This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bootstrap failure on darwin 7.4.0 due to memory exhaution
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- To: christov at mac dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 04 07:25:20 EDT
- Subject: Re: Bootstrap failure on darwin 7.4.0 due to memory exhaution
Ah. I hadn't quite clued into the fact that many patches were still in
your private tree.
It's not "many", but a few. I was assuming that Arno was going to propagate
local checkins to the FSF tree like he usually did and he was assuming
I was continuing to do it as I had been since I started the tree-ssa
conversion for Ada. The result was that the trees got out of synch more
than usual. But it's only a couple of week and not a lot of patches. And
Arno said he'd resolve this soon anyway.
That's where I got confused (overeager?). I knew that you had a
"working" compiler, but I didn't know how much was not in the public
tree yet.
No, the main issue is that *no* compiler comes remotely close to "working":
if it had, I'd have made sure that trees were synched. The one I'm working
with is a little better than that in the FSF tree, but not significantly so.