This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07)

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 16:18:14 -0400
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07)
References: <1083960280.3285.46.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On May 7, 2004, at 16:04, Diego Novillo wrote:

	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/crash13.C  (test for errors
	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900205_03.C  (test for errors
	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900205_03.C  (test for errors
	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900205_03.C  (test for errors
	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900205_03.C  (test for errors
	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/friend5.C  (test for errors
	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/friend5.C  (test for errors
	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p646.C  (test for warnings
	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p646.C  (test for warnings
	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p646.C  (test for warnings
	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p646.C  (test for warnings
	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p646.C  (test for warnings

        These are diagnostics that are either not emitted or at
        different lines.  Jason, are they fixable pre-merge?

I analyzed these before and you need CFG at -O0 so I would call this post-merge.


Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

References:
- [tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07)
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]