This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: mudflap versus cgraph
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Frank Eigler <fche at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:31:31 -0700
- Subject: Re: mudflap versus cgraph
- References: <87hdt48c1f.fsf@taltos.codesourcery.com>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 09:14:04PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> It might be acceptable to wind the enqueue/emit logic into cgraph itself,
I very very much want to do this. I got stuck with c++...
> provided that we could figure out how to construct a function in a
> completely language-independent manner (which we need anyway).
We have gimple/generic. We *can* create completely languages
independent functions now.
> .section .rodata.mf.statics, "a"
> .long x
> .long 4
This is pic-safe if you put it in a writeable section.
r~