This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- To: rth at redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 04 13:16:42 EDT
- Subject: Re: More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt
I don't follow. Sure there's a nest of references. So what? I don't
see how that affects my argument at all.
The scalar evolution code on the LNO branch can handle a simple linear
equation such as 15+4*i ({15,+,4}) just as easily as a simple direct
index ({0,+,1}). We are not losing any functionality there.
I disagree with both of these, but it's no longer relevant since
we seem to be converging on the solution of adding fields to the
ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF, which seems to satisfy all the needs.