This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> > > >If all the hard registers had to be preserved, so would be no place for the return address, so the pseudo-register column is needed.
> That is correct. There are several problems with the current > MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR.
> > 1) I think that the current definition of SIGNAL_UNWIND_RETURN_COLUMN > should be changed as I think it currently resides in the slot of a real > register (not sure about this though).
Yeah, I think that's probably true. I guess it ought not to require a
special column, but i can't remember the MIPS ABI well enough to know.
> 2) It probably does not do the right thing WRT floating point > registers. But with respect to libgcj, the signal handler does not use > floating point,so it works.They are not all callee-saved. I think the only thing that might allow it to work as is, is the fact that the unwinder does not use floating point, so the registers magically never get changed.
This all depends on how the MIPS ABI uses floating-point registers. If they're all callee-saved as they are on some systems, you won't have a problem.
Andrew.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |