gcc archive
date index for May, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

May 31, 2004
23:33 Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing Kaz Kojima
22:37 GCC Release Status (2004-05-31) Mark Mitchell
22:18 Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing Eric Botcazou
22:01 Re: Warnings in templates Gabriel Dos Reis
21:39 Re: Compilation at -O3 Still Broken Steven Bosscher
21:30 Re: Compilation at -O3 Still Broken Steven Bosscher
20:56 Re: Warnings in templates Mark Mitchell
20:30 Re: Warnings in templates Jason Merrill
19:44 Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing Gabriel Dos Reis
19:40 Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing Mark Mitchell
19:35 Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing Gabriel Dos Reis
19:30 Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing Matthias Klose
19:24 Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing Mark Mitchell
19:17 Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing Gabriel Dos Reis
18:48 Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing Matthias Klose
18:17 Warnings in templates Mark Mitchell
16:31 Re: g++ assumes libstdc++ in library path? Andreas Jaeger
16:27 g++ assumes libstdc++ in library path? Georg Schwarz
13:59 Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing Richard Guenther
13:57 Re: Feedback on -iquote Daniel Jacobowitz
13:09 Re: binutils at 2.15? Andreas Schwab
12:34 Feedback on -iquote Carlo Wood
12:25 binutils at 2.15? Georg Schwarz
10:37 Re: Compilation at -O3 Still Broken Steven Bosscher
10:22 Re: Compilation at -O3 Still Broken Ranjit Mathew
07:37 Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing Bauke van Dijk
07:09 Re: Compilation at -O3 Still Broken Eric Botcazou
07:02 Compilation at -O3 Still Broken Ranjit Mathew
03:19 Escribeme Paulina Andrea

May 30, 2004
23:32 Re: ICE on mainline with m68k-uclinux (verify_stmts failed) Bernardo Innocenti
21:51 --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs and libgcc_s Andreas Jaeger
19:45 Re: ICE on mainline with m68k-uclinux (verify_stmts failed) Andrew Pinski
19:39 ICE on mainline with m68k-uclinux (verify_stmts failed) Bernardo Innocenti
17:58 gcc-ss-3.5-20040530 is now available gccadmin
14:29 GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing Gabriel Dos Reis

May 29, 2004
23:45 Re: ICE on 2.6.7-rc1 kernel at -O2 (SPARC) Eric Botcazou
23:27 i386 simulator... The Thodes
18:55 Re: [lno] bootstrap failure with -ftree-vectorize Devang Patel
18:31 Re: [lno] bootstrap failure with -ftree-vectorize Dorit Naishlos
15:13 Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire Bernardo Innocenti
10:51 Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523) II Rene Rebe
10:06 PL/I Front-end for GCC v0.0.7 Henrik Sorensen
06:57 Re: cross-compilation documentation Zack Weinberg
06:41 Re: Bug 15718 dispute: showstopper or WONTFIX? Gabriel Dos Reis
06:25 Re: cross-compilation documentation Dan Kegel
06:06 Bug 15718 dispute: showstopper or WONTFIX? Joe Buck
03:52 Re: new ICE in 3.3.4 on alpha Gabriel Dos Reis

May 28, 2004
23:52 new ICE in 3.3.4 on alpha Joe Buck
21:28 Re: Building a Solaris cross compiler Mark Cuss
21:21 Re: Building a Solaris cross compiler Mark Cuss
20:53 Re: [lno] bootstrap failure with -ftree-vectorize Dorit Naishlos
20:42 Re: Building a Solaris cross compiler Eric Botcazou
20:20 Re: Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523) Laurent GUERBY
19:51 Re: Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523) Rene Rebe
19:33 PATCH for Re: GCC-3.3.4 Status Report Gerald Pfeifer
19:13 [lno] bootstrap failure with -ftree-vectorize Devang Patel
18:56 Re: Building a Solaris cross compiler Mark Cuss
18:53 Re: Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523) Laurent GUERBY
17:10 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire Bernardo Innocenti
16:36 GCC Summit Schedule Richard Kenner
16:28 Re: Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523) Rene Rebe
15:55 Re: Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523) James A. Morrison
15:49 Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Joe Buck
15:05 Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523) Rene Rebe
14:07 Re: template static member instantiation Michael Elizabeth Chastain
14:00 Re: template static member instantiation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:46 template static member instantiation Michael Elizabeth Chastain
13:33 GCC-3.3.4 Status Report Gabriel Dos Reis
13:05 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Paul Koning
10:10 ICE on 2.6.7-rc1 kernel at -O2 (SPARC) Eric Botcazou
10:06 RE: Building a Solaris cross compiler Dave Korn
07:20 Re: Miscompilation of glibc by GCC 3.5? Andreas Jaeger
06:42 Re: [PATCH] Change <bits/mathinline.h> for GCC 3.{2,4,5}+ Ulrich Drepper
05:41 Re: [toplevel] Add --enable-bootstrap configure switch Alexandre Oliva
05:28 Ecartis command results: -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis -- Ecartis
03:11 Re: gcc-3.4.0 incorrect error message Giovanni Bajo
01:30 gcc-3.4.0 incorrect error message 2boxers
01:16 sign_extending to values wider than hard registers d9910490
00:47 Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Joe Buck
00:12 Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Gabriel Dos Reis
00:03 Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Richard Henderson

May 27, 2004
23:33 More pre-DRs Joseph S. Myers
23:08 Re: VLIW pack and DFA scheduler:Register sharing question Ayal Zaks
22:23 Building a Solaris cross compiler Mark Cuss
21:11 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Andrew Pinski
21:08 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings llewelly
20:06 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Stan Shebs
19:02 The Linux binutils 2.15.91.0.1 is released H. J. Lu
18:54 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings DJ Delorie
18:51 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings DJ Delorie
18:36 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Andrew Pinski
18:28 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Stan Shebs
18:20 Re: GCC Summit schedule Andrew J. Hutton
18:13 Re: [Make failure with GCC-3.3.X and GCC-3.4.0 on Solaris 8 ] : gmake:*** [all-libiberty] Error 2 DJ Delorie
17:36 RE: Warning wrapping (was RE: Suppressing specific compiler warnings) Ruth Ivimey-Cook
16:40 Re: Mainline broken on alpha and x86-64. SPEC2000's eon does notbuild. Paolo Bonzini
15:54 Re: Miscompilation of glibc by GCC 3.5? Jakub Jelinek
15:52 Re: Mainline broken on alpha and x86-64. SPEC2000's eon does not build. Steven Bosscher
15:46 Miscompilation of glibc by GCC 3.5? Andreas Jaeger
15:40 Re: Mainline broken on alpha and x86-64. SPEC2000's eon does notbuild. Paolo Bonzini
14:44 Re: Mainline broken on alpha and x86-64. SPEC2000's eon does not build. Jan Hubicka
14:42 Re: [Make failure with GCC-3.3.X and GCC-3.4.0 on Solaris 8 ] : gmake: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2 Dom
14:18 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybe a fix) peter
14:18 Re: Mainline broken on alpha and x86-64. SPEC2000's eon does notbuild. Bryce McKinlay
14:16 Mainline broken on alpha and x86-64. SPEC2000's eon does notbuild. Diego Novillo
14:12 Re: Superblock Scheduling Alg in GCC Ghassan Shobaki
13:57 Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire Peter Barada
13:55 Re: [Make failure with GCC-3.3.X and GCC-3.4.0 on Solaris 8 ] : g make: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2 Eric Botcazou
13:45 Re: [Make failure with GCC-3.3.X and GCC-3.4.0 on Solaris 8 ] : gmake: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2 Dom
13:43 Re: Any way to do branch hints? Jan Hubicka
13:24 Re: [Make failure with GCC-3.3.X and GCC-3.4.0 on Solaris 8 ] : g make: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2 Eric Botcazou
13:18 RE: [Make failure with GCC-3.3.X and GCC-3.4.0 on Solaris 8 ] : gmake: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2 Dom
13:09 Re: gcc-3.4.0 bootstrap link error on Solaris 8 Wang h
12:59 gcc-3.4.0 bootstrap link error on Solaris 8 Wang h
12:58 Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire Andreas Schwab
12:36 Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire Peter Barada
12:34 Re: gcc-3.4.0 bootstrap link error on Solaris 8 Eric Botcazou
12:34 Re: [Make failure with GCC-3.3.X and GCC-3.4.0 on Solaris 8 ] : gmake: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2 Eric Botcazou
12:28 Re: [gui] [merge] java-gui-merge for may 26 Michael Koch
12:06 gcc-3.4.0 bootstrap link error on Solaris 8 Wang h
11:33 [Make failure with GCC-3.3.X and GCC-3.4.0 on Solaris 8 ] : gmake:*** [all-libiberty] Error 2 Dom
11:08 New snipped urls for regression queries giovannibajo\ at libero\ dot i
10:07 Re: Exception Handling Broken in the Last 24 Hours Ranjit Mathew
09:50 Re: [gui] [merge] java-gui-merge for may 26 Andreas Schwab
09:47 [PATCH] Change <bits/mathinline.h> for GCC 3.{2,4,5}+ Jakub Jelinek
09:27 Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire Andreas Schwab
08:47 RE: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Joseph S. Myers
08:34 Re: Warning wrapping (was RE: Suppressing specific compiler warnings) Phil Edwards
08:33 Re: Casts, types, pointers, and ADDR_EXPR Joseph S. Myers
08:07 Warning wrapping (was RE: Suppressing specific compiler warnings) Ruth Ivimey-Cook
07:53 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Robert Dewar
07:24 Exception Handling Broken in the Last 24 Hours Ranjit Mathew
06:49 DrDobb's Benchmarks deploy.kde
06:45 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Steven Bosscher
04:53 RE: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Banibrata Dutta
04:37 GCC Summit schedule Richard Kenner
03:54 Generate tree/rtx for address-of exp? MajorZ
03:23 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Alexander E. Kopilovich
03:04 Re: replace_ssa_names abort that started last week Bradley Lucier
02:59 Re: replace_ssa_names abort that started last week Andrew Pinski
02:50 replace_ssa_names abort that started last week Bradley Lucier
01:58 Casts, types, pointers, and ADDR_EXPR Andrew Pinski

May 26, 2004
23:40 e500 breakage caused by altivec patch Aldy Hernandez
23:13 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Falk Hueffner
23:02 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Joe Buck
22:58 Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire Peter Barada
22:49 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Matt Austern
22:23 Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire Andreas Schwab
21:45 Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire Falk Hueffner
21:41 Re: debugging gcc/cc1 sashan
21:39 [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire Peter Barada
21:27 [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire Peter Barada
21:23 Re: debugging gcc/cc1 Johnny Huynh
21:21 Re: debugging gcc/cc1 Janis Johnson
21:15 Re: debugging gcc/cc1 Paolo Carlini
21:10 Re: debugging gcc/cc1 sashan
20:59 Re: debugging gcc/cc1 Mike Stump
20:55 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Stan Shebs
20:42 Re: debugging gcc/cc1 Zack Weinberg
20:39 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Dale Johannesen
20:35 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
20:29 debugging gcc/cc1 Johnny Huynh
20:15 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Zack Weinberg
20:04 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Dale Johannesen
19:50 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Phil Edwards
19:35 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Geert Bosch
19:17 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings llewelly
19:10 Re: Missing patch after tree-ssa merge? Pat Haugen
19:06 Re: Erlang and gcc? Joe Buck
18:51 Erlang and gcc? Christian Joensson
18:17 Q about edge structures jlquinn
17:56 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Mike Stump
17:55 RE: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Eric Christopher
17:20 Re: Missing patch after tree-ssa merge? Diego Novillo
17:16 Re: Missing patch after tree-ssa merge? Pat Haugen
17:10 Re: __enable_executable_stack Richard Henderson
16:48 Re: Missing patch after tree-ssa merge? Zdenek Dvorak
16:20 Re: Missing patch after tree-ssa merge? Diego Novillo
16:06 Missing patch after tree-ssa merge? Pat Haugen
16:05 gcc-3.4.0 Bootstrap failure Arthur I Schwarz
15:00 [PATCH] <bits/string2.h> changes for GCC 3.2+ and 3.4+ Jakub Jelinek
10:37 Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Gabriel Dos Reis
10:21 Re: VLIW pack and DFA scheduler:Register sharing question tm_gccmail
09:50 RE: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Banibrata Dutta
09:41 Re: Installing GCC and other packages on Linux Luca Saiu
09:10 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Joseph S. Myers
08:57 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Steven Bosscher
08:46 RE: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Banibrata Dutta
08:31 Re: are ".da" files platform-independent? Nathan Sidwell
08:27 Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings Ranjit Mathew
08:21 Suppressing specific compiler warnings Banibrata Dutta
07:47 __enable_executable_stack Eric Botcazou
07:13 Re: [RFH] changing linkfile name depending on a flag passed Paolo Bonzini
02:36 [RFH] changing linkfile name depending on a flag passed Andrew Pinski
01:25 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Janis Johnson
01:02 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire Peter Barada
00:24 gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire peter

May 25, 2004
23:23 Re: prerequisites.html Ben Elliston
22:48 Re: What to do with gcc 3.4 regression on Itanium 1? H. J. Lu
22:45 Re: What to do with gcc 3.4 regression on Itanium 1? Vladimir Makarov
22:34 What to do with gcc 3.4 regression on Itanium 1? H. J. Lu
22:29 Re: categorize_decl_for_section bogosity Richard Henderson
21:37 Installing GCC and other packages on Linux Justin Lundeen
19:41 are ".da" files platform-independent? Johnny Huynh
19:36 prolog/epilog sevtov
18:38 Re: categorize_decl_for_section bogosity Zack Weinberg
18:31 Re: Any way to do branch hints? Geert Bosch
18:23 categorize_decl_for_section bogosity Dave Korn
17:54 Re: Any way to do branch hints? Andi Kleen
17:26 Re: Any way to do branch hints? Kean Johnston
17:16 Re: Any way to do branch hints? Andrew Pinski
17:12 Re: Any way to do branch hints? Kean Johnston
17:12 Re: Any way to do branch hints? Joe Buck
17:12 Re: Bootstrap failure on ia64-linux (since the last 4 days) Andrew Pinski
16:56 Re: Any way to do branch hints? Andi Kleen
16:42 Re: Any way to do branch hints? Andrew Pinski
16:38 Any way to do branch hints? Kean Johnston
16:24 Re: gcc mainline [RFH] reload of 8-character vector into memory causes bad pattern David Edelsohn
16:18 Re: gcc mainline [RFH] reload of 8-character vector into memory causes bad pattern Fariborz Jahanian
15:44 TREE_OVERFLOW Zdenek Dvorak
14:44 TYPE_PTRMEMFUNC_P Zdenek Dvorak
14:31 RE: how can RETURN_ADDR_RTX possibly do its work? Dave Korn
14:31 RE: how can RETURN_ADDR_RTX possibly do its work? Dave Korn
14:26 Re: how can RETURN_ADDR_RTX possibly do its work? Joern Rennecke
14:25 Re: Help: LD_LIBRARY_PATH needed for gcc to find libgcc_s.so.1 Andrew Walrond
14:07 Re: mainline wants too much memory? Joern Rennecke
14:07 Re: Help: LD_LIBRARY_PATH needed for gcc to find libgcc_s.so.1 Andrew Walrond
14:05 Re: how can RETURN_ADDR_RTX possibly do its work? David Edelsohn
13:40 Re: how can RETURN_ADDR_RTX possibly do its work? Nathan Sidwell
12:33 how can RETURN_ADDR_RTX possibly do its work? Dave Korn
12:26 Re: I need help. mike
12:01 Re: Write a md about a cpu having a risc unit and a dsp unit Paul Brook
11:47 I need help. Andre Pena
10:48 RE: Write a md about a cpu having a risc unit and a dsp unit Dave Korn
10:35 VLIW pack and DFA scheduler:Register sharing question mike
10:29 Help: LD_LIBRARY_PATH needed for gcc to find libgcc_s.so.1 Andrew Walrond
10:05 mainline wants too much memory? Andrew Haley
10:04 Bootstrap failure on ia64-linux (since the last 4 days) Richard Guenther
09:51 mainline wants too much memory? Eyal Lebedinsky
09:02 Re: RFC: support for multiple CFGs (necessary for the tree-profiling branch) Jan Hubicka
08:30 Re: Ready-to-use GCC toolchains Gerald Pfeifer
07:38 Re: Suspicious C++ stringstream crashes, gcc 3.3.3 Andrew Walrond
06:04 gcc summit lodging... Dan Kegel
06:01 Write a md about a cpu having a risc unit and a dsp unit mike
05:44 Ready-to-use GCC toolchains GNU Support
01:44 Re: gcc mainline [RFH] reload of 8-character vector into memory causes bad pattern David Edelsohn
01:33 Re: RFC: support for multiple CFGs (necessary for the tree-profiling branch) Stuart Hastings
01:28 gcc mainline [RFH] reload of 8-character vector into memory causes bad pattern Fariborz Jahanian
00:53 Re: Question... Robert Dewar
00:32 Re: Question... Robert Dewar
00:30 Re: Suspicious C++ stringstream crashes, gcc 3.3.3 Andrew Walrond
00:23 prerequisites.html Andrew Pinski

May 24, 2004
23:05 Re: Suspicious C++ stringstream crashes, gcc 3.3.3 Phil Edwards
22:39 Re: Suspicious C++ stringstream crashes, gcc 3.3.3 Andrew Walrond
21:54 Re: Suspicious C++ stringstream crashes, gcc 3.3.3 Joe Buck
21:37 Re: About "define_expand" having names which are not standard pattern names. David Edelsohn
21:36 Re: About "define_expand" having names which are not standard pattern names. DJ Delorie
21:32 About "define_expand" having names which are not standard pattern names. mike
20:03 Re: RFC: support for multiple CFGs (necessary for the tree-profiling branch) Steven Bosscher
19:46 Re: RFC: support for multiple CFGs (necessary for the tree-profiling branch) Stuart Hastings
19:40 PATCH for: "exotic" machine modes Gerald Pfeifer
19:38 No requests found University of Colorado at Boul
19:24 Re: cpplib.h is breaking bootstrap on mainline Ziemowit Laski
18:58 Re: Question... Zack Weinberg
18:55 Re: Question... Gerald Pfeifer
18:46 Question... Valeriu Palos
18:12 cpplib.h is breaking bootstrap on mainline Steve Kargl
18:10 Re: error for _muldi3.o Shinpei Kato
17:57 Re: Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.3.4-20040517 snapshot on i686-pc-cygwin Gabriel Dos Reis
17:57 Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Gabriel Dos Reis
17:47 Re: What does "define_bypass" mean? Vladimir N. Makarov
17:21 Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.3.4-20040517 snapshot on i686-pc-cygwin Dave Korn
16:55 Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Joe Buck
16:45 Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Richard Henderson
16:38 Re: RFC: support for multiple CFGs (necessary for the tree-profiling branch) Richard Henderson
15:43 Re: "exotic" machine modes Paolo Bonzini
15:07 [toplevel] Add --enable-bootstrap configure switch Paolo Bonzini
15:06 Re: Suspicious C++ stringstream crashes, gcc 3.3.3 Benjamin Kosnik
14:43 Re: "exotic" machine modes Jan Beulich
14:17 Re: "exotic" machine modes Paolo Bonzini
14:11 Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23) Jan Hubicka
13:59 Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23) Paolo Bonzini
13:46 Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23) Jan Hubicka
13:24 Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23) Richard Kenner
13:18 Suspicious C++ stringstream crashes, gcc 3.3.3 Andrew Walrond
13:15 Re: "exotic" machine modes Andrew Walrond
13:02 Re: Inclusion of g95 in gcc Paul Brook
12:40 Re: "exotic" machine modes Jan Beulich
09:15 Inclusion of g95 in gcc THOMAS Paul Richard
08:43 Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23) Paolo Bonzini
08:23 Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23) Steven Bosscher
08:13 Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23) Ranjit Mathew
07:45 Re: Why function overloading doesn't happen when I use friend functiontemplates in class templates? Nathan Sidwell
06:34 Re: Conversion to bool. Falk Hueffner
05:53 Why function overloading doesn't happen when I use friend functiontemplates in class templates? Yueh-Wei Hu
05:52 Why function overloading doesn't happen when I use friend functiontemplates in class templates? Yueh-Wei Hu
05:35 Re: *-linux test results for 3.3 branch (Debian) Gabriel Dos Reis
04:48 Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Roger Sayle
04:33 Re: *-linux test results for 3.3 branch (Debian) Matthias Klose

May 23, 2004
23:22 Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23) Mark Mitchell
23:00 Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23) Steven Bosscher
22:33 GCC Release Status (2004-05-23) Mark Mitchell
22:31 Conversion to bool. Jan Ringoš
21:01 RFC: support for multiple CFGs (necessary for the tree-profiling branch) Steven Bosscher
19:19 gcc-ss-3.5-20040523 is now available gccadmin
18:02 Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Gabriel Dos Reis
17:53 Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Gabriel Dos Reis
17:00 Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Richard Henderson
15:39 Re: Objective C++ question llewelly
14:38 Re: [PATCH] improve C++ code by changing fold-const.c Richard Kenner
14:34 Re: [PATCH] improve C++ code by changing fold-const.c Richard Kenner
14:29 gcc-3.4.0 + glibc-2.2.5 generate static apps that segfault at startup? Dan Kegel
13:54 Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 Marc Espie
13:51 Re: more test results for Gaby's 3.3.4-prerelease tarball Marc Espie
11:58 What does "define_bypass" mean? mike
11:33 Add myself to MAINTAINERS (write after approval) Mostafa Hagog
11:31 Re: Tree representation in GCC Front End Paul Brook
09:45 Re: -masm=intel examples Robert Dewar
09:22 Tree representation in GCC Front End srinivas koppadi
07:41 Re: *-linux test results for 3.3 branch (Debian) Matthias Klose
07:16 Re: *-linux test results for 3.3 branch (Debian) Matthias Klose
02:02 Re: Objective C++ question llewelly
01:53 Re: Objective C++ question llewelly

May 22, 2004
20:17 Objective C++ question Dolgov, Alex (Contractor)
19:36 Re: error for _muldi3.o Eric Christopher
16:24 Re: more test results for Gaby's 3.3.4-prerelease tarball Alexandre Oliva
15:07 Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 Gerald Pfeifer
13:39 Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Gabriel Dos Reis
12:44 Re: *-linux test results for 3.3 branch (Debian) Gabriel Dos Reis
10:39 Re: question on double to int conversion Andrew Haley
02:20 Re: RFC: C++: __attribute__((visibility)) for classes Mark Mitchell
01:51 Re: New target submission deadlines Mark Mitchell
00:05 Re: Pass specific annotation data for trees Daniel Berlin

May 21, 2004
23:06 Re: Long and short jumps Mike Stump
20:46 *-linux test results for 3.3 branch (Debian) Matthias Klose
20:43 Re: question on double to int conversion Richard Henderson
20:24 Re: libmudflap and RUNTESTFLAGS Frank Ch. Eigler
19:49 Re: Pass specific annotation data for trees Andrew MacLeod
18:24 more test results for Gaby's 3.3.4-prerelease tarball Joe Buck
18:12 Pass specific annotation data for trees Daniel Berlin
18:10 Re: precompiled header support Marc Espie
17:50 Long and short jumps Nathan Sidwell
17:46 Re: libmudflap and RUNTESTFLAGS Janis Johnson
17:31 Re: tree-ssa/lno compute_may_aliases failure Daniel Berlin
17:04 RE: HELP: GCC Passes and Files Dave Korn
16:26 HELP: GCC Passes and Files perugupa
16:15 Re: [tree-profiling-branch] Fix mudflap Steven Bosscher
16:07 Re: question on double to int conversion Geert Bosch
16:05 Re: [tree-profiling-branch] Fix mudflap Frank Eigler
13:44 Re: gcc-ss-3.3-20040519 is now available Gerald Pfeifer
13:43 RE: Porting gcc Dave Korn
13:22 Re: New CSiBE benchmark released Giovanni Bajo
13:18 Re: New CSiBE benchmark released Arpad Beszedes
13:09 Porting gcc Mile Davidovic
11:11 libmudflap and RUNTESTFLAGS Christian Joensson
10:46 Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball? Paolo Carlini
10:35 Re: FYI: LWN.net on Tree-SSA Nathan Sidwell
10:32 Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball? Gerald Pfeifer
08:39 Re: Mainline failed to boostrap on Linux/ia64 Andreas Schwab
08:07 Re: question on double to int conversion Jaeyoun Chung
04:54 Re: powerpc-eabispe bugs Aldy Hernandez
04:36 Re: question on double to int conversion James A. Morrison
04:30 Re: Installation Problems.. llewelly
04:29 Re: calling function in .init and .fini gives problem Zack Weinberg
04:12 Re: calling function in .init and .fini gives problem mohanlal jangir
04:02 Mainline failed to boostrap on Linux/ia64 H. J. Lu
03:50 question on double to int conversion Jaeyoun Chung
00:49 successful gcc-3.3.4-prerelease builds: i686-pc-linux-gnu; hppa-hpux Joe Buck

May 20, 2004
22:51 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Joe Buck
22:40 Re: Input charsets - What's going on? Tom Tromey
21:01 Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball? Paolo Carlini
20:50 Re: error for _muldi3.o Shinpei Kato
20:37 Re: tree-ssa/lno compute_may_aliases failure Dorit Naishlos
20:28 What about providing changes.html in the tarball? Paolo Carlini
20:28 Re: tree-ssa/lno compute_may_aliases failure Diego Novillo
20:26 Installation Problems.. ARUN Sundararaman
18:38 Re: tree-ssa/lno compute_may_aliases failure Dorit Naishlos
17:58 Re: gcc-ss-3.3-20040519 is now available Kelley Cook
17:43 Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball? Joseph S. Myers
17:29 Re: Janis Johnson appointed GCC compat testsuite maintainer Janis Johnson
16:40 Re: calling function in .init and .fini gives problem Janis Johnson
16:30 Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 Joe Buck
16:27 Re: powerpc testsuite regressions (was Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled) Andrew Pinski
16:13 Re: powerpc testsuite regressions Zack Weinberg
16:06 Re: powerpc testsuite regressions (was Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled) Devang Patel
16:01 Re: powerpc testsuite regressions (was Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled) Andrew Pinski
15:59 Re: FYI: LWN.net on Tree-SSA Joe Buck
15:58 Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball? Paolo Carlini
15:51 Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball? Paolo Carlini
15:45 Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball? Paolo Carlini
15:38 Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball? Joseph S. Myers
15:24 Re: calling function in .init and .fini gives problem Diego Novillo
15:22 Re: Control register spilling: Is it possible ? Ian Lance Taylor
15:16 Re: gcc-ss-3.3-20040519 is now available Joseph S. Myers
14:41 What about providing changes.html in the tarball? Paolo Carlini
14:37 calling function in .init and .fini gives problem mohanlal jangir
13:53 Re: Calculating elements addresses from arrays once Gruik
13:53 Re: gcc-ss-3.3-20040519 is now available Kelley Cook
13:49 Control register spilling: Is it possible ? Petar Penchev
13:39 Re: powerpc testsuite regressions (was Re: Bootstrap miscomparisonon mainline with checking disabled) Diego Novillo
13:15 powerpc testsuite regressions (was Re: Bootstrap miscomparison onmainline with checking disabled) Diego Novillo
13:15 New target submission deadlines Nitin Gupta
13:00 Re: tree-ssa/lno compute_may_aliases failure Diego Novillo
12:57 Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas Gabriel Dos Reis
11:18 Re: Calculating elements addresses from arrays once Ranjit Mathew
10:43 RE: Calculating elements addresses from arrays once Gruik
10:06 RE: Calculating elements addresses from arrays once Dave Korn
09:38 Calculating elements addresses from arrays once Gruik
09:14 FYI: LWN.net on Tree-SSA Ranjit Mathew
07:19 Can't build gcc for sparc64-linux: cgraph.c:150: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size Christian Joensson
06:32 Re: About standard pattern names in the gcc source files Zack Weinberg
06:20 About standard pattern names in the gcc source files mike
05:38 Re: error for _muldi3.o Ranjit Mathew
05:15 Re: error for _muldi3.o Ian Lance Taylor
04:25 Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas llewelly
04:17 Re: error for _muldi3.o Shinpei Kato
02:11 Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 Gabriel Dos Reis
00:19 Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 Gerald Pfeifer

May 19, 2004
23:45 Support for 32-bit stack processors? The Thodes
23:34 Re: ARM PIC/PID code generation Jim Wilson
23:19 Re: tree to rtl conversion optimizations Jim Wilson
23:11 gcc-ss-3.3-20040519 is now available gccadmin
23:09 Re: gcc 3.4 nukes __guard Jim Wilson
23:02 Re: types of new builtins Jim Wilson
22:27 Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas Mark Mitchell
21:27 Re: tree-ssa/lno compute_may_aliases failure Dorit Naishlos
21:13 Re: Input charsets - What's going on? Zack Weinberg
21:11 Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas Zack Weinberg
20:47 Re: Input charsets - What's going on? Joseph S. Myers
20:43 Re: RFC: C++: __attribute__((visibility)) for classes Matt Austern
20:30 Re: RFC: C++: __attribute__((visibility)) for classes Gabriel Dos Reis
20:27 Re: C++: __attribute__((visibility)) for classes Giovanni Bajo
20:25 Re: RFC: C++: __attribute__((visibility)) for classes Matt Austern
20:25 Re: Input charsets - What's going on? Zack Weinberg
20:23 Re: RFC: C++: __attribute__((visibility)) for classes Andrew Pinski
20:18 RFC: C++: __attribute__((visibility)) for classes Matt Austern
19:58 Re: New CSiBE benchmark released Diego Novillo
19:31 Re: Variables whose types are anonymous structs, once again Matt Austern
19:09 Re: Variables whose types are anonymous structs, once again law
18:57 Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas Gabriel Dos Reis
17:30 Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas Joseph S. Myers
17:21 Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas Ian Lance Taylor
17:20 Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas Andrew Pinski
17:18 Re: Why is a const array pointer with -fPIC mapped in ".data"? Richard Earnshaw
17:14 Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas Ian Lance Taylor
17:04 Re: error for _muldi3.o Ian Lance Taylor
16:52 Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled law
16:47 Re: RFC: Dropping the non-GCC bootstrap requirement (Was: Beginner GCC projects question) Joe Buck
16:46 Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas Joe Buck
16:44 Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled Andrew Pinski
16:40 Re: transparent way of inserting insns Joe Buck
16:35 Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled law
16:33 Input charsets - What's going on? Paolo Bonzini
16:25 Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled Diego Novillo
16:15 Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas Ian Lance Taylor
16:08 Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled law
15:30 Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled law
15:15 transparent way of inserting insns Johnny Huynh
15:08 Re: Mail Authentication zonida
15:07 Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled Andrew Pinski
14:57 New CSiBE benchmark released Arpad Beszedes
14:54 Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled Diego Novillo
14:48 Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled law
14:30 State of Pentium4 optimization in v3.4.0? Steve Snyder
14:03 Control register spilling: Is it possible ? Petar Penchev
13:48 Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled Diego Novillo
10:48 Re: How to mirror? Jan-Benedict Glaw
10:20 How to mirror? Astharot
09:33 error for _muldi3.o Shinpei Kato
08:05 Re: Bootstrap broken with checking disabled on at least i686 Ranjit Mathew
08:03 Re: Bootstrap broken with checking disabled on at least i686 Dan Nicolaescu
07:45 Bootstrap broken with checking disabled on at least i686 Steven Bosscher
06:57 Bootstrap failure after IMA fixes Steven Bosscher
06:51 Re: permit unary plus to be used with vector types Jan Beulich
06:36 Re: porting new arch Shinpei Kato
04:14 Re: Why is a const array pointer with -fPIC mapped in ".data"? Kazuomi Kato
02:55 RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas Zack Weinberg
02:33 Re: porting new arch Shinpei Kato
02:28 Re: RFC: Dropping the non-GCC bootstrap requirement (Was: BeginnerGCC projects question) Kean Johnston
01:31 Re: PATCH: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 Gabriel Dos Reis
01:18 Re: PATCH: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 Mark Mitchell
01:13 PATCH: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 H. J. Lu

May 18, 2004
23:46 Re: Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
23:28 Re: RFC: Dropping the non-GCC bootstrap requirement (Was: BeginnerGCC projects question) Bernardo Innocenti
22:31 Re: Why is a const array pointer with -fPIC mapped in ".data"? Alexandre Oliva
22:01 Re: RFC: Dropping the non-GCC bootstrap requirement (Was: Beginner GCC projects question) Joe Buck
21:35 Re: Failed compile of 3.4 on Solaris 8 Eric Botcazou
21:11 Re: Failed compile of 3.4 on Solaris 8 DJ Delorie
21:06 Failed compile of 3.4 on Solaris 8 Garey Mills
21:02 Re: Fix for PR 15235 libgfortran doesn't build on Solaris Joseph S. Myers
21:00 Re: RFC: Dropping the non-GCC bootstrap requirement Zack Weinberg
20:50 Re: RFC: Dropping the non-GCC bootstrap requirement (Was: Beginner GCC projects question) Andrew Pinski
20:46 Re: RFC: Dropping the non-GCC bootstrap requirement Zack Weinberg
20:44 RFC: Dropping the non-GCC bootstrap requirement (Was: Beginner GCCprojects question) Bernardo Innocenti
20:13 RE: MIPS gcc/crtstuff.c force_to_data[] not working for me Graeme Peterson
20:11 Re: change the sampling time in the gprof Ian Lance Taylor
19:59 Re: change the sampling time in the gprof perugupa
19:03 Re: Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0 Mike Stump
18:57 Re: change the sampling time in the gprof Ian Lance Taylor
18:46 Re: change the sampling time in the gprof Zack Weinberg
18:41 Re: Beginner GCC projects question Zack Weinberg
18:39 Re: Fix for PR 15235 libgfortran doesn't build on Solaris Andrew Pinski
18:37 Re: Beginner GCC projects question Zack Weinberg
18:35 Re: change the sampling time in the gprof Ian Lance Taylor
18:32 Re: Beginner GCC projects question Ian Lance Taylor
18:18 Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL) Diego Novillo
18:09 change the sampling time in the gprof perugupa
18:05 Re: Beginner GCC projects question Mark G. Adams
17:54 Re: Beginner GCC projects question Mark G. Adams
16:58 RE: order of passes (was: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL)) Luchezar Belev
16:50 MIPS gcc/crtstuff.c force_to_data[] not working for me Graeme Peterson
16:24 RE: permit unary plus to be used with vector types Dave Korn
16:23 Re: permit unary plus to be used with vector types Zack Weinberg
16:06 Re: permit unary plus to be used with vector types Jan Beulich
16:04 Re: Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0 Joe Buck
16:03 Re: Testsuite duplication Zack Weinberg
15:42 Re: GCC-3.3.4 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
15:08 RE: Why is x86_sahf_1 pattern disabled in x86_64? Lu, Hongjiu
14:38 RE: order of passes (was: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL)) Dave Korn
14:35 ARM PIC/PID code generation Oren Sokoler
14:28 Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 H. J. Lu
14:10 Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL) Luchezar Belev
14:06 order of passes (was: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL)) Luchezar Belev
13:40 Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 Gabriel Dos Reis
13:23 Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 Gabriel Dos Reis
13:19 Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 Gabriel Dos Reis
13:11 Re: Can GMP be replaced by trees? Tobias Schlüter
13:07 Re: porting new arch Shinpei Kato
12:38 Re: porting new arch Steven Bosscher
12:30 Re: Can GMP be replaced by trees? Paul Brook
12:26 Testsuite duplication Dave Korn
12:23 Re: porting new arch Shinpei Kato
12:15 Re: Can GMP be replaced by trees? Joseph S. Myers
12:08 Re: porting new arch Steven Bosscher
12:04 Re: Can GMP be replaced by trees? Steven Bosscher
11:46 porting new arch Shinpei Kato
11:33 Re: Why is x86_sahf_1 pattern disabled in x86_64? Uros Bizjak
11:32 Can GMP be replaced by trees? Tobias Schlüter
10:36 powerpc-eabispe bugs arcjai
08:36 Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 Mark Mitchell
08:31 Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 Gerald Pfeifer
08:28 Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 Gerald Pfeifer
07:44 Re: Beginner GCC projects question Zack Weinberg
07:28 Re: Beginner GCC projects question Paolo Bonzini
05:53 Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 Mark Mitchell
05:11 Re: dejagnu version requiered, 1.4.4? Eric Christopher
04:17 Re: First GCC-3.3.4 prerelease available Gabriel Dos Reis
04:15 Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 Gabriel Dos Reis
04:04 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4 H. J. Lu
03:54 Re: dejagnu version requiered, 1.4.4? Gabriel Dos Reis
01:56 Re: Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0 Mike Stump
01:24 Re: GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report Jie Zhang
01:17 dejagnu version requiered, 1.4.4? Mike Stump
00:47 Re: Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
00:14 Re: Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0 Joe Buck
00:09 Re: Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf

May 17, 2004
23:55 Re: Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0 Mike Stump
23:34 Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
21:49 Re: Why is x86_sahf_1 pattern disabled in x86_64? H. J. Lu
21:39 Re: compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header Mike Stump
21:34 Re: casting return values Jim Wilson
21:13 Re: GCC runs SPEC2000 189.lucas for the first time Andrew Pinski
21:12 Re: compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header Ian Lance Taylor
21:05 Re: compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header Geoff Keating
20:10 Re: First GCC-3.3.4 prerelease available Ulrich Weigand
19:33 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Andrew MacLeod
19:29 Re: Beginner GCC projects question Zack Weinberg
19:10 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 law
19:08 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 law
19:06 Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison law
18:47 A framework for static analysis of RTL: RTL-Check Patrice Lacroix
18:44 Re: Beginner GCC projects question Paolo Bonzini
18:33 Re: compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header Mike Stump
18:31 Re: GCC runs SPEC2000 189.lucas for the first time Joe Buck
18:23 Re: tree to rtl conversion optimizations Johnny Huynh
18:00 GCC runs SPEC2000 189.lucas for the first time Diego Novillo
17:58 tree to rtl conversion optimizations Johnny Huynh
17:21 Re: Beginner GCC projects question Zack Weinberg
16:29 Re: Beginner GCC projects question Tom Tromey
16:05 Re: Tree-profiling branch status Andrew MacLeod
15:51 Re: Tree-profiling branch status Stuart Hastings
15:49 Re: Tree-profiling branch status Stuart Hastings
15:44 Re: Tree-profiling branch status Richard Guenther
15:39 Re: Tree-profiling branch status Jan Hubicka
15:32 RE: why m68k-linux target is not building? Dave Korn
15:24 Re: Tree-profiling branch status Richard Guenther
15:20 Tree-profiling branch status Jan Hubicka
15:06 Re: why m68k-linux target is not building? Andreas Schwab
15:03 Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL) Frank Ch. Eigler
15:00 re: Linking ELF on Mac OS X with GCC Dan Kegel
14:53 Re: why m68k-linux target is not building? arcjai
14:50 re: why m68k-linux target is not building? Dan Kegel
14:45 Re: why m68k-linux target is not building? Andreas Schwab
14:31 Re: why m68k-linux target is not building? arcjai
14:26 Build report for AIX 5.1 Mario Linke
14:25 Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL) Diego Novillo
14:23 Re: why m68k-linux target is not building? Peter Barada
14:21 Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL) Diego Novillo
14:15 Re: Re: Re: GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report zhanrk
14:15 Re: Still tree-ssa warnings in the rs6000 backend? Diego Novillo
13:53 Still tree-ssa warnings in the rs6000 backend? Steven Bosscher
13:53 why m68k-linux target is not building? arcjai
13:18 RE: Beginner GCC projects question Michael Veksler
11:29 RE: Beginner GCC projects question Dave Korn
11:10 RE: Overriding cc1 Dave Korn
11:04 Re: Why is a const array pointer with -fPIC mapped in ".data"? Richard Earnshaw
10:41 Why is a const array pointer with -fPIC mapped in ".data"? Kazuomi Kato
10:38 Re: Re: GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report zhanrk
10:00 Re: Beginner GCC projects question Michael Veksler
09:24 Re: Beginner GCC projects question Paolo Bonzini
09:21 Re: compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header Jan Beulich
09:09 gcc 3.4 nukes __guard Travis Tilley
09:07 Re: GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report Andreas Schwab
09:00 Re: Beginner GCC projects question Gerald Pfeifer
08:41 types of new builtins Jan Beulich
06:31 Re: -masm=intel examples Ranjit Mathew
05:32 Re: canadian cross trouble with libiberty location Dan Kegel
05:19 Re: GCC-3.3.4 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
05:06 Re: Why is gcc-3.3.3 in a strange directory on ftp.gnu.org? Gabriel Dos Reis
04:45 First GCC-3.3.4 prerelease available Gabriel Dos Reis
04:40 Re: GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report Jim Wilson
04:03 Re: casting return values Dan Nicolaescu
03:59 Re: debug option mising? Jim Wilson
03:49 Re: Default values of "struct item *items[MAX_ITEMS]" array? Daniel Jacobowitz
03:45 Re: [Patch] Re-enable Tree Browser for All Front Ends (WAS: Re: Tree-SSA Newbie Questions) Jim Wilson
03:06 Re: Reload Problem Jim Wilson
02:53 Re: casting return values Jim Wilson
02:39 Re: GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report Jim Wilson
02:31 Re: Why is gcc-3.3.3 in a strange directory on ftp.gnu.org? Jim Wilson
02:24 Beginner GCC projects question Mark G. Adams
02:20 Re: canadian cross trouble with libiberty location Jim Wilson
01:39 Re: Linking ELF on Mac OS X with GCC Mike Stump
01:35 Re: Re: GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report zhanrk
01:31 Re: GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report Jie Zhang
01:28 Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL) Jim Wilson
01:14 Re: GCC-3.3.4 status report Giovanni Bajo
00:46 Linking ELF on Mac OS X with GCC Jonathan Johnson

May 16, 2004
23:08 GCC-3.3.4 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
19:30 Re: [lno] missing optimization Zdenek Dvorak
18:02 gcc-ss-3.5-20040516 is now available gccadmin
17:30 [lno] missing optimization Dale Johannesen
12:40 Re: [RFC] Reload Problem tm_gccmail
09:56 Re:IPA Constant Propagation Optimization Razya Ladelsky
05:07 Re: Overriding cc1 Alexandre Oliva
02:44 Re: -masm=intel examples Robert Dewar

May 15, 2004
19:51 Re: -masm=intel examples Andi Kleen
18:20 RE: building 3.4.0 for powerpc-elf target Dave Murphy
15:29 Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL) Luchezar Belev
14:45 debug option mising? Prashanth T
14:21 Re: -masm=intel examples Robert Dewar
14:16 Re: -masm=intel examples llewelly
13:51 Re: canadian cross trouble with libiberty location DJ Delorie
13:28 Re: [RFC] Reload Problem Robert Dewar
13:25 Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL) Robert Dewar
13:22 [RFC] Reload Problem C Jaiprakash, Noida
13:20 Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL) Luchezar Belev
13:11 Re: -masm=intel examples Robert Dewar
13:09 Re: canadian cross trouble with libiberty location Andreas Schwab
12:35 Re: canadian cross trouble with libiberty location Gerald Pfeifer
12:16 Re: -masm=intel examples Marek Peteraj
11:54 importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL) Andrew Haley
11:28 Re: -masm=intel examples Florian Weimer
10:00 Re: -masm=intel examples Marek Peteraj
09:46 Re: -masm=intel examples Robert Dewar
09:33 RE: Namespace Issue Stephan T. Lavavej
09:09 -masm=intel examples Marek Peteraj
08:59 Re: Namespace Issue Giovanni Bajo
06:00 Re: canadian cross trouble with libiberty location Dan Kegel
03:17 importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL) Luchezar Belev
02:17 Re: canadian cross trouble with libiberty location DJ Delorie
02:10 Namespace Issue Stephan T. Lavavej
00:24 canadian cross trouble with libiberty location Daniel Kegel
00:14 Re: error: ISO C++ forbids initialization in array new Joe Buck
00:02 Re: error: ISO C++ forbids initialization in array new Giovanni Bajo

May 14, 2004
23:49 error: ISO C++ forbids initialization in array new Maurizio Monge
23:09 gcc-ss-3.4-20040514 is now available gccadmin
22:49 Re: misoptimization causing der_io.f90 failures Tobias Schlüter
22:42 Re: misoptimization causing der_io.f90 failures Joe Buck
22:37 misoptimization causing der_io.f90 failures Tobias Schlüter
19:30 Re: compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header Geoff Keating
19:19 Re: Multiplatform binary generation Mike Stump
17:00 RFA: make reg_equiv_memory_loc visible to garbage collector (Was: Re: reg_equiv_memory_loc vs. garbage collection) Joern Rennecke
16:56 re: Multiplatform binary generation Dan Kegel
16:17 Re: compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header Ian Lance Taylor
16:12 Re: compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header Paul Brook
16:03 compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header Jan Beulich
15:55 Re: Default values of "struct item *items[MAX_ITEMS]" array? Joe Buck
13:40 Re: Fw: IPA Constant Propagation Optimization Steven Bosscher
13:31 RE: Multiplatform binary generation Dave Korn
13:25 Re: Tree-SSA Newbie Questions Diego Novillo
13:20 Multiplatform binary generation deploy.kde
12:31 Why is gcc-3.3.3 in a strange directory on ftp.gnu.org? Dan Kegel
12:01 Re: reg_equiv_memory_loc vs. garbage collection Joern Rennecke
11:49 Re: template aliasing llewelly
11:17 template aliasing Marco Correia
10:30 RE: Overriding cc1 Dave Korn
10:24 GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report zhanrk-gcc
09:05 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Gunther Nikl
08:55 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Gunther Nikl
08:54 RE: Default values of "struct item *items[MAX_ITEMS]" array? Andriy Korud
06:40 Re: gcc 3.4.0 running error for 173.applu on Itanium 2 Qiong Cai
06:38 Re: reg_equiv_memory_loc vs. garbage collection Jim Wilson
06:21 Re: gcc 3.4.0 running error for 173.applu on Itanium 2 Jim Wilson
05:49 Re: building 3.4.0 for powerpc-elf target Jim Wilson
05:49 Re: Overriding cc1 Alexandre Oliva
04:50 Re: Arm-elf-gcc Ranjit Mathew
04:49 Reload Problem Konark
02:44 casting return values Dan Nicolaescu
02:43 Re: Configure problem Jim Wilson
01:28 Re: Question about the order global declarations are output Jim Wilson
01:24 Re: Web archive at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-05/ stuck? Jim Wilson
01:21 Re: HELP: GCC Passes and Files Jim Wilson
01:16 Re: Arm-elf-gcc Jim Wilson
01:11 Re: template matching variable size array Jim Wilson
01:03 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Segher Boessenkool
01:03 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Segher Boessenkool
00:52 Re: Overriding cc1 Ben Elliston
00:48 Re: Contributing to GCC / copyright assignment request Jim Wilson
00:46 Re: FDO regression in Skidmarks component ParserVid Jim Wilson

May 13, 2004
22:28 Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch? Diego Novillo
22:14 Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch? Mike Stump
21:12 Patch config.gcc to accept --with-cpu=85xx for PowerPC Michael Eager
20:05 Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch? Daniel Jacobowitz
20:04 Re: [RFC] Attributes on types Joseph S. Myers
19:35 Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch? Zdenek Dvorak
19:24 Re: Disabling libbanshee and libmudflap Daniel Jacobowitz
19:22 Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch? Geoff Keating
19:21 Disabling libbanshee and libmudflap Kelley Cook
19:18 [RFC] Attributes on types Svein E. Seldal
19:10 Re: Tree-SSA Newbie Questions Ranjit Mathew
19:01 Re: Tree-SSA Newbie Questions Diego Novillo
19:00 Re: Tree-SSA Newbie Questions Diego Novillo
18:34 Re: Overriding cc1 Pat Haugen
18:24 Re: Default values of "struct item *items[MAX_ITEMS]" array? Richard Guenther
18:24 Re: -ftree-* options Scott Robert Ladd
18:04 Default values of "struct item *items[MAX_ITEMS]" array? Andriy Korud
18:02 Re: Overriding cc1 Pat Haugen
18:01 Re: Overriding cc1 Paul Brook
18:00 Re: -ftree-* options Serge Belyshev
17:50 Re: Overriding cc1 Ian Lance Taylor
17:49 -ftree-* options Scott Robert Ladd
17:45 Re: Overriding cc1 John R. Shannon
17:40 Overriding cc1 Pat Haugen
17:11 Re: fortran vs gfortran bugs in Bugzilla Paul Brook
16:59 Re: fortran vs gfortran bugs in Bugzilla Joe Buck
16:26 Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch? law
15:57 Re: tree-ssa-20020619-branch merged into mainline Devang Patel
15:53 RE: IPA Constant Propagation Optimization Chris Lattner
15:52 Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch? Devang Patel
15:28 Fw: IPA Constant Propagation Optimization Razya Ladelsky
14:44 Re: Question about RTL Peter Barada
14:39 [Patch] Re-enable Tree Browser for All Front Ends (WAS: Re: Tree-SSANewbie Questions) Ranjit Mathew
14:26 Re: Question about RTL Paul Brook
14:19 Re: tree-ssa-20020619-branch merged into mainline Diego Novillo
14:14 boehm-gc gctest failure (does not exit) in tree-ssa but not mainline (pre-merge) Christian Joensson
14:11 Question about RTL Petar Penchev
13:47 Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch? Mike Stump
13:45 Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch? Mike Stump
13:42 Re: tree-ssa-20020619-branch merged into mainline Anthony Green
13:42 Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch? Daniel Jacobowitz
13:20 Re: Tree-SSA Newbie Questions Sebastian Pop
13:06 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Gunther Nikl
13:00 Re: Tree-SSA Newbie Questions Andrew Pinski
12:53 Tree-SSA Newbie Questions Ranjit Mathew
12:48 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Gunther Nikl
12:24 Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch? Richard Guenther
12:10 Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch? Zdenek Dvorak
11:53 RE: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Dave Korn
11:53 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Andreas Schwab
11:53 RE: ICE for overlap of asm-register-declared variable and asm clobber list [H8/S target] Dave Korn
11:41 fortran vs gfortran bugs in Bugzilla Giovanni Bajo
11:34 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Gunther Nikl
11:25 RE: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Dave Korn
11:03 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Andrew Pinski
10:33 Re: Setting milestones on PRs for bugs already fixed Giovanni Bajo
09:34 Re: Setting milestones on PRs for bugs already fixed Richard Earnshaw
08:45 Re: tree-ssa-20020619-branch merged into mainline Joseph S. Myers
08:34 [lno] what's going to happen with the branch? Richard Guenther
07:56 Re: Suggestion re tree-ssa merge Andreas Jaeger
07:50 Re: Suggestion re tree-ssa merge Alexandre Oliva
07:18 tree-ssa-20020619-branch merged into mainline Diego Novillo
05:13 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Ian Lance Taylor
04:52 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Gabriel Paubert
04:37 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-05-12 Andreas Tobler
02:15 Re: Compiling differences? Muthukumar Ratty
01:43 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Peter Barada

May 12, 2004
22:52 Draft pre-DR: offsetof Joseph S. Myers
22:25 Compiling differences? Matias Bordese
22:08 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Zack Weinberg
21:36 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Andreas Schwab
21:03 Re: RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality Aldy Hernandez
20:59 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Zack Weinberg
20:42 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Richard Henderson
20:29 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Andreas Schwab
20:13 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Zack Weinberg
20:11 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Andreas Schwab
19:33 Re: RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality Geert Bosch
19:28 Re: Setting milestones on PRs for bugs already fixed Wolfgang Bangerth
19:15 Re: Setting milestones on PRs for bugs already fixed Joe Buck
18:36 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Ian Lance Taylor
18:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-05-12 Diego Novillo
18:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-05-12 Zack Weinberg
18:21 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Richard Henderson
18:18 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-05-12 Diego Novillo
18:15 Re: RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality Richard Henderson
18:12 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-05-12 Jonathan Lennox
18:12 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 law
18:04 [tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-05-12 Diego Novillo
17:57 Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook Richard Henderson
16:45 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Ian Lance Taylor
16:37 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Ian Lance Taylor
16:35 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Gunther Nikl
16:25 RE: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Dave Korn
16:13 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Ian Lance Taylor
16:13 Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Andreas Schwab
16:08 Re: RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality Aldy Hernandez
16:05 Re: RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality Paolo Bonzini
16:04 RE: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Dave Korn
15:55 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Fariborz Jahanian
15:54 Re: RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality Aldy Hernandez
15:49 Re: RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality Daniel Jacobowitz
15:45 Re: RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality Michael Matz
15:41 [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5 Gunther Nikl
15:18 RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality Aldy Hernandez
13:55 Re: download GCC 3.4.0 for IBM Aix 5.2 Ian Lance Taylor
13:46 Re: *-*-netware target Daniel Jacobowitz
13:26 RE: Suggestion re tree-ssa merge Diego Novillo
13:21 RE: Suggestion re tree-ssa merge Dave Korn
13:18 RE: question about AltiVec builtins Dave Korn
13:16 Re: precompiled header support Ian Lance Taylor
13:15 Re: Suggestion re tree-ssa merge Diego Novillo
13:09 RE: question about AltiVec builtins ITN \(L S Rao\)
13:06 RE: question about AltiVec builtins Dave Korn
12:57 RE: question about AltiVec builtins ITN \(L S Rao\)
12:49 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Paolo Bonzini
12:38 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Aldy Hernandez
12:23 gcc 3.4.0 running error for 173.applu on Itanium 2 Qiong Cai
12:21 Re: precompiled header support DJ Delorie
12:11 Re: *-*-netware target Michael Matz
12:10 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Paolo Bonzini
12:07 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Aldy Hernandez
11:50 Re: precompiled header support Gunther Nikl
11:39 Re: *-*-netware target Jan Beulich
10:45 Re: Setting milestones on PRs for bugs already fixed Richard Earnshaw
10:42 RE: precompiled header support Dave Korn
10:34 RE: precompiled header support Dave Korn
10:29 Suggestion re tree-ssa merge Richard Kenner
10:27 Re: Setting milestones on PRs for bugs already fixed Giovanni Bajo
10:23 RE: precompiled header support Dave Korn
10:11 Re: precompiled header support Andreas Schwab
09:49 Setting milestones on PRs for bugs already fixed Richard Earnshaw
09:24 Noticias: Especial Oferta WLAN Ana Puente Diaz
09:15 Noticias: Especial Oferta WLAN Ana Puente Diaz
08:11 Re: *-*-netware target Steven Bosscher
07:52 Re: precompiled header support Gunther Nikl
07:51 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Paolo Bonzini
07:39 *-*-netware target Jan Beulich
07:21 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Paolo Bonzini
06:30 Re: precompiled header support Jed Davis
06:16 Re: -isystem and C++ headers Zack Weinberg
06:11 Re: -isystem and C++ headers Daniel Jacobowitz
05:28 Re: -isystem and C++ headers Zack Weinberg
05:15 Re: GCC 3.4 on Mac OS X: compilable, but with problems Andreas Tobler
05:08 Re: -isystem and C++ headers Phil Edwards
04:57 download GCC 3.4.0 for IBM Aix 5.2 ITN \(L S Rao\)
03:51 Re: ANN: Merge of tree-ssa into mainline Ben Elliston
03:51 Re: ANN: Merge of tree-ssa into mainline Christopher Faylor
03:44 Re: ANN: Merge of tree-ssa into mainline Gabriel Dos Reis
03:28 Re: ANN: Merge of tree-ssa into mainline Christopher Faylor
03:28 Re: g++ 3.4.0 : C++ templates' error messages llewelly
01:20 g++ 3.4.0 : C++ templates' error messages Shelly Adhikari
00:30 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Janis Johnson
00:07 3.3-e500-branch now closed Aldy Hernandez

May 11, 2004
23:57 Re: -isystem and C++ headers Daniel Jacobowitz
23:51 Re: -isystem and C++ headers Matt Austern
23:50 Re: -isystem and C++ headers Andrew Pinski
23:48 Re: -isystem and C++ headers Geoff Keating
23:46 Re: -isystem and C++ headers Zack Weinberg
23:34 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Andrew Pinski
23:32 Re: g++ on DEC Alpha V5.1 Ben Elliston
23:29 Re: -isystem and C++ headers Daniel Jacobowitz
23:24 -isystem and C++ headers Daniel Jacobowitz
23:21 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Fariborz Jahanian
23:04 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Aldy Hernandez
22:34 Re: Doloop transform resulting in extra code Zdenek Dvorak
21:25 Re: precompiled header support Geoff Keating
21:24 GCC 3.4 on Mac OS X: compilable, but with problems Bojan Antonovic
21:15 RE: precompiled header support tm_gccmail
21:09 Re: precompiled header support tm_gccmail
20:58 Re: precompiled header support DJ Delorie
20:45 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Fariborz Jahanian
20:23 Re: precompiled header support Ian Lance Taylor
20:23 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Aldy Hernandez
20:13 Re: Doloop transform resulting in extra code Andrew Pinski
20:05 Doloop transform resulting in extra code Pat Haugen
19:55 Re: Using EH from C revisited Stelios Xanthakis
19:36 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Ziemowit Laski
17:59 Re: Resend: GAS embedded-PIC reloc removal vs. mips-linux exception handling Alexandre Oliva
17:37 Re: precompiled header support DJ Delorie
17:24 Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook Kean Johnston
17:08 RE: precompiled header support Dave Korn
16:57 Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook Richard Henderson
16:37 Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook Richard Henderson
16:08 Re: avr-gcc, .debug_frame and bitfields Denis Chertykov
15:58 Re: precompiled header support DJ Delorie
15:18 Re: Using EH from C revisited Stelios Xanthakis
15:13 RE: precompiled header support Dave Korn
14:59 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Andi Kleen
14:54 [RTL] Generation? Andrew Haley
14:53 Re: [RTL] Generation? Ian Lance Taylor
14:27 Re: precompiled header support Ian Lance Taylor
14:25 Re: to exec a shared object Ian Lance Taylor
14:21 Re: Using EH from C revisited Giovanni Bajo
14:21 g++ on DEC Alpha V5.1 Kalmar Tibor
14:20 ANN: Merge of tree-ssa into mainline Diego Novillo
14:20 Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook Paolo Bonzini
14:19 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Robert Dewar
14:19 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Aldy Hernandez
14:19 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Michael Matz
14:19 [RTL] Generation? 王 逸
14:06 Re: to exec a shared object Henry Thor Baldursson
08:05 Re: precompiled header support Gunther Nikl
07:55 Re: precompiled header support Gunther Nikl
07:32 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Robert Dewar
06:18 Re: -fnon-call-exceptions + -fprofile-arcs on x86 Zdenek Dvorak
06:17 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Paolo Bonzini
05:55 Re: -fnon-call-exceptions + -fprofile-arcs on x86 Eric Botcazou
05:35 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Neil Booth
03:33 Re: Inline assembly syntax tm_gccmail
02:10 Re: Inline assembly syntax Stan Shebs
02:07 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
01:33 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Robert Dewar
01:30 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Robert Dewar
01:16 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Ziemowit Laski
01:15 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Robert Dewar
01:13 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Aldy Hernandez
00:57 Re: Inline assembly syntax tm_gccmail
00:52 Re: Inline assembly syntax tm_gccmail
00:51 Re: question about AltiVec builtins Fariborz Jahanian
00:43 Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook Ziemowit Laski
00:40 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC tm_gccmail
00:37 Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook Kean Johnston
00:28 question about AltiVec builtins Janis Johnson

May 10, 2004
22:29 Configure problem Zdenek Dvorak
21:22 Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook Ziemowit Laski
21:16 Question about the order global declarations are output Mike Lerwill
20:51 Re: Using EH from C revisited Richard Henderson
20:50 Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook Richard Henderson
20:49 Re: [tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07) Jason Merrill
20:19 Re: -fnon-call-exceptions + -fprofile-arcs on x86 Zdenek Dvorak
20:18 Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook Andrew Pinski
20:09 Web archive at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-05/ stuck? Kelley Cook
20:00 Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook Ziemowit Laski
19:52 Re: arm cross compiler Daniel Kegel
19:37 arm cross compiler kripashankar
19:33 Re: Using EH from C revisited Giovanni Bajo
19:27 Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook Andrew Pinski
19:22 Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook Steven Bosscher
19:18 PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook Ziemowit Laski
18:27 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Jack Lloyd
18:05 Re: -fnon-call-exceptions + -fprofile-arcs on x86 Eric Botcazou
17:18 Using EH from C revisited Stelios Xanthakis
17:12 Re: to exec a shared object Ian Lance Taylor
16:45 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Robert Dewar
16:43 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Ian Lance Taylor
16:35 Re: Where is rd_gen computed in gcse.c Steven Bosscher
16:21 Re: Where is rd_gen computed in gcse.c law
16:20 Re: -fnon-call-exceptions + -fprofile-arcs on x86 Nathan Sidwell
15:18 HELP: GCC Passes and Files perugupa
15:09 Re: -fnon-call-exceptions + -fprofile-arcs on x86 Eric Botcazou
14:53 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Paul Koning
14:47 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Jack Lloyd
14:34 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Robert Dewar
14:29 Re: [lno] ICE with large unsigned loop bound Sebastian Pop
14:27 Re: [tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont. Diego Novillo
14:24 Re: [lno] ICE with large unsigned loop bound Zdenek Dvorak
14:18 Re: -fnon-call-exceptions + -fprofile-arcs on x86 Andrew Pinski
14:16 Re: [lno] ICE with large unsigned loop bound Sebastian Pop
14:12 RE: savannah trailing sources? Dave Korn
14:11 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Paul Koning
13:59 Re: [tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont. Steven Bosscher
13:59 Re: Where is rd_gen computed in gcse.c Michael Matz
13:59 Re: savannah trailing sources? Kai Henningsen
13:59 Re: savannah trailing sources? Andreas Schwab
13:59 Re: -fmove-all-movables and -freduce-all-givs Toon Moene
13:59 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Nathan Sidwell
13:59 Re: savannah trailing sources? Andreas Jaeger
13:59 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Richard Earnshaw
13:59 -fnon-call-exceptions + -fprofile-arcs on x86 Eric Botcazou
13:59 RE: savannah trailing sources? Dave Korn
13:58 Re: [lno] tree loop optimization causes a problem in RTL alias analysis Mostafa Hagog
13:58 Re: [lno] tree loop optimization causes a problem in RTL alias analysis Zdenek Dvorak
13:57 Re: [lno] tree loop optimization causes a problem in RTL alias analysis Mostafa Hagog
13:43 Re: Inline assembly syntax Paul Koning
13:35 to exec a shared object Henry Thor Baldursson
04:54 Re: savannah trailing sources? Phil Edwards
02:55 Re: savannah trailing sources? Zack Weinberg
02:55 Re: savannah trailing sources? Matthew Galgoci
02:50 Re: savannah trailing sources? Andreas Jaeger
02:44 Re: savannah trailing sources? Matthew Galgoci
02:40 Re: [tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont. Andreas Jaeger
02:36 Re: savannah trailing sources? Christopher Faylor
02:17 Re: savannah trailing sources? Jeff Sturm
02:06 Re: pthread on Linux Ben Elliston
02:02 Re: savannah trailing sources? Christopher Faylor
01:41 Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
00:01 Re: Is this bug : g++ in gcc-3.4.0 ? llewelly

May 09, 2004
23:48 Is this bug : g++ in gcc-3.4.0 ? yuki shimada
23:27 Re: savannah trailing sources? Christopher Faylor
22:21 Re: RFC: use predicates for RTL objects more Eric Christopher
22:18 Re: RFC: use predicates for RTL objects more Andrew Pinski
22:10 Draft pre-DR on unprototyped function types Joseph S. Myers
22:10 RFC: use predicates for RTL objects more Steven Bosscher
20:33 tree-ssa/lno compute_may_aliases failure Dorit Naishlos
19:51 Re: [tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont. Paul Brook
18:59 Re: [tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont. Kevin Handy
18:46 Re: savannah trailing sources? Andreas Schwab
18:46 successful build of GCC 3.4 on Mac OS X 10.3.3 (Java only) Bojan Antonovic
18:46 [lno] ICE with large unsigned loop bound Falk Hueffner
18:43 Re: [lno] ICE with large unsigned loop bound Zdenek Dvorak
17:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont. Tom Crick
17:26 Re: [PATCH] provide means to access the zone from the correspondingchunk Paolo Bonzini
17:26 Re: savannah trailing sources? Christopher Faylor
17:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont. Paul Brook
17:26 Re: savannah trailing sources? Aldy Hernandez
15:33 Order Free Brochure: How to Build an Immortal Organization Agata Stanusch
15:22 savannah trailing sources? Aldy Hernandez
15:17 Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc? Adrian Bunk
15:04 savannah trailing sources? Aldy Hernandez
14:52 Re: [lno] tree loop optimization causes a problem in RTL alias analysis Zdenek Dvorak
14:41 Re: [tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont. Paul Brook
14:18 [tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont. Tom Crick
14:09 Where is rd_gen computed in gcse.c Steven Bosscher
13:52 [lno] tree loop optimization causes a problem in RTL alias analysis Mostafa Hagog

May 08, 2004
20:48 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Geoff Keating
17:08 Re: registering with bugzilla Andreas Schwab
16:44 Re: const_double - RTL Paul Brook
16:22 Re: Inline assembly syntax Ian Lance Taylor
16:07 Re: const_double - RTL Iman Narasamdya
16:06 Re: registering with bugzilla Peter Barada
15:54 Re: registering with bugzilla Kai Henningsen
15:54 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Richard Kenner
15:53 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Richard Earnshaw
15:53 Re: [PATCH] provide means to access the zone from the corresponding chunk Daniel Berlin
15:53 Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc? Ian Lance Taylor
15:50 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Diego Novillo
07:00 Re: [PATCH] provide means to access the zone from the correspondingchunk Paolo polimi
06:53 Re: [PATCH] make zone collector work without mmap Paolo polimi
06:03 Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc? Daniel Jacobowitz
05:56 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Kevin Atkinson
05:45 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Kevin Atkinson
04:56 Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend Peter Barada
03:26 building 3.4.0 for powerpc-elf target Dave Murphy
02:12 Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc? Paul Jarc
01:53 Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc? Adrian Bunk
01:50 Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc? Adrian Bunk
01:34 Re: Inline assembly syntax Zack Weinberg
01:33 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: sibling call optimization Jim Wilson
01:30 Re: Testcases on 3.4 branch Mark Mitchell
01:19 Re: Inline assembly syntax Stan Shebs
01:18 Re: registering with bugzilla Zack Weinberg
01:15 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: sibling call optimization Jim Wilson
01:12 registering with bugzilla Doug McIlroy
01:10 registering with bugzilla Doug McIlroy
01:02 Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
00:56 Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
00:51 Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
00:28 Re: Inline assembly syntax Timothy J. Wood

May 07, 2004
23:49 Inline assembly syntax Ian Lance Taylor
23:11 Re: const_double - RTL Jim Wilson
23:01 Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc? Paul Jarc
22:54 Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc? Jim Wilson
22:52 gcc-ss-3.4-20040507 is now available gccadmin
22:09 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
22:07 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Andrew Pinski
21:55 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Ian Lance Taylor
21:44 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Paul Koning
21:39 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: sibling call optimization Camm Maguire
21:36 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Richard Henderson
21:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Diego Novillo
21:15 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
21:14 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Andrew Haley
21:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07) Richard Henderson
20:37 Re: [tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07) Toon Moene
20:24 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Diego Novillo
20:21 Re: [tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07) Andrew Pinski
20:15 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Andrew Haley
20:13 Re: [tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07) Diego Novillo
20:11 [tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07) Andrew Haley
20:06 [tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07) Diego Novillo
20:03 Re: Why is x86_sahf_1 pattern disabled in x86_64? H. J. Lu
20:02 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Mark Mitchell
19:55 Re: [PATCH] make zone collector work without mmap Richard Henderson
19:55 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Matt Austern
19:45 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
19:42 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Richard Henderson
19:39 Re: precompiled header support Geoff Keating
19:38 Re: Why is x86_sahf_1 pattern disabled in x86_64? Jan Hubicka
19:38 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Mark Mitchell
17:25 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Dale Johannesen
17:24 Arm-elf-gcc frostflare
17:11 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Andrew Haley
16:15 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Ian Lance Taylor
16:15 Re: [PATCH] provide means to access the zone from the corresponding chunk Daniel Berlin
16:11 sourceware downtime Frank Ch. Eigler
16:02 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Devang Patel
15:40 pthread on Linux sadf sadf
15:40 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Andrew Haley
15:24 Re: precompiled header support Ian Lance Taylor
15:22 Re: precompiled header support Ian Lance Taylor
15:20 [PATCH] make zone collector work without mmap Paolo Bonzini
15:16 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Daniel Jacobowitz
15:10 Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc? Adrian Bunk
15:10 [PATCH] provide means to access the zone from the corresponding chunk Paolo Bonzini
14:12 template matching variable size array Neal D. Becker
13:40 Another attempt to send a rejected message Paul Koning
13:23 RE: precompiled header support Dave Korn
13:11 Contributing to GCC / copyright assignment request Jonah Graham
12:24 precompiled header support Gunther Nikl
12:04 Re: Why is x86_sahf_1 pattern disabled in x86_64? Michel Lespinasse
11:13 Why is x86_sahf_1 pattern disabled in x86_64? Uros Bizjak
11:01 Re: Testcases on 3.4 branch Paolo Bonzini
10:22 Re: Testcases on 3.4 branch Mark Mitchell
09:54 Re: lno: Bootstrap failure Sebastian Pop
09:26 Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc? Jim Wilson
09:12 [tree-ssa] on sparc-linux: comparison of test results between 3.5.0 20040504 (experimental) and 3.5-tree-ssa 20040504 (merged 20040428) Christian Joensson
09:08 Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend Kazu Hirata
08:27 Muchas gracias por contactarse Romulo y Remo
08:16 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Bernd Jendrissek
07:55 Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend Rogelio Serrano
07:44 Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend Kazu Hirata
07:28 Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend Paolo Bonzini
07:24 Testcases on 3.4 branch Eric Botcazou
05:26 Re: Question about REG_OFFSET on big endian machines Josef Zlomek
05:13 Re: Question about REG_OFFSET on big endian machines Jim Wilson
04:52 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
04:39 lno: Bootstrap failure Andreas Jaeger
04:23 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
03:28 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Andrew Pinski
03:14 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Peter Barada
02:53 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Michel Lespinasse
02:49 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Alex Rosenberg
02:45 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
02:38 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Daniel Berlin
02:37 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Mark Mitchell
02:35 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Ian Lance Taylor
02:34 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Andrew Pinski
02:30 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Ian Lance Taylor
02:19 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Ziemowit Laski
02:14 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Andrew Pinski
02:11 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Mike Stump
02:09 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
02:02 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
01:50 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Ian Lance Taylor
01:40 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Mark Mitchell
01:02 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Ian Lance Taylor
00:56 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Oscar Fuentes
00:25 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
00:20 Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend Giovanni Bajo

May 06, 2004
22:21 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
22:11 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Mark Mitchell
22:05 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Richard Guenther
21:52 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: sibling call optimization Jim Wilson
21:49 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
20:29 PL/1 Front-end for GCC v0.0.6 Henrik Sorensen
19:47 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Mark Mitchell
19:39 Re: ACATS cxa5015 on x86_64 Laurent GUERBY
19:32 Re: Draft pre-DR on type compatibility intransitivity Mark Mitchell
18:56 ACATS cxa5015 on x86_64 John R. Shannon
18:42 FDO regression in Skidmarks component ParserVid Peter Steinmetz
17:31 Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend Peter Barada
16:44 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC tm_gccmail
16:37 Resend: GAS embedded-PIC reloc removal vs. mips-linux exceptionhandling cgd
16:30 Re: Saving a process' context Joe Buck
16:27 Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc? Adrian Bunk
15:55 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:50 const_double - RTL Iman Narasamdya
15:24 Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc? Serge Belyshev
15:02 reg_equiv_memory_loc vs. garbage collection Joern Rennecke
15:00 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: sibling call optimization Camm Maguire
14:48 Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc? Paul Jarc
14:27 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss Daniel Jacobowitz
14:16 Re: Autoconf 2.59 breaks libstdc++ checks Andreas Schwab
13:55 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss Michael LeBlanc
13:53 How to build an RPATH into gcc? Adrian Bunk
13:51 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss Paul Koning
13:46 Re: Autoconf 2.59 breaks libstdc++ checks Kean Johnston
13:05 Draft pre-DR on type compatibility intransitivity Joseph S. Myers
12:58 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:54 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:40 Re: Autoconf 2.59 breaks libstdc++ checks Andrew Haley
12:36 Re: Autoconf 2.59 breaks libstdc++ checks Gunther Nikl
12:27 Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend Andreas Schwab
12:21 Re: Autoconf 2.59 breaks libstdc++ checks Andreas Schwab
12:00 Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend Gunther Nikl
11:53 Re: Autoconf 2.59 breaks libstdc++ checks Gunther Nikl
11:45 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss Michael LeBlanc
10:55 -fzero-initialized-in-bss Michael LeBlanc
09:02 Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison Paolo Bonzini
05:46 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: sibling call optimization Jim Wilson
03:24 Saving a process' context Lucas Correia Villa Real
00:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Analysis of testsuite differences Diego Novillo

May 05, 2004
23:51 Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison Richard Henderson
23:48 Re: Promoting floats to doubles? Kean Johnston
23:38 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Diego Novillo
23:33 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Jan Hubicka
23:14 gcc-ss-3.3-20040505 is now available gccadmin
23:13 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Jan Hubicka
23:11 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Diego Novillo
23:10 Re: Autoconf 2.59 breaks libstdc++ checks Andreas Schwab
23:07 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Jan Hubicka
22:47 Re: Promoting floats to doubles? Jim Wilson
22:46 Re: [tree-ssa] Analysis of testsuite differences Jan Hubicka
22:27 Autoconf 2.59 breaks libstdc++ checks Kean Johnston
21:58 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Richard Guenther
21:18 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Gerald Pfeifer
20:21 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Daniel Berlin
20:12 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Karel Gardas
19:59 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Daniel Berlin
19:57 Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison Richard Guenther
19:50 Re: scrambled source for breakfest? Stuart Hastings
19:43 Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison Steven Bosscher
19:39 Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison Steven Bosscher
19:19 Re: PATCH: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce Zack Weinberg
19:18 Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison Richard Guenther
19:14 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Karel Gardas
19:05 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Phil Edwards
19:00 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Matt Austern
18:56 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Robert Dewar
18:53 Re: PATCH: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce H. J. Lu
18:49 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Laurent GUERBY
18:47 Question about REG_OFFSET on big endian machines Josef Zlomek
18:42 Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison Richard Guenther
18:39 Re: PATCH: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce Zack Weinberg
18:35 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Joe Buck
18:26 PATCH: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce H. J. Lu
18:26 Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison Mark Mitchell
18:22 Re: Letter to DDJ Andrew Pinski
18:21 Re: Letter to DDJ Laurent GUERBY
18:09 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Laurent GUERBY
17:42 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Robert Dewar
17:37 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Joe Buck
17:07 scrambled source for breakfest? Mike Stump
16:51 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Robert Dewar
16:47 Re: Letter to DDJ Andi Kleen
16:38 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Joe Buck
16:34 Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend Peter Barada
16:23 Re: ::delete() reference generated but not used Gabriel Dos Reis
15:55 Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend Andreas Schwab
15:40 RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend Peter Barada
15:17 ::delete() reference generated but not used Paul Koning
15:00 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: sibling call optimization Camm Maguire
14:17 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSAtrees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Diego Novillo
14:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Diego Novillo
14:14 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Diego Novillo
11:23 gcc-3.4.0 successfully installs on x86_64--netbsdelf2.0 John R. Shannon
09:10 Re: Promoting floats to doubles? Kean Johnston
08:05 Re: Letter to DDJ Andrew Pinski
08:00 Re: Letter to DDJ Andi Kleen
07:53 Away at Drupa Peter Skarpetis
07:10 Re: Promoting floats to doubles? Jim Wilson
04:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
04:10 Re: cvs problems...EOF while looking for end of string in RCS file Daniel Jacobowitz
03:55 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
02:33 Re: cvs problems...EOF while looking for end of string in RCS file Ian Lance Taylor
02:18 Re: Promoting floats to doubles? Jim Wilson
01:59 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Mike Stump
01:43 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Mike Stump
01:27 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Mike Stump
01:08 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Richard Kenner
00:14 Re: Promoting floats to doubles? Kean Johnston
00:06 Re: Promoting floats to doubles? Kean Johnston

May 04, 2004
23:38 Re: Different register sets for local and global register allocation? Jim Wilson
23:32 Re: avr-gcc, .debug_frame and bitfields Jim Wilson
23:04 Re: RFC: [tree ssa] DSE extension law
22:56 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 law
22:34 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Steven Bosscher
22:17 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Karel Gardas
22:14 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
22:13 Re: [tree-ssa] Merged missing testsuite directories Diego Novillo
22:12 tree-ssa question - replacing data-refs in stmts Dorit Naishlos
22:10 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Diego Novillo
22:08 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Karel Gardas
21:51 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
21:38 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Daniel Berlin
21:35 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Richard Henderson
21:28 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Karel Gardas
21:26 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Karel Gardas
21:24 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Daniel Berlin
21:20 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Andrew Pinski
21:16 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
21:13 Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Mike Stump
21:03 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Richard Guenther
20:52 Re: [apple-ppc-branch] My CONSTRUCTORs are getting cloned! Ziemowit Laski
20:52 Re: Promoting floats to doubles? Jim Wilson
20:50 Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees onMICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Karel Gardas
20:44 Re: Promoting floats to doubles? Jim Wilson
20:43 Re: [tree-ssa] Analysis of testsuite differences Andrew Pinski
20:40 [tree-ssa] Merged missing testsuite directories Diego Novillo
20:30 [tree-ssa] Analysis of testsuite differences Diego Novillo
20:15 Re: sibling call optimization Andrew Pinski
20:13 Re: [apple-ppc-branch] My CONSTRUCTORs are getting cloned! Andrew Pinski
19:55 Re: copyright assignment Joe Buck
19:46 Re: Letter to DDJ Laurent GUERBY
19:38 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Geert Bosch
19:34 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Andrew Pinski
19:05 Re: avr-gcc, .debug_frame and bitfields E. Weddington
19:01 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
18:56 Re: [tree-ssa/java] remaining null-pointer-check hits law
18:54 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Andrew Haley
18:53 Re: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce? Mike Stump
18:52 Re: Promoting floats to doubles? Joseph S. Myers
18:49 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC James Morrison
18:44 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Richard Henderson
18:39 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Richard Henderson
18:34 Re: [tree-ssa/java] remaining null-pointer-check hits Steven Bosscher
18:33 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
18:28 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Andrew Haley
18:26 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Andrew Haley
18:19 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
18:10 [apple-ppc-branch] My CONSTRUCTORs are getting cloned! Ziemowit Laski
18:08 sibling call optimization Camm Maguire
18:07 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Matt Austern
17:54 Build success for gcc 3.4.0 on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 (CompaqTru64UNIX) Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
17:53 Re: Letter to DDJ Joel Sherrill
17:47 Re: avr-gcc, .debug_frame and bitfields Denis Chertykov
17:45 Re: Promoting floats to doubles? Kean Johnston
16:49 Letter to DDJ Andrew Haley
16:33 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC David Edelsohn
16:14 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Gabriel Dos Reis
15:31 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Matt Austern
15:30 Re: [tree-ssa/java] remaining null-pointer-check hits law
15:29 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Paul Koning
15:28 Re: C Optimization, Pentium 4, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc Scott Robert Ladd
15:26 Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison Richard Guenther
15:19 Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison Diego Novillo
15:17 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Michael Matz
14:58 Re: C Optimization, Pentium 4, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc Diego Novillo
14:54 Re: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce? H. J. Lu
14:54 Re: C Optimization, Pentium 4, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc Scott Robert Ladd
14:51 Re: C Optimization, Pentium 4, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc Scott Robert Ladd
14:44 Re: C Optimization, Pentium 4, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc Steven Bosscher
14:37 Re: C Optimization, Pentium 4, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc Paul Brook
14:33 Re: C Optimization, Pentium 4, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc Diego Novillo
14:27 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Paul Koning
14:17 C Optimization, Pentium 4, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc Scott Robert Ladd
14:17 C Optimization, Opteron, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4 Scott Robert Ladd
13:29 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Robert Dewar
13:26 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Robert Dewar
12:48 Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison Richard Guenther
11:31 cvs problems...EOF while looking for end of string in RCS file Christian Joensson
11:07 Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison Richard Guenther
11:04 Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison Richard Guenther
10:48 Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison Steven Bosscher
10:40 Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison Steven Bosscher
10:22 [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison Richard Guenther
09:05 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC GRAHAM STOTT
07:43 Re: copyright assignment Jim Wilson
07:37 Re: copyright assignment Jim Wilson
06:52 Re: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce? Jim Wilson
06:02 [tree-ssa] on sparc-linux: comparison of test results for 3.5-tree-ssa 20040428 (merged 20040414) and 3.5.0 20040428 (experimental) Christian Joensson
05:59 Re: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce? Zack Weinberg
05:46 Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce? H. J. Lu
05:41 Re: gcc/g++ 3.4.0 cygwin, binutils, SSE & alignment tbp
04:42 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Richard Henderson
04:40 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Andreas Jaeger
04:19 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Richard Henderson
04:00 Re: Promoting floats to doubles? Jim Wilson
03:42 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Geert Bosch
03:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Diego Novillo
03:30 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Ben Elliston
03:30 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Andrew Pinski
03:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Geert Bosch
02:05 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Diego Novillo
01:32 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Mike Stump
01:25 Re: Promoting floats to doubles? Kean Johnston
00:35 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
00:01 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Richard Henderson

May 03, 2004
23:45 Re: C optimization tests - almabench results Jim Wilson
23:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Diego Novillo
23:28 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Andrew Pinski
23:27 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
23:18 Re: Successful Build/Install of GCC 3.3.2 on Solaris 10 SPARC Jim Wilson
23:05 Re: bootstrap failure with HP's C compiler on trunk: PR 12186 returns Jim Wilson
23:04 [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03 Diego Novillo
22:57 Re: copyright assignment Ben Elliston
22:50 Re: trunk bootstrap fail on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00: ICE building libstdc++ Andrew Pinski
22:47 Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Andrew Pinski
22:41 trunk bootstrap fail on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00: ICE building libstdc++ Joe Buck
22:15 MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC Stan Shebs
21:29 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Gabriel Dos Reis
20:47 Re: Does gcc ever use section symbol? (Re: PATCH: Multiple sectionswith same name don't work) Jim Wilson
20:39 Re: Promoting floats to doubles? Jim Wilson
20:39 Re: ACATS Mark Mitchell
20:25 Re: does anyone use --enable-altivec? Mark Mitchell
20:24 Re: gcc/g++ 3.4.0 cygwin, binutils, SSE & alignment Jim Wilson
19:28 Re: [tree-ssa] Branch frozen Frank Ch. Eigler
18:00 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Richard Kenner
17:56 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Geoff Keating
16:56 Re: supression of 'matching constraint does not allow a register' warning Daniel Jacobowitz
16:32 Re: Using EH from C Richard Henderson
15:50 Re: libstdc++-v3/config/abi/*/baseline_symbols.txt Benjamin Kosnik
14:15 copyright assignment Grant Edwards
13:39 Re: typo in the webpage Volker Reichelt
13:30 Different register sets for local and global register allocation? Jan Hoogerbrugge
12:58 avr-gcc, .debug_frame and bitfields Torleif Sandnes
11:18 RE: Using EH from C Stelios Xanthakis
10:47 libstdc++-v3/config/abi/*/baseline_symbols.txt John R. Shannon
07:59 C optimization tests - almabench results Uros Bizjak
07:07 Re: register allocation Michael Matz
07:03 Successful Build/Install of GCC 3.3.2 on Solaris 10 SPARC Kris Kulasekera
05:11 Re: C Optimization Tests, 1 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc Kevin Atkinson
04:35 Re: C Optimization Tests, 1 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc Scott Robert Ladd
03:32 Re: C Optimization Tests, 1 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc Kevin Atkinson
03:24 Re: C Optimization Tests, 1 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc Scott Robert Ladd
02:40 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Ian Lance Taylor
00:21 Re: C Optimization Tests, 1 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc Kevin Atkinson
00:20 Re: bug report. Jim Wilson

May 02, 2004
23:21 typo in the webpage Huan Chul, Lee
21:02 Re: C Optimization Tests, 1 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc Scott Robert Ladd
20:52 Re: Ada documentation and http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ Arnaud Charlet
20:39 Re: C Optimization Tests, 1 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc H. J. Lu
20:00 Re: C Optimization Tests, 1 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc Scott Robert Ladd
19:12 Re: Ada documentation and http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ Joseph S. Myers
18:08 Re: [tree-ssa] Branch frozen Gerald Pfeifer
18:01 Re: gcc-ss-3.5-20040502 is now available Gerald Pfeifer
17:58 gcc-ss-3.5-20040502 is now available gccadmin
16:56 Re: register allocation Daniel Berlin
15:10 Re: C Optimization Tests, 1 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:56 Does gcc ever use section symbol? (Re: PATCH: Multiple sections with same name don't work) H. J. Lu
14:03 Re: gcc-ss-3.4-20040502 is now available Gerald Pfeifer
13:57 gcc-ss-3.4-20040502 is now available gccadmin
13:27 register allocation Qiong Cai
09:17 RE: Using EH from C Stelios Xanthakis
06:32 Promoting floats to doubles? Kean Johnston
04:39 RE: Using EH from C david daney
02:12 Re: Using EH from C Stelios Xanthakis
00:09 Re: [PATCH] sparc64-linux --with-cpu=ultrasparc fix Dan Kegel

May 01, 2004
22:40 C Optimization Tests, 1 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc Scott Robert Ladd
20:41 How does one get gcc to default to 64 bit executables? Dan Kegel
18:13 Re: Using EH from C Richard Henderson
18:13 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Richard Henderson
17:46 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Richard Henderson
17:06 Ada documentation and http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ Gerald Pfeifer
16:18 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Eric Botcazou
15:29 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Richard Kenner
14:54 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Eric Botcazou
14:45 [tree-ssa] Branch frozen Diego Novillo
14:09 Re: Using EH from C Stelios Xanthakis
13:11 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Eric Botcazou
12:18 Re: bug report. Gargoyle Crazy Master
12:13 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Richard Kenner
11:26 Re: Gcc 3.4.0 problem? Jakub Jelinek
11:21 Gcc 3.4.0 problem? Panagiotis Papadakos
08:30 gcc/g++ 3.4.0 cygwin, binutils, SSE & alignment tbp
08:20 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Eric Botcazou
08:03 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Eric Botcazou
07:33 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Eric Botcazou
06:29 Re: supression of 'matching constraint does not allow a register'warning Jim Wilson
01:12 Re: Spurious testsuite failures Dan Kegel


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3