This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>, David Carlton <david dot carlton at sun dot com>, Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:16:42 -0700
Subject: Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++

On Tuesday, August 24, 2004, at 04:29 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

I disagree that the enum object would have value 7, as 7 is not an
enumeration (E) value.

We are not claiming it would have the value 7, we are claiming that the compiler is free to use the value 7, if it wants.

See my memset post. Let us know what your survey results are.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]