gcc archive
date index for September, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

September 30, 2004
22:38 C pre-DR#9: implementation-defined bit-field types Joseph S. Myers
22:00 Re: problem creating a static library Mike Stump
21:23 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Geert Bosch
21:02 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Steven Bosscher
20:40 Re: problem creating a static library Danilo José
20:02 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
20:02 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Diego Novillo
20:01 Re: C pre-DR#8: va_list objects Geoffrey Keating
19:57 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Geoffrey Keating
19:56 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Geoffrey Keating
19:34 Re: problem creating a static library Mike Stump
19:06 RE: please help me!!! I need GCC 1.0 Dave Korn
18:43 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Geert Bosch
17:27 Re: Architecture-dependent optimizations Jan Hubicka
17:10 Architecture-dependent optimizations aimen bouchhima
17:05 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
17:03 Re: SMS scheduling Richard Henderson
16:51 Re: Results for 4.0.0 20040930 (experimental) testsuite on powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1 David Edelsohn
16:29 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Diego Novillo
15:58 Re: Results for 4.0.0 20040930 (experimental) testsuite on powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.1 Andrew Pinski
14:44 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Geert Bosch
14:39 Re: [non-GCC] Writing a compiler-backend for Linux/PowerPC Joseph S. Myers
14:32 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Diego Novillo
14:03 [non-GCC] Writing a compiler-backend for Linux/PowerPC Suriya Narayanan M S
13:46 Re: About GCC in Mandrake Linux Kurt Wall
12:00 re: 2.95.3 gcc compiler does not install in Mac_OS_X 10.2 Dan Kegel
11:29 Re: [RFC] autopinger Giovanni Bajo
11:27 Re: [RFC] autopinger Giovanni Bajo
11:26 2.95.3 gcc compiler does not install in Mac_OS_X 10.2 Danilo José
11:00 Re: problem creating a static library Danilo José
10:57 Re: problem creating a static library Danilo José
10:57 About GCC in Mandrake Linux Bud
08:51 Re: SMS scheduling Mostafa Hagog
08:50 Re: [RFC] autopinger Ranjit Mathew
08:42 Re: SMS scheduling Richard Henderson
08:17 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Richard Kenner
08:11 Re: Implementing multi-methods for C++ in GCC Lassi A . Tuura
08:03 Re: SMS scheduling Mostafa Hagog
07:57 Re: SMS scheduling Richard Henderson
06:58 Re: SMS scheduling Mostafa Hagog
05:48 Re: [RFC] autopinger Ben Elliston
02:09 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
01:50 [RFC] autopinger Giovanni Bajo
01:37 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Geert Bosch
01:27 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
00:57 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location James A. Morrison

September 29, 2004
23:35 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
23:32 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
23:14 gcc-3.3-20040929 is now available gccadmin
23:07 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Matt Austern
23:01 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
22:53 Re: Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Richard Kenner
22:50 Re: mudflap problem Doug Graham
22:50 Ada, treelang needs to be converted to --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
22:06 Re: mudflap problem Frank Ch. Eigler
21:57 duplicate static ctor/dtor function emission Frank Ch. Eigler
20:56 Re: mudflap problem Doug Graham
19:24 Re: problem creating a static library Mike Stump
19:24 Re: gcc mainline build failure David Edelsohn
19:00 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if--enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
18:45 gcc mainline build failure Fariborz Jahanian
18:44 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Matt Austern
18:14 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if--enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
18:06 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
18:04 glibc can be compiled by gcc 4.0 again! Andreas Jaeger
18:04 Re: bugzilla problem Aaron W. LaFramboise
18:01 problem creating a static library Danilo José
17:10 Re: O2 optimization differences Dale Johannesen
16:28 Re: bug in cse.c Richard Henderson
16:18 Re: Implementing multi-methods for C++ in GCC Joe Buck
16:14 Re: O2 optimization differences Joe Buck
15:36 Re: AIX bootstrap failure David Edelsohn
15:23 Re: AIX bootstrap failure jlquinn
13:50 Re: bugzilla problem Daniel Berlin
13:35 Re: bugzilla problem Richard Guenther
13:26 Re: bugzilla problem Daniel Berlin
13:16 Re: bugzilla problem Andrew Pinski
13:12 Re: SMS scheduling Mostafa Hagog
13:09 bugzilla problem micis
10:19 Re: O2 optimization differences Nathan Sidwell
09:44 O2 optimization differences Sujith R.
07:58 Implementing multi-methods for C++ in GCC Lassi A . Tuura
07:57 Re: Building GCC nico
07:54 Re: Building GCC nico
07:47 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X10.2.8) Di-an JAN
07:19 Re: C pre-DR#8: va_list objects Joseph S. Myers
07:17 Re: [RFT] b=linux, h=mingw32, t=mingw32 java cross. Mohan Embar
06:50 Re: Bootstrap failure on SH Kaz Kojima
06:13 Re: please help me!!! I need GCC 1.0 Dan Kegel
05:58 Re: Bootstrap failure on SH Ben Elliston
05:55 Re: Bootstrap Heisen-ICE? Ranjit Mathew
05:17 Re: please help me!!! I need GCC 1.0 Joe Buck
05:09 Bootstrap failure on SH Kaz Kojima
04:59 variations of .section directives - how to config? Gary Funck
02:41 Re: C pre-DR#8: va_list objects Dale Johannesen
01:57 Re: please help me!!! I need GCC 1.0 Kurt Wall
00:53 Re: please help me!!! I need GCC 1.0 Jason Molenda
00:28 C pre-DR#8: va_list objects Joseph S. Myers

September 28, 2004
22:46 Looking for GCC/compiler expertise Derrick Keefe
22:11 Re: mudflap problem Frank Ch. Eigler
21:38 C pre-DR#7: VLA definitions Joseph S. Myers
21:07 Re: mudflap problem Frank Ch. Eigler
20:59 Re: Bootstrap broken on aix David Edelsohn
20:52 -E and -fgnu-runtime options - bug or feature? Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
20:32 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Tom Tromey
20:30 Bootstrap broken on aix jlquinn
19:30 mudflap problem Herman ten Brugge
18:37 bug in cse.c Leehod Baruch
18:07 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Richard Kenner
17:59 GCC-3.3.5 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
17:38 Re: Programming Language for Beginners James A. Morrison
17:34 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Nathan Sidwell
17:16 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Jan Hubicka
17:14 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Andrew Haley
17:08 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Diego Novillo
17:05 [RFC] Tightening up the type system Andrew Haley
16:47 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Per Bothner
16:44 Re: Programming Language for Beginners Per Bothner
16:38 Re: [RFC] Tightening up the type system Richard Kenner
15:38 RE: Building GCC Dave Korn
15:36 [RFC] Tightening up the type system Diego Novillo
15:16 gcc 4.0 bobby mcnulty
14:58 Re: Building GCC Ian Lance Taylor
14:27 Re: please help me!!! I need GCC 1.0 Colin Douglas Howell
14:27 Building GCC nico
13:05 Re: warnings when building gcc-4.0.0-20040927 on sparc64-linux... Andrew Pinski
12:58 gcc 4.0 bobby mcnulty
12:57 Re: Programming Language for Beginners James A. Morrison
11:44 [RFC] Variable Expansion in unroller Revital Eres
11:42 warnings when building gcc-4.0.0-20040927 on sparc64-linux... Christian Joensson
11:40 Re: Bootstrap Heisen-ICE? bobby mcnulty
11:07 Bootstrap Heisen-ICE? Ranjit Mathew
09:14 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Andrew Haley
08:54 SMS scheduling Canqun Yang
06:33 Re: please help me!!! I need GCC 1.0 Aaron W. LaFramboise
03:32 Re: please help me!!! I need GCC 1.0 chrix
00:18 Re: Question about constraints and reload Ulrich Weigand
00:12 Re: Question about constraints and reload Peter Barada

September 27, 2004
23:17 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Peter O'Gorman
23:03 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Kelley Cook
22:32 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Tom Tromey
22:17 The linux binutils 2.15.92.0.2 is released H. J. Lu
21:16 Re: [OPEN64] source to source compilers Diego Novillo
21:12 Re: New Ada bootstrap failure: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx' Duncan Sands
20:58 Re: New Ada bootstrap failure: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx' Duncan Sands
20:58 Re: [OPEN64] source to source compilers Jairo Balart Tarzan
20:25 RE: Can code compiled with g++ 3.3.1 run with earlier versionsofcompiler runtime environment? James E Wilson
20:15 Re: adjusting stack size of executable compiled by gcc Mike Stump
19:58 source to source compilers peremolina at ya dot com
19:27 Re: mainline bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin. David Edelsohn
19:26 Re: mainline bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin. Andreas Tobler
19:24 mainline bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin. Fariborz Jahanian
19:15 Re: PT_GNU_EH_FRAME based unwinding on non-glibc systems Richard Henderson
18:19 Re: New Ada bootstrap failure: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx' bobby mcnulty
17:24 Re: New Ada bootstrap failure: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx' H. J. Lu
16:36 Re: New Ada bootstrap failure: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx' Duncan Sands
15:33 Re: New Ada bootstrap failure: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx' bobby mcnulty
15:27 New Ada bootstrap failure: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx' Duncan Sands
15:16 Re: adjusting stack size of executable compiled by gcc tm_gccmail
15:12 Re: Question about constraints and reload tm_gccmail
14:01 [RFT] b=linux, h=mingw32, t=mingw32 java cross. Kelley Cook
13:25 Re: GCC build of HEAD failed for native with your patch on 2004-09-27T04:12:39Z. Andrew Pinski
13:17 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Peter O'Gorman
13:12 adjusting stack size of executable compiled by gcc tony vong
13:01 gcc newsletter #12 Mathieu Lacage
12:04 Re: Question about constraints and reload tm_gccmail
11:56 Re: [PATCH] Re: Bad code generated by inter-block scheduling Mircea Namolaru
05:14 Re: How to specify gcc stack size Zack Weinberg
05:05 Re: How to specify gcc stack size Andreas Jaeger
03:15 How to specify gcc stack size tony vong
02:36 Re: Metabug for patches waiting for GCC 4.1 Giovanni Bajo
02:04 Re: Question about constraints and reload Geoff Keating
01:59 Re: Question about constraints and reload Geoff Keating

September 26, 2004
23:05 SRA and MOVE_RATIO Ulrich Weigand
21:36 Re: Question about constraints and reload Andrew Pinski
21:30 Re: Question about constraints and reload Geoffrey Keating
20:40 PT_GNU_EH_FRAME based unwinding on non-glibc systems Mark Kettenis
19:21 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Jamie Lokier
17:58 gcc-4.0-20040926 is now available gccadmin
11:48 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Marc Espie
00:31 Re: 'make boostrap' / gcc 4.0 Mathieu Malaterre
00:14 Re: 'make boostrap' / gcc 4.0 Ben Elliston
00:09 'make boostrap' / gcc 4.0 Mathieu Malaterre

September 25, 2004
22:43 Re: Old loop optimizer in 4.0? Richard Henderson
22:21 Re: ftrapv question Mathieu Malaterre
21:51 Re: Old loop optimizer in 4.0? Steven Bosscher
21:51 Re: Old loop optimizer in 4.0? Andrew Pinski
21:50 Re: ftrapv question Andrew Pinski
21:36 ftrapv question Mathieu Malaterre
21:27 Re: Old loop optimizer in 4.0? Richard Henderson
21:05 Re: Question about constraints and reload Richard Kenner
19:41 Re: Reducing the size of the binaries Oscar Fuentes
19:37 Re: Reducing the size of the binaries Kevin Puetz
19:04 Reducing the size of the binaries Juan Ignacio Garzón
18:55 Re: Target Milestone signification ? Andrew Pinski
18:52 Re: Target Milestone signification ? Mike Stump
18:43 Re: Question about constraints and reload Ulrich Weigand
17:52 Re: IBM Sponsoring Release Management Toon Moene
17:50 Re: -mtune != -march (>=) - optimizing for a higher architecture Tom Alsberg
17:30 Re: Target Milestone signification ? Joe Buck
17:25 Re: Question about constraints and reload Steven Bosscher
16:39 Re: Question about constraints and reload Ulrich Weigand
16:35 Re: Target Milestone signification ? Andrew Pinski
16:26 Target Milestone signification ? Mathieu Malaterre
16:08 Re: Question about constraints and reload Steven Bosscher
15:51 Re: Old loop optimizer in 4.0? Steven Bosscher
15:14 Old loop optimizer in 4.0? Zdenek Dvorak
14:56 Re: Question about constraints and reload Ulrich Weigand
14:40 Re: LNO merge status? Daniel Berlin
14:12 LNO merge status? Dan Kegel
13:47 Re: IBM Sponsoring Release Management Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
13:40 Question about constraints and reload Steven Bosscher
13:22 Re: loop unswitching is sensitive to edge order Ben Elliston
12:51 Re: -mtune != -march (>=) - optimizing for a higher architecture Paul Brook
11:54 Re: loop unswitching is sensitive to edge order Steven Bosscher
11:44 Re: loop unswitching is sensitive to edge order Zdenek Dvorak
11:39 Re: loop unswitching is sensitive to edge order Ben Elliston
11:31 Re: loop unswitching is sensitive to edge order Zdenek Dvorak
11:26 loop unswitching is sensitive to edge order Ben Elliston
11:14 Re: Updating glibc mathinlines.h to reflect additional GCC builtins ? Paolo Bonzini
10:54 Re: Updating glibc mathinlines.h to reflect additional GCC builtins ? Giovanni Bajo
09:06 -mtune != -march (>=) - optimizing for a higher architecture Tom Alsberg
07:51 Dwarf2 maybe broken in the last two weeks on mainline on MinGW Aaron W. LaFramboise
05:54 Re: Re: Richard Henderson
04:33 Re: Metabug for patches waiting for GCC 4.1 Ramana Radhakrishnan
02:59 Re: Re: Daniel Berlin
02:38 Re: Re: Dale Johannesen

September 24, 2004
23:37 gcc-3.4-20040924 is now available gccadmin
23:12 Re: IBM Sponsoring Release Management Kurt Wall
22:34 IBM Sponsoring Release Management Mark Mitchell
22:29 Re: GCC Release Status (2004-09-21) Mark Mitchell
22:15 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Joseph S. Myers
22:06 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Robert Dewar
21:50 Re: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Mike Stump
21:47 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Mark Mitchell
21:45 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if--enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
21:39 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Mark Mitchell
20:50 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Joseph S. Myers
20:36 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Tom Tromey
20:32 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Scott Robert Ladd
20:29 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if--enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
20:20 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Daniel Berlin
20:05 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Laurent GUERBY
19:51 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Devang Patel
19:39 Re: Build problem on ia64 (reverting patch on 3.4 branch) H. J. Lu
19:13 Re: -ansi, POSIX etc basic questions? Kurt Wall
19:07 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Daniel Berlin
19:06 Re: Build problem on ia64 (reverting patch on 3.4 branch) Geert Bosch
19:02 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Ziemowit Laski
18:53 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Andrew Pinski
18:50 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Joseph S. Myers
18:43 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Devang Patel
18:23 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Andrew Pinski
18:16 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Caroline Tice
16:55 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Joseph S. Myers
16:19 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Richard Kenner
16:16 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Joseph S. Myers
16:01 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Richard Kenner
15:57 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Joseph S. Myers
15:29 Re: [PATCH] Re: Bad code generated by inter-block scheduling Ulrich Weigand
14:45 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Richard Kenner
14:26 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Peter O'Gorman
14:17 Re: SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Andrew Pinski
14:03 SRA problem with uninitialzed fields Richard Kenner
13:48 [PATCH] Re: Passing -auxbase to cc1 thru gcc Clifford Wolf
12:24 Metabug for patches waiting for GCC 4.1 Giovanni Bajo
11:29 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Giovanni Bajo
11:23 -ansi, POSIX etc basic questions? Phil Prentice
09:17 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Joseph S. Myers
08:46 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Joseph S. Myers
08:40 [ObjC] Module /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/libobjc/Protocol.m version 0 doesn't match runtime 8 Christian Joensson
08:40 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Nathan Sidwell
08:36 Re: Updating glibc mathinlines.h to reflect additional GCC builtins ? Paolo Bonzini
08:36 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Joseph S. Myers
08:33 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Joseph S. Myers
08:27 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Andreas Schwab
08:25 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Andreas Schwab
06:56 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Geoffrey Keating
06:52 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Geoffrey Keating
06:46 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Geoffrey Keating
06:38 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Zack Weinberg
06:31 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Geoffrey Keating
06:20 Re: Updating glibc mathinlines.h to reflect additional GCC builtins? Uros Bizjak
06:17 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Geoffrey Keating
04:58 Re: [PATCH] Re: Bad code generated by inter-block scheduling Jeffrey A Law
04:18 Updating glibc mathinlines.h to reflect additional GCC builtins ? Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:17 Re: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Mathieu Malaterre
03:41 Re: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Giovanni Bajo
03:04 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Daniel Berlin
02:59 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
02:55 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Gabriel Dos Reis
02:46 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Giovanni Bajo
02:43 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Giovanni Bajo
02:39 Re: c pending sizes obsolete Andrew Pinski
02:35 Re: GCC Release Status (2004-09-21) Giovanni Bajo
02:35 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Daniel Berlin
02:35 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Gabriel Dos Reis
02:34 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
02:34 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Peter O'Gorman
02:33 Re: c pending sizes obsolete Zack Weinberg
02:30 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Giovanni Bajo
02:27 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. David Edelsohn
02:27 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Giovanni Bajo
02:22 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Giovanni Bajo
02:20 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Zack Weinberg
02:14 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Gabriel Dos Reis
02:14 c pending sizes obsolete Mike Stump
02:13 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Gabriel Dos Reis
02:08 Re: #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Zack Weinberg
02:03 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Steve Naroff
01:47 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Ziemowit Laski
01:45 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Ziemowit Laski
01:40 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Matt Austern
01:40 #pragma interface/implementation broken if --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
01:36 Re: PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Zack Weinberg
01:30 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Zack Weinberg
01:21 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Brad Roberts
01:19 PING: Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Ziemowit Laski
00:47 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Gabriel Dos Reis
00:34 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Ian Lance Taylor
00:15 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Joseph S. Myers
00:12 [PATCH] Re: Bad code generated by inter-block scheduling Ulrich Weigand
00:12 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Paul Koning
00:09 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Ben Elliston
00:05 Re: attribute data structure rewrite Andrew Pinski

September 23, 2004
23:55 attribute data structure rewrite Geoffrey Keating
23:04 Possible bug in gimplify.c:mostly_copy_tree_r with SAVE_EXPR Richard Kenner
22:41 Question: Need to store ObjC-specific info in type nodes. Ziemowit Laski
21:40 Re: Build problem on ia64 (reverting patch on 3.4 branch) H. J. Lu
21:00 Re: Build problem on ia64 (reverting patch on 3.4 branch) H. J. Lu
20:13 Re: Your patch causes regression in the Fortran frontend Richard Henderson
20:04 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Toon Moene
19:41 Re: GCC Release Status (2004-09-21) Mark Mitchell
19:38 Re: Build problem on ia64 (reverting patch on 3.4 branch) Geert Bosch
18:57 Re: GCC Release Status (2004-09-21) Joseph S. Myers
18:42 Re: Build problem on ia64 (reverting patch on 3.4 branch) H. J. Lu
18:12 Re: Build problem on ia64 (reverting patch on 3.4 branch) Geert Bosch
16:49 Re: Scimark 2.0 LU.c regression - matrices Giovanni Bajo
16:31 RE: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Dave Korn
16:11 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Joe Buck
16:01 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Peter O'Gorman
15:48 Re: Your patch causes regression in the Fortran frontend Richard Kenner
15:45 Re: Your patch causes regression in the Fortran frontend Graham Stott
15:11 Re: Your patch causes regression in the Fortran frontend Tobias Schlüter
14:31 Scimark 2.0 LU.c regression - matrices Uros Bizjak
12:31 RE: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Andrew Haley
12:29 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X10.2.8) Andreas Schwab
12:14 RE: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Dave Korn
12:11 RE: Can code compiled with g++ 3.3.1 run with earlier versions ofcompiler runtime environment? Arora, Sudhanshu
11:53 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Kelley Cook
11:49 VIRUS RE: Re: My details admin
11:38 RE: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Dave Korn
11:35 RE: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix on Windows host? Dave Korn
09:24 Re: df.c and cond_exec question Steven Bosscher
08:48 Re: Odd problem with building 3.4.2 on Solaris (use of as and ld) Eric Botcazou
07:54 Re: Odd problem with building 3.4.2 on Solaris (use of as and ld) Timothy Borgeaud
03:45 Re: Varray memory consumption strikes back Jeffrey A Law
02:50 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Bradley Lucier
02:12 Re: New failures in libstdc++ on x86-64? Giovanni Bajo
01:40 Re: df.c and cond_exec question Richard Henderson
01:39 Re: Problem with integer caching and inlining Richard Kenner
01:37 Re: Problem with integer caching and inlining Richard Henderson
01:31 Re: Problem with integer caching and inlining Richard Kenner
01:29 Re: Problem with integer caching and inlining Richard Henderson

September 22, 2004
23:58 df.c and cond_exec question Steve Ellcey
23:16 gcc-3.3-20040922 is now available gccadmin
22:54 Re: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Mathieu Malaterre
21:56 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Andreas Schwab
21:46 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix onWindows host? Mark Mitchell
21:36 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix onWindows host? E. Weddington
21:24 Re: Odd problem with building 3.4.2 on Solaris (use of as and ld) Eric Botcazou
20:50 Re: segfault in compute_transp() Steven Bosscher
20:48 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix onWindows host? Mark Mitchell
20:46 Re: Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Andrew Pinski
20:46 Re: Bad code generated by inter-block scheduling Jeffrey A Law
20:41 Re: segfault in compute_transp() Daniel Bayer
20:38 Re: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Luca Masini
19:46 New failures in libstdc++ on x86-64? Diego Novillo
19:08 Problem with integer caching and inlining Richard Kenner
18:52 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix on Windows host? Geoffrey Keating
18:46 Re: sizeof(union) and #pragma pack() Geoffrey Keating
18:45 Bootstrap difficulties on powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 (Mac OS X 10.2.8) Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
18:37 Re: Comments on Patching GCC Clifford Wolf
18:37 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Geoffrey Keating
18:34 Bad code generated by inter-block scheduling Ulrich Weigand
17:56 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix onWindows host? E. Weddington
17:49 Comments on Patching GCC Scott Robert Ladd
17:48 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix on Windows host? Ian Lance Taylor
17:45 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix onWindows host? E. Weddington
17:34 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix on Windows host? Ian Lance Taylor
17:27 Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix onWindows host? E. Weddington
17:20 RE: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Dave Korn
17:17 RE: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix on Windows host? Dave Korn
16:59 Re: g++: exceptions thrown from asm declarations Richard Henderson
16:53 Re: Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Richard Henderson
16:43 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Morten Welinder
16:42 RE: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Dave Korn
16:33 RE: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Paul Koning
16:31 How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix on Windowshost? E. Weddington
16:18 RE: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Dave Korn
16:17 RE: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Morten Welinder
16:15 Odd problem with building 3.4.2 on Solaris (use of as and ld) Timothy Borgeaud
15:51 Re: Build problem on ia64 H. J. Lu
15:38 Re: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Robert Dewar
15:36 Re: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Robert Dewar
15:12 Re: Fortran array format [Was: Scalar Replacement] Paul Brook
14:57 Re: Scalar Replacement Steven Bosscher
14:50 Scalar Replacement Canqun Yang
14:35 RE: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Thomas R. Truscott
14:16 Passing -auxbase to cc1 thru gcc Clifford Wolf
13:45 Re: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Robert Dewar
13:39 RE: Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Dave Korn
13:22 g++: exceptions thrown from asm declarations Stephan Bergmann
13:20 RE: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Dave Korn
11:42 Description of .eh_frame/.gcc_except_table contents? Stephan Bergmann
10:38 Re: Change of behaviour, or something broke in cin/streambuf behaviour between 3.3.4 and 3.4.1? Andrew Walrond
10:03 Re: Build problem on ia64 Paolo Carlini
10:00 Re: Change of behaviour, or something broke in cin/streambuf behaviourbetween 3.3.4 and 3.4.1? Paolo Carlini
10:00 Build problem on ia64 Zdenek Dvorak
09:38 Change of behaviour, or something broke in cin/streambuf behaviour between 3.3.4 and 3.4.1? Andrew Walrond
08:45 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Paolo Bonzini
06:04 Re: Set binutils version to 2.15.92 for COMDAT group Mark Mitchell
05:33 GCC Release Status (2004-09-21) Mark Mitchell
05:22 sizeof(union) and #pragma pack() Dave Trollope, Diane Barrowman
04:34 Re: Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Roger Sayle
01:21 Re: Is this a bug in the folder? Diego Novillo
01:15 Re: Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Eric Christopher
00:35 Warning flags for unsigned operations (unsafe) Mathieu Malaterre

September 21, 2004
23:09 Re: Register Allocation tm_gccmail
22:36 Re: #pragma redefine_extname and local declarations Mark Mitchell
21:13 Register Allocation Adrian Strätling
20:56 Re: Yet another java bootstrap failure Andreas Tobler
20:52 Yet another java bootstrap failure Matt Austern
18:56 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Ranjit Mathew
18:48 Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning Linus Torvalds
18:39 Re: Mixed-mode assembler Ian Lance Taylor
18:30 Re: Mixed-mode assembler Nick Gianakas
18:26 signed vs unsigned pointer warning Richard Henderson
18:22 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Zack Weinberg
18:14 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Matt Austern
17:59 Re: Interesting paper from Perdue Daniel Berlin
17:44 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Frank Ch. Eigler
16:11 Re: Is this a bug in the folder? Roger Sayle
16:09 Your patch causes regression in the Fortran frontend Tobias Schlüter
16:04 Re: segfault in compute_transp() Steven Bosscher
16:01 Re: Interesting paper from Perdue Vladimir Makarov
15:55 Re: Mixed-mode assembler Ian Lance Taylor
15:47 Re: #pragma redefine_extname and local declarations Joseph S. Myers
15:41 Re: Mixed-mode assembler Nick Gianakas
15:37 segfault in compute_transp() Daniel Bayer
15:35 Re: Interesting paper from Perdue Vladimir Makarov
15:29 Is this a bug in the folder? Diego Novillo
15:13 Re: Mixed-mode assembler Nathan Sidwell
15:12 Re: Mixed-mode assembler Ian Lance Taylor
15:08 Mixed-mode assembler Nick Gianakas
15:05 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Andreas Schwab
14:49 Re: Detecting and optimising byte swaping operations in words Giovanni Bajo
14:29 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Giovanni Bajo
14:10 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Robert Dewar
13:30 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Daniel Jacobowitz
13:26 Re: Please *bootstrap* patches Giovanni Bajo
12:40 Detecting and optimising byte swaping operations in words K . G .
12:39 Successful build and check results of gcc-3.3.4 on alphaev67-dec-osf5.1 Julian R. Parramore
10:26 Warning in 3_4 docs Paolo Carlini
09:34 An error in http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html Li, Jing (Fred)
09:24 RE: Please *bootstrap* patches Andreas Tobler
09:18 Please *bootstrap* patches Steven Bosscher
09:03 Re: DR handling for C++ Joseph S. Myers
08:43 Successful build of gcc-3.3.4 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.5.0 Julian R. Parramore
08:28 Successful build of gcc-3.3.4 on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 Julian R. Parramore
07:59 RE: Bootstrap broken in Mainline Andreas Tobler
07:57 Bootstrap broken in Mainline Andreas Jaeger
07:53 How to disable double and long double? Petar Penchev
07:21 Re: DR handling for C++ Paolo Bonzini
05:55 Re: suggestion for C/C++ warning Jakub Jelinek
05:18 suggestion for C/C++ warning William Brodie-Tyrrell
03:34 Re: Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Jeffrey A Law
00:13 Re: Interesting paper from Perdue tm_gccmail

September 20, 2004
23:42 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Scott Robert Ladd
23:31 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Steven Bosscher
23:16 #pragma redefine_extname and local declarations Mark Mitchell
23:12 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Scott Robert Ladd
22:59 Re: DR handling for C++ Joseph S. Myers
22:32 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Robert Dewar
21:41 Re: DR handling for C++ Mark Mitchell
21:36 Re: DR handling for C++ Matt Austern
21:26 Re: DR handling for C++ Mark Mitchell
21:14 Re: DR handling for C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:08 Re: DR handling for C++ Matt Austern
21:07 Re: DR handling for C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
21:04 Re: DR handling for C++ Dale Johannesen
21:01 Re: DR handling for C++ Mark Mitchell
21:00 Re: DR handling for C++ Mark Mitchell
20:55 Re: DR handling for C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
20:54 Re: DR handling for C++ Matt Austern
20:47 Re: DR handling for C++ Mark Mitchell
20:44 Re: DR handling for C++ Mark Mitchell
20:44 Re: DR handling for C++ Andrew Pinski
20:41 Re: DR handling for C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
20:34 Re: DR handling for C++ Dale Johannesen
20:04 DR handling for C++ Mark Mitchell
19:51 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Devang Patel
19:43 Re: Peeling loops at tree level?, Lno branch merge patches ping Richard Henderson
19:04 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:45 Re: Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:38 Re: Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:29 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Toon Moene
18:22 Re: Template Template Matching Problem on Defaults (old g++ extension induced problem -- bug 9737) Tyson Whitehead
17:48 Re: Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Jeffrey A Law
17:47 Re: Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Eric Christopher
17:41 Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:52 Re: Template Template Matching Problem on Defaults (old g++ extension induced problem -- bug 9737) Gabriel Dos Reis
16:25 Re: number of vector template instances and pointers Joe Buck
16:11 Re: Template Template Matching Problem on Defaults (old g++ extensioninduced problem -- bug 9737) Wolfgang Bangerth
15:40 Re: Version 0.0 of binutils is unsurprisingly feature-poor Paolo Bonzini
15:39 Re: [wwwdocs] tree-cleanup-branch created Diego Novillo
15:16 Re: Version 0.0 of binutils is unsurprisingly feature-poor Zack Weinberg
14:56 Re: number of vector template instances and pointers Dan Kegel
13:57 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Nathan Sidwell
13:51 RE: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Dave Korn
13:45 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Scott Robert Ladd
13:31 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Paul Koning
12:12 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Kaveh R. Ghazi
10:40 Version 0.0 of binutils is unsurprisingly feature-poor (was Re: Regression for csl-arm on arm-none-elf) Phil Edwards
10:36 Interesting paper from Perdue Steven Bosscher
09:07 Re: error Nathan Sidwell
08:51 Re: Assembly code generated Paolo Bonzini
08:15 Assembly code generated .jareeN.
07:37 Re: Need info on C Macro Paolo Bonzini
07:14 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Ralf Corsepius
07:11 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Kai Henningsen
05:44 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm tm_gccmail
04:27 Template Template Matching Problem on Defaults (old g++ extension induced problem -- bug 9737) Tyson Whitehead
03:51 Re: varargs Dave Trollope, Diane Barrowman
00:54 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Dale Johannesen
00:31 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Robert Dewar

September 19, 2004
22:41 varargs Paul Harmon
21:12 Re: Quadratic behavior due to tree-cfg.c:tree_redirect_edge_and_branch Steven Bosscher
21:04 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Timothy J . Wood
20:56 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Robert Dewar
20:53 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Robert Dewar
20:34 Quadratic behavior due to tree-cfg.c:tree_redirect_edge_and_branch Steven Bosscher
20:25 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Zack Weinberg
19:55 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Timothy J . Wood
19:31 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Luchezar Belev
19:17 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Robert Dewar
19:14 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Luchezar Belev
18:41 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Robert Dewar
18:34 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Luchezar Belev
18:00 gcc-4.0-20040919 is now available gccadmin
17:41 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Kai Henningsen
17:08 An illustration of how bad the DOM memory regression is Steven Bosscher
16:02 Re: why not consfold sin(const) Robert Dewar
14:55 Re: How useful is the web pass on targets other than x86/amd64? Jan Hubicka
14:23 error Anton Feldmann
14:07 why not consfold sin(const) Luchezar Belev
14:02 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Jeremy Sanders
13:12 How useful is the web pass on targets other than x86/amd64? Steven Bosscher
12:18 Info on "asm out" Theoharis Tsenis
11:50 Re: Using alloca in function parameters buggy or works ??? Marc Espie
11:38 Need info on C Macro Monojit Roy
08:24 Prerelease tarballs of GCC-3.3.5 (second iteration) Gabriel Dos Reis
00:39 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Scott Robert Ladd
00:08 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Kaveh R. Ghazi

September 18, 2004
23:46 Re: [wwwdocs] tree-cleanup-branch created Gerald Pfeifer
23:19 Re: Spurious testsuite failures on multi-cpu sparc-solaris2.9 Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:35 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Scott Robert Ladd
21:21 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Natros
20:48 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Scott Robert Ladd
20:42 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Andi Kleen
18:37 Re: TMSC320C6x port: return label is being deleted Adrian Strätling
18:26 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Giovanni Bajo
17:33 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Scott Robert Ladd
17:31 Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Richard Guenther
17:10 Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis Scott Robert Ladd
16:52 Re: template function specialization trouble - probably a user error, but... Alexandre Oliva
16:51 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Alexandre Oliva
15:14 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Jamie Lokier
14:43 Re: Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Robert Dewar
14:36 [wwwdocs] tree-cleanup-branch created Diego Novillo
13:05 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Kai Henningsen
11:02 Re: Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Laurent GUERBY
10:46 Re: Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Richard Kenner
10:43 Re: Ada status 20040917 Richard Kenner
09:16 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) Paolo Bonzini
06:23 Paid Search! czy
03:08 Re: Critical edge splitting inconsistency Daniel Berlin
01:52 Re: Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Robert Dewar
00:48 Build/test report for gcc 3.4.2 on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu Kaz Kojima

September 17, 2004
23:38 Re: Error on GCC 3.4 release web page Giovanni Bajo
23:35 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Giovanni Bajo
23:31 gcc-3.4-20040917 is now available gccadmin
22:35 RE: Error on GCC 3.4 release web page Johan Bergman (KI/EAB)
22:07 Error on GCC 3.4 release web page Johan Bergman (KI/EAB)
21:44 Critical edge splitting inconsistency Jan Hubicka
21:34 Re: Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Laurent GUERBY
21:24 Re: Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Robert Dewar
21:12 Re: Slightly different Ada RTS build verify_ssa error Laurent GUERBY
20:52 Re: Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Laurent GUERBY
20:40 Re: Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Robert Dewar
19:57 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? DJ Delorie
19:54 Ada system.fat_lflt.fat_long_float.scaling problem analysis Laurent GUERBY
19:27 Ada status 20040917 Laurent GUERBY
18:51 Re: Style of libstdc++ header files Gabriel Dos Reis
18:28 Re: Testing GCC & OSDL Mike Stump
18:15 Re: Style of libstdc++ header files Mark Mitchell
18:02 Re: SuperH patch contributions Andrew Cagney
17:43 Re: HAVE_GAS_COMDAT_GROUP problem (GCC Head) Simon MARTIN
16:44 Re: mainline libstdc++ failures, one week old Benjamin Kosnik
16:39 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Jamie Lokier
16:38 Re: Style of libstdc++ header files Benjamin Kosnik
16:30 Re: template function specialization trouble - probably a user error,but... Nathan Sidwell
16:13 Re: template function specialization trouble - probably a user error, but... Alexandre Oliva
16:07 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Alexandre Oliva
16:06 Re: RFC: Remove flags -fmove-all-movables and -freduce-all-givs. Toon Moene
15:50 SuperH patch contributions Joern Rennecke
15:39 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Nathan Sidwell
15:32 Build success for gcc 3.4.2 on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 (CompaqTru64UNIX) Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
15:16 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Jamie Lokier
14:50 Re: A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Ian Lance Taylor
14:45 A question about "memory" clobbers in asm Jamie Lokier
14:16 Re: Testing GCC & OSDL Daniel Jacobowitz
14:13 Re: Ability to disable URL mangling in makeinfo 4.7? Jamie Lokier
14:10 Re: Samsung CalmRISC16 support Steven Bosscher
14:01 Re: Samsung CalmRISC16 support Jeffrey A Law
13:46 Re: Ada: prj-attr-pm.ads/b missing in FSF CVS Arnaud Charlet
13:44 Re: Samsung CalmRISC16 support Richard Earnshaw
13:22 Re: Samsung CalmRISC16 support Joern Rennecke
13:04 Re: Samsung CalmRISC16 support Richard Earnshaw
12:51 Re: Samsung CalmRISC16 support Steven Bosscher
12:44 Re: Samsung CalmRISC16 support Diego Novillo
12:37 Samsung CalmRISC16 support Udo van den Heuvel
12:36 Fwd: Manik , Manik Raina has invited you to open a Google mail account Manik Raina
12:27 Re: template function specialization trouble - probably a user error,but... Nathan Sidwell
12:26 RX cheap heaven Greta Duke
12:08 Re: sh64 and mulilibs Joern Rennecke
11:41 template function specialization trouble - probably a user error, but... Alan Lehotsky
11:39 Re: Testing GCC & OSDL Joseph S. Myers
11:08 Re: Testing GCC & OSDL Laurent GUERBY
08:43 Re: Testing GCC & OSDL (Was: RFC: Generated structure layout testsfor gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1 (take 2)) Joseph S. Myers
07:46 Re: Ada: prj-attr-pm.ads/b missing in FSF CVS Arnaud Charlet
06:32 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Ralf Corsepius
06:29 Re: Testing GCC & OSDL (Was: RFC: Generated structure layout testsfor gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1 (take 2)) Laurent GUERBY
04:26 MUAs (was Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling) Ross Combs
02:47 Re: Testing GCC & OSDL (Was: RFC: Generated structure layout testsfor gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1 (take 2)) Randy.Dunlap
02:42 Re: Testing GCC & OSDL (Was: RFC: Generated structure layout testsfor gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1 (take 2)) Hans-Peter Nilsson
02:24 Re: HAVE_GAS_COMDAT_GROUP problem (GCC Head) Mark Mitchell
01:52 Re: More on memory barriers Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:39 Re: Prerelease of GCC-3.3.5 available for testing Gabriel Dos Reis
01:33 Re: Prerelease of GCC-3.3.5 available for testing James E Wilson
01:27 Re: PATCH: web/17495 Hans-Peter Nilsson
00:02 Re: Ability to disable URL mangling in makeinfo 4.7? Gerald Pfeifer

September 16, 2004
23:28 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Richard Kenner
23:26 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Erik Trulsson
23:12 Re: PATCH: web/17495 Joseph S. Myers
23:05 Re: PATCH: web/17495 Gerald Pfeifer
22:50 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Kai Henningsen
22:03 Re: Varray memory consumption strikes back Jan Hubicka
22:01 Re: Peeling loops at tree level?, Lno branch merge patches ping Zdenek Dvorak
21:58 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) [--enable-mapped-location] Steven Bosscher
21:20 HAVE_GAS_COMDAT_GROUP problem (GCC Head) Simon MARTIN
20:52 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Matthias B.
20:20 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) Mark Mitchell
19:50 Ada: prj-attr-pm.ads/b missing in FSF CVS Laurent GUERBY
19:46 Re: tree dump system and scopes James E Wilson
19:31 Re: libgfortran and libiberty: mkstemp in gfortran/io/unix.c James E Wilson
19:28 Question on pthread_cancel/pthread_exit and thread stack unwind Yufeng_Xiong
19:03 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) [--enable-mapped-location] Mark Mitchell
19:02 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) [--enable-mapped-location] Mark Mitchell
18:57 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) [--enable-mapped-location] Per Bothner
18:56 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) [--enable-mapped-location] Matt Austern
18:46 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) [--enable-mapped-location] Mark Mitchell
18:45 Re: please clarify criteria for gcc-4.0.0 patches Mark Mitchell
18:30 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) [--enable-mapped-location] Per Bothner
18:18 Re: please clarify criteria for gcc-4.0.0 patches Benjamin Kosnik
18:07 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) [--enable-mapped-location] Mark Mitchell
18:03 Re: TMSC320C6x port: return label is being deleted Graham Stott
17:58 Re: please clarify criteria for gcc-4.0.0 patches Mark Mitchell
17:42 please clarify criteria for gcc-4.0.0 patches Benjamin Kosnik
17:32 Re: TMSC320C6x port: return label is being deleted Adrian Strätling
17:30 Qt 3.3.3's uic miscompilation by gcc3.4.2/3.4.1/4.0.0-20040914/3.3.5-20040914? Karel Gardas
16:53 RE: Using alloca in function parameters buggy or works ??? Dave Korn
16:51 Re: Using alloca in function parameters buggy or works ??? Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:47 Re: [RFC] optabs and tree-codes for vector operations Devang Patel
16:43 Re: Using alloca in function parameters buggy or works ??? Andreas Schwab
16:38 Re: Using alloca in function parameters buggy or works ??? DJ Delorie
16:38 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? DJ Delorie
16:36 RE: Using alloca in function parameters buggy or works ??? Graham Stott
16:35 Re: Varray memory consumption strikes back Jeffrey A Law
16:31 Re: Using alloca in function parameters buggy or works ??? Robert Dewar
16:23 RE: Using alloca in function parameters buggy or works ??? Dave Korn
16:08 Re: Using alloca in function parameters buggy or works ??? Jeffrey A Law
15:58 Re: Using alloca in function parameters buggy or works ??? Andreas Schwab
15:52 RE: Using alloca in function parameters buggy or works ??? Dave Korn
15:41 Re: Using alloca in function parameters buggy or works ??? Graham Stott
15:39 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) [--enable-mapped-location] Per Bothner
15:29 Re: Using alloca in function parameters buggy or works ??? Jeffrey A Law
15:16 Using alloca in function parameters buggy or works ??? Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:48 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Robert Dewar
14:30 Re: [BUG] int i; float a[i]; Giovanni Bajo
13:31 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Richard Earnshaw
13:23 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Richard Kenner
12:25 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Daniel Berlin
11:54 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Richard Kenner
11:32 Slightly different Ada RTS build verify_ssa error Richard Kenner
10:40 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Gabriel Dos Reis
10:25 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Richard Kenner
10:20 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Richard Kenner
08:15 Garbage collection & implicit delete operator in destructor catch-22 Peter Blemel
07:38 A question about exact semantics of TRUTH_*_EXPR Kazu Hirata
07:05 Re: -O1 -Winline Gabriel Dos Reis
05:59 Re: -O1 -Winline Mathieu Lacage
05:45 Re: PIC code for coldfire v4e Peter Barada
05:36 two more 3.4.2 build/test reports Joe Buck
04:57 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Ralf Corsepius
03:23 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Richard Henderson
03:20 Re: attempt to use poisoned "malloc"? Steven Z
03:11 Re: [BUG] int i; float a[i]; Mathieu Malaterre
02:46 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Gabriel Dos Reis
02:44 Re: [BUG] int i; float a[i]; Gabriel Dos Reis
02:21 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Richard Kenner
01:45 Re: Peeling loops at tree level?, Lno branch merge patches ping Richard Henderson
01:39 Re: Peeling loops at tree level?, Lno branch merge patches ping Richard Henderson
01:30 Re: Peeling loops at tree level?, Lno branch merge patches ping Richard Henderson
00:39 [BUG] int i; float a[i]; Mathieu Malaterre
00:36 Re: More on memory barriers Richard Henderson
00:29 Re: Prerelease of GCC-3.3.5 available for testing Gabriel Dos Reis
00:24 Re: -O1 -Winline Mathieu Malaterre
00:23 Re: libgfortran and libiberty: mkstemp in gfortran/io/unix.c DJ Delorie
00:22 Re: RTL problem with optimizations James E Wilson
00:15 Re: libgfortran and libiberty: mkstemp in gfortran/io/unix.c Aaron W. LaFramboise
00:07 Re: -O1 -Winline James E Wilson
00:00 Re: __tfi: unresolved reference James E Wilson

September 15, 2004
23:48 Re: libgfortran and libiberty: mkstemp in gfortran/io/unix.c DJ Delorie
23:45 gcc-3.3-20040915 is now available gccadmin
23:37 Re: Prerelease of GCC-3.3.5 available for testing James E Wilson
22:46 libgfortran and libiberty: mkstemp in gfortran/io/unix.c Aaron W. LaFramboise
22:30 Re: More on memory barriers Geoffrey Keating
21:54 Re: More on memory barriers Jason Merrill
21:42 Re: More on memory barriers Richard Henderson
21:36 Re: More on memory barriers Richard Henderson
21:29 Re: More on memory barriers Jason Merrill
21:28 Re: More on memory barriers Jason Merrill
21:25 Re: More on memory barriers Jason Merrill
21:15 Re: More on memory barriers Jason Merrill
20:49 Re: More on memory barriers Jason Merrill
20:35 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) Scott Robert Ladd
20:29 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Alexandre Oliva
20:11 Re: More on memory barriers Richard Henderson
20:10 Re: More on memory barriers Richard Henderson
19:56 Re: More on memory barriers Richard Henderson
19:42 Re: PIC code for coldfire v4e Andreas Schwab
19:26 Set binutils version to 2.15.92 for COMDAT group H. J. Lu
19:20 Re: More on memory barriers Geoffrey Keating
18:58 Re: RTL problem with optimizations Dale Johannesen
18:52 Re: attempt to use poisoned "malloc"? Eric Christopher
18:47 some 3.4.2 build reports Joe Buck
18:40 Re: More on memory barriers Benjamin Kosnik
18:39 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Gabriel Dos Reis
18:36 Re: More on memory barriers Benjamin Kosnik
18:17 PIC code for coldfire v4e C Jaiprakash, Noida
16:58 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Joe Buck
16:16 attempt to use poisoned "malloc"? Steven Z
15:43 Re: More on memory barriers Jason Merrill
15:43 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Phil Edwards
13:28 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Richard Earnshaw
13:08 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? DJ Delorie
12:53 Re: More on memory barriers Paul Koning
12:51 Thank you for your comments! SparkNotes.com
12:31 Re: Still aliasing problems left? Richard Guenther
12:11 Re: Still aliasing problems left? Richard Guenther
11:23 RTL problem with optimizations Petar Penchev
11:09 tree dump system and scopes Tiago Stein
11:07 gcc newsletter #11 Mathieu Lacage
09:53 gcc-3.4.2 bootstrapped on Solaris 9 / x86 Jonas Jonsson
09:22 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Richard Earnshaw
09:00 Re: constant expressions change? CVS build failure on IA64 David Mosberger
08:49 Re: gcc-3.4.2 or libpthread bug? Peter Seiderer
08:45 Still aliasing problems left? Richard Guenther
07:59 jobs azwanin
07:40 Fortran misscompiled Zdenek Dvorak
07:17 Re: More on memory barriers Richard Henderson
07:07 Re: Ability to disable URL mangling in makeinfo 4.7? Eli Zaretskii
06:38 Compilation warnings on cygwin.. up for a change? Christian Joensson
06:22 Re: More on memory barriers Jason Merrill
06:06 Re: Ability to disable URL mangling in makeinfo 4.7? Stepan Kasal
04:02 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Loren James Rittle
03:26 Re: 3.4 branch regressions on i386, x86-64 and ia64 Alan Modra
02:28 -O1 -Winline Mathieu Malaterre
00:15 Re: More on memory barriers Tom Lord

September 14, 2004
23:42 Re: Ability to disable URL mangling in makeinfo 4.7? Andreas Schwab
22:39 Re: More on memory barriers Geoffrey Keating
22:38 Re: Ability to disable URL mangling in makeinfo 4.7? Karl Berry
22:25 Re: Ability to disable URL mangling in makeinfo 4.7? Gerald Pfeifer
21:52 Re: More on memory barriers Richard Henderson
21:25 More on memory barriers Jason Merrill
20:18 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? DJ Delorie
20:12 Re: gcc-3.4.2 or libpthread bug? James E Wilson
20:08 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Zack Weinberg
19:59 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Joe Buck
19:47 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? DJ Delorie
19:44 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? DJ Delorie
19:40 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Joseph S. Myers
19:30 Re: small 'instrument-functions' patch James E Wilson
19:24 Re: Style of libstdc++ header files Wolfgang Bangerth
19:22 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Zack Weinberg
19:21 3.4 branch regressions on i386, x86-64 and ia64 H. J. Lu
19:20 Re: Style of libstdc++ header files Daniel Berlin
19:17 Re: Style of libstdc++ header files Wolfgang Bangerth
19:17 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? Joe Buck
19:11 Re: Style of libstdc++ header files Wolfgang Bangerth
19:06 Re: Style of libstdc++ header files Theodore Papadopoulo
18:58 Re: Style of libstdc++ header files Richard Guenther
18:50 Style of libstdc++ header files Wolfgang Bangerth
18:50 RE: ext-inst.cc Input/output error [RESOLVED] Dave Korn
18:20 PATCH: Support the new ia64 EH ABI H. J. Lu
18:11 Re: ext-inst.cc Input/output error [RESOLVED] Shaun Jackman
18:09 Re: TMSC320C6x port: return label is being deleted Graham Stott
17:52 Re: bootstrapping on i386 with --disable-checking Marc Espie
17:24 RE: ext-inst.cc Input/output error Dave Korn
17:07 Re: Do we have the testsuite infrastructure to easily do this? Frank Ch. Eigler
16:54 RE: Could not split insn Dave Korn
15:54 TMSC320C6x port: return label is being deleted Adrian Strätling
15:44 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) Mark Mitchell
15:41 RE: Could not split insn Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:41 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) Jan Hubicka
15:32 Re: Varray memory consumption strikes back Jeffrey A Law
15:14 Re: Varray memory consumption strikes back Jan Hubicka
15:13 ext-inst.cc Input/output error Shaun Jackman
14:53 Prerelease of GCC-3.3.5 available for testing Gabriel Dos Reis
13:52 Re: No bootstrap with --enable-checking=assert,misc,tree,gc,rtl,rtlflag,fold,gcac Daniel Jacobowitz
13:46 Re: No bootstrap with --enable-checking=assert,misc,tree,gc,rtl,rtlflag,fold,gcac micis
13:40 RE: Do we have the testsuite infrastructure to easily do this? Dave Korn
13:29 Re: Do we have the testsuite infrastructure to easily do this? Daniel Berlin
13:11 Re: No bootstrap with --enable-checking=assert,misc,tree,gc,rtl,rtlflag,fold,gcac Daniel Jacobowitz
13:08 RE: Could not split insn Dave Korn
13:08 RE: cvs repository broken? Dave Korn
12:52 RE: Do we have the testsuite infrastructure to easily do this? Dave Korn
12:06 No bootstrap with --enable-checking=assert,misc,tree,gc,rtl,rtlflag,fold,gcac micis
11:25 _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE for coldfire C Jaiprakash, Noida
11:19 Re: Varray memory consumption strikes back Jan Hubicka
11:16 Re: Another --disable-checking bootstrap failure Jan Hubicka
10:27 Re: Data corruption problem compiling Ada rts g-awk Richard Kenner
10:23 Re: bootstrapping on i386 with --disable-checking Steven Bosscher
10:22 Re: Another --disable-checking bootstrap failure Steven Bosscher
10:17 bootstrapping on i386 with --disable-checking Marc Espie
10:16 Re: Another --disable-checking bootstrap failure Richard Kenner
08:29 Re: Could not split insn Petar Penchev
08:00 Re: Varray memory consumption strikes back Richard Henderson
07:48 GCC online documentation - no GCC 3.4.2 manual micis
07:37 __tfi: unresolved reference FE
06:29 Re: 3.4 bootstrap problem with sun cc Eric Botcazou
06:28 Re: Another --disable-checking bootstrap failure Steven Bosscher
05:58 Re: Data corruption problem compiling Ada rts g-awk Jeffrey A Law
05:53 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) Jeffrey A Law
05:02 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) Mark Mitchell
05:00 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) Mark Mitchell
04:48 Re: Varray memory consumption strikes back Jeffrey A Law
04:10 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) Jeffrey A Law
04:03 Re: Another --disable-checking bootstrap failure Jeffrey A Law
03:45 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) Wolfgang Bangerth
03:35 Re: Another --disable-checking bootstrap failure Diego Novillo
03:23 Re: Another --disable-checking bootstrap failure Jeffrey A Law
03:12 Re: Another --disable-checking bootstrap failure Andrew Pinski
03:05 Another --disable-checking bootstrap failure Diego Novillo
02:56 Re: [PATCH] Re: How to disable toplevel fixincludes? Aaron W. LaFramboise
02:42 3.4 bootstrap problem with sun cc Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:15 Re: Could not split insn James E Wilson
02:09 Re: data lost while transfer James E Wilson
02:02 Re: ARM linux-2.6.8 build fail with gcc-3.4.x James E Wilson
01:55 Numbers for SWIM with -ftree-loop-linear Daniel Berlin
01:50 Re: Could not split insn Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:34 Re: Could not split insn Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:28 Re: PR debug/17406: ICE dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr on MinGW James E Wilson
01:14 Re: Help me solve this error: fatal: libstdc++.so.5: No such fileor directory !! James E Wilson
00:36 Re: Still missing some addr_expr invariant recomputations Richard Henderson
00:30 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) Jan Hubicka

September 13, 2004
23:51 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) Andrew Pinski
23:28 Re: Still missing some addr_expr invariant recomputations Steven Bosscher
23:05 GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) Mark Mitchell
22:54 Re: RFC: Remove flags -fmove-all-movables and -freduce-all-givs. Toon Moene
22:18 Re: Data corruption problem compiling Ada rts g-awk Steven Bosscher
22:16 Data corruption problem compiling Ada rts g-awk Richard Kenner
22:08 Re: constant expressions change? CVS build failure on IA64 Gabriel Dos Reis
22:03 Re: Still missing some addr_expr invariant recomputations Steven Bosscher
21:48 Re: fixinc required for new FreeBSD 4.x bootstrap failures Bruce Korb
21:20 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux (some more progress) Richard Kenner
21:16 constant expressions change? CVS build failure on IA64 Boehm, Hans
21:13 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux (some more progress) Laurent GUERBY
20:40 Re: AC_COMPILE_CHECK_SIZEOF DJ Delorie
20:35 Re: fixinc required for new FreeBSD 4.x bootstrap failures Gerald Pfeifer
20:26 Re: AC_COMPILE_CHECK_SIZEOF Zack Weinberg
20:17 Re: Some serious problem with GC again Mark Mitchell
19:47 Re: Still missing some addr_expr invariant recomputations Richard Henderson
19:42 Re: Still missing some addr_expr invariant recomputations Richard Henderson
19:30 Re: [RFC] fixing libstdc++/10606 Mark Mitchell
19:29 Do we have the testsuite infrastructure to easily do this? Daniel Berlin
19:28 Re: Still missing some addr_expr invariant recomputations Diego Novillo
19:25 Re: Still missing some addr_expr invariant recomputations Jeffrey A Law
19:19 Re: Still missing some addr_expr invariant recomputations Steven Bosscher
19:18 Re: Some aspect of GCC memory consumption increased by recent patch Jeffrey A Law
18:41 Re: [RFA:] Improve "asm-reg in asm" documentation (was: Re: [m68k]asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5) Hans-Peter Nilsson
18:23 Re: Still missing some addr_expr invariant recomputations Andrew Pinski
17:59 Re: Still missing some addr_expr invariant recomputations Daniel Berlin
17:52 Re: Still missing some addr_expr invariant recomputations Richard Henderson
17:20 Re: [patch] ivopts fixes Zdenek Dvorak
17:17 Re: [patch] ivopts fixes Giovanni Bajo
16:53 Re: [RFC] fixing libstdc++/10606 Benjamin Kosnik
16:19 Re: fixinc required for new FreeBSD 4.x bootstrap failures Vladimir Merzliakov
15:49 Re: fixinc required for new FreeBSD 4.x bootstrap failures Bruce Korb
15:44 Still missing some addr_expr invariant recomputations Daniel Berlin
15:12 Re: Java pages invalid HTML Tom Tromey
15:05 Re: Peeling loops at tree level?, Lno branch merge patches ping Zdenek Dvorak
15:00 Re: [RFA:] Improve "asm-reg in asm" documentation (was: Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5) Gunther Nikl
14:57 Re: fixinc required for new FreeBSD 4.x bootstrap failures Gerald Pfeifer
14:54 Re: fixinc required for new FreeBSD 4.x bootstrap failures David O'Brien
14:42 Re: Problem compiling crtstuff.c on x86_64 Daniel Jacobowitz
14:40 Re: Peeling loops at tree level? Zdenek Dvorak
14:34 "tree" dumps now cluttered and mixed with RTL dumps Steven Bosscher
14:18 Re: Hang when compiling gcc/libgcc2.c Steven Bosscher
14:12 Re: Peeling loops at tree level? Richard Guenther
14:09 Peeling loops at tree level? Richard Guenther
14:07 Re: RFC: Remove flags -fmove-all-movables and -freduce-all-givs. Joseph S. Myers
14:06 Hang when compiling gcc/libgcc2.c Lars Gullik Bjønnes
13:51 Re: Problem compiling crtstuff.c on x86_64 Jan Hubicka
13:35 successful bootstrap/install of gcc-4.0-20040912 on OpenDarwin 7.2.1/x86 (i686-apple-darwin7.2.1) Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
13:25 gcc-3.4.2 or libpthread bug? Peter Seiderer
13:23 Re: RFC: Remove flags -fmove-all-movables and -freduce-all-givs. Giovanni Bajo
13:22 Problem compiling crtstuff.c on x86_64 Richard Kenner
13:18 Re: Java pages invalid HTML Gerald Pfeifer
13:08 Re: Java pages invalid HTML Michael Koch
12:09 Java pages invalid HTML Gerald Pfeifer
11:59 Re: AC_COMPILE_CHECK_SIZEOF Jones Desougi
11:35 Re: ICE with --enable-checking=assert,misc,tree,gc,rtl,rtlflag,fold,gcac micis
11:02 fixinc required for new FreeBSD 4.x bootstrap failures Gerald Pfeifer
10:54 Re: ICE with --enable-checking=assert,misc,tree,gc,rtl,rtlflag,fold,gcac Giovanni Bajo
10:13 small 'instrument-functions' patch Perret Yannick
10:00 Re: Unix Signals as OS Exceptions in C++ Andrew Haley
09:55 Unix Signals as OS Exceptions in C++ Andrew Haley
09:32 ALERT FROM PostMaster Enterprise AVAC Administrator
09:09 GCC-3.3.5 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
08:52 Could not split insn Petar Penchev
08:25 ICE with --enable-checking=assert,misc,tree,gc,rtl,rtlflag,fold,gcac micis
07:39 Re: How to change bit-field allocation tm_gccmail
07:34 data lost while transfer Ankit Jain
05:01 [RFA:] Improve "asm-reg in asm" documentation (was: Re: [m68k] asmregression with 3.3/3.4/3.5) Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:14 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux (some more progress) Richard Kenner
03:07 Re: Obsolete building in source dir? DJ Delorie
00:12 Re: Failure to parse nested explicit constructor calls in C++ Patrick Hartling

September 12, 2004
23:57 Re: [RFC] fixing libstdc++/10606 Gabriel Dos Reis
23:39 Re: Failure to parse nested explicit constructor calls in C++ Giovanni Bajo
23:33 [RFC] fixing libstdc++/10606 Richard Henderson
23:18 Failure to parse nested explicit constructor calls in C++ Patrick Hartling
22:12 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Per Bothner
21:25 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux (some more progress) Laurent GUERBY
19:51 [patch] Re: Latent bug in tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:split_loop_exit_edge Zdenek Dvorak
19:46 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux (some progress) Zdenek Dvorak
18:21 Re: Unix Signals as OS Exceptions in C++ Richard Henderson
18:19 gcc-4.0-20040912 is now available gccadmin
17:52 Re: Unix Signals as OS Exceptions in C++ Andrew Pinski
17:48 Re: lno branch: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
17:33 lno branch: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
17:17 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux (some progress) Laurent GUERBY
16:22 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Tom Tromey
16:20 Re: Some serious problem with GC again Graham Stott
16:15 Re: Some aspect of GCC memory consumption increased by recent patch Jan Hubicka
15:55 Re: Unix Signals as OS Exceptions in C++ Luca Saiu
15:54 Re: Some serious problem with GC again Nathan Sidwell
15:39 Re: Some aspect of GCC memory consumption increased by recent patch Diego Novillo
15:06 Re: Some serious problem with GC again Daniel Jacobowitz
14:41 Re: Some serious problem with GC again Steven Bosscher
14:41 Some serious problem with GC again Steven Bosscher
14:15 Re: Unix Signals as OS Exceptions in C++ Ian Lance Taylor
13:17 Bootstrap failure on i386 Andreas Jaeger
12:29 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Robert Dewar
11:39 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Florian Weimer
11:37 Re: Newly failing fortran compilations in test-suite. Andreas Jaeger
10:56 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Andrew Haley
05:53 Re: RFC: Remove flags -fmove-all-movables and -freduce-all-givs. Toon Moene
04:00 Away from my mail Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
03:56 Re: Matching on Outer Template Parameters Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
02:59 ARM linux-2.6.8 build fail with gcc-3.4.x Dan Kegel
02:46 Re: SPEC's 176.gcc now working Andrew Pinski
01:52 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux (some progress) Richard Kenner
01:32 Unix Signals as OS Exceptions in C++ Steven T. Hatton
01:32 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Per Bothner
00:26 Re: Some aspect of GCC memory consumption increased by recent patch Jan Hubicka
00:14 Re: Separate dir for the C frontend Joseph S. Myers
00:04 Separate dir for the C frontend Gioele Barabucci

September 11, 2004
23:56 Re: How is EQ in mklibgcc used? Phil Edwards
23:03 Re: Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation? Zack Weinberg
22:12 Re: PATCH for Re: GCC mirror at UKMS: new URLs Adam Sampson
22:06 Re: Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation? Gerald Pfeifer
21:27 PATCH for Re: GCC mirror at UKMS: new URLs Gerald Pfeifer
20:55 Re: some strangeness with gcc 3.4.1 chris jefferson
20:28 some strangeness with gcc 3.4.1 Marty Leisner
20:10 Re: Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation? Gerald Pfeifer
19:56 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Gerald Pfeifer
19:39 gcc-4.0-20040911 is now available Gerald Pfeifer
19:02 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux (some progress) Zdenek Dvorak
18:52 Re: Newly failing fortran compilations in test-suite. Richard Henderson
18:17 Re: Programming Language for Beginners Gerald Pfeifer
17:58 Re: RFC: Remove flags -fmove-all-movables and -freduce-all-givs. Richard Henderson
17:53 Re: Newly failing fortran compilations in test-suite. David Edelsohn
17:46 Re: Newly failing fortran compilations in test-suite. Andreas Jaeger
17:37 successful build of GCC 3.4.2 on Mac OS 10.3.5 (bootstrap) Bojan Antonovic
17:24 Re: How is EQ in mklibgcc used? H. J. Lu
17:20 Re: Newly failing fortran compilations in test-suite. David Edelsohn
17:14 RFC: Remove flags -fmove-all-movables and -freduce-all-givs. Toon Moene
17:03 Re: question about scheduling optimization in machine description Richard Henderson
17:01 Re: question about scheduling optimization in machine description Spundun Bhatt
15:31 Re: How is EQ in mklibgcc used? Daniel Jacobowitz
14:29 Re: Latent bug in tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:split_loop_exit_edge Zdenek Dvorak
14:16 Latent bug in tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:split_loop_exit_edge Diego Novillo
13:25 Re: Matching on Outer Template Parameters Tyson Whitehead
11:59 Re: Ada Policy Richard Kenner
11:51 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux (some progress) Richard Kenner
11:10 RE: *** SPAM *** Re: Reload problem, advice required Jon Beniston
11:01 Re: Newly failing fortran compilations in test-suite. Andreas Jaeger
10:57 Re: Redundant instructions in loop optimization for x86-64? Jan Hubicka
10:54 Re: Newly failing fortran compilations in test-suite. Andreas Jaeger
10:48 Re: Newly failing fortran compilations in test-suite. Andreas Jaeger
10:43 Newly failing fortran compilations in test-suite. Toon Moene
10:30 Re: -freduce-all-* Toon Moene
10:25 Re: Reload problem, advice required Ulrich Weigand
08:40 Re: Ada Policy Nathanael Nerode
08:06 Re: (3.4.2 Bug?) Copy ctor needed to pass temporary as const reference? Giovanni Bajo
08:02 (3.4.2 Bug?) Copy ctor needed to pass temporary as const reference? Faschingbauer
05:58 Re: How is EQ in mklibgcc used? Alexandre Oliva
05:03 Re: cvs repository broken? Zack Weinberg
04:06 I'm Interested , Tell me More Lecciones R.
03:49 Re: cvs repository broken? Christopher Faylor
03:19 Matching on Outer Template Parameters Tyson Whitehead
01:58 Obsolete building in source dir? Giovanni Bajo
00:33 Reload problem, advice required Jon Beniston
00:31 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux (some progress) Jan Hubicka
00:18 Re: Redundant instructions in loop optimization for x86-64? Jan Hubicka
00:10 gcc-3.4-20040910 is now available gccadmin

September 10, 2004
23:44 PR debug/17406: ICE dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr on MinGW Aaron W. LaFramboise
22:55 Re: mainline libstdc++ failures, one week old Mike Stump
22:15 Re: Redundant instructions in loop optimization for x86-64? James E Wilson
22:07 Re: Redundant instructions in loop optimization for x86-64? H. J. Lu
21:25 Help me solve this error: fatal: libstdc++.so.5: No such file or directory !! tran trung dung~
20:43 Re: Redundant instructions in loop optimization for x86-64? James E Wilson
19:39 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Phil Edwards
19:11 RE: Can code compiled with g++ 3.3.1 run with earlier versions ofcompiler runtime environment? James E Wilson
19:07 RE: Can code compiled with g++ 3.3.1 run with earlier versions ofcompiler runtime environment? James E Wilson
19:02 Re: macro BITS_BIG_ENDIAN James E Wilson
19:00 Re: Mimic OSF with gcc Richard Henderson
18:55 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux Richard Henderson
18:12 Re: Programming Language for Beginners Joseph S. Myers
18:01 Re: Suspicious lines in i386.md Jan Hubicka
17:55 Re: Precompiled Header support for GCC-3.4 Mike Stump
17:54 Re: Fwd: Linking public: static const members in lib*.a's Steven T. Hatton
17:51 Re: Programming Language for Beginners Richard Kenner
17:40 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Richard Kenner
17:35 Re: Programming Language for Beginners James A. Morrison
17:24 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Mike Stump
17:04 Re: Ada mainline Matt Austern
16:54 Re: Redundant instructions in loop optimization for x86-64? H. J. Lu
16:45 Re: GC_descr_obj_sz miscompilation (was RE: GC_enable_incremental()) Bryce McKinlay
16:20 Re: Programming Language for Beginners Paul Brook
16:17 Re: Programming Language for Beginners James A. Morrison
15:55 Re: Programming Language for Beginners Paul Brook
15:40 Re: Programming Language for Beginners Kevin Handy
15:34 Re: Reenabling Ada by default James A. Morrison
15:02 Re: Ada mainline Manfred Hollstein
14:54 Re: Ada mainline James A. Morrison
14:50 Re: Precompiled Header support for GCC-3.4 Daniel Jacobowitz
14:11 Re: Ada mainline Paul Koning
13:53 Mimic OSF with gcc Mathieu Malaterre
13:21 Re: Ada mainline Gabriel Dos Reis
13:17 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Gabriel Dos Reis
13:00 Re: cvs repository broken? Paolo Bonzini
12:46 Re: cvs repository broken? Nathan Sidwell
12:34 Re: amd64 bootstrap broken Nathan Sidwell
12:09 RE: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Dave Korn
11:58 Re: cvs repository broken? Paolo Bonzini
11:56 Re: Ada mainline Richard Kenner
11:53 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux (some progress) Richard Kenner
11:39 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Richard Kenner
11:27 Re: amd64 bootstrap broken Nathan Sidwell
10:58 Suspicious lines in i386.md Uros Bizjak
10:40 Re: Fwd: Linking public: static const members in lib*.a's Steven T. Hatton
10:37 Re: Ada mainline Laurent GUERBY
10:37 Re: cvs repository broken? Phil Edwards
10:17 Re: Fwd: Linking public: static const members in lib*.a's Steven T. Hatton
10:10 Re: question about scheduling optimization in machine description Paolo Bonzini
10:08 cvs repository broken? Andreas Jaeger
09:50 Re: Redundant instructions in loop optimization for x86-64? Jan Hubicka
09:40 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux Jan Hubicka
09:38 Re: amd64 bootstrap broken Steven Bosscher
09:21 Re: Ada mainline Joseph S. Myers
09:07 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux Jan Hubicka
08:45 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux (some progress) Jan Hubicka
08:44 Re: Fwd: Linking public: static const members in lib*.a's Florian Weimer
08:43 Re: Need help for doing gcc modifications Perret Yannick
08:14 Re: Ada mainline Robert Dewar
07:31 amd64 bootstrap broken Steven Bosscher
07:29 [PATCH] Re: How to disable toplevel fixincludes? Paolo Bonzini
06:53 RE: Can code compiled with g++ 3.3.1 run with earlier versions of compiler runtime environment? Arora, Sudhanshu
06:47 Re: macro BITS_BIG_ENDIAN (re send) Sivan Balaji
06:43 Fwd: Linking public: static const members in lib*.a's Steven T. Hatton
06:38 Re: macro BITS_BIG_ENDIAN Sivan Balaji
06:38 gcc install on SuSE9.0 Christina Jarlskog
06:32 RE: Can code compiled with g++ 3.3.1 run with earlier versions of compiler runtime environment? Rathi, Dinesh
06:15 Re: question about scheduling optimization in machine description Richard Henderson
06:14 Re: GC_descr_obj_sz miscompilation (was RE: GC_enable_incremental()) Ranjit Mathew
06:09 Re: GC_descr_obj_sz miscompilation (was RE: GC_enable_incremental()) Richard Henderson
06:01 Re: GC_descr_obj_sz miscompilation (was RE: GC_enable_incremental()) Ranjit Mathew
05:49 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Phil Edwards
05:39 Nathan Sidwell appointed C++ and vec.h maintainer Mark Mitchell
05:27 [Patch]fix new reg-alloc-branch crash in final.c Ramana Radhakrishnan
05:19 How to disable toplevel fixincludes? Aaron W. LaFramboise
05:08 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Richard Kenner
04:55 Re: Precompiled Header support for GCC-3.4 Prasad Kulkarni
04:38 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Phil Edwards
03:50 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Richard Henderson
03:12 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:21 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Richard Kenner
02:18 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:18 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Richard Kenner
01:59 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Mark Mitchell
01:52 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Paul Brook
01:28 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Richard Kenner
01:18 Re: Ada mainline Richard Kenner
01:16 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Richard Kenner
00:38 question about scheduling optimization in machine description Spundun Bhatt
00:29 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Giovanni Bajo
00:22 Snapshots? (was Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0) Phil Edwards
00:20 Re: Ada mainline Florian Weimer
00:15 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Giovanni Bajo
00:00 Redundant instructions in loop optimization for x86-64? H. J. Lu

September 09, 2004
23:36 GC_descr_obj_sz miscompilation (was RE: GC_enable_incremental()) Boehm, Hans
23:31 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Daniel Berlin
23:30 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Daniel Berlin
23:29 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Joseph S. Myers
23:23 Re: Ada mainline Kaveh R. Ghazi
23:19 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Mike Stump
23:14 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Daniel Jacobowitz
23:11 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Kaveh R. Ghazi
23:10 Re: Ada mainline Robert Dewar
23:08 Re: Ada mainline Richard Henderson
23:08 Re: Ada mainline Robert Dewar
23:07 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Robert Dewar
23:06 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Robert Dewar
23:00 Re: macro BITS_BIG_ENDIAN DJ Delorie
22:57 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Richard Henderson
22:54 Re: Ada mainline Robert Dewar
22:53 Re: Ada mainline Robert Dewar
22:52 Re: Ada mainline Robert Dewar
22:50 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Joseph S. Myers
22:50 Re: Ada mainline Robert Dewar
22:49 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Per Bothner
22:41 Re: Reenabling Ada by default James A. Morrison
22:39 Re: macro BITS_BIG_ENDIAN James E Wilson
22:38 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Phil Edwards
22:38 Re: Ada mainline Gabriel Dos Reis
22:37 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Robert Dewar
22:36 Re: Ada mainline Diego Novillo
22:32 Re: Information Request James E Wilson
22:25 Re: Ada mainline D. Starner
22:22 Re: s390 bootstrap broken on mainline Ulrich Weigand
22:19 Re: Ada mainline Diego Novillo
22:17 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Gabriel Dos Reis
22:15 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Per Bothner
22:15 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Mark Mitchell
22:12 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Richard Kenner
22:10 Re: Missing if optimization James E Wilson
22:10 Re: Ada mainline Richard Henderson
22:08 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Wolfgang Bangerth
22:06 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Gabriel Dos Reis
22:00 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Gabriel Dos Reis
21:59 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux (some progress) Richard Kenner
21:58 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Duncan Sands
21:57 Re: [3.4] libgcc2.c:1500: warning: no previous prototype for '__enable_execute_stack' James E Wilson
21:57 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Robert Dewar
21:56 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Gabriel Dos Reis
21:54 Re: Ada mainline Robert Dewar
21:52 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Robert Dewar
21:50 Re: Can code compiled with g++ 3.3.1 run with earlier versions ofcompiler runtime environment? James E Wilson
21:50 Re: Ada mainline Robert Dewar
21:49 Re: Ada mainline Robert Dewar
21:48 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Joseph S. Myers
21:45 Re: Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation? Joseph S. Myers
21:43 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux (some progress) Laurent GUERBY
21:39 Re: Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation? Daniel Berlin
21:36 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Robert Dewar
21:29 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Mike Stump
21:26 Re: Ada mainline Joseph S. Myers
21:22 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Richard Kenner
21:20 Re: Ada mainline Daniel Berlin
21:19 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Duncan Sands
21:18 Re: Ada mainline Diego Novillo
21:15 Re: How is EQ in mklibgcc used? H. J. Lu
21:13 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Eric Christopher
21:04 Re: Ada mainline Robert Dewar
21:00 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
21:00 Re: How is EQ in mklibgcc used? Alexandre Oliva
20:57 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Robert Dewar
20:56 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
20:54 Re: Ada mainline Daniel Berlin
20:54 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Florian Weimer
20:43 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Robert Dewar
20:37 Re: How is EQ in mklibgcc used? H. J. Lu
20:35 Re: Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation? Stan Shebs
20:32 Successful build of gcc-3.4.2 on i686-pc-mingw32 Aaron W. LaFramboise
20:30 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Richard Kenner
20:04 Re: Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation? Joseph S. Myers
19:56 Re: Precompiled Header support for GCC-3.4 Mike Stump
19:41 Re: Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation? Joseph S. Myers
19:40 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Andrew Haley
19:40 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Diego Novillo
19:34 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Robert Dewar
19:34 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:22 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Zack Weinberg
19:22 Re: Programming Language for Beginners Paul Brook
19:21 Re: How is EQ in mklibgcc used? Daniel Jacobowitz
19:20 Re: Ada mainline Richard Kenner
19:17 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Robert Dewar
19:17 How is EQ in mklibgcc used? H. J. Lu
19:13 Re: Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation? Matt Austern
19:10 Re: ra.c todo list. Michael Matz
19:05 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Zack Weinberg
19:03 Re: ra.c todo list. Ramana Radhakrishnan
19:01 Re: alias.c: find_base_decl: TREE_CODE_CLASS of '3' Richard Kenner
18:52 Re: SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Zack Weinberg
18:50 RE: Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation? Dave Korn
18:50 Re: Reenabling Ada by default Richard Kenner
18:41 SC decision on version numbering: 4.0 Per Bothner
18:40 Re: Ada mainline Richard Henderson
18:32 Programming Language for Beginners Kailash Balnac
18:32 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux Richard Henderson
18:13 Re: alias.c: find_base_decl: TREE_CODE_CLASS of '3' Richard Henderson
17:40 Re: Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation? Chunhua Liao
17:33 Re: Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation? Daniel Berlin
17:31 Re: alias.c: find_base_decl: TREE_CODE_CLASS of '3' Dale Johannesen
17:24 Re: Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation? Joseph S. Myers
17:04 Re: Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation? Daniel Berlin
16:14 libstdc++ rpm Arora, Sudhanshu
15:29 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux Jan Hubicka
14:51 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux Arnaud Charlet
14:05 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux Arnaud Charlet
14:03 Re: Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation? Joseph S. Myers
13:50 Re: Ada mainline Arnaud Charlet
13:48 Re: Ada mainline Arnaud Charlet
13:47 Re: Ada mainline Diego Novillo
13:43 Re: Ada mainline Arnaud Charlet
13:36 Re: Ada mainline Paolo Bonzini
13:25 Re: Ada mainline Jan Hubicka
13:13 Re: Ada mainline Arnaud Charlet
12:54 Why don't we set up an official wiki for GCC documentation? Chunhua Liao
12:30 Re: Ada mainline Jan Hubicka
12:07 Re: Ada mainline Arnaud Charlet
12:06 Precompiled Header support for GCC-3.4 Prasad Kulkarni
11:55 SPEC's 176.gcc now working Diego Novillo
11:51 Re: Ada mainline Richard Kenner
11:37 Re: profiledbootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin Paolo Bonzini
10:47 Re: Ada mainline Giovanni Bajo
10:41 Ada mainline Laurent GUERBY
10:40 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux Arnaud Charlet
10:37 Re: Ada broken on i686-linux Nathan Sidwell
10:28 Re: GCC help Nathan Sidwell
10:25 Ada broken on i686-linux Arnaud Charlet
10:25 Re: GCC help Ranjit Mathew
10:16 macro BITS_BIG_ENDIAN Sivan Balaji
10:08 Information Request alex19_82\ at libero\ dot it
09:53 GCC help Sonawane Sachin Vijayku
08:21 GCC mirror at UKMS: new URLs Adam Sampson
05:49 Re: Missing if optimization Andrew Pinski
05:24 Missing if optimization Uros Bizjak
03:57 -freduce-all-* Michael T. Babcock
01:44 Re: alias.c: find_base_decl: TREE_CODE_CLASS of '3' Zack Weinberg
00:59 Re: alias.c: find_base_decl: TREE_CODE_CLASS of '3' Mike Stump
00:44 Re: alias.c: find_base_decl: TREE_CODE_CLASS of '3' Zack Weinberg
00:38 Re: profiledbootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin Daniel Jacobowitz
00:35 alias.c: find_base_decl: TREE_CODE_CLASS of '3' Jeffrey D. Oldham
00:15 Re: gprof not happy with mainline output. James E Wilson
00:04 Re: gcc 3.4.2 release notes, first draft Mark Mitchell

September 08, 2004
23:30 Re: profiledbootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin Mike Stump
23:13 gcc-3.3-20040908 is now available gccadmin
22:41 Re: Type problem with template functions and inheritance? Wolfgang Bangerth
22:09 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails on powerpc-apple-darwin7.5.0 with--enable-checking=all Richard Sandiford
21:59 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails on powerpc-apple-darwin7.5.0 with--enable-checking=all Richard Sandiford
21:41 Re: Why is the TREE_PURPOSE of a CONSTRUCTOR_ELT list for ARRAY_TYPENULL? Mark Mitchell
21:35 Re: Why is the TREE_PURPOSE of a CONSTRUCTOR_ELT list for ARRAY_TYPENULL? Joseph S. Myers
21:33 Re: Type problem with template functions and inheritance ? Vaclav Haisman
21:28 Re: Stage 3 rules now in force on mainline Michael Ritzert
21:27 profiledbootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin Caroline Tice
21:25 Re: Stage 3 rules now in force on mainline Mike Stump
21:16 Re: errors with hidden symbols and apache Mike Stump
20:49 Re: Why is the TREE_PURPOSE of a CONSTRUCTOR_ELT list for ARRAY_TYPENULL? Mark Mitchell
20:35 Re: Is gcc mainline parallel build safe? Mark Mitchell
20:10 Type problem with template functions and inheritance ? Simon MARTIN
20:08 Re: errors with hidden symbols and apache Edward Peschko
20:05 Re: aliasing question Jan Hubicka
19:40 Re: gprof not happy with mainline output. Peter Steinmetz
19:21 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails on powerpc-apple-darwin7.5.0 with --enable-checking=all Graham Stott
18:47 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails on powerpc-apple-darwin7.5.0 with --enable-checking=all Andrew Pinski
18:18 Mainline bootstrap fails on powerpc-apple-darwin7.5.0 with --enable-checking=all Matt Austern
18:16 Re: errors with hidden symbols and apache Richard Henderson
18:15 Re: Single error mode Zack Weinberg
17:55 Re: Single error mode Daniel Berlin
17:51 Re: Single error mode Richard Guenther
17:51 Re: Single error mode Zack Weinberg
17:44 [RFC] Exploiting dual mode operation, implementation. Leehod Baruch
17:38 Re: Single error mode Daniel Berlin
17:32 Re: Single error mode Piotr Wyderski
17:23 Re: Single error mode Daniel Berlin
16:57 Re: mainline libstdc++ failures, one week old Andrew Pinski
16:56 RE: Single error mode Dave Korn
16:48 mainline libstdc++ failures, one week old Benjamin Kosnik
16:47 Single error mode Piotr Wyderski
16:03 Re: Treedump output Diego Novillo
15:59 Re: Stage 3 rules now in force on mainline Arnaud Charlet
15:54 Re: Stage 3 rules now in force on mainline Mark Mitchell
15:53 Re: Treedump output Svein E. Seldal
15:10 Re: Treedump output Svein E. Seldal
14:51 Re: Treedump output Svein E. Seldal
14:27 RE: Treedump output Dave Korn
14:24 RE: newsletter #10 Dave Korn
14:22 Re: Treedump output Paul Brook
14:16 Treedump output Svein E. Seldal
14:11 Re: Can code compiled with g++ 3.3.1 run with earlier versions ofcompiler runtime environment? Nathan Sidwell
14:03 Re: newsletter #10 Gabriel Paubert
12:58 Re: newsletter #10 Ranjit Mathew
12:51 Re: newsletter #10 Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:22 newsletter #10 Mathieu Lacage
12:00 Re: stack height reduction in tree-SSA tm_gccmail
09:26 Re: errors with hidden symbols and apache Edward Peschko
08:50 Can code compiled with g++ 3.3.1 run with earlier versions of compiler runtime environment? Rathi, Dinesh
08:12 Re: Spurious testsuite failures on multi-cpu sparc-solaris2.9 Christian Ehrhardt
06:42 Re: Stage 3 rules now in force on mainline Arnaud Charlet
05:58 GCC 3.4 branch reopened Mark Mitchell
05:39 GCC 3.4.2 Released Mark Mitchell
05:13 Stage 3 rules now in force on mainline Mark Mitchell
04:08 Re: Spurious testsuite failures on multi-cpu sparc-solaris2.9 Dan Kegel
03:45 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Richard Kenner
03:34 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Diego Novillo
03:34 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Diego Novillo
03:34 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Richard Henderson
03:34 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Richard Henderson
02:05 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Diego Novillo
02:01 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Diego Novillo
01:56 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Daniel Berlin
01:55 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Richard Kenner
01:52 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Diego Novillo
01:49 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Daniel Berlin
01:28 Spurious testsuite failures on multi-cpu sparc-solaris2.9 Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:23 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Richard Kenner
00:58 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Diego Novillo

September 07, 2004
23:05 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Richard Kenner
23:04 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Diego Novillo
22:59 Yet another problem compiling Ada library Richard Kenner
22:57 Re: New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Richard Henderson
22:57 Re: Need help for doing gcc modifications James E Wilson
22:52 Re: Problem with operand handling Richard Henderson
22:21 New problem compiling g-exctra.adb Richard Kenner
21:35 Re: Problem with operand handling Richard Kenner
20:52 sourceware / gcc.gnu.org outage tonight Frank Ch. Eigler
20:48 Re: Problem with operand handling Andrew MacLeod
20:41 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Richard Kenner
20:38 Re: successful bootstrap of gcc-3.5-20040905 on OpenDarwin 7.2.1/x86 (i686-apple-darwin7.2.1) Mike Stump
20:32 Re: Problem with operand handling Richard Kenner
20:03 Re: Why is the TREE_PURPOSE of a CONSTRUCTOR_ELT list for ARRAY_TYPE NULL? Richard Henderson
19:55 Alexandre Oliva and Aldy Hernandez appointed FR-V maintainers David Edelsohn
19:45 Re: Parallel make also broken now... Mohan Embar
19:44 Re: tutorials for gcc devel ? Sebastian Pop
19:28 Re: Using --disable-shared to build non-apple gcc on darwin Andrew Pinski
19:28 Re: [MAC] gcc bug Andrew Pinski
19:23 [MAC] gcc bug Mathieu Malaterre
18:54 Re: Parallel make also broken now... Mohan Embar
18:52 Re: Parallel make also broken now... Zack Weinberg
18:16 Re: Parallel make also broken now... Kelley Cook
17:18 tutorials for gcc devel ? Perret Yannick
16:41 Re: Problem with operand handling Andrew Pinski
15:56 RE: How to change bit-field allocation Dave Korn
15:55 Re: Re: Andrew MacLeod
15:47 Results for 3.5.0 20040905 (experimental) testsuite on i686-apple-darwin7.2.1 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
15:46 Re: Nathan Sidwell
15:27 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Diego Novillo
15:24 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Richard Kenner
15:07 Re: kernel modules Randy.Dunlap
14:59 Re: How to change bit-field allocation Etienne Lorrain
14:55 Re: Reminder re breakage on Friday of Ada in lcm.c Vladimir Merzliakov
14:51 Re: Problem with operand handling Andrew MacLeod
14:41 Re: Problem with operand handling Diego Novillo
14:22 Re: aliasing question Diego Novillo
14:12 Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Diego Novillo
14:07 Re: How to change bit-field allocation Robert Dewar
13:59 Re: Problem with operand handling Richard Kenner
13:47 Re: Problem with operand handling Andrew MacLeod
13:30 [3.4] libgcc2.c:1500: warning: no previous prototype for '__enable_execute_stack' Christian Joensson
13:30 Yet another new verify_ssa failure for Ada Richard Kenner
13:28 Re: Problem with operand handling Richard Kenner
13:03 successful bootstrap of gcc-3.5-20040905 on OpenDarwin 7.2.1/x86 (i686-apple-darwin7.2.1) Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
13:02 Re: Problem with operand handling Andrew MacLeod
13:01 Using --disable-shared to build non-apple gcc on darwin Peter O'Gorman
12:38 Re: Problem with operand handling Richard Kenner
12:20 Re: Problem with operand handling Andrew MacLeod
12:19 Re: gcc 3.4.2 release notes, first draft KRECKEL Richard NGLTD
11:45 Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Richard Kenner
11:36 Reminder re breakage on Friday of Ada in lcm.c Richard Kenner
11:30 kernel modules rinku rathore
11:11 Re: Ada bootstrap broken on x86 and x86_64 Richard Kenner
10:51 aliasing question Jan Hubicka
08:17 Re: GCC pending_chain contains only (nil) Paolo Bonzini
08:12 Re: Ada bootstrap broken on x86 and x86_64 Jan Hubicka
04:56 Re: AC_COMPILE_CHECK_SIZEOF Zack Weinberg
03:47 Re: How to change bit-field allocation Min ZOU
03:44 Re: How to change bit-field allocation Min ZOU
01:24 Re: How to change bit-field allocation DJ Delorie
01:18 Re: Explicit conversion operators Giovanni Bajo
00:58 Explicit conversion operators Piotr Wyderski

September 06, 2004
23:33 Re: Is gcc mainline parallel build safe? H. J. Lu
22:43 Re: Ada bootstrap broken on x86 and x86_64 Richard Kenner
22:19 Re: How to change bit-field allocation Robert Dewar
22:14 Re: Ada bootstrap broken on x86 and x86_64 Jan Hubicka
22:09 Re: Is gcc mainline parallel build safe? James E Wilson
22:03 Re: AC_COMPILE_CHECK_SIZEOF Jones Desougi
22:01 Re: Ada bootstrap broken on x86 and x86_64 Richard Kenner
21:43 Re: How to change bit-field allocation James E Wilson
21:40 Mainline miscompiles tramp3d-v3 testcase at -O0 Richard Guenther
21:38 Re: GCC pending_chain contains only (nil) James E Wilson
21:28 Re: Ada bootstrap broken on x86 and x86_64 Jan Hubicka
21:18 Re: Mainline space problem James E Wilson
21:12 Re: Ada bootstrap broken on x86 and x86_64 Jan Hubicka
20:55 Re: Ada bootstrap broken on x86 and x86_64 Jan Hubicka
20:54 Re: Ada bootstrap broken on x86 and x86_64 Richard Kenner
20:52 Ada bootstrap broken on x86 and x86_64 Laurent GUERBY
20:20 Re: Why is the TREE_PURPOSE of a CONSTRUCTOR_ELT list for ARRAY_TYPE NULL? Richard Kenner
19:55 Why is the TREE_PURPOSE of a CONSTRUCTOR_ELT list for ARRAY_TYPENULL? Daniel Berlin
18:40 Re: Parallel make also broken now... Steven Bosscher
17:15 Re: How to change bit-field allocation Ramana Radhakrishnan
16:53 Need help for doing gcc modifications Perret Yannick
16:53 Re: Parallel make also broken now... Zack Weinberg
16:44 Re: AC_COMPILE_CHECK_SIZEOF Zack Weinberg
16:18 Parallel make also broken now... Steven Bosscher
16:10 Re: Build failure, HEAD, java/lang/Class.o Steven Bosscher
16:02 Re: Build failure, HEAD, java/lang/Class.o Andreas Jaeger
15:57 Build failure, HEAD, java/lang/Class.o Michael Chastain
15:18 Re: Can't build gcc HEAD 20040905 on sparc64-linux: ICE building libgfortran/generated/_exp_r4.f90:0:... Eric Botcazou
14:36 Re: AC_COMPILE_CHECK_SIZEOF Giovanni Bajo
14:18 Re: --as-needed problem with gnatmake while building 3.4.2 on RH 7.1/RHEL 2.1 H. J. Lu
13:10 Re: Mail Server story
11:59 Re: A question about integer promotion in GCC Joseph S. Myers
11:41 How to change bit-field allocation Min ZOU
09:54 Re: A question about integer promotion in GCC Nathan Sidwell
09:01 Re: A question about integer promotion in GCC Joseph S. Myers
08:52 Re: A question about integer promotion in GCC Nathan Sidwell
08:47 Re: --as-needed problem with gnatmake while building 3.4.2 on RH 7.1/RHEL 2.1 Greg Schafer
08:43 Re: A question about integer promotion in GCC Joseph S. Myers
08:08 Can't build gcc HEAD 20040905 on sparc64-linux: ICE building libgfortran/generated/_exp_r4.f90:0:... Christian Joensson
08:01 Re: A question about integer promotion in GCC Nathan Sidwell
02:47 Re: GCC Bug in 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 ? Dave Trollope, Diane Barrowman
02:42 GCC Bug in 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 ? Dave Trollope, Diane Barrowman
00:44 Re: AC_COMPILE_CHECK_SIZEOF Zack Weinberg
00:34 Re: Ability to disable URL mangling in makeinfo 4.7? Karl Berry

September 05, 2004
23:45 Re: AC_COMPILE_CHECK_SIZEOF Jones Desougi
23:22 RE: Idea of feature/optimization for C++ staube
21:52 PATCH for RE: Broken link and defunct search Gerald Pfeifer
21:47 Re: Ability to disable URL mangling in makeinfo 4.7? Gerald Pfeifer
21:32 Re: Ability to disable URL mangling in makeinfo 4.7? Karl Berry
21:12 Re: Ability to disable URL mangling in makeinfo 4.7? Gerald Pfeifer
21:10 Re: [wwwdocs] disregard previous release notes patch, use this one Gerald Pfeifer
18:06 Re: question of RTL Generation Dale Johannesen
18:01 gcc-3.5-20040905 is now available gccadmin
17:04 Re: AC_COMPILE_CHECK_SIZEOF Zack Weinberg
16:34 Problem building for MinGW with 3.4.2 Mark Mitchell
15:45 AC_COMPILE_CHECK_SIZEOF Jones Desougi
14:35 question of RTL Generation Hsin-Hsien Wu
11:35 Re: Cross compiling Andrew Walrond
11:26 Cross compiling Paul A. Kerr
10:03 --as-needed problem with gnatmake while building 3.4.2 on RH 7.1/RHEL 2.1 Albert Chin
09:30 GCC pending_chain contains only (nil) Hsin-Hsien Wu
06:01 Re: Does it matter? story
03:38 gcc 3.4.2 release notes, first draft Joe Buck
00:51 GCC 3.4.2 release build underway Mark Mitchell

September 04, 2004
22:57 Re: GCC 3.4.2 RC2 Available Aaron W. LaFramboise
22:34 Re: [PATCH] Remove all ggc'd bitmaps from PRE (Was Re: Memoryoverhead of tree-SSA optimization passes) Daniel Berlin
21:50 Re: [PATCH] Remove all ggc'd bitmaps from PRE (Was Re: Memory overhead of tree-SSA optimization passes) Jan Hubicka
21:33 Re: Varray memory consumption strikes back Jan Hubicka
21:30 Re: GCC 3.4.2 RC2 Available Matthias Klose
20:41 Re: Memory overhead of tree-SSA optimization passes Jan Hubicka
18:11 Re: Varray memory consumption strikes back Jeffrey A Law
17:04 Re: GCC 3.4.2 RC2 Available Joe Buck
16:51 More problems with operands Richard Kenner
16:17 [PATCH] Remove all ggc'd bitmaps from PRE (Was Re: Memory overheadof tree-SSA optimization passes) Daniel Berlin
16:06 Re: Mainline is broken Andreas Schwab
16:00 Mainline is broken H. J. Lu
15:53 Re: Memory overhead of tree-SSA optimization passes Daniel Berlin
15:48 Re: Confusing errormessage with implicit typename Robert Dewar
15:41 Re: Confusing errormessage with implicit typename Nicolas Pavlidis
14:48 Problem with operand handling Richard Kenner
13:30 Re: Memory overhead of tree-SSA optimization passes Jan Hubicka
13:26 Re: Memory overhead of tree-SSA optimization passes Diego Novillo
13:22 Memory overhead of tree-SSA optimization passes Jan Hubicka
13:17 Re: sh64 and mulilibs DJ Delorie
13:13 New ICE in optimize_mode_switching Richard Kenner
11:00 Re: sh64 and mulilibs Kaz Kojima
10:11 Re: sh64 and mulilibs Joern Rennecke
09:59 Varray memory consumption strikes back Jan Hubicka
07:35 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.02004-08-30on MICO sources Karel Gardas
02:42 Re: sh64 and mulilibs DJ Delorie
02:33 Re: sh64 and mulilibs Joern Rennecke
00:42 Re: dynamic linking question James E Wilson
00:38 Re: Confusing errormessage with implicit typename Joe Buck
00:30 Re: GCC .h for C James E Wilson
00:28 Re: Confusing errormessage with implicit typename James E Wilson
00:26 Is gcc mainline parallel build safe? H. J. Lu
00:22 Re: gprof not happy with mainline output. James E Wilson
00:11 JSR on the topic of complementary currencies Bernhard Fastenrath
00:02 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/librarystatus.html James E Wilson

September 03, 2004
23:34 Re: errors with hidden symbols and apache Richard Henderson
23:31 gcc-3.4-20040903 is now available gccadmin
23:27 Re: compilation bug on solaris with perl Richard Henderson
23:25 Re: errors with hidden symbols and apache Edward Peschko
23:23 Re: compilation bug on solaris with perl Richard Henderson
23:15 Re: compilation bug on solaris with perl Edward Peschko
23:09 Re: errors with hidden symbols and apache Richard Henderson
22:53 Re: GCC .h for C Phil Edwards
22:43 errors with hidden symbols and apache Edward Peschko
22:30 sh64 and mulilibs DJ Delorie
22:13 Re: The newly built libgcc_s.so.1 is never used for "make check" H. J. Lu
21:15 Re: Nested Class Member Access Joe Buck
21:05 Re: make in libjava uses wrong specs to build libgcj... H. J. Lu
20:51 The newly built libgcc_s.so.1 is never used for "make check" H. J. Lu
20:47 Re: Broken URL in README.QMTEST Joseph S. Myers
20:42 Re: make in libjava uses wrong specs to build libgcj... Bryce McKinlay
20:29 Re: make in libjava uses wrong specs to build libgcj... H. J. Lu
20:03 Re: make in libjava uses wrong specs to build libgcj... Bryce McKinlay
19:13 Re: compilation bug on solaris with perl Richard Henderson
18:26 Re: Nested Class Member Access Giovanni Bajo
18:14 Re: dynamic linking question Joe Buck
18:05 Re: Mainline space problem Andrew Pinski
17:48 Re: Mainline space problem Diego Novillo
17:40 Re: Mainline space problem Bradley Lucier
17:26 RE: Lousy scheduling decisions owing to bad interaction betweensched and greg :( Dave Korn
16:43 Re: NOTE_INSN_LOOP_END note crept in between casesi-insn andaddr_diff_vec? Jeffrey A Law
16:37 dynamic linking question Jim Norris
16:35 Re: Lousy scheduling decisions owing to bad interaction betweensched and greg :( Jeffrey A Law
16:05 Re: sparc-linux Ada failure [Was: GCC 3.4.2 RC2 Available] Christian Joensson
15:35 RE: Nested Class Member Access Steven L. Zook
14:42 Re: Lousy scheduling decisions owing to bad interaction betweensched and greg :( Richard Earnshaw
14:11 Re: Native GNAT (Ada) Support Richard Kenner
14:06 Native GNAT (Ada) Support Bob Rossi
13:26 Re: Lousy scheduling decisions owing to bad interaction between sched and greg :( Joern Rennecke
13:16 Re: sparc-linux Ada failure [Was: GCC 3.4.2 RC2 Available] Eric Botcazou
13:05 GCC .h for C Joao Americo Fabricio
12:52 Lousy scheduling decisions owing to bad interaction between sched and greg :( Dave Korn
08:33 Re: A question about integer promotion in GCC Jie Zhang
07:54 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
07:05 sparc-linux Ada failure [Was: GCC 3.4.2 RC2 Available] Christian Joensson
05:58 Re: Broken URL in README.QMTEST Mark Mitchell
05:41 Re: GCC 3.4.2 RC2 Available Eric Botcazou
05:12 Re: Mainline space problem James E Wilson
03:32 compilation bug on solaris with perl Edward Peschko
00:47 GCC 3.4.2 RC2 Available Mark Mitchell

September 02, 2004
23:21 Re: make in libjava uses wrong specs to build libgcj... H. J. Lu
22:54 make in libjava uses wrong specs to build libgcj... David Daney
22:21 [lno] Swim loop reduced and heuristics problem Sebastian Pop
21:38 gprof not happy with mainline output. Peter Steinmetz
20:43 Re: GCC Error messages Diego Novillo
20:38 Re: GCC Error messages Gabriel Dos Reis
20:32 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.02004-08-30 on MICO sources Giovanni Bajo
20:17 GCC Error messages Luke Liu
19:43 Did you regenerate libiberty/configure? H. J. Lu
19:22 Re: Nested Class Member Access Florian Weimer
19:13 Nested Class Member Access Steven L. Zook
18:55 [branch]: Structure aliasing branch created Daniel Berlin
18:33 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? Janis Johnson
17:54 volunteer needed to maintain build status lists temporarily Janis Johnson
17:46 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? Janis Johnson
16:31 Bogus libjava dependency in 3.5? H. J. Lu
15:20 NOTE_INSN_LOOP_END note crept in between casesi-insn and addr_diff_vec? Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:27 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? Paolo Bonzini
14:06 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? David Edelsohn
13:42 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
13:04 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? Paolo Bonzini
13:03 gcc 3.3.4 for 'sparc-sun-solaris2.8' Tony D'Amato
10:37 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Joern Rennecke
09:44 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.02004-08-30 on MICO sources Karel Gardas
09:41 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.02004-08-30 on MICO sources Karel Gardas
09:13 Confusing errormessage with implicit typename Nicolas Pavlidis
08:19 Re: A question about integer promotion in GCC Joseph S. Myers
08:09 Re: A question about integer promotion in GCC Jie Zhang
07:56 A question about integer promotion in GCC Jie Zhang
05:10 GCC 3.4.2 RC2 Mark Mitchell
04:40 Re: RFH: dejagnu and make check using remote testing host... Dan Kegel
01:23 Re: RFH: dejagnu and make check using remote testing host... David Daney
01:07 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? Richard Henderson
00:17 re: RFH: dejagnu and make check using remote testing host... Dan Kegel

September 01, 2004
23:47 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? Janis Johnson
23:38 http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/librarystatus.html William Clodius,,,
23:23 gcc-3.3-20040901 is now available gccadmin
23:18 Re: Mainline space problem Mike Stump
23:02 Re: Mainline space problem Janis Johnson
22:24 Re: Undefined static functions Richard Henderson
22:08 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? David Edelsohn
21:22 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? James E Wilson
20:53 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
20:52 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
20:48 Re: Ada policy Richard Kenner
20:44 Re: Ada policy Joe Buck
20:40 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? David Edelsohn
20:40 Little memory consumption scores Jan Hubicka
20:21 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
20:18 Re: number of spills and reloads James E Wilson
20:16 Re: Using registers as a queue James E Wilson
20:12 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? James E Wilson
20:06 Re: stack height reduction in tree-SSA Richard Henderson
19:52 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? Richard Henderson
19:49 Re: Need Help James E Wilson
19:36 Re: Mainline space problem Geert Bosch
19:00 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files James E Wilson
18:51 Re: Ada policy Joe Buck
18:49 RFH: dejagnu and make check using remote testing host... David Daney
18:43 Re: Mainline space problem Mike Stump
18:33 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Steve Ellcey
18:26 RE: Mainline space problem Dave Korn
18:22 Re: Mainline space problem Bradley Lucier
18:19 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
18:07 Re: GNU libobjc on Darwin David Edelsohn
17:57 Re: stack height reduction in tree-SSA Mike Stump
17:51 Re: IA64 floating point division question Steve Ellcey
17:38 Re: stack height reduction in tree-SSA Jeffrey A Law
17:32 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
17:23 Re: GNU libobjc on Darwin Stan Shebs
17:20 Re: Libgfortran licensing Robert Dewar
17:18 Re: stack height reduction in tree-SSA Dale Johannesen
17:12 Re: Ada policy Kai Henningsen
17:12 Re: Libgfortran licensing Kai Henningsen
16:49 Re: stack height reduction in tree-SSA Jeffrey A Law
16:00 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? Paolo Bonzini
16:00 [cft] Toplevel bootstrap Paolo Bonzini
15:52 Broken URL in README.QMTEST Joseph S. Myers
15:35 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? Giovanni Bajo
15:32 Re: number of spills and reloads Joern Rennecke
15:27 Re: question on class layout with virtual base classes Giovanni Bajo
15:13 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? Paolo Bonzini
15:08 [BC ABI] Fix type signature used in verification Andrew Haley
14:49 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? David Edelsohn
14:02 Re: number of spills and reloads Qiong Cai
13:43 RE: Idea of feature/optimization for C++ Dave Korn
13:43 [OT] RE: Canadian cross on cygwin Dave Korn
13:07 [BC ABI] Fix type signature used in verification Andrew Haley
12:51 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
12:36 Re: Ada policy Florian Weimer
12:35 Re: number of spills and reloads Joern Rennecke
12:28 Re: IA64 floating point division question Joern Rennecke
12:25 Re: IA64 floating point division question Joern Rennecke
12:20 Re: RFC: Using mode and code macros in *.md files Joern Rennecke
12:12 Re: On -ftrapv vs. libcalls... Joern Rennecke
11:18 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30 on MICO sources Giovanni Bajo
10:50 Re: stack height reduction in tree-SSA Giovanni Bajo
10:40 Re: stack height reduction in tree-SSA Joseph S. Myers
10:23 Re: stack height reduction in tree-SSA Giovanni Bajo
09:29 Idea of feature/optimization for C++ staube
08:27 Re: Minimal FDE Alan Modra
07:59 Re: Minimal FDE Yaakov Yaari
07:58 Re: proposal: drop support for ada on tru64-alpha Arnaud Charlet
07:53 Re: number of spills and reloads Qiong Cai
07:26 Re: Minimal FDE Alan Modra
07:18 Re: Compilation performance comparison of gcc3.4.1 and gcc3.5.0 2004-08-30 on MICO sources Paolo Bonzini
07:11 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? Paolo Bonzini
06:51 Re: Minimal FDE Yaakov Yaari
06:37 Using registers as a queue Pavel Boytchev
06:22 Re: Question on cfg_remove_useless_stmts_bb Jeffrey A Law
06:10 stack height reduction in tree-SSA Rakesh Kumar, Noida
05:24 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Andrew Pinski
05:21 Re: GCC 3.4.2 Release Candidate Available Christian Joensson
04:22 Re: Minimal FDE Alan Modra
04:16 Re: Mainline space problem Bradley Lucier
02:59 Re: binds_local question Mark Mitchell
02:14 Re: Mainline space problem Bradley Lucier
02:11 Re: generic vectors: how should they work? David Edelsohn
01:23 Re: Ada policy Robert Dewar
01:16 Re: GNU libobjc on Darwin Mike Stump
00:36 Re: GNU libobjc on Darwin Bill Northcott
00:35 generic vectors: how should they work? Janis Johnson
00:10 Re: IA64 floating point division question Zack Weinberg
00:10 Re: Undefined static functions Joseph S. Myers
00:08 [Patch ping] was: Option to compile for both AMD64 and EM64T? Kelley Cook


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3