This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: mudflap versus cgraph
On 22 Jun 2004 12:00:28 -0400
fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) wrote:
> > > Is this for your IMA fixes? It might be that mudflap has to be
> > > broken for a while, while IMA gets fixed...
> >
> > Yeah, it's for IMA. If it's mudflap's turn to be broken for awhile
> > I don't have a problem with that [...]
>
> Please first think through the issue so there is some design for doing
> what mudflap (and several other compiler parts) have to do, in a way
> that doesn't twitch the "eww, that's ugly" knee-jerk nerves. Maybe
> the nerves just need some botox.
For the record, I currently think I can get away with just delaying
invocation of mudflap_finish() until after all translation units have
been processed. That doesn't solve any of the larger issues but it does
make IMA happy.
zw