This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523)
Hi,
On: 28 May 2004 11:55:11 -0400,
ja2morri@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (James A. Morrison) wrote:
> > Various build %-buildtimes with gcc-2.95.2 as base:
> > http://rocklinux-consulting.de/stat-bt2.png
> >
> > Various runtimes with gcc-2.95.3 as base:
> > http://rocklinux-consulting.de/stat-rt2.png
> >
>
> I think it would be a good idea to specify that your times are percentages,
> not actual times. Also, I'm unsure if a line graph is a good representation
> as your nodes have no relation to each other.
Ah - yes. Bar graphs are much better. I also increased the gnupg data
set (not only make check but additionally crypt and decrypt the 12MB
binary and 64MB tar.
http://rocklinux-consulting.de/stat-bt3.png
http://rocklinux-consulting.de/stat-rt3.png
Now the gnupg results are not more reasonable and place recent gcc
versions into a better light.
I'll now add more tests and run them on the athlon-xp ...
Sincerely yours,
René Rebe
- ROCK Linux stable release maintainer
--
René Rebe - Europe/Germany/Berlin
rene@rocklinux.org rene@rocklinux-consulting.de
http://www.rocklinux.org http://www.rocklinux-consulting.de