This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics


Dale Johannesen <dalej@apple.com> writes:

> I really don't think IMA mode ought to affect semantics.  The
> result of building and running a program in IMA mode should be the
> same as with separate compilation, but possibly better optimized, IMO.

I agree in principle, but I do not think it is feasible in practice
and in the present state of the implementation.  In *this* case,
realize that the function you patched (merge_translation_unit_decls)
no longer exists and the architecture is completely different (it
operates on a merge-as-you-go model).  We could revert to the old
model but that will be substantially more work.  Nor do I think this
is the only case where IMA will have to be pickier than normal
compilation.

(Mind, I'm just fine with making this a hard error in both modes.)

zw


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]