This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, dberlin at dberlin dot org
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:59:10 -0700
Subject: Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
References: <4132641E.3030206@codesourcery.com> <200408300148.54421.stevenb@suse.de> <41326EBF.9020501@codesourcery.com> <200408300229.13652.stevenb@suse.de> <41327A88.5080903@codesourcery.com>

On Aug 29, 2004, at 5:53 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:

Maintaining compilation speed was a precondition set by the SC for the tree-ssa merge. If that condition was not met, then perhaps the merge should not have been performed. The fact that it was probably indicates that people weren't too worried about these compile-time effects.

There has been a couple of cases where compile time has actually speed up a huge amount even with the new optimization so it was no a clear cut if we should not merge or not.

I should note that the bootstrap time feels longer but I could be imagining things.

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

References:
- GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]