvorak
19:57 Re: A latent bug - use of BRANCH_EDGE on trees. Steven Bosscher
19:54 Re: A latent bug - use of BRANCH_EDGE on trees. Zdenek Dvorak
19:51 Re: A latent bug - use of BRANCH_EDGE on trees. Steven Bosscher
19:33 Re: A latent bug - use of BRANCH_EDGE on trees. Steven Bosscher
19:17 Re: A latent bug - use of BRANCH_EDGE on trees. Zdenek Dvorak
19:13 Re: A latent bug - use of BRANCH_EDGE on trees. Kazu Hirata
18:57 Warning: ISO C++ does not support the `hh' scanf length modifier Mathieu Malaterre
18:51 Re: A latent bug - use of BRANCH_EDGE on trees. Zdenek Dvorak
18:08 A latent bug - use of BRANCH_EDGE on trees. Kazu Hirata
18:05 gcc-4.0-20041024 is now available gccadmin
12:01 Re: SMS scheduling Mostafa Hagog
11:35 Strange (wrong?) aliasing outcome Michael Veksler
10:32 Re: Problem when defining new mips insns Pontus Lidman
08:03 Re: Attacking quadratic behaviors associated with SWITCH_EXPR Zdenek Dvorak
03:29 Re: Memory aliasing Rajkishore Barik

October 23, 2004
16:58 Re: Problem when defining new mips insns Roger Sayle
16:54 Re: Nested Functions in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:17 Re: Nested Functions in C++ Robert Dewar
15:10 Re: Nested Functions in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
13:52 Re: Nested Functions in C++ Robert Dewar
13:00 Re: Nested Functions in C++ Andrew Haley
12:47 Re: Problem when defining new mips insns Pontus Lidman
12:40 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Remko Troncon
11:49 Re: Nested Functions in C++ Robert Dewar
11:23 Re: Nested Functions in C++ Steven Bosscher
11:13 Re: Nested Functions in C++ Andrew Haley
08:06 Re: Nested Functions in C++ Joe Buck
04:50 Re: Nested Functions in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
04:46 Re: Nested Functions in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:43 Attacking quadratic behaviors associated with SWITCH_EXPR Kazu Hirata

October 22, 2004
23:48 Include file path processing change under Cygwin Steven L. Zook
23:14 gcc-3.4-20041022 is now available gccadmin
22:05 Re: Guidelines for building fixincludes for targets? Andrew Pinski
22:03 Re: Guidelines for building fixincludes for targets? Zack Weinberg
21:55 Re: Guidelines for building fixincludes for targets? Joe Buck
21:30 Re: Guidelines for building fixincludes for targets? Andrew Pinski
21:21 Re: Guidelines for building fixincludes for targets? E. Weddington
21:08 Re: Guidelines for building fixincludes for targets? Aaron W. LaFramboise
19:30 Re: Nested Functions in C++ Joe Buck
19:04 Re: new gcc-3_4-e500-branch Aldy Hernandez
19:04 Re: OpenMP options and threading models Scott Robert Ladd
19:04 Re: Default function calling convention on x86_64 Richard Henderson
18:57 Re: new gcc-3_4-e500-branch Aldy Hernandez
18:52 Default function calling convention on x86_64 Thiago Guzella
18:47 Re: OpenMP options and threading models Mark Mitchell
18:46 Re: OpenMP options and threading models Tom Tromey
18:43 Re: [m68k] register renaming not properly tracking used registers Bernardo Innocenti
18:38 Re: OpenMP options and threading models Mark Mitchell
18:35 Re: Nested Functions in C++ Mark Mitchell
18:23 Re: Do we ever pass ERROR_MARK to expanders? Mark Mitchell
17:34 Re: [m68k] register renaming not properly tracking used registers Mark Mitchell
17:31 Re: [m68k] register renaming not properly tracking used registers Bernardo Innocenti
17:30 Re: [m68k] register renaming not properly tracking used registers Peter Barada
17:20 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.5.0 Andrew Pinski
17:17 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.5.0 Geoffrey Keating
17:11 Re: [m68k] register renaming not properly tracking used registers Peter Barada
16:36 Re: [m68k] register renaming not properly tracking used registers Mark Mitchell
16:33 Re: [m68k] register renaming not properly tracking used registers Peter Barada
16:26 Guidelines for building fixincludes for targets? E. Weddington
16:26 Thoughts on OpenMP and other extensions Jonathan Day
16:10 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.5.0 Timothy J . Wood
15:52 Re: [m68k] register renaming not properly tracking used registers Mark Mitchell
15:51 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.5.0 Andrew Pinski
15:43 Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.5.0 Timothy J . Wood
12:47 Re: [m68k] register renaming not properly tracking used registers Bernardo Innocenti
08:14 Re: new gcc-3_4-e500-branch Gerald Pfeifer
06:44 Re: undefined versioned symbol name std::time_put_w@@GLIBCPP_3.2 Nick NoSpam
06:37 Re: undefined versioned symbol name std::time_put_w@@GLIBCPP_3.2 Nick NoSpam
06:32 undefined versioned symbol name std::time_put_w@@GLIBCPP_3.2 Nick NoSpam
05:45 Re: PATCH for Re: Stale link to StackGuard in extensions page Joe Buck
04:11 Re: Bugzilla: Reporter filing bugs to oneself Daniel Berlin
03:45 Bugzilla: Reporter filing bugs to oneself Aaron W. LaFramboise
02:54 Re: Problem when defining new mips insns Roger Sayle
01:10 Re: possible problem with C implied intermediate variable sizerequirements -> rtl mapping ? Paul Schlie
00:06 Re: possible problem with C implied intermediate variable sizerequirements -> rtl mapping ? Paul Koning

October 21, 2004
23:15 new gcc-3_4-e500-branch Aldy Hernandez
22:38 possible problem with C implied intermediate variable sizerequirements -> rtl mapping ? Paul Schlie
21:10 Re: PR ada/18099: Rounding floating-point to integer Richard Henderson
17:31 PR ada/18099: Rounding floating-point to integer Geert Bosch
16:28 Nested Functions in C++ Steven L. Zook
15:05 Re: Query about cpp0 binary in version 3.3.4 and later Geoffrey Keating
15:01 proposal: suppress warnings in unexecutable code Thomas R. Truscott
14:51 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Paolo Bonzini
14:49 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Robert Dewar
14:48 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Robert Dewar
14:47 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Robert Dewar
14:35 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Scott Robert Ladd
14:33 Re: RFC: Enhancing ObjC message lookup in the presence of protocols David Ayers
14:25 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Biagio Lucini
14:24 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Gabriel Dos Reis
14:23 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Gabriel Dos Reis
14:21 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Robert Dewar
14:17 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Gabriel Dos Reis
14:14 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Biagio Lucini
14:09 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Gabriel Dos Reis
14:08 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Robert Dewar
13:21 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Diego Novillo
13:17 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Sebastian Pop
13:16 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Scott Robert Ladd
13:13 Re: heads up new sub-port e500 v2 Aldy Hernandez
13:10 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Sebastian Pop
13:06 Re: heads up new sub-port e500 v2 Geoff Keating
13:06 Re: Cleanup tests failing Greg Schafer
12:58 RE: Query about cpp0 binary in version 3.3.4 on Debian Dave Korn
12:44 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Diego Novillo
12:36 PATCH for Re: Stale link to StackGuard in extensions page Gerald Pfeifer
12:09 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Gabriel Dos Reis
11:28 Query about cpp0 binary in version 3.3.4 on Debian Sarge Tim Parker
11:10 Query about cpp0 binary in version 3.3.4 on Debian Tim Parker
10:48 Re: heads up new sub-port e500 v2 Aldy Hernandez
10:34 Problem when defining new mips insns Pontus Lidman
10:28 Re: Fortran Clifford Wolf
09:26 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Sebastian Pop
07:34 Query about cpp0 binary in version 3.3.4 and later Tim Parker
06:03 Re: heads up new sub-port e500 v2 Geoff Keating
05:49 Re: [m68k] register renaming not properly tracking used registers Peter Barada
01:42 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Mike Stump
01:38 Re: ProPolice (was Re: libffi on OpenBSD x86) Joseph S. Myers
01:17 Re: Declarations after statements in front ends Richard Kenner
01:09 Re: SoS Zack Weinberg
00:51 Re: [m68k] register renaming not properly tracking used registers Richard Henderson
00:50 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Joe Buck
00:49 Re: SoS Ben Elliston
00:48 ProPolice (was Re: libffi on OpenBSD x86) Joe Buck
00:43 Re: [m68k] register renaming not properly tracking used registers Peter Barada
00:01 SoS Huai Bo WANG
00:00 Re: More on memory barriers Jason Merrill

October 20, 2004
23:45 Re: Cross compilers without assemblers (rant) Kelley Cook
23:29 Re: Declarations after statements in front ends Zack Weinberg
23:29 Re: Cross compilers without assemblers (rant) Daniel Jacobowitz
23:27 Re: Declarations after statements in front ends Andrew Pinski
23:26 Re: Cross compilers without assemblers (rant) Andrew Pinski
23:21 Re: Declarations after statements in front ends Robert Dewar
23:03 Re: Declarations after statements in front ends Robert Dewar
22:57 Re: libffi on OpenBSD x86 Marc Espie
22:45 Cross compilers without assemblers (rant) Zack Weinberg
21:46 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Scott Robert Ladd
21:22 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Remko Troncon
21:01 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Giovanni Bajo
20:21 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Andrew Pinski
20:14 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Giovanni Bajo
20:11 Re: RFC: Enhancing ObjC message lookup in the presence of protocols Ziemowit Laski
19:05 Re: section() handling changed (or a bug was introduced)? Richard Henderson
19:00 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Zack Weinberg
18:43 Re: gcc installation problem Peter Barada
18:41 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Peter Barada
18:38 gcc installation problem Virender Kashyap
18:14 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Zack Weinberg
18:09 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Földy Lajos
17:49 Re: Declarations after statements in front ends Zack Weinberg
17:32 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Daniel Berlin
17:30 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Zack Weinberg
17:26 Re: Declarations after statements in front ends Gabriel Dos Reis
17:17 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Földy Lajos
17:12 gcc configuration problem with ld and gas aram bharathi
17:01 Re: Declarations after statements in front ends Zack Weinberg
16:58 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Zack Weinberg
16:32 Gcc's comdat support in glibc missing (was: Re: section() handling changed (or a bug was introduced)?) Mariusz Mazur
16:29 pr17209 on arm (was: Re: Problem compiling gcc-3.4.2 and glibc-2.3.2) Dan Kegel
16:21 Re: attribute((mode)) pointers broken by STRIP_USELESS_TYPE_CONVERSION Ulrich Weigand
16:20 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Földy Lajos
15:40 source code for GFORTRAN and GCC Boris Shkoller
15:36 Declarations after statements in front ends Bryce McKinlay
14:52 Re: Fortran Robert Dewar
14:52 Re: attribute((mode)) pointers broken by STRIP_USELESS_TYPE_CONVERSION Andrew Pinski
14:47 attribute((mode)) pointers broken by STRIP_USELESS_TYPE_CONVERSION Ulrich Weigand
14:33 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Steven Bosscher
14:30 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Richard Guenther
14:27 Re: libffi on OpenBSD x86 Anthony Green
14:25 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Remko Troncon
14:21 Re: section() handling changed (or a bug was introduced)? Daniel Jacobowitz
14:12 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Steven Bosscher
14:03 Re: libffi on OpenBSD x86 Thomas Heller
13:53 Re: libffi on OpenBSD x86 Thomas Heller
13:52 Re: libffi on OpenBSD x86 Anthony Green
13:49 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Ranjit Mathew
13:46 Re: libffi on OpenBSD x86 Andrew Haley
13:38 Re: libffi on OpenBSD x86 Anthony Green
13:26 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Richard Guenther
13:26 Re: Fortran Tolga Dalman
13:19 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Remko Troncon
13:07 Re: libffi on OpenBSD x86 Thomas Heller
13:03 Re: Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Steven Bosscher
13:00 libffi on OpenBSD x86 Thomas Heller
12:49 Re: Fortran Robert Dewar
12:35 Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3 Remko Troncon
11:20 Re: Fortran Tolga Dalman
10:53 gcc newsletter #13 Mathieu Lacage
10:53 Re: Fortran Robert Dewar
09:59 Elimination of function call negit
09:46 Re: section() handling changed (or a bug was introduced)? Mariusz Mazur
09:26 Re: how to install gcc in local directory John R. Shannon
08:06 Re: RFC: Enhancing ObjC message lookup in the presence of protocols d.ayers
08:02 how to install gcc in local directory aram bharathi
07:48 Re: Fortran Tolga Dalman
07:24 Fortran Faruk Diblen
06:29 RE: Question about comment in arm_legitimize_address() Richard Earnshaw
01:34 Re: RFC: Enhancing ObjC message lookup in the presence of protocols Ziemowit Laski

October 19, 2004
23:24 Re: heads up new sub-port e500 v2 Richard Kenner
23:08 Re: heads up new sub-port e500 v2 Mark Mitchell
22:24 Re: section() handling changed (or a bug was introduced)? Daniel Jacobowitz
22:13 heads up new sub-port e500 v2 Aldy Hernandez
21:06 section() handling changed (or a bug was introduced)? Mariusz Mazur
20:09 Re: CVS write after approval access Bryce McKinlay
20:05 Re: OpenMP options and threading models Tom Tromey
20:01 Successfully built GCC 3.4.2 for i585-ncr-sysv4.3.03 mike . meyer
19:56 Re: RFC: Enhancing ObjC message lookup in the presence of protocols d.ayers
19:41 CVS write after approval access Aaron W. LaFramboise
18:45 Question about comment in arm_legitimize_address() Ian Lance Taylor
18:09 Re: rfc: constant pool and floats Aldy Hernandez
17:45 OpenMP options and threading models Scott Robert Ladd
17:17 RE: What is cc0 target? Dave Korn
17:05 Re: What is cc0 target? Janis Johnson
16:49 Re: 3.3.x releases and branch Gabriel Dos Reis
16:30 Re: Patch reversion policy: can I approve reversion of my own patch? Zack Weinberg
15:15 C99 complex support broken? Wolfram Wadepohl
14:15 powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0, bootstrap 3.4.2 David Perry
11:30 What is cc0 target? C Jaiprakash, Noida
08:16 Patch reversion policy: can I approve reversion of my own patch? Hans-Peter Nilsson
07:16 Re: 3.3.x releases and branch Zack Weinberg
07:06 Re: 3.3.x releases and branch Eric Botcazou
06:06 Re: 3.3.x releases and branch Zack Weinberg
04:04 Build failure for sh64-unknown-linux-gnu Kaz Kojima

October 18, 2004
22:59 Re: RFC: Enhancing ObjC message lookup in the presence of protocols Ziemowit Laski
21:19 Re: 3.3.x releases and branch Eric Botcazou
21:15 Re: Mode for enum rejected on 3.4 branch Richard Henderson
20:58 Re: fold_convert question Richard Kenner
20:57 Re: fold_convert question Eric Botcazou
20:31 Re: fold_convert question Jeffrey A Law
19:57 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-10-08) Jeffrey A Law
19:46 Re: rfc: constant pool and floats Aldy Hernandez
19:44 Re: rfc: constant pool and floats Aldy Hernandez
19:43 Re: Libunwind and libgcc on ia64 H. J. Lu
19:40 Re: fold_convert question Richard Kenner
19:36 Re: Static Initializer Mike Stump
19:30 Re: fold_convert question Jeffrey A Law
19:28 Re: Libunwind and libgcc on ia64 Mariusz Mazur
19:24 Re: Libunwind and libgcc on ia64 H. J. Lu
19:06 Re: Libunwind and libgcc on ia64 Mariusz Mazur
18:40 Re: 3.3.x releases and branch Gabriel Dos Reis
18:36 Aviso de conta desativada Uniti%SFCORP
17:11 RE: [m68k] register renaming not properly tracking used registers C Jaiprakash, Noida
17:04 Re: Static Initializer Joe Buck
17:03 Re: bug w/ inline of inline? Richard Henderson
17:03 Re: Libunwind and libgcc on ia64 H. J. Lu
16:59 Re: [m68k] register renaming not properly tracking used registers Richard Henderson
16:31 Re: Static Initializer Nathan Sidwell
15:54 Static Initializer Kartchner Val Civ OO-ALC/MASHA
15:44 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-10-08) H. J. Lu
14:25 Re: List-Files with GNU Andrew Haley
14:02 Re: List-Files with GNU Giovanni Bajo
12:29 Re: RFC: Enhancing ObjC message lookup in the presence of protocols David Ayers
10:20 Re: List-Files with GNU Clifford Wolf
10:19 Re: List-Files with GNU Julian Brown
09:45 Re: List-Files with GNU Steven Bosscher
09:19 List-Files with GNU Kukuk Barbara
08:21 Re: [BUG] gcc HEAD 2004-10-08, linux-x-sh-elf, SEGV when building newlib/libm/math/e_scalb.c Ben Elliston
08:02 Cleanup tests failing Greg Schafer
07:40 3.3.x releases and branch Eric Botcazou
06:23 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-10-08) Mark Mitchell
04:48 Re: DR handling for C++ Jason Merrill
04:13 Re: Status of edge-vector-branch merge Ben Elliston
02:39 Re: bug w/ inline of inline? Richard Kenner
00:29 Re: bug w/ inline of inline? Andrew Pinski
00:18 Re: bug w/ inline of inline? Zack Weinberg

October 17, 2004
23:48 bug w/ inline of inline? Eliot Dresselhaus
23:06 Re: RFC: Enhancing ObjC message lookup in the presence of protocols Ziemowit Laski
20:32 [m68k] register renaming not properly tracking used registers Peter Barada
18:08 gcc-4.0-20041017 is now available gccadmin
17:22 Re: Do we ever pass ERROR_MARK to expanders? Kazu Hirata
17:16 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-10-08) John David Anglin
16:58 Re: Do we ever pass ERROR_MARK to expanders? Jan Hubicka
16:13 Re: Do we ever pass ERROR_MARK to expanders? Steven Bosscher
15:40 Libunwind and libgcc on ia64 Mariusz Mazur
15:32 Do we ever pass ERROR_MARK to expanders? Kazu Hirata
08:54 pseudo register in reload progress Shinpei Kato
02:41 Re: rfc: constant pool and floats Geoff Keating
01:43 Re: rfc: constant pool and floats David Edelsohn
01:30 Re: rfc: constant pool and floats Aldy Hernandez
00:33 3.4.2: Succesful bootstrap build on mandrake linux 10 dsjoblom

October 16, 2004
21:29 Re: [RFC] Gimple and language independent Richard Kenner
21:19 Re: rfc: constant pool and floats Geoff Keating
20:53 Re: PR 17949 (unaligned memory accesses due to ivopts) question Zdenek Dvorak
20:37 Re: PR 17949 (unaligned memory accesses due to ivopts) question Daniel Jacobowitz
20:24 [RFC] Gimple and language independent Andrew Pinski
19:35 PR 17949 (unaligned memory accesses due to ivopts) question Zdenek Dvorak
14:49 GCC 3.4.2/GNAT bootstrap problem Frank Ecke
14:36 One of our website users is looking into your background at our website. Experience Request Advisory
13:12 Re: request related to arm Paul Brook
12:34 Re: fold_convert question Eric Botcazou
10:41 Status of edge-vector-branch merge Andreas Meier
09:19 request related to arm aram bharathi
05:23 Re: fold_convert question Richard Kenner
03:16 Re: fold_convert question Andrew Pinski
03:10 Re: fold_convert question Richard Kenner
02:33 Re: rfc: constant pool and floats Aldy Hernandez
02:31 Re: rfc: constant pool and floats Aldy Hernandez
02:25 Re: fold_convert question Roger Sayle
01:11 Re: fold_convert question Richard Kenner
01:07 Re: fold_convert question Roger Sayle
00:57 Dubious code in check_global_declarations Jan Hubicka

October 15, 2004
23:59 Re: rfc: constant pool and floats Aldy Hernandez
23:57 Re: ieee.exp tests containing generic FP tests Aldy Hernandez
23:44 gcc-3.4-20041015 is now available gccadmin
23:04 Re: rfc: constant pool and floats Daniel Jacobowitz
22:58 Re: libjava clean-nat is broken Giovanni Bajo
22:28 Do we ever have a compound assignment like a = b = c? Kazu Hirata
22:23 Re: rfc: constant pool and floats Geoffrey Keating
22:19 Re: ieee.exp tests containing generic FP tests Geoffrey Keating
21:45 Re: rfc: constant pool and floats Andrew Pinski
21:41 Re: Speculative prefetching: report Dale Johannesen
21:36 Re: Speculative prefetching: report Jan Hubicka
21:36 Re: Speculative prefetching: report Zdenek Dvorak
21:32 Re: Speculative prefetching: report Dale Johannesen
21:30 rfc: constant pool and floats Aldy Hernandez
21:30 Re: Speculative prefetching: report Zdenek Dvorak
21:25 Re: Speculative prefetching: report Jan Hubicka
21:04 Re: Speculative prefetching: report Dale Johannesen
21:01 [mudflap] gimple grammar question Frank Ch. Eigler
20:56 Re: Speculative prefetching: report Zdenek Dvorak
20:39 Re: Speculative prefetching: report Dale Johannesen
20:22 Re: Speculative prefetching: report Zdenek Dvorak
20:22 Re: Speculative prefetching: report Zdenek Dvorak
19:34 Re: Questions on Bug Reporting Mike Stump
19:18 fold_convert question Richard Kenner
19:16 ieee.exp tests containing generic FP tests Aldy Hernandez
19:07 Re: Help: Testsuite filenames are not parallel-make safe Mike Stump
18:07 Re: Help: Testsuite filenames are not parallel-make safe Janis Johnson
17:39 Re: libjava clean-nat is broken Tom Tromey
17:01 Re: RFC: Enhancing ObjC message lookup in the presence of protocols David Ayers
16:37 Help Wanted Alex @ IC Resources
16:28 Re: libjava clean-nat is broken Andrew Haley
16:22 libjava clean-nat is broken Andrew Haley
15:58 Re: -V and -b fails of g++ Andrew Pinski
15:57 Re: -V and -b fails of g++ Joe Buck
15:52 -V and -b fails of g++ Dana, Eric
13:02 Re: Undeclared variable in tree-vectorizer.c Dorit Naishlos
12:51 libjava clean-nat is broken Giovanni Bajo
12:48 RE: How to configure GCC as debuggable Dave Korn
12:03 Re: How to configure GCC as debuggable Paolo Bonzini
10:56 Re: PR target/16482: first scheduling pass on SH4 Kaz Kojima
10:09 Re: How to configure GCC as debuggable Bernd Feindt
09:11 function arguments Shinpei Kato
07:23 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Kai Henningsen
07:23 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Kai Henningsen
04:25 PR target/16482: first scheduling pass on SH4 tm_gccmail
03:32 Help: Testsuite filenames are not parallel-make safe Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:22 Re: [PATCH] trivial fix for arc/lib1funcs.asm . Mark Mitchell
02:33 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Giovanni Bajo
00:54 Re: A gcc-cris bug? Hans-Peter Nilsson
00:06 FIXME in gimplifier.c Andrew Pinski

October 14, 2004
21:14 Re: RFC: Enhancing ObjC message lookup in the presence of protocols Ziemowit Laski
21:01 Re: Undeclared variable in tree-vectorizer.c Andrew Pinski
20:56 Undeclared variable in tree-vectorizer.c Diego Novillo
20:33 Re: How to configure GCC as debuggable Phil Edwards
20:19 Re: PR 161/251 patch causing massive link time regression Jakub Jelinek
19:13 Re: [PATCH] trivial fix for arc/lib1funcs.asm . Ramana Radhakrishnan
18:48 Re: PR 161/251 patch causing massive link time regression H. J. Lu
18:44 gcc 3.3.5 is not announced Guillermo Ballester Valor
18:40 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Geoffrey Keating
18:37 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Geoffrey Keating
17:50 Re: Major deficiency in optimising memset calls Jan Hubicka
17:01 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
16:46 Visualizing RTL dumps using graphviz Clifford Wolf
16:37 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Andreas Schwab
16:37 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Andreas Schwab
16:07 Re: Questions on Bug Reporting Joe Buck
14:34 Re: RFC: Enhancing ObjC message lookup in the presence of protocols David Ayers
14:05 RE: How to configure GCC as debuggable Dave Korn
13:40 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Giovanni Bajo
13:32 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Scott Robert Ladd
13:30 Major deficiency in optimising memset calls Daniel Egger
13:26 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Scott Robert Ladd
13:06 Re: Simplifing tuples Giovanni Bajo
12:57 Re: PR 161/251 patch causing massive link time regression Jakub Jelinek
12:43 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:40 Re: How to configure GCC as debuggable Giovanni Bajo
12:34 RE: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Dave Korn
12:05 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
11:44 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Giovanni Bajo
11:40 Re: dynamically written code problem Paolo Bonzini
11:36 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Paolo Bonzini
11:29 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Lars Segerlund
11:06 Re: Is this a 3.4.2 bug (segfault compiling arts) ? Volker Reichelt
11:04 Re: dynamically written code problem Tolga Dalman
10:59 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Giovanni Bajo
10:09 How to configure GCC as debuggable Bernd Feindt
09:37 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Andreas Schwab
07:30 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Paolo Bonzini
07:10 Re: Is this a 3.4.2 bug (segfault compiling arts) ? Jason Mancini
06:55 first set of testresults for arc-elf32 target. Ramana Radhakrishnan
06:04 Is this a 3.4.2 bug (segfault compiling arts) ? Frédéric L. W. Meunier
04:29 Re: Questions on Bug Reporting Giovanni Bajo
04:21 Questions on Bug Reporting Aaron W. LaFramboise
03:11 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
01:42 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Giovanni Bajo
00:22 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Andreas Schwab
00:21 Re: PR 161/251 patch causing massive link time regression H. J. Lu

October 13, 2004
23:57 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Mike Stump
23:19 gcc-3.3-20041013 is now available gccadmin
22:53 RE: Meaning of __BASE_FILE__ inside -include file? Gary Funck
22:45 Re: Meaning of __BASE_FILE__ inside -include file? Zack Weinberg
22:24 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
22:19 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Gabriel Dos Reis
22:15 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Geoffrey Keating
22:02 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Joseph S. Myers
21:59 Meaning of __BASE_FILE__ inside -include file? Gary Funck
21:55 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
21:45 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Scott Robert Ladd
21:37 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Geoffrey Keating
21:16 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Gabriel Dos Reis
20:58 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Scott Robert Ladd
20:41 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
20:39 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
20:29 Re: [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Phil Edwards
19:41 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Geoffrey Keating
19:34 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Phil Edwards
19:26 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Matt Austern
19:13 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Geoffrey Keating
19:09 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Andreas Schwab
18:25 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Matt Austern
18:20 Re: IV-OPTs causes huge regression David Edelsohn
17:01 [gomp] Challenges in Implementing OpenMP Scott Robert Ladd
16:06 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Richard Henderson
15:46 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Andreas Schwab
15:33 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Andreas Schwab
15:31 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
15:24 RE: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Dave Korn
15:22 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Chris Lattner
15:06 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
15:04 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Andreas Schwab
14:53 Re: First stage bootstrap failure on apple-ppc-darwin Andrew Pinski
14:50 Re: First stage bootstrap failure on apple-ppc-darwin Fariborz Jahanian
14:30 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
14:22 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Andreas Schwab
14:10 RE: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Joseph S. Myers
14:01 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:56 RE: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Dave Korn
13:45 RE: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Dave Korn
13:45 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:29 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Andreas Schwab
13:29 Re: RFC: Enhancing ObjC message lookup in the presence of protocols David Ayers
13:22 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Andreas Schwab
13:16 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:12 Re: spurious ICE in cp_tree_equal, at /cp/tree.c:1586 Giovanni Bajo
13:09 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:04 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:04 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Daniel Berlin
13:02 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:41 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Nick Ing-Simmons
12:35 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Ranjit Mathew
12:30 IV-OPTs causes huge regression Andrew Pinski
12:24 spurious ICE in cp_tree_equal, at /cp/tree.c:1586 Michael Cieslinski
11:47 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Giovanni Bajo
11:45 RE: Is -Wparentheses b0rken in 3.3? Dave Korn
10:57 Re: Is -Wparentheses b0rken in 3.3? Paolo Carlini
10:47 Is -Wparentheses b0rken in 3.3? Dave Korn
10:09 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Andreas Schwab
09:23 RE: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Dave Korn
09:19 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Nick Ing-Simmons
09:18 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Andreas Schwab
07:26 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Kai Henningsen
06:24 Re: constructing webs from ssa. Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
05:49 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Ranjit Mathew
04:35 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Zack Weinberg
04:06 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Chris Lattner
03:49 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
03:47 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
03:42 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
02:53 Moving floating point through integer registers Canqun Yang
02:27 Re: Protocol error: too many arguments Ian Lance Taylor
01:05 Re: First stage bootstrap failure on apple-ppc-darwin Andrew Pinski

October 12, 2004
23:23 RE: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Steven L. Zook
23:14 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Daniel Berlin
23:13 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Phil Edwards
23:00 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Geoffrey Keating
23:00 Re: C++ cpp lineno breakage Zack Weinberg
22:59 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Zack Weinberg
21:46 Re: First stage bootstrap failure on apple-ppc-darwin Fariborz Jahanian
21:26 Re: Speculative prefetching: report David Edelsohn
21:15 First stage bootstrap failure on apple-ppc-darwin Fariborz Jahanian
20:03 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
20:02 C++ cpp lineno breakage Mike Stump
19:51 Re: RFC: Enhancing ObjC message lookup in the presence of protocols Ziemowit Laski
19:44 Re: Speculative prefetching: report Dale Johannesen
19:36 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Geoffrey Keating
19:32 Re: Speculative prefetching: report Andrew Pinski
19:17 Speculative prefetching: report Dale Johannesen
18:17 Re: [BC ABI] Branch is frozen Andrew Haley
18:01 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Mike Stump
17:22 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Mike Stump
16:34 Re: adding a directory on a branch Richard Henderson
16:15 Re: RFC: Enhancing ObjC message lookup in the presence of protocols David Ayers
15:49 Re: constructing webs from ssa. Jeffrey A Law
15:20 RE: Protocol error: too many arguments Dave Korn
14:36 Re: Protocol error: too many arguments Andrew Haley
14:33 Re: Protocol error: too many arguments Christopher Faylor
14:23 RE: [PATCH] PR/17860: wrong code generated by loop optimizer up to 3.4 Dave Korn
14:14 RE: Protocol error: too many arguments Dave Korn
13:43 Re: Protocol error: too many arguments Andrew Haley
13:38 Re: Protocol error: too many arguments Ian Lance Taylor
13:21 RE: Protocol error: too many arguments Andrew Haley
13:17 RE: Protocol error: too many arguments Dave Korn
13:10 Protocol error: too many arguments Andrew Haley
12:19 Re: [PATCH] PR/17860: wrong code generated by loop optimizer up to3.4 Paolo Bonzini
11:59 RE: [PATCH] PR/17860: wrong code generated by loop optimizer up to 3.4 Dave Korn
10:06 constructing webs from ssa. Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
09:37 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Gabriel Dos Reis
09:02 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Robert Dewar
08:53 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Mark Mitchell
08:40 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Robert Dewar
07:38 Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Ranjit Mathew
07:01 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Mark Mitchell
06:59 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Kai Henningsen
06:11 Re: [PATCH] trivial fix for arc/lib1funcs.asm . Ramana Radhakrishnan
05:36 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Florian Weimer
02:55 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Mark Mitchell
01:20 Re: [PATCH] trivial fix for arc/lib1funcs.asm . Giovanni Bajo

October 11, 2004
23:12 Re: [Ada?] Can't build gcc-3.3.5 on rawhide/i686-linux: system.adsis incorrectly formatted Robert Dewar
22:04 RFC: Enhancing ObjC message lookup in the presence of protocols Ziemowit Laski
21:03 AW: Lego.NET: An MSIL front-end for gcc Martin von Löwis
17:28 Re: Another untested testcase Mark Mitchell
17:20 Re: Another untested testcase Andrew Pinski
16:58 Another untested testcase Mark Mitchell
16:50 Lego.NET: An MSIL front-end for gcc Martin von Löwis
16:34 Re: Error compiling gcc-4.0 Paul Brook
16:05 Error compiling gcc-4.0 Rajkishore Barik
12:44 RE: cvs problems ... Dave Korn
10:46 Successful build of gcc-3.4.2 on alpha-dec-osf4.0f Arnold Vogelsang
10:23 Inline assembly with optimization gives error. Dhruv Matani
09:53 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Richard Earnshaw
09:48 Re: List and map files with GCC Ramana Radhakrishnan
09:45 Re: Obsoleting ports Ramana Radhakrishnan
08:22 List and map files with GCC Kukuk Barbara
08:05 Re: dynamically written code problem Paolo Bonzini
07:48 Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++) Ranjit Mathew
07:45 Re: dynamically written code problem Jakub Jelinek
07:44 Re: Typo on http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html Paolo Bonzini
07:33 Typo on http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html ian
07:33 Re: dynamically written code problem Paolo Bonzini
07:26 Re: dynamically written code problem Jakub Jelinek
07:16 Re: dynamically written code problem Paolo Bonzini
07:11 GCC 3.3 compiling program with optimization for Pentium-M!? Arnvid Karstad
04:34 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
01:46 Re: Problem with "cvs update" Ben Elliston
00:11 Re: Any news? (was: edge vector corruption) Ben Elliston

October 10, 2004
21:51 dynamically written code problem Bob Wilkinson
19:21 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Richard Guenther
18:12 Re: Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Mike Stump
18:01 gcc-4.0-20041010 is now available gccadmin
16:32 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Kai Henningsen
14:48 Optimizing of explicit temporary storage Richard Guenther
13:27 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-10-08) Toon Moene
09:57 Any news? (was: edge vector corruption) Steven Bosscher
02:03 Re: Obsoleting ports Andrew Pinski
02:00 Re: Obsoleting ports Andrew Pinski
01:57 Re: Obsoleting ports Joseph S. Myers
01:19 Obsoleting ports Kazu Hirata

October 09, 2004
17:57 Re: Test for PR17902 Andrew Pinski
17:55 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Matthias B.
17:36 Test for PR17902 Mark Mitchell
15:59 successful bootstrap/install of gcc-4.0-20041003 on Mac OS X 10.2.8 (powerpc-apple-darwin6.8) Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
13:29 Memory aliasing Rajkishore Barik
08:48 [help] Is this a frv-elf-gcc bug? zhan rongkai
07:05 Re: SMS scheduling Canqun Yang
01:39 Compiler porting: Problem with stack slots Vasanth

October 08, 2004
23:32 gcc-3.4-20041008 is now available gccadmin
22:34 GCC Status Report (2004-10-08) Mark Mitchell
21:14 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Paul Jarc
20:59 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Jamie Lokier
20:45 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Andreas Schwab
20:26 Re: cvs problems ... Zack Weinberg
20:10 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Paul Koning
19:57 Re: cvs problems ... Mike Stump
18:57 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Matthias B.
18:24 Re: cvs problems ... Andrew Haley
18:22 Re: cvs problems ... Phil Edwards
18:15 Re: cvs problems ... Paolo Bonzini
17:59 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Paul Jarc
17:31 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Morten Welinder
17:28 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Jamie Lokier
17:20 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Joe Buck
17:12 RE: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Dave Korn
17:08 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Joe Buck
16:56 Re: adding a directory on a branch David Daney
16:28 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Paul Jarc
16:17 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Joe Buck
15:52 Re: cvs problems ... Zack Weinberg
15:30 Re: anyone knows the c++ object model of GCC? falcon
15:23 Re: anyone knows the c++ object model of GCC? falcon
15:07 [BUG] gcc HEAD 2004-10-08, linux-x-sh-elf, SEGV when building newlib/libm/math/e_scalb.c Corinna Vinschen
14:45 Re: huge amount of warnings... Andrew Pinski
14:38 Re: [Ada?] Can't build gcc-3.3.5 on rawhide/i686-linux: system.ads is incorrectly formatted Michael Chastain
14:26 Re: cvs problems ... Christopher Faylor
14:18 Re: anyone knows the c++ object model of GCC? Nathan Sidwell
14:12 Re: adding a directory on a branch DJ Delorie
14:11 Re: cvs problems ... Diego Novillo
14:04 Re: anyone knows the c++ object model of GCC? Tingting GU
14:03 Re: cvs problems ... Christopher Faylor
14:01 RE: cvs problems ... Dave Korn
14:00 Re: cvs problems ... Christopher Faylor
13:57 RE: cvs problems ... Dave Korn
13:56 Re: cvs problems ... Christopher Faylor
13:55 Re: cvs problems ... Diego Novillo
13:54 Re: cvs problems ... Andrew Haley
13:51 RE: cvs problems ... Andreas Tobler
13:48 Re: cvs problems ... Christopher Faylor
13:48 Re: TMSC320C6x port: return label is being deleted Nick Ing-Simmons
13:35 RE: cvs problems ... Andrew Haley
13:32 RE: cvs problems ... Diego Novillo
13:29 anyone knows the c++ object model of GCC? 肖占中
13:28 RE: cvs problems ... Andrew Haley
13:24 RE: cvs problems ... Diego Novillo
13:15 RE: cvs problems ... Dave Korn
13:13 RE: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Dave Korn
13:06 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Nick Ing-Simmons
12:54 RE: cvs problems ... Dave Korn
12:42 RE: [RFC] Removing -fpack-struct in C++ for 4.0 Dave Korn
12:10 RE: cvs problems ... Andrew Haley
11:56 RE: cvs problems ... Andrew Haley
11:54 RE: cvs problems ... Andrew Haley
11:47 RE: cvs problems ... Dave Korn
11:40 RE: cvs problems ... Dave Korn
11:39 Problem with "cvs update" Richard Kenner
11:35 cvs problems ... Andreas Tobler
10:26 Re: adding a directory on a branch Joseph S. Myers
08:18 Re: ARCH_rtx_costs Shinpei Kato
08:13 Re: m68k-wrs-vxworks Cross compiler no longer supported??? Phil Prentice
08:01 Re: huge amount of warnings... Andreas Jaeger
07:34 Re: adding a directory on a branch Paolo Bonzini
07:20 Re: adding a directory on a branch Ranjit Mathew
07:19 Re: ARCH_rtx_costs Steven Bosscher
06:10 Question about print-tree.c!! Sean Hsiao
01:20 Re: ARCH_rtx_costs Shinpei Kato
00:35 Re: objc data structures Ziemowit Laski
00:10 Re: "Steengaard" should be "Steensgaard" (on tree-ssa web page) Diego Novillo
00:06 Re: [RFC] Removing -fpack-struct in C++ for 4.0 Joseph S. Myers
00:05 "Steengaard" should be "Steensgaard" (on tree-ssa web page) Howard B. Golden

October 07, 2004
23:54 Re: [RFC] Removing -fpack-struct in C++ for 4.0 Aaron W. LaFramboise
21:21 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Florian Weimer
21:02 data prefetch support pranav bhandarkar
19:39 Re: objc data structures Geoffrey Keating
19:17 adding a directory on a branch Tom Tromey
19:04 Re: objc data structures Ziemowit Laski
18:28 objc data structures Geoffrey Keating
18:08 Re: Is profiledbootstrap supposed to work currently? [PR bootstrap/14684] Jan Hubicka
17:04 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Richard Kenner
17:01 Re: ARCH_rtx_costs Eric Christopher
16:01 Stale link to StackGuard in extensions page E. Weddington
15:46 Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada Robert Dewar
15:42 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Mark Mitchell
13:54 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Daniel Jacobowitz
13:16 RE: [RFC] Removing -fpack-struct in C++ for 4.0 Dave Korn
13:15 Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada Giovanni Bajo
13:04 Re: [RFC] Removing -fpack-struct in C++ for 4.0 Giovanni Bajo
12:57 Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada Richard Kenner
12:52 RE: [RFC] Removing -fpack-struct in C++ for 4.0 Andrew Haley
12:42 RE: [RFC] Removing -fpack-struct in C++ for 4.0 Dave Korn
12:39 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Richard Kenner
11:46 ARCH_rtx_costs Shinpei Kato
11:23 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Richard Kenner
11:21 Re: [RFC] Removing -fpack-struct in C++ for 4.0 Giovanni Bajo
10:33 [RFC] Removing -fpack-struct in C++ for 4.0 Andrew Haley
10:30 Re: [BC ABI] Branch is frozen Andrew Haley
10:30 [RFC] Removing -fpack-struct in C++ for 4.0 Giovanni Bajo
10:07 `_Unwind_RaiseException_Phase2' Andrew Haley
10:04 Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada Giovanni Bajo
09:52 Re: A gcc-cris bug? Paolo Bonzini
09:03 Re: A gcc-cris bug? Richard Guenther
08:33 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Florian Weimer
07:19 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Laurent GUERBY
06:50 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Robert Dewar
06:42 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Mark Mitchell
06:24 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Steven Bosscher
06:24 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Steven Bosscher
05:56 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Robert Dewar
05:16 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Robert Dewar
05:07 Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada Robert Dewar
02:31 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Mark Mitchell
02:06 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Richard Kenner
01:42 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Mark Mitchell
01:42 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Richard Kenner
01:07 Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada James A. Morrison
01:06 `_Unwind_RaiseException_Phase2' Nagender Telkar
00:44 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner

October 06, 2004
23:30 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
23:27 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Robert Dewar
23:26 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Robert Dewar
23:25 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Richard Kenner
23:25 Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada Robert Dewar
23:25 gcc-3.3-20041006 is now available gccadmin
23:22 Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada Richard Kenner
23:16 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
23:15 Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada Steven Bosscher
23:09 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Richard Kenner
23:06 Re: bootstrap failure on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu (trunk) H. J. Lu
23:04 Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada Robert Dewar
22:59 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Joe Buck
22:54 Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada Joe Buck
22:52 Re: bootstrap failure on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu (trunk) Joe Buck
22:35 Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada Robert Dewar
22:26 Re: legal C++ ? Giovanni Bajo
22:21 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Richard Kenner
22:03 Re: bootstrap failure on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu (trunk) H. J. Lu
22:03 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
21:58 bootstrap failure on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu (trunk) Joe Buck
21:37 Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada Steven Bosscher
21:07 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Richard Kenner
20:54 Re: Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada Geert Bosch
20:52 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Laurent GUERBY
20:39 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
20:19 Question/proposal for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION and Ada Richard Kenner
20:17 Re: Varray memory consumption strikes back Jan Hubicka
20:06 Re: Varray memory consumption strikes back Daniel Jacobowitz
19:59 Re: Varray memory consumption strikes back Jan Hubicka
19:58 legal C++ ? Steve Ellcey
19:25 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Ulrich Weigand
19:11 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Richard Kenner
18:52 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Ulrich Weigand
18:22 huge amount of warnings... Christian Joensson
18:18 RE: A gcc-cris bug? Graham Stott
17:46 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
17:38 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
17:20 RE: A gcc-cris bug? Dave Korn
17:13 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Richard Kenner
17:00 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Richard Kenner
16:58 Re: [BC ABI] Branch is frozen Andrew Haley
16:57 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Ulrich Weigand
16:41 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Richard Kenner
16:39 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Richard Kenner
16:36 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Geert Bosch
16:34 RE: A gcc-cris bug? Graham Stott
16:11 Re: Why does tree-pretty-print try to print BINFO_TYPE of TREE__VEC Daniel Berlin
16:09 Re: Why does tree-pretty-print try to print BINFO_TYPE of TREE__VEC Nathan Sidwell
15:59 Re: [BC ABI] Branch is frozen Andrew Haley
15:52 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
15:45 Why does tree-pretty-print try to print BINFO_TYPE of TREE__VEC Daniel Berlin
15:36 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Geert Bosch
15:33 RE: A gcc-cris bug? Dave Korn
15:21 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
15:00 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Geert Bosch
15:00 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Geert Bosch
14:57 Re: A gcc-cris bug? Andrew Pinski
14:55 Re: A gcc-cris bug? Andrew Pinski
14:48 RE: A gcc-cris bug? Dave Korn
14:46 Re: mudflap problem Frank Ch. Eigler
14:21 Re: wording of ICE comment (was "Re: committed: gigi clean ups") Richard Kenner
14:05 gcc-3.3.5 failed bootstrap on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Rainer Emrich
13:56 Re: A gcc-cris bug? Richard Guenther
13:54 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Ulrich Weigand
13:52 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Ulrich Weigand
13:48 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
13:47 Re: A gcc-cris bug? Daniel Jacobowitz
13:17 Re: A gcc-cris bug? Richard Guenther
13:12 Re: A gcc-cris bug? Tal Agmon
12:56 Re: A gcc-cris bug? Andrew Pinski
12:48 Re: A gcc-cris bug? Richard Guenther
12:46 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Richard Kenner
12:36 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Richard Kenner
12:33 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Richard Kenner
12:23 RE: A gcc-cris bug? Dave Korn
12:02 RE: A gcc-cris bug? Diego Novillo
11:54 Re: A gcc-cris bug? Andrew Pinski
11:46 RE: A gcc-cris bug? Dave Korn
11:37 PR target/16482: first scheduling pass on SH4 Kaz Kojima
11:30 Re: A gcc-cris bug? Tal Agmon
11:23 [Ada?] Can't build gcc-3.3.5 on rawhide/i686-linux: system.ads is incorrectly formatted Christian Joensson
11:05 Re: A gcc-cris bug? Richard Guenther
10:15 A gcc-cris bug? Tal Agmon
09:36 GCC mirrors ip97.com mirror administrator
07:58 Re: Bootstrap Heisen-ICE? Ranjit Mathew
03:46 Re: Bootstrap Heisen-ICE? Ben Elliston

October 05, 2004
23:33 Re: mudflap problem Doug Graham
23:08 Successful GCC v3.4.2 build (make bootstrap) Joel P
19:51 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Andrew MacLeod
19:35 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Zdenek Dvorak
19:26 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Andrew MacLeod
18:04 Re: Is profiledbootstrap supposed to work currently? [PR bootstrap/14684] Kelley Cook
18:01 RE: m68k-wrs-vxworks Cross compiler no longer supported??? Dave Korn
17:59 Re: m68k-wrs-vxworks Cross compiler no longer supported??? Giovanni Bajo
17:39 Re: Should gcc-4.0 apply mathematical associative rules foraddition or multiplication Jeffrey A Law
17:29 m68k-wrs-vxworks Cross compiler no longer supported??? Phil Prentice
16:24 Re: Should gcc-4.0 apply mathematical associative rules for addition or multiplication Fariborz Jahanian
16:16 Re: Should gcc-4.0 apply mathematical associative rules for additionor multiplication Gabriel Dos Reis
15:55 Re: Should gcc-4.0 apply mathematical associative rules for addition or multiplication Fariborz Jahanian
15:39 Re: Should gcc-4.0 apply mathematical associative rules for additionor multiplication Gabriel Dos Reis
15:10 Re: Should gcc-4.0 apply mathematical associative rules for addition or multiplication Fariborz Jahanian
14:27 Re: Is profiledbootstrap supposed to work currently? Andrew Pinski
14:22 Is profiledbootstrap supposed to work currently? Richard Guenther
12:02 [PATCH, committed] Re: bootstrap failure on Linux /AMD64 Kelley Cook
11:52 Re: Spurious testsuite failures on multi-cpu sparc-solaris2.9 Kaveh R. Ghazi
10:09 Re: edge profiling code clobbers regs Jan Hubicka
08:32 Re: "new" statement and -fno-exceptions Paolo Carlini
07:59 Re: "new" statement and -fno-exceptions Paolo Carlini
07:34 Re: stale pooma src for testing gcc in 'POOMA build and test guide'? Ben Elliston
07:15 Re: bootstrap failure on Linux /AMD64 Zack Weinberg
07:05 Re: bootstrap failure on Linux /AMD64 Robert Schiele
06:50 edge profiling code clobbers regs Andreas Krebbel
02:35 Re: Should gcc-4.0 apply mathematical associative rules for addition or multiplication Gabriel Dos Reis
02:22 Re: gcc head on mingw Aaron W. LaFramboise
02:09 Re: "new" statement and -fno-exceptions Giovanni Bajo
00:58 Re: Should gcc-4.0 apply mathematical associative rules for addition or multiplication Fariborz Jahanian
00:53 Re: "new" statement and -fno-exceptions Joe Buck
00:39 Re: Should gcc-4.0 apply mathematical associative rules for additionor multiplication Roger Sayle
00:34 RE: "new" statement and -fno-exceptions Paul Koning

October 04, 2004
23:56 Re: Should gcc-4.0 apply mathematical associative rules for addition or multiplication Andrew Pinski
23:56 Re: Should gcc-4.0 apply mathematical associative rules for addition or multiplication Mike Stump
23:55 Re: Should gcc-4.0 apply mathematical associative rules for addition or multiplication Dale Johannesen
23:53 Re: Should gcc-4.0 apply mathematical associative rules for addition or multiplication Fariborz Jahanian
23:48 RE: "new" statement and -fno-exceptions Steven L. Zook
23:34 Re: "new" statement and -fno-exceptions Paolo Carlini
23:20 Re: Should gcc-4.0 apply mathematical associative rules for addition or multiplication Andrew Pinski
23:16 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Zdenek Dvorak
23:14 Re: "new" statement and -fno-exceptions Mike Stump
23:07 Re: Should gcc-4.0 apply mathematical associative rules for addition or multiplication Andrew Pinski
23:05 Re: Should gcc-4.0 apply mathematical associative rules for addition or multiplication Gabriel Dos Reis
23:03 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Andrew MacLeod
22:56 Should gcc-4.0 apply mathematical associative rules for addition or multiplication Fariborz Jahanian
22:37 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Zdenek Dvorak
22:34 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Richard Henderson
22:32 Re: SMS scheduling Ayal Zaks
21:57 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Zdenek Dvorak
20:08 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Andrew MacLeod
19:58 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Andrew MacLeod
17:20 Re: Writing out long long integers David Edelsohn
16:59 Re: Spurious testsuite failures on multi-cpu sparc-solaris2.9 Christian Ehrhardt
16:59 Writing out long long integers Suriya Narayanan M S
16:54 Re: [Bug bootstrap/17817] [4.0 Regression] restage[1,2,3] and then bootstrap no longer cause build dir to be rebuilt Kelley Cook
16:31 Re: SMS scheduling Richard Henderson
15:57 Re: "new" statement and -fno-exceptions Paolo Carlini
15:53 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Andrew MacLeod
15:42 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Andrew MacLeod
15:10 Re: TMSC320C6x port: return label is being deleted Adrian StrÃtling
14:50 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Jan Hubicka
14:46 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Daniel Jacobowitz
14:42 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Andrew MacLeod
14:24 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Steven Bosscher
14:19 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Andrew MacLeod
14:13 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Zdenek Dvorak
14:08 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Paolo Bonzini
13:50 Re: Spurious testsuite failures on multi-cpu sparc-solaris2.9 Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:37 "new" statement and -fno-exceptions Paul Koning
13:29 Re: Register Allocation Nick Ing-Simmons
13:24 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Zdenek Dvorak
13:17 Re: stale pooma src for testing gcc in 'POOMA build and test guide'? Jon Grimm
13:00 Re: TMSC320C6x port: return label is being deleted Nick Ing-Simmons
12:21 Re: Spurious testsuite failures on multi-cpu sparc-solaris2.9 Christian Ehrhardt
12:14 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Paolo Bonzini
11:56 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Zdenek Dvorak
11:44 Re: g++ bug? Nathan Sidwell
09:21 g++ bug? Thomas, Steve
09:02 Re: SMS scheduling Mostafa Hagog
08:40 Re: gcc head on mingw Paolo Bonzini
07:28 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
04:00 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Eric Christopher
01:06 Re: gcc head on mingw Bobby McNulty Junior

October 03, 2004
23:15 Re: gcc head on mingw Aaron W. LaFramboise
22:55 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Ulrich Weigand
22:38 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Richard Henderson
22:31 Re: SMS scheduling Richard Henderson
22:21 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Ulrich Weigand
21:41 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Richard Henderson
20:05 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Ulrich Weigand
19:54 Re: Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Richard Henderson
19:40 Regression due to tree loop opt / expand weirdness Ulrich Weigand
17:59 gcc-4.0-20041003 is now available gccadmin
14:00 gcc head on mingw Bobby McNulty Junior
07:33 Re: SMS scheduling Mostafa Hagog
07:13 Re: [Ada] Can't build gcc 4.0.0 20041001 on sparc-linux: GNAT BUG DETECTED in g-awk.adb Eric Botcazou
06:59 Re: SMS scheduling Mostafa Hagog
06:51 [Ada] Can't build gcc 4.0.0 20041001 on sparc-linux: GNAT BUG DETECTED in g-awk.adb Christian Joensson
06:48 bootstrap failure on Linux /AMD64 Andreas Jaeger

October 02, 2004
20:50 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Richard Kenner
18:34 Re: stale pooma src for testing gcc in 'POOMA build and test guide'? Richard Guenther
14:31 Re: C++ and Ada. Robert Dewar
14:10 Re: C++ and Ada. Daniel Lundqvist
12:30 Re: C++ and Ada. Robert Dewar
12:25 Re: C++ and Ada. Laurent GUERBY
12:02 C++ and Ada. Daniel Lundqvist
11:21 VLIW Umar Janjua
09:28 Re: SMS scheduling Canqun Yang
00:14 Re: ia-64 doesn't bootstrap without --enable-shared?!? Paolo Carlini

October 01, 2004
23:43 Re: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Robert Dewar
23:32 Re: GCC DFA Instruction Scheduler Vladimir N. Makarov
23:21 gcc-3.4-20041001 is now available gccadmin
23:21 Re: ia-64 doesn't bootstrap without --enable-shared?!? H. J. Lu
22:36 Re: Building GCC Nix
22:34 Re: ia-64 doesn't bootstrap without --enable-shared?!? Paolo Carlini
22:25 Re: ia-64 doesn't bootstrap without --enable-shared?!? H. J. Lu
22:01 Re: ia-64 doesn't bootstrap without --enable-shared?!? Paolo Carlini
21:49 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Zdenek Dvorak
21:46 Re: ia-64 doesn't bootstrap without --enable-shared?!? H. J. Lu
19:32 Re: redirect_edge_and_branch questions Jan Hubicka
19:11 RE: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Paul Schlie
19:04 Re: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Joe Buck
18:52 Re: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Paul Schlie
17:52 RE: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Dave Korn
17:43 RE: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Paul Schlie
17:28 Re: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Nathan Sidwell
17:13 RE: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Dave Korn
17:02 Re: problem creating a static library Phil Edwards
17:01 Re: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Paul Schlie
16:56 C pre-DR#10: static main Joseph S. Myers
16:44 stale pooma src for testing gcc in 'POOMA build and test guide'? Jon Grimm
16:30 Re: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Nathan Sidwell
16:27 RE: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Steven L. Zook
16:24 XFAILED testcase loop-2e.c Volker Reichelt
16:21 Re: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Nathan Sidwell
16:20 Re: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Paul Schlie
16:12 Re: ia-64 doesn't bootstrap without --enable-shared?!? Paolo Carlini
15:57 Re: ia-64 doesn't bootstrap without --enable-shared?!? H. J. Lu
15:43 Re: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Paul Schlie
15:41 redirect_edge_and_branch questions Andrew MacLeod
14:34 Re: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Robert Dewar
14:25 Re: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Andrew Pinski
14:25 Re: dejagnu help? Problems reproducing bugs in testsuite/g++.dg/pch Manfred Hollstein
14:18 Re: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Paul Schlie
14:07 dejagnu help? Problems reproducing bugs in testsuite/g++.dg/pch Diego Novillo
13:04 Re: GCC Target for TI C54x series of DSP. Joseph S. Myers
12:37 GCC Target for TI C54x series of DSP. Tim O'Callaghan
09:41 ia-64 doesn't bootstrap without --enable-shared?!? Paolo Carlini
09:11 Re: GCC DFA Instruction Scheduler Nathan Sidwell
09:00 RE: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Dave Korn
08:10 GCC DFA Instruction Scheduler Sonawane Sachin Vijayku
07:04 Re: Architecture-dependent optimizations aimen bouchhima
03:43 Re: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Giovanni Bajo
03:12 Re: warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Paul Brook
03:10 Re: [RFC] autopinger Giovanni Bajo
02:58 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
02:57 warning: operation on 'zero' may be undefined Mathieu Malaterre
02:54 Re: [RFC] autopinger Ian Lance Taylor
02:33 Re: problem creating a static library Danilo José
01:25 Re: AIX bootstrap failure David Edelsohn
01:15 Re: problem creating a static library Mike Stump
01:10 Re: [RFC] autopinger Giovanni Bajo
01:07 Re: problem creating a static library Danilo José
00:41 Re: AIX bootstrap failure Jerry Quinn
00:40 Re: [non-GCC] Writing a compiler-backend for Linux/PowerPC Ian Lance Taylor
00:36 Re: problem creating a static library Mike Stump
00:31 Re: [RFC] autopinger Ian Lance Taylor
00:13 Re: problem creating a static library Danilo José


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3