This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Ada: GNATLINK_OBJS (was: Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really

From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at ACT-Europe dot FR>
To: Laurent GUERBY <laurent at guerby dot net>
Cc: charlet at act-europe dot fr, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 10:00:41 +0200
Subject: Re: Ada: GNATLINK_OBJS (was: Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really
References: <20040414201739.GA5142@twcny.rr.com> <1081977016.8860.39.camel@pc> <407DAB57.6070503@twcny.rr.com> <1082571375.15390.66.camel@pc>

> An old issue, gnatlink depends on gnat.os_lib which depends
> on gnat.strings so ada/Makefile.in should be updated.

No, because gnatlink is always linked with libgnat.a, so only non libgnat
objects need be listed explicitely.

(in your gnatls output, it means all ../rts files should *not* be
 listed).

Arno

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ada: GNATLINK_OBJS (was: Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Ada: GNATLINK_OBJS (was: Ada users: please try libada-branch-- really
  - From: Laurent GUERBY

References:
- Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really
  - From: Nathanael Nerode
- Re: Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really
  - From: Laurent GUERBY
- Re: Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really
  - From: Nathanael Nerode
- Ada: GNATLINK_OBJS (was: Ada users: please try libada-branch --really
  - From: Laurent GUERBY

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]