This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt
- From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- To: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- Cc: echristo at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:03:22 -0700
- Subject: Re: c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt
- References: <10406061927.AA01511@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) writes:
> I disagree. There's nothing at all wrong with describing the function
> itself and what it does and how it works.
>
> Of course not! But it's critical to separate the *specification* and
> *implementation* of a function and when you put them both in the same
> comment, you aren't doing that.
As long as it's obvious to the reader which is which, I fail to see a
problem.
zw