This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Scott Robert Ladd <coyote@coyotegulch.com> writes:
That sentiment would be an argument against enabling voting. I certainly would not want to give assurances any stronger than that I just *might* take votes into account occasionally.
If that is your attitude, and it reflects the attitude of other primary GCC developers, then voting or lobbying are indeed meaningless.
Speaking as someone who actually does fix random PRs, I think voting would be useful. As everyone else has said, it obviously would not be any sort of guarantee.
Right now my random PR fixing is driven mainly by the list of PRs reported against 3.4.0 (there are only five remaining 3.4.0 PRs in the search which I use; right now I'm slowly poking at PR 14400).
-- Scott Robert Ladd Coyote Gulch Productions (http://www.coyotegulch.com) Software Invention for High-Performance Computing
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |