This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Question on internal_get_tmp_var
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:48:22 -0700
- Subject: Re: Question on internal_get_tmp_var
- References: <10406232243.AA22038@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 06:43:45PM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote:
> But there's no *harm* in setting it, right?
When IS_FORMAL is set, no harm.
> DECL_INITIAL isn't gimple. Notice that we *clear* DECL_INITIAL
> in gimplify_decl_stmt.
>
> I'm running into trouble with the early gimplification of things
> because it makes it harder to trace back and find the expression that
> a PLACEHOLDER_EXPR is to match. I fixed this particular problem by
> making a little deeper in the tree (on a fat pointer instead of a
> COMPONENT_REF of it), but I'm a little concerned more that can't be fixed
> this easily will come up. Maybe not ...
I have no idea what you're talking about.
r~