This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system


Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> writes:

> In fact, I would like to get to the point where we can simply call
> 'gcc_assert (lang_hook.compatible_types_p (dest, orig))' when doing
> propagation.  Ideally, all the necessary type conversions should be
> exposed in the IL.

Should the validity of GIMPLE really depend on a language hook like
this?  Surely it would make more sense to have a
gimple_compatible_types_p that reflects what code that parses GIMPLE
can actually handle (presumably a superset of what each language can
generate).


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]