gcc archive
date index for April, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

April 30, 2004
23:06 bootstrap failure with HP's C compiler on trunk: PR 12186 returns Joe Buck
22:55 Re: Spurious testsuite failures Christian Ehrhardt
22:28 Re: [tree-ssa] Write to global memory not hoisted out of loop Daniel Berlin
22:28 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Richard Kenner
22:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Write to global memory not hoisted out of loop Diego Novillo
22:25 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Richard Henderson
22:22 Re: [tree-ssa] Write to global memory not hoisted out of loop Daniel Berlin
21:52 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Geoff Keating
21:46 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Richard Kenner
21:39 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Richard Henderson
21:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Kills by VDEFs in mark_def_sites law
21:27 Re: [tree-ssa] Write to global memory not hoisted out of loop Diego Novillo
21:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Write to global memory not hoisted out of loop Richard Kenner
21:02 Re: [tree-ssa] Write to global memory not hoisted out of loop Diego Novillo
20:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Write to global memory not hoisted out of loop Zdenek Dvorak
20:09 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Richard Kenner
20:05 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Ian Lance Taylor
20:00 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Richard Kenner
19:45 Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Ian Lance Taylor
19:22 -fzero-initialized-in-bss again Eric Botcazou
19:12 Re: does anyone use --enable-altivec? Daniel Egger
18:52 Re: How to file such a bug report? Ian Lance Taylor
18:45 Re: optimization issue about -O2 and -Os llewelly
18:30 Re: supression of 'matching constraint does not allow a register'warning David Carlton
18:29 Re: optimization issue about -O2 and -Os David Edelsohn
18:15 Re: optimization issue about -O2 and -Os Phil Edwards
18:09 Re: supression of 'matching constraint does not allow a register' warning Daniel Jacobowitz
17:23 RE: optimization issue about -O2 and -Os Dave Korn
17:05 Re: Spurious testsuite failures Joe Buck
16:59 Re: optimization issue about -O2 and -Os Zack Weinberg
16:59 Re: x86 code generation question Joe Buck
16:55 Re: Spurious testsuite failures Dan Kegel
16:50 Re: Spurious testsuite failures Dan Kegel
16:42 Re: optimization issue about -O2 and -Os Dale Johannesen
16:31 RE: How to file such a bug report? Dave Korn
16:26 RE: optimization issue about -O2 and -Os Dave Korn
16:25 supression of 'matching constraint does not allow a register' warning Andrew Haley
16:23 Re: supression of 'matching constraint does not allow a register'warning David Carlton
16:10 supression of 'matching constraint does not allow a register' warning Peter Barada
16:06 How to file such a bug report? Xin Wei Hu
15:47 Re: Spurious testsuite failures Christian Ehrhardt
15:32 Re: optimization issue about -O2 and -Os Zack Weinberg
13:50 Re: x86 code generation question Florian Weimer
13:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Write to global memory not hoisted out of loop Richard Guenther
12:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Write to global memory not hoisted out of loop Steven Bosscher
11:14 [tree-ssa] Write to global memory not hoisted out of loop Richard Guenther
10:56 Re: Using EH from C Stelios Xanthakis
09:47 RE: optimization issue about -O2 and -Os Dave Korn
09:20 Re: altivec still broken?! Paolo Bonzini
07:28 Re: x86 code generation question Robert Dewar
06:50 Re: optimization issue about -O2 and -Os Ebony Zhu
06:39 Re: x86 code generation question Bernd Jendrissek
05:31 Re: here MAIL.SYMRISE.COM: ScanMail has blocked your mail due a mail policy. virenschutz
05:02 Re: altivec still broken?! Paolo Bonzini
05:00 Re: Branch for factoring? Jim Wilson
04:05 Re: optimization issue about -O2 and -Os Jim Wilson
03:36 does anyone use --enable-altivec? Aldy Hernandez
03:15 Re: g++ help.. llewelly
02:35 Re: optimization issue about -O2 and -Os Ebony Zhu
02:08 Re: Does this failure pattern indicate something? Eric Christopher
02:06 Re: Does this failure pattern indicate something? Kean Johnston
02:01 Re: Does this failure pattern indicate something? Eric Christopher
01:57 Does this failure pattern indicate something? Kean Johnston
01:54 Re: Using EH from C Mike Stump
01:48 Re: Using EH from C Richard Henderson
00:37 Re: Using EH from C Giovanni Bajo

April 29, 2004
23:38 Re: x86 code generation question Zack Weinberg
23:31 Re: intent in cfg_layout_initialize DJ Delorie
23:27 Re: -MM -MG, <foo.h>, and 3.4.0 Jim Wilson
23:24 Re: x86 code generation question Vadim Lobanov
23:20 Re: x86 code generation question Zack Weinberg
23:12 Re: ACATS Zack Weinberg
22:58 Re: optimization issue about -O2 and -Os Jim Wilson
22:55 Re: successful build gcc-3.4.0 on Red Hat 7.1.2.96-81 Jim Wilson
22:46 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.4.0 on alpha-dec-osf4.0f Jim Wilson
21:38 Re: x86 code generation question Vadim Lobanov
21:26 Re: x86 code generation question Paul Koning
21:21 Re: x86 code generation question Vadim Lobanov
21:14 Re: x86 code generation question Jack Lloyd
21:03 Re: x86 code generation question Paul Koning
20:55 x86 code generation question Vadim Lobanov
20:46 Re: Using EH from C Richard Henderson
20:10 g++ help.. j_morelli
19:46 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-04-28 Diego Novillo
18:46 Re: altivec still broken?! Ziemowit Laski
18:32 Re: ACATS Richard Kenner
18:20 Re: HP/Compaq Tru64 linker semantics Rainer Orth
17:14 Re: ACATS Richard Kenner
17:11 Re: ACATS John R. Shannon
17:04 Re: altivec still broken?! Paolo Bonzini
16:47 Re: ACATS Richard Kenner
16:39 Re: ACATS John R. Shannon
16:19 RE: ACATS Dave Korn
16:13 Re: GCC-3.4.0/PCH - some numbers incl. a bug report Rene Rebe
16:09 Re: expanding movdi into 2 x movsi Denis Chertykov
15:58 Re: ACATS John R. Shannon
15:50 Re: Stupid question Joe Buck
14:30 Stupid question Mile Davidovic
14:26 Re: altivec still broken?! aldyh
14:20 Re: RFC embedded c proposal Joseph S. Myers
14:10 Your email requires verification verify#bqWnSAtFbkvCotvATdQJylt7q5xlvmx2 steve
14:06 2004 GCC Developers' Summit - Reminder. Andrew J. Hutton
13:55 Re: intent in cfg_layout_initialize DJ Delorie
13:44 Are BUILT_IN_POWII and BUILT_IN_POWCI necessary? (RE: Exponentiation by integral exponents) Feng Wang
13:12 Re: GCC-3.4.0/PCH - some numbers incl. a bug report Karel Gardas
12:51 Re: Exploiting dual mode operation Mircea Namolaru
12:51 Re: GCC-3.4.0/PCH - some more problems (libstdc++.gch) Andrew Pinski
12:47 RE: ACATS Dave Korn
12:20 GCC-3.4.0/PCH - some more problems (libstdc++.gch) Rene Rebe
12:19 Re: ACATS John R. Shannon
12:15 RE: ACATS Dave Korn
12:09 ACATS John R. Shannon
12:02 Re: RFC embedded c proposal Giovanni Bajo
11:57 Using EH from C Stelios Xanthakis
11:45 Branch for factoring? Gábor Lóki
11:25 Re: [gfortran] Exponentiation by integral exponents Tobias Schlüter
11:03 Re: GCC 3.4.0 and template type resolution bug (no) Giovanni Bajo
10:33 Re: GCC 3.4.0 and template type resolution bug (OT) Michael Veksler
10:27 GCC-3.4.0/PCH - some numbers incl. a bug report Rene Rebe
09:08 Re: Machine Dependent Reorganization Pass Jim Wilson
08:04 Re: RFC embedded c proposal Paolo Bonzini
07:53 Re: GCC 3.4.0 and template type resolution bug (no) Rene Rebe
07:44 RFC embedded c proposal Svein E. Seldal
07:12 Add myself to MAINTAINERS (write after approval) Uros Bizjak
06:49 optimization issue about -O2 and -Os Ebony Zhu
06:46 Re: intent in cfg_layout_initialize Jan Hubicka
06:28 Re: GCC 3.4.0 and template type resolution bug Vladimir Prus
06:23 Re: GCC 3.4.0 and template type resolution bug (no) Michael Veksler
06:12 GCC 3.4.0 and template type resolution bug Rene Rebe
05:20 ASTM International Support Response support
04:49 Re: Machine Dependent Reorganization Pass kernel_learner
04:07 intent in cfg_layout_initialize DJ Delorie
03:05 Re: g++ 3.4.0 cygwin, codegen SSE & alignement issues Ross Ridge
02:58 Re: powerpc-linux altivec vector function arg passing Alan Modra
02:20 Re: powerpc-linux altivec vector function arg passing Mike Stump
00:55 Re: g++ 3.4.0 cygwin, codegen SSE & alignement issues DJ Delorie
00:49 Re: powerpc-linux altivec vector function arg passing Alan Modra
00:48 RE: g++ 3.4.0 cygwin, codegen SSE & alignement issues Ross Ridge

April 28, 2004
23:47 Re: HP/Compaq Tru64 linker semantics Karl Vogel
22:43 Re: GCC-3.3.4 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
22:40 Re: Compile fails using valarray on 3.4.0 but not 3.3.2 Gabriel Dos Reis
22:18 Re: GCC-3.3.4 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
22:05 Re: HP/Compaq Tru64 linker semantics Rainer Orth
21:56 Re: HP/Compaq Tru64 linker semantics Jim Wilson
21:56 Re: inadequate multiply-by-const expansion for pentium4 Luchezar Belev
20:42 Re: HP/Compaq Tru64 linker semantics Rainer Orth
20:40 Re: HP/Compaq Tru64 linker semantics Andrew Pinski
20:37 Re: HP/Compaq Tru64 linker semantics Rainer Orth
20:27 Re: GCC for AmigaOne? Jim Wilson
20:12 Re: Check for nonlocal goto in check_maybe_invariant Jim Wilson
20:01 Re: HP/Compaq Tru64 linker semantics Jim Wilson
19:17 Re: powerpc-linux altivec vector function arg passing Aldy Hernandez
18:03 RE: g++ 3.4.0 cygwin, codegen SSE & alignement issues Brian Ford
17:38 Re: powerpc-linux altivec vector function arg passing David Edelsohn
17:28 Re: Website suggestion [was RE: [OT] RE: Useful articles.] Janis Johnson
17:14 subregs Kenneth Zadeck
17:04 Re: Problem with `unspec' construct Zack Weinberg
16:56 RE: g++ 3.4.0 cygwin, codegen SSE & alignement issues Dave Korn
16:45 Website suggestion [was RE: [OT] RE: Useful articles.] Dave Korn
16:30 Re: Problem with `unspec' construct Nitin Jain
16:29 Re: inadequate multiply-by-const expansion for pentium4 Jim Wilson
16:20 RE: g++ 3.4.0 cygwin, codegen SSE & alignement issues Tim Prince
15:53 RE: g++ 3.4.0 cygwin, codegen SSE & alignement issues Dave Korn
15:53 Re: gcc 3.4 build failed cygwin->i386-unknown-nto-qnx61 Ion Gaztañaga
14:33 Re: hi need help on unrolling Zdenek Dvorak
14:32 powerpc-linux altivec vector function arg passing Alan Modra
14:28 successful build gcc-3.4.0 on Red Hat 7.1.2.96-81 J.M.W. Kooijman
13:46 Re: gcc-3.4.0 - build failure on AIX 5.1 Ryszard Kabatek
13:35 Re: inadequate multiply-by-const expansion for pentium4 Daniel Jacobowitz
13:02 Re: inadequate multiply-by-const expansion for pentium4 Geert Bosch
12:48 Re: gcc-3.4.0 - build failure on AIX 5.1 Andrew Pinski
11:52 Re: gcc-3.4.0 - build failure on AIX 5.1 Ryszard Kabatek
11:47 Re: gcc-3.4.0 - build failure on AIX 5.1 Andrew Pinski
11:43 gcc-3.4.0 - build failure on AIX 5.1 Ryszard Kabatek
10:40 Re: inadequate multiply-by-const expansion for pentium4 Luchezar Belev
09:23 Re: sign/zero extension patterns Richard Earnshaw
08:00 Re: UNSPEC_* handling in reg-stack.c Jim Wilson
07:41 Successful build of gcc-3.4.0 on alpha-dec-osf4.0f Arnold Vogelsang
07:22 Re: sign/zero extension patterns Nathan Sidwell
06:07 Re: UNSPEC_* handling in reg-stack.c Uros Bizjak
06:05 hi need help on unrolling vijayanand hongal
05:59 Re: gcc error message and Boost.static_assert Jim Wilson
05:46 -MM -MG, <foo.h>, and 3.4.0 Paul Jarc
05:38 Re: gcc with a cpu contain multiple risc units sharing the same registerfile. Jim Wilson
05:28 Re: Machine Dependent Reorganization Pass Jim Wilson
05:16 Re: inadequate multiply-by-const expansion for pentium4 Jim Wilson
04:52 Re: bug report. Jim Wilson
04:39 GCC for AmigaOne? Maciek Plewa
04:26 RE: Notify about your e-mail account utilization. Dave Murphy
04:20 Re: gcc 3.4 build failed cygwin->i386-unknown-nto-qnx61 Jim Wilson
03:48 Re: 3.4.0 on linux-alpha: Bug with FDO Jim Wilson
03:45 Re: [C++] Deprecating -fno-for-scope for 3.5.0 Mark Mitchell
03:05 Notify about your e-mail account utilization. administration
02:56 urgent: mike obi
01:38 sc_pvector Satish Banukumar

April 27, 2004
23:09 Re: [gfortran] Exponentiation by integral exponents Tobias Schlüter
22:39 Built gcc 3.4.0 on hp-ux 11.22, IA64 architecture Seip, Christopher
22:15 Re: [gfortran] Exponentiation by integral exponents Paul Brook
22:14 Re: [gfortran] Exponentiation by integral exponents Andrew Pinski
22:07 Re: [gfortran] Exponentiation by integral exponents Tobias Schlüter
21:23 Re: [gfortran] Exponentiation by integral exponents Andrew Pinski
20:47 Check for nonlocal goto in check_maybe_invariant Zdenek Dvorak
20:32 Re: altivec still broken?! Aldy Hernandez
19:42 Re: A question about a "subreg SSA patch" from long ago Geoff Keating
19:02 Re: GCC-3.3.4 status report Matthias Klose
18:55 Re: Compile fails using valarray on 3.4.0 but not 3.3.2 Steven T. Hatton
18:48 Re: Compile fails using valarray on 3.4.0 but not 3.3.2 dank
18:42 Re: Build issue with 3.4.0 Phil Edwards
18:39 Build issue with 3.4.0 seth
18:30 Re: Compile fails using valarray on 3.4.0 but not 3.3.2 Steven T. Hatton
18:17 Re: Compile fails using valarray on 3.4.0 but not 3.3.2 Joe Buck
17:55 RE: Error while using LOG_LINKS information. Dave Korn
17:32 Re: Compile fails using valarray on 3.4.0 but not 3.3.2 Volker Reichelt
16:45 Compile fails using valarray on 3.4.0 but not 3.3.2 Steven T. Hatton
16:35 Error while using LOG_LINKS information. kernel_learner
16:34 Re: sign/zero extension patterns Richard Earnshaw
16:16 sign/zero extension patterns Nathan Sidwell
15:26 Re: gcc-3.4.0 fails for ColdFire(does not satisfy constraints) Ian Lance Taylor
15:10 Re: gcc-3.4.0 fails for ColdFire(does not satisfy constraints) Peter Barada
14:57 Re: gcc-3.4.0 fails for ColdFire(does not satisfy constraints) Ian Lance Taylor
14:31 Re: gcc-3.4.0 fails for ColdFire(does not satisfy constraints) Peter Barada
14:14 Re: [C++] Deprecating -fno-for-scope for 3.5.0 Mike Stump
14:09 Re: information rearding the failed testcases... Mike Stump
14:03 Re: gcc-3.4.0 fails for ColdFire(does not satisfy constraints) Ian Lance Taylor
13:39 Re: gcc-3.4.0 fails for ColdFire(does not satisfy constraints) Peter Barada
13:17 Re: problem building glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4.0 and binutils-2.15.90.0.3for m68k Dan Kegel
13:06 Re: Useful articles. Dan Kegel
12:10 Re: GCC-3.3.4 status report Volker Reichelt
12:02 Re: make prefix=xxx install no longer working on main line Andreas Schwab
11:55 Re: make prefix=xxx install no longer working on main line Paolo Bonzini
11:43 Re: problem building glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4.0 andbinutils-2.15.90.0.3 for m68k Andreas Schwab
11:24 Re: GCC-3.3.4 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
11:07 Re: GCC-3.3.4 status report Volker Reichelt
11:04 Re: altivec still broken?! Paolo Bonzini
11:04 [OT] RE: Useful articles. Dave Korn
11:03 Re: GCC-3.3.4 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
10:43 Re: altivec still broken?! Paolo Bonzini
10:24 Re: Useful articles. Ian Bruntlett
10:15 Re: Useful articles. Ian Bruntlett
09:26 make prefix=xxx install no longer working on main line Arnaud Charlet
08:46 Re: GCC-3.3.4 status report Giovanni Bajo
08:36 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Arnaud Charlet
07:21 GCC-3.3.4 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
06:31 Re: Useful articles. Dan Kegel
04:20 Re: gcc-3.4.0 fails for ColdFire(does not satisfy constraints) Jim Wilson
03:35 Re: What is to be updated in reginfo section coprocessor register mask? Ben Elliston
02:58 Re: [C++] Deprecating -fno-for-scope for 3.5.0 Gabriel Dos Reis
01:54 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of_Unwind_*() symbols Jim Wilson
01:40 Re: gcc-3.4.0 fails for ColdFire(does not satisfy constraints) Ian Lance Taylor
00:56 Re: proposed fix for PR bootstrap/15093 [for trunk] Joe Buck
00:54 proposed fix for PR bootstrap/15093 [for trunk] Joe Buck
00:53 Re: Error manual for SystemC Ben Elliston

April 26, 2004
23:21 Re: bootstrap failure, gcc HEAD, --disable-shared, gnatlib-plain Michael Elizabeth Chastain
22:56 altivec still broken?! Aldy Hernandez
22:41 Re: build of 3.4.0 failed in configure of libffi on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Jim Wilson
22:36 Re: gcc-3.4.0 fails for ColdFire(does not satisfy constraints) Peter Barada
22:22 Re: gcc 3.4.0 bug Justin Piszcz
22:17 Re: gcc 3.4.0 bug Ian Lance Taylor
22:09 gcc 3.4.0 bug Justin Piszcz
21:41 Re: -fmove-all-movables and -freduce-all-givs Joern Rennecke
21:24 Re: -fmove-all-movables and -freduce-all-givs Ian Lance Taylor
21:19 Re: gcc-3.4.0 fails for ColdFire(does not satisfy constraints) Ian Lance Taylor
21:17 gcc with a cpu contain multiple risc units sharing the same register file. mike
21:10 -fmove-all-movables and -freduce-all-givs Mark Stephenson
21:06 Re: gcc-3.4.0 fails for ColdFire(does not satisfy constraints) Peter Barada
21:00 Re: bootstrap failure, gcc HEAD, --disable-shared, gnatlib-plain Jim Wilson
20:49 Re: problem building glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4.0 and binutils-2.15.90.0.3 for m68k Jim Wilson
20:40 Re: gcc-3.4.0 fails for ColdFire(does not satisfy constraints) Ian Lance Taylor
20:34 Re: gcc-3.4.0 fails for ColdFire(does not satisfy constraints) Peter Barada
20:23 Re: expanding movdi into 2 x movsi Jim Wilson
20:16 Re: UNSPEC_* handling in reg-stack.c Jim Wilson
20:01 Re: build of 3.4.0 failed in configure of libffi onalphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Aaron Ucko
18:25 Re: gcc-3.4.0 fails for ColdFire(does not satisfy constraints) Ian Lance Taylor
17:00 gcc-3.4.0 fails for ColdFire(does not satisfy constraints) Peter Barada
16:59 Re: [C++] Deprecating -fno-for-scope for 3.5.0 Joe Buck
16:57 Re: Useful articles. Joe Buck
16:49 Re: request for stack advice Joe Buck
16:41 request for stack advice Justin M. Lee
14:02 HP/Compaq Tru64 linker semantics Karl Vogel
12:52 Re: Exploiting dual mode operation Joern Rennecke
11:36 Useful articles. Ian Bruntlett
10:33 Re: Exploiting dual mode operation Mircea Namolaru
08:47 gcc error message and Boost.static_assert Vladimir Prus
07:59 RE: [C++] Deprecating -fno-for-scope for 3.5.0 Gerald Pfeifer
05:00 Machine Dependent Reorganization Pass kernel_learner
02:08 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Christopher Faylor
01:02 Re: Problem with `unspec' construct Zack Weinberg

April 25, 2004
22:46 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Ross Ridge
17:57 Problem with `unspec' construct Nitin Jain
16:37 information rearding the failed testcases... perugupa
14:14 capo Get Windows XP Pro for 50$ for Willis Frederick
11:13 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Richard Kenner
09:07 Re: powerpc-linux, ada and tasking (was: GCC 3.4.0: successful build and installation on GNU/Linux PowerPC) Arnaud Charlet
08:50 Re: Ada build broken on x86-linux Arnaud Charlet
05:36 RE: [C++] Deprecating -fno-for-scope for 3.5.0 Stephan T. Lavavej
02:08 [C++] Deprecating -fno-for-scope for 3.5.0 Andrew Pinski
02:02 Error manual for SystemC Satish Banukumar
00:52 Re: protoize and unprotoize building with gcc-3.4-20040325 Ian Lance Taylor

April 24, 2004
23:23 Re: branches compared (lja_speed, EV56) Kurt Garloff
23:13 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Christopher Faylor
20:32 inadequate multiply-by-const expansion for pentium4 Luchezar Belev
17:57 powerpc-linux, ada and tasking (was: GCC 3.4.0: successful buildand installation on GNU/Linux PowerPC) Laurent GUERBY
16:29 Re: s390 & other targets misc ACATS failures Ulrich Weigand
14:32 bug report. Gargoyle Crazy Master
14:17 Ada build broken on x86-linux Laurent GUERBY
13:27 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken with your patch Andrew Pinski
13:08 What is to be updated in reginfo section coprocessor register mask? K. Ahmed Feroz
12:12 gcc 3.4 build failed cygwin->i386-unknown-nto-qnx61 Ion Gaztañaga
11:56 GCC 3.4.0: successful build and installation on GNU/Linux PowerPC Luca Saiu
11:24 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Arnaud Charlet
10:07 Succesfully built 3.4.0 on sparc-linux and sparc64-linux Christian Joensson
09:16 3.4.0 on linux-alpha: Bug with FDO Kurt Garloff
09:13 [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken with your patch Diego Novillo
07:52 s390 & other targets misc ACATS failures Laurent GUERBY
05:28 Build and test report for gcc 3.4.0 on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 (CompaqTru64 UNIX) Joe Buck
04:28 gfortranspec change breaks freebsd Steve Kargl
00:41 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Ulrich Weigand
00:26 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Ross Ridge

April 23, 2004
23:41 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of_Unwind_*() symbols Jim Wilson
23:40 Re: download Joe Buck
23:05 download Bart Oldenhof
22:00 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 DJ Delorie
21:39 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Ross Ridge
21:22 bootstrap failure, gcc HEAD, --disable-shared, gnatlib-plain Michael Elizabeth Chastain
17:25 gcc 3.4.0 successfully install on Ix86 NetBSD 2.0D John R. Shannon
17:25 RE: parse error at end of input Dave Korn
16:44 build of 3.4.0 failed in configure of libffi on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Joe Buck
16:21 Re: x86_64 == athlon-4? Scott Robert Ladd
15:57 usubscribe tux
15:14 Re: x86_64 == athlon-4? Paul Brook
15:07 Re: [lno] ICE in coalesce_abnormal_edges, at tree-outof-ssa.c:645 Zdenek Dvorak
14:54 x86_64 == athlon-4? Neal D. Becker
14:23 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Christopher Faylor
13:34 Re: testsuite "spawn failed" Michael Ritzert
12:53 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstraps broken on x86-64 Diego Novillo
10:47 RE: protoize and unprotoize building with gcc-3.4-20040325 Rekha Deshmukh
07:55 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstraps broken on x86-64 Sebastian Pop
07:42 Successful build of 3.4.0 on i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6.2 Nils O.
07:09 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Florian Weimer
07:08 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Arnaud Charlet
07:05 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Florian Weimer
07:03 Re: Copy constructor revisited Nathan Sidwell
06:29 Re: testsuite "spawn failed" Ben Elliston
06:21 testsuite "spawn failed" Michael Ritzert
05:33 Re: Bootstrap hangs while compiling gnat1 Josef Zlomek
04:57 [tree-ssa] bootstraps broken on x86-64 Diego Novillo
03:48 Re: Fix problem with constant modulus John David Anglin
02:46 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Robert Dewar
02:30 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Christopher Faylor
01:37 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of_Unwind_*() symbols Jim Wilson
01:15 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols David Mosberger
01:04 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
01:02 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
00:42 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Robert Dewar
00:33 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Christopher Faylor
00:04 Re: Copy constructor revisited llewelly

April 22, 2004
23:59 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Robert Dewar
23:58 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Joe Buck
23:50 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols David Mosberger
23:36 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 DJ Delorie
23:34 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Daniel Jacobowitz
23:34 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols David Mosberger
23:15 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
23:03 Re: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Joe Buck
22:12 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols David Mosberger
22:02 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
21:48 Re: Problem in propagating profiling information through loop unrolling Jan Hubicka
21:41 RE: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Tristan Fillmore
21:39 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Mark Mitchell
21:16 Re: Ada: GNATLINK_OBJS (was: Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really Keith Bauer
19:45 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Mark Mitchell
19:22 RE: GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Rupert Wood
19:19 Re: Bootstrap hangs while compiling gnat1 Jim Wilson
18:54 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols David Mosberger
18:28 GCC 3.4.0 build failed on interix3 Tristan Fillmore
18:22 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
18:19 Re: minor gcc2->gcc3 migration nit Kai Henningsen
18:07 Re: [tree-ssa] Why are bools cast to int in conditionals? Dan Nicolaescu
18:02 Re: Copy constructor revisited Robert Schweikert
17:59 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Mark Mitchell
17:54 Re: Bootstrap failure on sparc-linux-gnu James Morrison
17:49 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
17:46 Re: minor gcc2->gcc3 migration nit Joe Buck
17:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Why are bools cast to int in conditionals? Joseph S. Myers
17:38 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Mark Mitchell
17:37 Re: [tree-ssa] Why are bools cast to int in conditionals? Joe Buck
17:29 Re: Fix problem with constant modulus Arnaud Charlet
17:28 Re: minor gcc2->gcc3 migration nit Phil Edwards
17:22 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
17:07 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Mark Mitchell
16:58 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
16:36 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Mark Mitchell
16:35 Re: Ada: GNATLINK_OBJS (was: Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really Geert Bosch
16:27 Re: Bootstrap failure on sparc-linux-gnu James Morrison
16:13 Re: Bootstrap failure on sparc-linux-gnu Laurent GUERBY
16:08 Re: minor gcc2->gcc3 migration nit Richard Kenner
16:06 Re: minor gcc2->gcc3 migration nit James Morrison
15:56 problem building glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4.0 and binutils-2.15.90.0.3for m68k Dan Kegel
15:47 Re: minor gcc2->gcc3 migration nit Phil Edwards
15:47 Re: Bootstrap failure on sparc-linux-gnu Eric Botcazou
15:42 Re: minor gcc2->gcc3 migration nit Phil Edwards
15:42 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
15:39 Re: minor gcc2->gcc3 migration nit Dan Kegel
15:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Why are bools cast to int in conditionals? Joseph S. Myers
15:31 Re: minor gcc2->gcc3 migration nit Robert Dewar
15:31 Re: Copy constructor revisited Nathan Sidwell
15:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Why are bools cast to int in conditionals? Paul Koning
15:19 Re: Copy constructor revisited Michael Veksler
15:19 Re: minor gcc2->gcc3 migration nit Phil Edwards
15:14 Re: minor gcc2->gcc3 migration nit Phil Edwards
15:13 Re: Ada: GNATLINK_OBJS (was: Ada users: please try libada-branch-- really Laurent GUERBY
15:12 Re: Bootstrap failure on sparc-linux-gnu Andrew Pinski
15:01 Bootstrap failure on sparc-linux-gnu James Morrison
14:59 Copy constructor revisited Robert Schweikert
14:52 Re: [tree-ssa] Why are bools cast to int in conditionals? Joseph S. Myers
14:28 Re: Exploiting dual mode operation Joern Rennecke
14:11 Re: minor gcc2->gcc3 migration nit James Morrison
13:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Why are bools cast to int in conditionals? Paul Koning
13:36 Re: Ada: GNATLINK_OBJS (was: Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really Geert Bosch
13:34 Re: Exploiting dual mode operation Leehod Baruch
12:59 Successful build of 3.4.0 for alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Jeremy Sanders
12:25 expanding movdi into 2 x movsi Jan Hoogerbrugge
12:17 Re: Link time checking for incompatible flags Ian Lance Taylor
12:12 Re: Link time checking for incompatible flags Alan Modra
12:08 Re: Bootstrap hangs while compiling gnat1 Josef Zlomek
12:03 Re: minor gcc2->gcc3 migration nit Joseph S. Myers
11:54 Re: Link time checking for incompatible flags Mike Stump
11:38 Re: Bootstrap hangs while compiling gnat1 Andreas Schwab
10:53 Re: minor gcc2->gcc3 migration nit Richard Kenner
10:49 Re: Fix problem with constant modulus Richard Kenner
10:40 Re: Ada: GNATLINK_OBJS (was: Ada users: please try libada-branch-- really Laurent GUERBY
09:22 Re: Link time checking for incompatible flags Robert Dewar
09:13 Re: Link time checking for incompatible flags Jim Wilson
09:05 Re: Help modifying an existing port. Jim Wilson
08:55 Re: [tree-ssa] Why are bools cast to int in conditionals? Joseph S. Myers
08:24 Re: Ada: GNATLINK_OBJS (was: Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really Eric Botcazou
08:18 Re: GCC 3.4.0 has lots of failures in test-suite Christian Ehrhardt
08:00 Re: Ada: GNATLINK_OBJS (was: Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really Arnaud Charlet
07:44 Re: Removing gthr-gnat.c? Arnaud Charlet
07:16 Re: Link time checking for incompatible flags Alan Modra
05:18 Re: minor gcc2->gcc3 migration nit Phil Edwards
03:22 Re: Fix problem with constant modulus John David Anglin
03:15 Re: Bootstrap hangs while compiling gnat1 Jim Wilson
02:31 RE: GCC 3.4.0 has lots of failures in test-suite Eric Christopher
02:18 Re: [tree-ssa] Why are bools cast to int in conditionals? Dan Nicolaescu
02:02 Re: Link time checking for incompatible flags Mike Stump
01:25 Re: Link time checking for incompatible flags Ian Lance Taylor
01:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Why are bools cast to int in conditionals? Joseph S. Myers
01:08 RE: GCC 3.4.0 has lots of failures in test-suite Steve Lee
00:39 minor gcc2->gcc3 migration nit Daniel Kegel
00:09 Re: GCC 3.4.0 has lots of failures in test-suite Eric Christopher

April 21, 2004
23:55 Re: [tree-ssa/java] remaining null-pointer-check hits Andrew Pinski
23:55 GCC 3.4.0 has lots of failures in test-suite Steve Lee
23:44 another GCC 3.4.0 build report: x86_64, RHEL 3.0 Joe Buck
23:00 [tree-ssa] Why are bools cast to int in conditionals? Dan Nicolaescu
22:57 Re: Fix problem with constant modulus Richard Kenner
22:29 GCC 3.1 release tag restored Mark Mitchell
22:11 Re: [tree-ssa/java] remaining null-pointer-check hits law
21:59 Re: Question on function-at-a-time and GC Zack Weinberg
21:44 Re: builtin_apply et al Richard Henderson
21:44 Re: Question on function-at-a-time and GC Richard Henderson
21:44 Re: Question on function-at-a-time and GC Richard Henderson
21:43 Re: Question on variable_size and function-at-a-time Richard Henderson
21:43 [tree-ssa/java] remaining null-pointer-check hits Richard Henderson
21:43 Re: Modulus by constant Richard Henderson
21:40 Re: Fix problem with constant modulus John David Anglin
21:22 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
21:20 Re: Fix problem with constant modulus John David Anglin
21:13 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Mark Mitchell
21:13 Re: Fix problem with constant modulus Eric Botcazou
21:09 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
20:52 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Mark Mitchell
20:37 Re: parse error at end of input Joe Buck
20:18 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of_Unwind_*() symbols Jim Wilson
20:18 Re: parse error at end of input Satish Banukumar
20:05 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
19:36 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Mark Mitchell
19:34 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Mark Mitchell
19:25 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
19:20 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Daniel Jacobowitz
19:17 Re: C++ bug due to overlapping temporary stack slots Ulrich Weigand
19:15 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Mark Mitchell
19:05 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
19:04 Re: Fix problem with constant modulus John David Anglin
19:00 Re: C++ bug due to overlapping temporary stack slots Mark Mitchell
18:56 Re: parse error at end of input Joe Buck
18:51 3.4.0 build and test results Joe Buck
18:45 Re: Fix problem with constant modulus Richard Kenner
18:42 Re: Fix problem with constant modulus John David Anglin
18:36 parse error at end of input Satish Banukumar
18:26 Re: Exploiting dual mode operation Joern Rennecke
18:16 Ada: GNATLINK_OBJS (was: Ada users: please try libada-branch --really Laurent GUERBY
17:54 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Mark Mitchell
17:36 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols David Mosberger
17:13 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
17:11 Re: Fix problem with constant modulus Richard Kenner
16:55 Re: Fix problem with constant modulus John David Anglin
16:51 Removing gthr-gnat.c? H. J. Lu
16:49 Re: GCC 3.4 branch reopened Joe Buck
16:44 Re: protoize and unprotoize building with gcc-3.4-20040325 Ian Lance Taylor
16:44 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols David Mosberger
16:34 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
16:24 Re: C++ bug due to overlapping temporary stack slots Richard Guenther
16:12 C++ bug due to overlapping temporary stack slots Ulrich Weigand
15:35 Successfully built 3.4.0 for pentium2-linux on FC2 Christian Joensson
15:22 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols David Mosberger
15:10 Re: Ghost testcase eb42.C Benjamin Kosnik
14:43 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Arnaud Charlet
14:35 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
14:33 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
13:40 Bootstrap hangs while compiling gnat1 Andreas Schwab
13:31 Exploiting dual mode operation Mircea Namolaru
12:57 RE: protoize and unprotoize building with gcc-3.4-20040325 Rekha Deshmukh
12:22 Re: Problem in propagating profiling information through loop unrolling Mostafa Hagog
12:12 UNSPEC_* handling in reg-stack.c Uros Bizjak
11:19 GCC 3.4.0 successfully installed on PowerPC MacOSX 10.3.1/Darwin7.3 Shrisha Rao
09:36 Re: GCC 3.4 branch reopened Ranjit Mathew
08:39 Re: libstdcxx_so_7 branch proposal Paolo Carlini
07:04 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Arnaud Charlet
06:53 GCC 3.4 branch reopened Mark Mitchell
06:38 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of_Unwind_*() symbols Jim Wilson
06:09 Re: PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols David Mosberger
05:58 Link time checking for incompatible flags Rahul Joshi
05:57 PATCH: Put libunwind.a in libgcc_s.so: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
05:46 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? H. J. Lu
05:01 Nitpicking: -mcpu v/s -mtune for IA-32 in GCC 3.4.0 changes document Ranjit Mathew
04:44 GCC 3.4.0 Released Mark Mitchell
03:13 Help modifying an existing port. kernel_learner
02:21 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Daniel Jacobowitz
02:09 gcc-3.4.0 profiledbootstrap success report (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Alex Tribble
01:46 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Gabriel Dos Reis
01:39 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols David Mosberger
01:24 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Jim Wilson
01:06 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
00:45 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Daniel Jacobowitz
00:44 Re: 3.4.0 vs 3.3.3 Giovanni Bajo
00:37 Re: 3.4.0 vs 3.3.3 Shelly Adhikari
00:25 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Jim Wilson
00:19 Re: 3.4.0 vs 3.3.3 Giovanni Bajo

April 20, 2004
23:52 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Jim Wilson
23:51 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols David Mosberger
23:41 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
23:35 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols David Mosberger
23:28 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols H. J. Lu
23:21 Re: [PATCH] Add 64-bit get_user and __get_user for i386 Jim Wilson
23:06 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols David Mosberger
22:47 Re: versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols Jim Wilson
22:38 Re: Ghost testcase eb42.C Daniel Jacobowitz
22:08 Re: Possible Additional g++ bug(s) Jim Wilson
21:25 Re: libstdcxx_so_7 branch proposal Phil Edwards
20:49 branches compared (lja_speed, EV56) Kurt Garloff
20:41 3.4.0 vs 3.3.3 Shelly Adhikari
20:41 Re: Fix problem with constant modulus Richard Kenner
20:35 Re: Fix problem with constant modulus David Edelsohn
20:28 Re: libstdcxx_so_7 branch proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
19:50 libstdcxx_so_7 branch proposal Benjamin Kosnik
18:09 GNAT online docs web page link problem Vincent Marciante
17:43 Re: So where is 3.4.0 - web page announces the RELEASE of 3.4.0 Joe Buck
17:23 So where is 3.4.0 - web page announces the RELEASE of 3.4.0 Paul Nelson
16:27 Re: GNAT: Handling of Freezing Rules Geert Bosch
16:01 Re: GNAT: Handling of Freezing Rules Robert Dewar
15:25 Re: protoize and unprotoize building with gcc-3.4-20040325 Ian Lance Taylor
14:27 GNAT: Handling of Freezing Rules Reinhold May
14:03 Re: Crash in garbage collector Daniel Berlin
13:40 Re: Crash in garbage collector Jan Hoogerbrugge
13:00 Re: Modulus by constant Segher Boessenkool
12:23 protoize and unprotoize building with gcc-3.4-20040325 Rekha Deshmukh
10:45 [tree-ssa] Can't bootstrap gcc 20040429 on cygwin: mf-hooks2.c:1700: error: dereferencing poin Christian Joensson
10:23 gcc3.4.0/gcc3.3.2/icc8.0 compile-time performance comparison on MICOSL3's sources. Karel Gardas
09:30 Re: -profile-use: "has overflowed" error Michael Veksler
04:07 RE: re: your document parrt
03:41 Re: Modulus by constant Waldek Hebisch
03:07 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure on ia64 Jim Wilson
02:42 Re: [PATCH] Add 64-bit get_user and __get_user for i386 Linus Torvalds
02:09 Re: [PATCH] Add 64-bit get_user and __get_user for i386 Jamie Lokier

April 19, 2004
23:49 Re: Cross-configury broken in 3.4? Jim Wilson
23:25 Re: gcc Sparc alignment problems Jim Wilson
23:20 Re: gcc Sparc alignment problems Jim Wilson
23:10 Re: make check-gcc failing Jim Wilson
23:04 Re: gcc/gcc/f ChangeLog Gabriel Dos Reis
22:47 Re: Crash in garbage collector Jim Wilson
22:18 Re: gcc/gcc/f ChangeLog Mike Stump
22:16 make check-gcc failing sashan
22:13 Re: Ada bootstrap broken: missing file makeutl.ads/b Arnaud Charlet
21:46 Re: gcc/gcc/f ChangeLog Mark Mitchell
21:44 Re: Problem in propagating profiling information through loop unrolling Zdenek Dvorak
21:42 Re: gcc Sparc alignment problems Mike Stump
21:41 Re: Problem in propagating profiling information through loop unrolling Zdenek Dvorak
21:36 Re: Problem in propagating profiling information through loop unrolling Dale Johannesen
21:29 Re: Problem in propagating profiling information through loop unrolling Jan Hubicka
21:20 Problem in propagating profiling information through loop unrolling Mostafa Hagog
20:59 Re: gcc Sparc alignment problems Dale Johannesen
20:50 gcc Sparc alignment problems Phil Prentice
20:31 Re: -profile-use: "has overflowed" error Andreas Jaeger
20:08 RE: -profile-use: "has overflowed" error [OT] Michael Veksler
18:48 Re: [3.4] Broken link in IRIX installation documentation Mark Mitchell
18:42 Ada bootstrap broken: missing file makeutl.ads/b Laurent GUERBY
18:31 versioning of _Unwind_*() symbols David Mosberger
18:31 Re: Crash in garbage collector Geoff Keating
18:29 RE: GCC 3.4.0 RC2 Available - cygwin native results Bauke van Dijk
17:43 RE: -profile-use: "has overflowed" error Dave Korn
17:41 Re: [lno] ICE in coalesce_abnormal_edges, at tree-outof-ssa.c:645 Zdenek Dvorak
17:21 Re: ICE (with Red Hat's 3.2.3) building Ada for GCC 3.4.0-pre on x86_64 Joe Buck
17:09 RE: GCC 3.4.0 RC2 Available - cygwin native results Dave Korn
17:04 Re: Optimization comparison: 3.3, 3.4, mainline, tree-ssa Geert Bosch
16:56 -profile-use: "has overflowed" error Michael Veksler
16:52 Re: Optimization comparison: 3.3, 3.4, mainline, tree-ssa Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:49 -profile-use: "has overflowed" error Michael Veksler
16:38 RE: GCC 3.4.0 RC2 Available - cygwin native results Dave Korn
16:33 Re: Optimization comparison: 3.3, 3.4, mainline, tree-ssa Guillermo Ballester Valor
16:27 Re: [lno] ICE in coalesce_abnormal_edges, at tree-outof-ssa.c:645 Andrew MacLeod
16:18 Re: [RFC PATCH] implement asin() and acos() as built-in function Roger Sayle
16:05 Re: [3.4] Broken link in IRIX installation documentation Rainer Orth
16:04 Re: ICE (with Red Hat's 3.2.3) building Ada for GCC 3.4.0-pre on x86_64 H. J. Lu
15:59 ICE (with Red Hat's 3.2.3) building Ada for GCC 3.4.0-pre on x86_64 Joe Buck
15:59 Re: [lno] ICE in coalesce_abnormal_edges, at tree-outof-ssa.c:645 law
15:57 [RFC PATCH] implement asin() and acos() as built-in function Uros Bizjak
15:41 Re: Optimization comparison: 3.3, 3.4, mainline, tree-ssa Geert Bosch
14:46 Cross-configury broken in 3.4? Dan Kegel
14:28 Re: Optimization comparison: 3.3, 3.4, mainline, tree-ssa Andi Kleen
13:21 Re: Optimization comparison: 3.3, 3.4, mainline, tree-ssa Scott Robert Ladd
12:02 Re: Optimization comparison: 3.3, 3.4, mainline, tree-ssa Kaveh R. Ghazi
11:29 How do optimization flags work on hp Stéphane Graziani
11:03 Crash in garbage collector Jan Hoogerbrugge
09:46 Re: Ada broken on mainline (Linux/AMD64) Andreas Jaeger
09:15 Re: Ada broken on mainline (Linux/AMD64) Paolo Bonzini
08:18 Re: Debugging info on # spills? Michael Matz
06:59 Re: future status of generic vectors? Paolo Bonzini
06:37 Re: Optimization comparison: 3.3, 3.4, mainline, tree-ssa Uros Bizjak
05:19 Re: Re: Re: errors on building the cross-gcc for FRV architecture (frv-elf-gcc) zhanrk
03:20 Re: Re: errors on building the cross-gcc for FRV architecture (frv-elf-gcc) zhanrk
01:59 Re: errors on building the cross-gcc for FRV architecture(frv-elf-gcc) Eric Christopher
01:26 Re: gcc/gcc/f ChangeLog Gabriel Dos Reis
00:27 Re: [Fwd: trouble building gcc-3.4.0-20040416 with binutils-2.15.90.0.3?] Dan Kegel
00:16 Re: GCC 3.4 Branch Frozen Mark Mitchell
00:08 Re: GCC 3.4 Branch Frozen Michael Elizabeth Chastain

April 18, 2004
23:56 Re: Optimization comparison: 3.3, 3.4, mainline, tree-ssa Scott Robert Ladd
23:27 Re: [Newb] grokdeclarator in gcc/cp/decl.c Geert Bosch
22:58 Re: [lno] ICE in coalesce_abnormal_edges, at tree-outof-ssa.c:645 Zdenek Dvorak
22:56 Re: Optimization comparison: 3.3, 3.4, mainline, tree-ssa Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:59 GCC 3.4 Branch Frozen Mark Mitchell
20:32 Optimization comparison: 3.3, 3.4, mainline, tree-ssa Scott Robert Ladd
20:23 Re: [Newb] grokdeclarator in gcc/cp/decl.c Joseph S. Myers
20:08 Re: [Newb] grokdeclarator in gcc/cp/decl.c Zack Weinberg
19:19 Re: F95 supports F77 too, right? (was Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Nathanael Nerode
19:01 [Newb] grokdeclarator in gcc/cp/decl.c sashan
17:48 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2004-04-10 Jan Hubicka
15:42 errors on building the cross-gcc for FRV architecture (frv-elf-gcc) Rongkai
14:30 Re: Ada broken on mainline (Linux/AMD64) Andreas Schwab
14:15 Re: GCC & C++ ABI llewelly
14:14 Ada broken on mainline (Linux/AMD64) Andreas Jaeger
14:14 Mainline bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
12:57 gcc 3.3.3 - mandrake 9.0 cea
12:26 Re: F95 supports F77 too, right? (was Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Robert Dewar
12:13 future status of generic vectors? Aldy Hernandez
11:59 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Robert Dewar
10:38 Re: Modulus by constant Richard Kenner
05:20 Re: trouble building gcc-3.4.0-20040416 with binutils-2.15.90.0.3? H. J. Lu
04:32 trouble building gcc-3.4.0-20040416 with binutils-2.15.90.0.3? Dan Kegel
04:31 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 -- don't decide now! Joe Buck
03:59 GCC & C++ ABI Jonathan Wilson
03:43 Possible Additional g++ bug(s) Peri Saner
03:08 Re: F95 supports F77 too, right? (was Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Nathanael Nerode
03:00 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 -- don't decide now! Nathanael Nerode
02:34 Re: forcing C++ objects to an address (ABI issue B-7) Mark Mitchell
02:27 Re: Modulus by constant Joe Buck
02:07 Re: Modulus by constant Richard Kenner
02:01 Re: Modulus by constant Roger Sayle
02:00 Re: attribute pure and gcse Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:31 Re: Modulus by constant Zack Weinberg
01:16 Modulus by constant Richard Kenner
01:07 va-arg-24.c? what to do... Aldy Hernandez
00:38 Re: attribute pure and gcse Roger Sayle

April 17, 2004
22:43 Re: codecvt Paolo Carlini
22:29 Re: codecvt Paolo Carlini
20:42 [3.4] Broken link in IRIX installation documentation Gerald Pfeifer
19:32 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 -- don't decide now! Zack Weinberg
19:29 Re: builtin_apply et al Stelios Xanthakis
19:25 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Zack Weinberg
19:20 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Zack Weinberg
18:58 Re: Disable g++/libstdc++-v3 on AIX for 3.4? Mark Mitchell
18:54 attribute pure and gcse Dara Hazeghi
18:42 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Mark Mitchell
17:41 Re: what is ADA and what is FORTRAN? Marcel Cox
17:40 Re: what is ADA and what is FORTRAN? Phil Edwards
17:38 Re: Load insn register restrictions Geert Bosch
16:30 Re: New ACATS failures at -O2 (again) Geert Bosch
16:03 Re: Downloading tricore-gcc-3.3.2? Florian Weimer
15:58 what is ADA and what is FORTRAN? Jonathan Wilson
15:56 Re: F95 supports F77 too, right? (was Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Paul Brook
15:24 Re: GCC 3.4.0 RC2 Available Richard Sandiford
15:16 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Paul Schlie
15:11 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Paul Schlie
14:42 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Paul Schlie
14:42 Re: F95 supports F77 too, right? (was Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Daniel Jacobowitz
14:38 Re: Disable g++/libstdc++-v3 on AIX for 3.4? Roger Sayle
13:46 F95 supports F77 too, right? (was Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Nathanael Nerode
13:44 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 -- don't decide now! Nathanael Nerode
13:39 Re: Downloading tricore-gcc-3.3.2? Robert Dewar
12:49 Re: Downloading tricore-gcc-3.3.2? Robert Dewar
12:39 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Laurent GUERBY
12:34 New ACATS failures at -O2 (again) Laurent GUERBY
12:02 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Robert Dewar
11:58 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Gabriel Dos Reis
11:49 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Robert Dewar
09:45 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Steven Bosscher
09:38 codecvt Walter Horsten
04:43 Re: Disable g++/libstdc++-v3 on AIX for 3.4? David Edelsohn
02:48 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Roger Sayle
02:20 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Zack Weinberg
02:19 Disable g++/libstdc++-v3 on AIX for 3.4? Roger Sayle
01:49 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Richard Kenner
01:45 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Geert Bosch
01:06 Re: GCC 3.4.0 RC2 still doesn't build on HP-UX Mark Mitchell
01:04 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Mark Mitchell
00:22 Re: GCC 3.4.0 RC2 still doesn't build on HP-UX Joseph S. Myers
00:04 Re: GCC 3.4.0 RC2 still doesn't build on HP-UX Kelley Cook

April 16, 2004
23:33 Re: GCC 3.4.0 RC2 still doesn't build on HP-UX Joe Buck
23:26 Re: builtin_apply et al Nicola Pero
23:26 GCC 3.4.0 RC2 still doesn't build on HP-UX Joe Buck
23:23 Re: [tree-ssa] problems linking f951 to gmp Diego Novillo
23:09 Re: builtin_apply et al Stan Shebs
22:54 Re: builtin_apply et al Nicola Pero
22:35 Re: builtin_apply et al Stan Shebs
22:33 Re: gcc.dg/funcorder.c failure on pa64 - need advice John David Anglin
22:20 Re: [tree-ssa] problems linking f951 to gmp Paul Brook
22:17 Re: gcc.dg/funcorder.c failure on pa64 - need advice Zack Weinberg
22:15 Re: gcc.dg/funcorder.c failure on pa64 - need advice Zack Weinberg
22:15 Re: Question on function-at-a-time and GC Zack Weinberg
21:28 Re: Ada bootstrap failures on various platforms Laurent GUERBY
21:20 Re: GCC 3.4.0 RC2 Available Benjamin Kosnik
21:14 Re: gcc.dg/funcorder.c failure on pa64 - need advice John David Anglin
21:03 Re: gcc.dg/funcorder.c failure on pa64 - need advice John David Anglin
21:00 [tree-ssa] problems linking f951 to gmp Diego Novillo
20:44 Re: gcc.dg/funcorder.c failure on pa64 - need advice John David Anglin
20:43 GCC 3.4.0 RC2 Available Mark Mitchell
20:42 Re: gcc.dg/funcorder.c failure on pa64 - need advice law
20:32 Re: Ada bootstrap failures on various platforms Andrew Pinski
20:28 gcc.dg/funcorder.c failure on pa64 - need advice Zack Weinberg
20:28 Ada bootstrap failures on various platforms Rainer Orth
20:12 Re: builtin_apply et al law
20:07 Re: builtin_apply et al Zack Weinberg
20:02 Re: [lno] ICE in coalesce_abnormal_edges, at tree-outof-ssa.c:645 Zdenek Dvorak
20:00 Re: builtin_apply et al Eric Christopher
19:43 Re: IMA status? Zack Weinberg
19:36 Re: Question on function-at-a-time and GC Laurent GUERBY
19:29 Re: GCCStatus Report (2004-04-12) Gerald Pfeifer
18:39 Re: Question on function-at-a-time and GC Richard Kenner
18:37 Re: Question on variable_size and function-at-a-time Richard Kenner
18:21 RE: Downloading tricore-gcc-3.3.2? Dave Korn
18:02 Re: GCJ on mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu Andrew Haley
17:54 Re: GCCStatus Report (2004-04-12) Andrew Pinski
17:49 Re: GCCStatus Report (2004-04-12) Daniel Jacobowitz
17:42 Re: GCCStatus Report (2004-04-12) Andrew Pinski
17:35 Re: Question on function-at-a-time and GC Zack Weinberg
17:35 Re: Question on variable_size and function-at-a-time Zack Weinberg
17:35 GCCStatus Report (2004-04-12) Mark Mitchell
17:29 Re: builtin_apply et al Andrew Pinski
17:23 Re: builtin_apply et al Richard Earnshaw (Lists)
17:17 RE: Downloading tricore-gcc-3.3.2? Dave Korn
16:16 builtin_apply et al Nathan Sidwell
14:53 Re: GCJ on mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu David Daney
14:37 RE: Downloading tricore-gcc-3.3.2? Dave Korn
14:28 Re: [lno] ICE in coalesce_abnormal_edges, at tree-outof-ssa.c:645 Andrew MacLeod
13:57 [lno] ICE in coalesce_abnormal_edges, at tree-outof-ssa.c:645 Richard Guenther
13:15 Downloading tricore-gcc-3.3.2? Eric Taylor
09:47 Re: GCJ on mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu Andrew Haley
09:28 Re: why -mhitachi gives ICE for SH-coff toolchain [gcc 3.4] Nick Clifton
09:13 Re: Problem with fstream in gcc3.4.0 (directory reading allowed?) Karel Gardas
08:59 Re: Problem with fstream in gcc3.4.0 (directory reading allowed?) Paolo Carlini
07:06 Problem with fstream in gcc3.4.0 (directory reading allowed?) Karel Gardas
02:47 Re: [PATCH] Re: [tree-ssa] build failure on powerpc-aix in libobjc Andrew Pinski
02:24 Re: [PATCH] Re: [tree-ssa] build failure on powerpc-aix in libobjc Diego Novillo
01:42 [PATCH] Re: [tree-ssa] build failure on powerpc-aix in libobjc Andrew Pinski
01:12 Re: [tree-ssa] build failure on powerpc-aix in libobjc David Edelsohn
01:09 [tree-ssa] build failure on powerpc-aix in libobjc Andrew Pinski

April 15, 2004
22:53 Re: Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really Luke A. Guest
21:47 Re: simple question Andreas Tobler
21:47 Re: simple question Gabriel Dos Reis
21:43 simple question Ramin NIkaeen
20:57 Re: Question on variable_size and function-at-a-time Toon Moene
20:17 Re: 3.4 Bug? template dependent name lookup fails from template functions Gabriel Dos Reis
20:16 Re: [darwin] linkonce patch troubles Andreas Tobler
20:01 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-04-14 Diego Novillo
19:13 Re: ASM_OUTPUT_ADDR_VEC_ELT Jim Wilson
18:46 IMA status? Geoffrey Keating
18:28 Re: GCJ on mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu David Daney
17:45 Re: [darwin] linkonce patch troubles Matt Austern
16:09 Re: 3.4 Bug? template dependent name lookup fails from template functions Michael Veksler
15:48 The Linux binutils 2.15.90.0.3 is released H. J. Lu
15:28 Re: 3.4 Bug? template dependent name lookup fails from template functions Gabriel Dos Reis
14:29 Re: 3.4 Bug? template dependent name lookup fails from template functions llewelly
14:24 Re: 3.4 Bug? template dependent name lookup fails from template functions llewelly
13:35 Re: 3.4 Bug? template dependent name lookup fails from template functions Paolo Carlini
13:34 Re: 3.4 Bug? template dependent name lookup fails from templatefunctions Karel Gardas
13:23 Re: 3.4 Bug? template dependent name lookup fails from templatefunctions Richard Guenther
13:07 Re: 3.4 Bug? template dependent name lookup fails from template functions llewelly
12:46 RE: why -mhitachi gives ICE for SH-coff toolchain [gcc 3.4] Nitin Yewale
11:23 Re: 3.4 Bug? template dependent name lookup fails from template functions Nathan Sidwell
10:55 3.4 Bug? template dependent name lookup fails from template functions Michael Veksler
08:44 Re: Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really Luke A. Guest

April 14, 2004
23:22 Re: Question on variable_size and function-at-a-time Geoff Keating
22:46 Re: Superblock Scheduling Alg in GCC Vladimir Makarov
22:04 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2004-04-10 Jan Hubicka
21:37 Re: Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really Laurent GUERBY
21:36 [tree-ssa] Kills by VDEFs in mark_def_sites Zdenek Dvorak
21:33 Re: Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really Geert Bosch
21:21 Re: Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really Nathanael Nerode
21:20 Re: cc1 of nonexistent file still segfaults Per Bothner
21:10 Re: Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really Laurent GUERBY
21:06 Re: 100% speed improvement 3.4 -> 3.5 for ia64!! (?) Jim Wilson
20:28 Re: Question on variable_size and function-at-a-time Toon Moene
20:27 RE: why -mhitachi gives ICE for SH-coff toolchain [gcc 3.4] Jim Wilson
20:17 Ada users: please try libada-branch -- really Nathanael Nerode
18:35 Re: cc1 of nonexistent file still segfaults Mike Stump
17:40 gcc-ss-3.4-20040414 is now available gccadmin
17:33 Re: why -mhitachi gives ICE for SH-coff toolchain [gcc 3.4] Nick Clifton
17:22 Re: Superblock Scheduling Alg in GCC Ghassan Shobaki
17:03 cc:Mail Link to SMTP Undeliverable Message cbritton
15:31 Re: collect2 bug in 3.3.2 on Tru64 UNIX 5.1 Ian Lance Taylor
14:29 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2004-04-10 Diego Novillo
14:18 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2004-04-10 David Edelsohn
13:46 Re: 100% speed improvement 3.4 -> 3.5 for ia64!! (?) Richard Guenther
13:16 Re: 100% speed improvement 3.4 -> 3.5 for ia64!! (?) Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:14 forcing C++ objects to an address (ABI issue B-7) Anthony Heading
12:59 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2004-04-10 Diego Novillo
12:42 Re: 100% speed improvement 3.4 -> 3.5 for ia64!! (?) Andrew Pinski
12:39 Re: 100% speed improvement 3.4 -> 3.5 for ia64!! (?) Richard Guenther
12:38 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2004-04-10 Andrew Pinski
12:24 RE: why -mhitachi gives ICE for SH-coff toolchain [gcc 3.4] Nitin Yewale
12:15 Re: 100% speed improvement 3.4 -> 3.5 for ia64!! (?) Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:10 Re: 100% speed improvement 3.4 -> 3.5 for ia64!! (?) Richard Guenther
11:55 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2004-04-10 Diego Novillo
11:40 Re: collect2 bug in 3.3.2 on Tru64 UNIX 5.1 Rainer Orth
11:18 ASM_OUTPUT_ADDR_VEC_ELT Nathan Sidwell
09:57 100% speed improvement 3.4 -> 3.5 for ia64!! (?) Richard Guenther
06:24 Re: cc1 of nonexistent file still segfaults Jim Wilson
05:17 gcc-3.4 changes.html : template vs. copy ctor Michael Veksler
03:54 Re: help with gcc bugs Ben Elliston
03:26 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2004-04-10 Andi Kleen
03:19 Re: collect2 bug in 3.3.2 on Tru64 UNIX 5.1 Jim Wilson
03:14 help with gcc bugs clarke micheal
02:39 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2004-04-10 David Edelsohn

April 13, 2004
22:52 [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2004-04-10 Diego Novillo
22:30 RE: Bootstrap FAILURE: gcc-3.4.0-20040406 prerelease Stephan T. Lavavej
22:20 RE:Bootstrap FAILURE: gcc-3.4.0-20040406 prerelease Danny Smith
20:57 Re: Obtain AST from GCC Jim Wilson
19:03 Re: Question on function-at-a-time and GC Richard Henderson
18:00 Re: gcc 3.3.3 and interworking Eric Christopher
17:54 Re: gcc 3.3.3 and interworking Gabriel Dos Reis
17:40 Re: gcc-3.4: critical C++ bug, too many destructors Michael Veksler
17:20 gcc 3.3.3 and interworking Dave Murphy
17:17 Re: [tree-ssa] labels after returns Richard Henderson
16:36 Re: gcc-3.4: critical C++ bug, too many destructors Gabriel Dos Reis
16:23 The Linux binutils 2.15.90.0.2 is released H. J. Lu
16:01 Re: gcc-3.4: critical C++ bug, too many destructors Andrew Pinski
16:01 Re: gcc-3.4: critical C++ bug, too many destructors Andrew Pinski
15:57 Re: gcc-3.4: critical C++ bug, too many destructors Gabriel Dos Reis
15:20 Re: gcc-3.4: critical C++ bug, too many destructors Andrew Pinski
15:09 Re: RFC: *_FOR_TARGET and friends Aldy Hernandez
14:29 Re: [tree-ssa] labels after returns Daniel Jacobowitz
14:17 Re: gcc-3.4: critical C++ bug, too many destructors Richard Guenther
14:13 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Olivier Hainque
14:02 Re: some testing for the 3.4.0 prerelease Eric Botcazou
13:59 gcc-3.4: critical C++ bug, too many destructors Michael Veksler
13:52 Re: GCC warnings question Nathan Sidwell
13:33 Re: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Alexandre Oliva
13:32 Re: RFC: *_FOR_TARGET and friends Alexandre Oliva
11:45 Bootstrap FAILURE: gcc-3.4.0-20040406 prerelease Stephan T. Lavavej
11:24 RE: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Dave Korn
10:51 Re: GCC warnings question llewelly
09:23 always_inline + template failures (oops) Michael Veksler
09:17 gcc@gcc.gnu.org Michael Veksler
09:14 Re: Question on variable_size and function-at-a-time Robert Dewar
09:12 Re: Question on function-at-a-time and GC Robert Dewar
08:22 GCC warnings question Jonathan Wilson
07:27 Re: [tree-ssa] labels after returns law
03:22 Re: RFC: *_FOR_TARGET and friends James Morrison
01:54 Re: RFC: *_FOR_TARGET and friends Aldy Hernandez
01:42 Re: RFC: *_FOR_TARGET and friends Alexandre Oliva
00:51 Re: some testing for the 3.4.0 prerelease Ben Elliston
00:05 Re: [tree-ssa] What to do with ChangeLog.tree-ssa? Ben Elliston

April 12, 2004
21:00 Re: Question on function-at-a-time and GC Daniel Jacobowitz
20:50 Re: Question on variable_size and function-at-a-time Geoff Keating
20:38 Re: Question on function-at-a-time and GC Richard Kenner
20:35 Re: Question on function-at-a-time and GC Geoff Keating
20:34 Re: Question on function-at-a-time and GC Richard Henderson
20:33 Re: Running Gcov on a target, embedded platform Frank Ch. Eigler
20:31 Re: Load insn register restrictions David Edelsohn
20:31 Re: Question on variable_size and function-at-a-time Richard Kenner
20:30 Re: [tree-ssa] labels after returns Richard Henderson
20:27 Re: Question on variable_size and function-at-a-time Richard Henderson
20:22 Load insn register restrictions Paul Brook
19:40 Re: ordering of constructors Gabriel Dos Reis
19:03 Re: ordering of constructors Phil Edwards
19:00 Re: Question on function-at-a-time and GC Richard Kenner
18:48 Re: ordering of constructors Matt Austern
18:44 Re: Question on function-at-a-time and GC Zack Weinberg
17:42 Re: RFC: *_FOR_TARGET and friends Aldy Hernandez
17:33 Re: [tree-ssa] labels after returns Andrew Pinski
17:27 Re: [tree-ssa] labels after returns Andrew Pinski
17:26 Re: RFC: *_FOR_TARGET and friends Alexandre Oliva
17:15 Running Gcov on a target, embedded platform Ryan and Karen
17:13 Re: Question on function-at-a-time and GC Richard Kenner
17:12 Re: Question on function-at-a-time and GC Zack Weinberg
17:01 Re: ordering of constructors Phil Edwards
16:48 Re: [tree-ssa] labels after returns Graham Stott
16:46 Re: [tree-ssa] labels after returns law
16:39 Re: [tree-ssa] labels after returns Diego Novillo
16:35 Re: [tree-ssa] labels after returns law
16:27 Re: [tree-ssa] labels after returns Diego Novillo
16:23 Re: [tree-ssa] labels after returns law
16:20 Obtain AST from GCC Sean Hsiao
15:34 Re: GCC-3.3.3 & GNAT Luke A. Guest
15:23 Re: GCC-3.3.3 & GNAT Robert Dewar
15:20 GCC-3.3.3 & GNAT Luke A. Guest
14:28 Re: 3.4.0-20040406 regression: 'make install' fails with Java. PR12730? Dan Kegel
13:33 Missing documentation on "varray" Richard Kenner
12:24 Question on function-at-a-time and GC Richard Kenner
12:17 Re: [tree-ssa] labels after returns Diego Novillo
12:16 Re: [tree-ssa] GENERIC and GIMPLE documentation Diego Novillo
11:49 Re: RFC: *_FOR_TARGET and friends Aldy Hernandez
11:34 Re: [tree-ssa] GENERIC and GIMPLE documentation Tom Crick
10:33 Re: RFC: *_FOR_TARGET and friends Alexandre Oliva
07:39 Re: gcc-ss-3.3-20040411 is now available Gerald Pfeifer
06:24 [tree-ssa] labels after returns Andrew Pinski
03:54 Re: RFC: *_FOR_TARGET and friends Aldy Hernandez
03:16 Re: RFC: *_FOR_TARGET and friends Daniel Jacobowitz
02:37 Re: 3.4.0-20040406 regression: 'make install' fails with Java. PR12730? Paul Jarc
02:31 Re: Failure when installing gcc-3.4.0-prerelease Paul Jarc
02:00 RFC: *_FOR_TARGET and friends Aldy Hernandez

April 11, 2004
23:44 Re: Building GENERIC trees Tom Crick
17:07 gcc-ss-3.3-20040411 is now available gccadmin
16:08 Re: 3.4.0-20040406 regression: 'make install' fails with Java. PR12730? Guillermo Ballester Valor
15:53 3.4.0-20040406 regression: 'make install' fails with Java. PR12730? Dan Kegel
15:11 Distributed.Net Block Fetcher Failure blocks-bounces
13:58 Re: Failure when installing gcc-3.4.0-prerelease Andreas Jaeger
12:21 Failure when installing gcc-3.4.0-prerelease Guillermo Ballester Valor
12:03 Question on variable_size and function-at-a-time Richard Kenner
02:06 Re: ordering of constructors Gabriel Dos Reis
00:52 Re: ordering of constructors Neal Becker

April 10, 2004
22:09 Re: ordering of constructors Gabriel Dos Reis
21:49 Re: complex __real__ and __imag__ as lvalues Richard Henderson
21:49 Re: ordering of constructors Gabriel Dos Reis
21:49 Re: ordering of constructors Neal Becker
21:49 Re: complex __real__ and __imag__ as lvalues Gabriel Dos Reis
18:27 Jem has a new address jem
17:33 Re: ordering of constructors Matt Austern
17:05 Re: contrib/update_gcc broken Mike Stump
16:18 Re: contrib/update_gcc broken Andreas Jaeger
16:05 contrib/update_gcc broken Mike Stump
10:52 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Toon Moene
08:18 Re: ordering of constructors Gabriel Dos Reis
06:20 Re: Why are vectors not arrays? Zdenek Dvorak
03:40 Re: ordering of constructors Matt Austern
01:51 Re: ordering of constructors llewelly
01:18 Re: ordering of constructors Daniel Jacobowitz
00:54 Re: ordering of constructors Gabriel Dos Reis
00:49 Re: ordering of constructors Gabriel Dos Reis
00:47 Re: complex __real__ and __imag__ as lvalues Gabriel Dos Reis
00:23 Re: complex __real__ and __imag__ as lvalues Richard Henderson
00:22 Re: Why are vectors not arrays? Richard Henderson

April 09, 2004
21:19 complex __real__ and __imag__ as lvalues Benjamin Kosnik
19:47 Re: some testing for the 3.4.0 prerelease Scott Robert Ladd
19:23 Re: some testing for the 3.4.0 prerelease Joe Buck
19:02 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Joe Buck
17:53 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Christopher Faylor
17:26 Re: ordering of constructors Jay Freeman \(saurik\)
17:22 Re: ordering of constructors Chris Lattner
16:55 Re: ordering of constructors Jay Freeman \(saurik\)
16:15 Re: ordering of constructors Joe Buck
16:12 Re: ordering of constructors Joe Buck
15:39 Re: ordering of constructors Theodore Papadopoulo
14:52 Re: ordering of constructors Daniel Jacobowitz
14:49 Re: ordering of constructors Gabriel Dos Reis
14:47 Re: ordering of constructors Gabriel Dos Reis
14:30 Re: Why are vectors not arrays? Daniel Berlin
14:25 Re: ordering of constructors Theodore Papadopoulo
14:04 Why are vectors not arrays? Ian Lance Taylor
13:57 Re: ordering of constructors Daniel Jacobowitz
13:52 Re: Debugging info on # spills? Vladimir N. Makarov
13:29 Re: ordering of constructors Gabriel Dos Reis
12:57 Re: ordering of constructors Neal Becker
12:48 Re: ordering of constructors Gabriel Dos Reis
12:20 ordering of constructors Neal Becker
12:04 Re: some testing for the 3.4.0 prerelease Kaveh R. Ghazi
06:49 Re: some testing for the 3.4.0 prerelease Laurent GUERBY
06:25 Re: Debugging info on # spills? Mostafa Hagog
06:08 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Stephan T. Lavavej
05:52 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Eric Christopher
05:14 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? E. Weddington
05:02 Re: Broken links to main ftp site on your gnu.org web site Andrew Pinski
04:54 Broken links to main ftp site on your gnu.org web site Bill Bruns
02:15 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Nathanael Nerode
00:35 Re: AltiVec [RFH] Overload resolution of vec_subs intrinsic fails Andrew Pinski
00:33 Re: AltiVec [RFH] Overload resolution of vec_subs intrinsic fails Andrew Pinski
00:33 Re: Your archive reflection-comments
00:27 AltiVec [RFH] Overload resolution of vec_subs intrinsic fails Fariborz Jahanian
00:01 Re: some testing for the 3.4.0 prerelease Phil Edwards

April 08, 2004
23:55 Re: some testing for the 3.4.0 prerelease Scott Robert Ladd
22:56 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Danny Smith
22:53 Re: some testing for the 3.4.0 prerelease Scott Robert Ladd
22:45 Re: Strange testsuite behavior on AMD64, more info Joe Buck
22:36 Strange testsuite behavior on AMD64, more info Scott Robert Ladd
22:28 Re: some testing for the 3.4.0 prerelease Phil Edwards
22:22 Re: some testing for the 3.4.0 prerelease Laurent GUERBY
22:18 Re: Mainline: failure building libstdc++ Andrew Pinski
22:11 Re: [tree-ssa] GENERIC and GIMPLE documentation Diego Novillo
22:11 Re: some testing for the 3.4.0 prerelease Zack Weinberg
22:11 Variables whose types are anonymous structs, once again Matt Austern
22:10 Mainline: failure building libstdc++ Matt Austern
21:28 Re: Functions in RAM Mike Stump
21:20 some testing for the 3.4.0 prerelease Joe Buck
21:16 Functions in RAM David Mc Kenna
21:05 Re: What's the purpose of struct elt_loc_list's canon_loc field? Jan Hubicka
20:46 Re: What's the purpose of struct elt_loc_list's canon_loc field? Jan Hubicka
20:34 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Gabriel Dos Reis
20:27 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Joe Buck
20:15 Re: [tree-ssa] GENERIC and GIMPLE documentation Geert Bosch
19:58 New ACATS failures on x86-linux Laurent GUERBY
19:45 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Gabriel Dos Reis
19:34 Re: [tree-ssa] GENERIC and GIMPLE documentation Diego Novillo
19:30 [tree-ssa] GENERIC and GIMPLE documentation Geert Bosch
19:24 Re: [tree-ssa] What to do with ChangeLog.tree-ssa? law
18:39 Re: committed: Ada updates Andi Kleen
18:35 pragma Inspection_Point (was: committed: Ada updates) Laurent GUERBY
18:35 Re: java man page installation failure Mark Mitchell
18:32 [tree-ssa] What to do with ChangeLog.tree-ssa? Diego Novillo
18:20 Re: ICE with current gcc cvs Zack Weinberg
18:15 Question!! Sean Hsiao
18:12 Re: java man page installation failure Michael Elizabeth Chastain
18:07 Re: Running the testsuite on gentoo-amd64 Scott Robert Ladd
17:56 Re: java man page installation failure Paul Jarc
17:43 Re: java man page installation failure Michael Elizabeth Chastain
17:39 Re: TYPE_MODE() returns wrong mode for POINTER_TYPE nodes Richard Henderson
17:36 Re: Partially redundant casts Richard Henderson
17:22 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Joe Buck
17:20 i386.md strangeness in sse2_movsd Davide Rossetti
17:13 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? DJ Delorie
17:03 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Joe Buck
16:56 Re: Running the testsuite on gentoo-amd64 Joe Buck
16:54 Re: help with CVS Joe Buck
16:50 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Daniel Jacobowitz
16:43 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Joe Buck
16:42 help with CVS clarke micheal
16:42 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Daniel Berlin
16:30 Running the testsuite on gentoo-amd64 Scott Robert Ladd
16:25 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? E. Weddington
16:23 Re: java man page installation failure Mark Mitchell
16:12 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Segher Boessenkool
16:09 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Richard Kenner
16:04 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Christopher Faylor
16:00 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Christopher Faylor
15:56 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? E. Weddington
15:50 Re: Tin foil hat GCC (Was: Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries) Tom Lord
15:44 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Richard Kenner
15:42 Re: Added LLVM 1.2 to nightly SPEC comparison runs Chris Lattner
15:41 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? E. Weddington
15:39 Re: g++ 3.2 questions llewelly
15:36 Re: Added LLVM 1.2 to nightly SPEC comparison runs Diego Novillo
15:27 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Richard Kenner
15:22 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? E. Weddington
15:16 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? E. Weddington
15:14 Re: Added LLVM 1.2 to nightly SPEC comparison runs Chris Lattner
14:54 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Phil Edwards
14:47 java man page installation failure (was: GCC 3.4.0 PrereleaseAvailable) Paul Jarc
14:32 Re: GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Scott Robert Ladd
14:17 RE: Debugging info on # spills? Michael Matz
14:10 RE: Debugging info on # spills? Dave Korn
13:37 Re: Debugging info on # spills? Michael Matz
13:20 Re: Debugging info on # spills? Mostafa Hagog
13:05 g++ 3.2 questions Greg Hosler
12:26 Successful bootstrap of GCC-3.4.0 prerelease with powerpc-apple-darwin6.8 Kelley Cook
11:55 TYPE_MODE() returns wrong mode for POINTER_TYPE nodes Uros Bizjak
11:55 GCJ and "new-bootstrap" (Was: Re: Mainline is Busted for Java) Ranjit Mathew
11:55 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Richard Kenner
11:54 GCC 4.0 vs. 3.5 Richard Kenner
09:27 Tin foil hat GCC (Was: Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries) Bernd Jendrissek
08:23 Re: [RFC] Speeding up delta by -fatal-errors Richard Guenther
08:14 ICE with current gcc cvs Andrew Morton
07:50 Re: Removing "brik" from release script Bernd Jendrissek
06:30 Re: HEAD update blocked law
06:26 Re: GCC 3.4.0 fails to boot with a non-GCC C compiler Mark Mitchell
05:53 re: Spurious testsuite failures Dan Kegel
05:24 Re: Mainline Is Busted for Java Ranjit Mathew
05:20 Re: HEAD update blocked law
05:16 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Tom Lord
05:13 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Tom Lord
05:05 Re: HEAD update blocked Gabriel Dos Reis
04:51 Re: HEAD update blocked Zack Weinberg
04:44 Re: HEAD update blocked David Edelsohn
04:34 HEAD update blocked Gabriel Dos Reis
03:02 Partially redundant casts Daniel Berlin
02:28 Added LLVM 1.2 to nightly SPEC comparison runs Diego Novillo
02:16 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Christopher Faylor
01:59 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Richard Kenner
01:59 Re: why -mhitachi gives ICE for SH-coff toolchain [gcc 3.4] Jim Wilson
01:53 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Jim Wilson
01:50 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Nathanael Nerode
01:23 Re: [MIPS] reduce floating point registers Shinpei Kato
01:23 Re: What's the purpose of struct elt_loc_list's canon_loc field? Jim Wilson
01:07 Re: [RFC] Speeding up delta by -fatal-errors Jim Wilson
00:39 Re: user-guided speculative precomputation? (my wacky ia64 idea) Jim Wilson
00:10 Re: user-guided speculative precomputation? (my wacky ia64 idea) Duraid Madina

April 07, 2004
23:46 Re: user-guided speculative precomputation? (my wacky ia64 idea) Jim Wilson
23:41 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Gabriel Dos Reis
23:22 Re: C++ grammar issue Ian Lance Taylor
23:19 C++ grammar issue Yu Yang
23:05 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Christopher Faylor
22:55 Re: [Fwd: tree-ssa treelang problems] Diego Novillo
22:52 [Fwd: tree-ssa treelang problems] George Gensure
22:29 Re: GCC 3.4.0 fails to boot with a non-GCC C compiler Andreas Schwab
22:28 Re: GCC 3.4.0 fails to boot with a non-GCC C compiler Joe Buck
22:23 Re: GCC 3.4.0 fails to boot with a non-GCC C compiler Joe Buck
22:09 gcc-ss-3.4-20040407 is now available gccadmin
21:36 Re: GCC 3.4.0 fails to boot with a non-GCC C compiler Mark Mitchell
21:29 Re: GCC 3.4.0 fails to boot with a non-GCC C compiler Andreas Schwab
21:24 Re: Darwin Contributor Mike Stump
21:05 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Phil Edwards
20:55 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Joe Buck
20:40 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Tom Lord
20:40 Re: GCC 3.4.0 fails to boot with a non-GCC C compiler Joe Buck
20:29 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Joe Buck
20:25 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Tom Lord
20:19 Re: GCC 3.4.0 fails to boot with a non-GCC C compiler Joe Buck
20:00 Re: GCC 3.4.0 fails to boot with a non-GCC C compiler Richard Henderson
19:58 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Joe Buck
19:53 Re: Removing "brik" from release script Joe Buck
19:43 Re: GCC 3.4.0 fails to boot with a non-GCC C compiler Joe Buck
19:32 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Tom Lord
19:30 RE: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Stephan T. Lavavej
19:30 Re: GCC 3.4.0 fails to boot with a non-GCC C compiler Richard Henderson
19:29 Re: Removing "brik" from release script Joseph S. Myers
19:19 Re: gcc.gnu.org anoncvs problem ? Ian Lance Taylor
19:15 Re: Mainline Is Busted for Java Ian Lance Taylor
19:14 gcc.gnu.org anoncvs problem ? Frédéric L. W. Meunier
19:13 Re: Removing "brik" from release script Volker Reichelt
19:08 Re: Mainline Is Busted for Java Mark Wielaard
19:06 Re: GCC 3.4.0 fails to boot with a non-GCC C compiler Mark Mitchell
19:02 Re: GCC 3.4.0 fails to boot with a non-GCC C compiler Joe Buck
18:51 Re: GCC 3.4.0 fails to boot with a non-GCC C compiler Joe Buck
18:45 GCC 3.4.0 fails to boot with a non-GCC C compiler Joe Buck
17:46 Removing "brik" from release script Mark Mitchell
17:44 GCC 3.4.0 Prerelease Available Mark Mitchell
17:38 Re: GCC 3.4 prerelease build failed Mark Mitchell
17:32 Re: RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? E. Weddington
17:03 RFC: Removing --enable-win32-registry? Nathanael Nerode
16:53 Re: Where does one go to ask about testsuites? Diego Novillo
16:51 Re: Where does one go to ask about testsuites? Joe Buck
16:47 Re: Mainline is Busted for Java Nathanael Nerode
16:43 Re: Mainline Is Busted for Java Caroline Tice
16:41 Where does one go to ask about testsuites? Scott Robert Ladd
16:16 Re: Debugging info on # spills? Daniel Berlin
16:10 Re: Debugging info on # spills? Vladimir Makarov
16:02 Re: Debugging info on # spills? Daniel Berlin
15:54 Re: Debugging info on # spills? Michael Matz
15:22 Re: Debugging info on # spills? Daniel Berlin
14:08 Re: Mainline Is Busted for Java John David Anglin
14:00 Re: Error codes from driver Ian Lance Taylor
13:38 Re: Debugging info on # spills? Michael Matz
12:44 Re: Mainline Is Busted for Java Ranjit Mathew
12:34 Re: Mainline Is Busted for Java Andrew Pinski
12:27 Re: Mainline Is Busted for Java Ranjit Mathew
11:56 Re: Error codes from driver Martin Reinecke
11:16 Mainline Is Busted for Java Andrew Haley
10:03 Re: Error codes from driver Martin Reinecke
08:21 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-04-05) Lars Albertsson
07:50 Re: [RFC] Speed up htab/walk_tree? Richard Guenther
07:43 Re: GCC 3.4 prerelease build failed Gerald Pfeifer
06:56 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Bernd Jendrissek
06:03 Re: collect2 bug in 3.3.2 on Tru64 UNIX 5.1 Bruno Hall
05:53 Re: user-guided speculative precomputation? (my wacky ia64 idea) Duraid Madina
05:48 collect2 bug in 3.3.2 on Tru64 UNIX 5.1 Albert Chin
05:19 Re: user-guided speculative precomputation? (my wacky ia64 idea) James Morrison
05:03 Re: a contentious configure idea: --quiet Ben Elliston
04:45 Re: user-guided speculative precomputation? (my wacky ia64 idea) Daniel Jacobowitz
03:54 Debugging info on # spills? Timothy J. Wood
03:47 Re: cygwin version of gcc Christopher Faylor
02:39 Error codes from driver Richard Kenner
02:38 Re: How does the configure process decide to create shared libraries? David Daney
01:54 Re: user-guided speculative precomputation? (my wacky ia64 idea) James Morrison
00:08 Re: user-guided speculative precomputation? (my wacky ia64 idea) Duraid Madina

April 06, 2004
22:41 Re: [tree-ssa] more experiments with disabling RTL passes for tree-ssa Steven Bosscher
22:35 Re: [tree-ssa] more experiments with disabling RTL passes for tree-ssa Steven Bosscher
22:24 Re: [RFC] Speed up htab/walk_tree? Andrew Pinski
22:22 Re: [tree-ssa] more experiments with disabling RTL passes for tree-ssa Paolo Carlini
21:47 [tree-ssa] more experiments with disabling RTL passes for tree-ssa Steven Bosscher
20:18 Re: Darwin Contributor Laurent GUERBY
20:05 Re: Darwin Contributor Andrew Pinski
20:03 Re: Darwin Contributor Laurent GUERBY
19:44 Re: cygwin version of gcc Jim Wilson
19:43 [RFC] Speed up htab/walk_tree? Richard Guenther
19:35 Re: Darwin Contributor Geert Bosch
19:27 Re: Darwin Contributor Jim Wilson
19:21 Re: How does the configure process decide to create shared libraries? Jim Wilson
19:18 Tree-SSA maintainers appointed for mainline David Edelsohn
18:20 Re: Byte types and aliasing Richard Henderson
17:37 GCC 3.4 prerelease build failed Mark Mitchell
16:58 Re: Spurious testsuite failures Eric Botcazou
16:56 What's the purpose of struct elt_loc_list's canon_loc field? Jakub Jelinek
16:49 Re: does 3.4 truncate include paths? Zack Weinberg
15:45 Spurious testsuite failures Christian Ehrhardt
15:03 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Chris Lattner
14:15 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Daniel Jacobowitz
14:04 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Chris Lattner
13:50 [RFC] Speeding up delta by -fatal-errors Richard Guenther
12:29 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Scott Robert Ladd
12:28 Byte types and aliasing Andrew Haley
11:52 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-04-05) Richard Guenther
11:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-04-05 Paolo Bonzini
09:19 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Robert Dewar
09:17 why -mhitachi gives ICE for SH-coff toolchain [gcc 3.4] Nitin Yewale
08:27 RE: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Stephan T. Lavavej
08:21 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Alexandre Oliva
08:19 Re: regmove pass with x87 sincos() instruction Uros Bizjak
07:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Problem with CVS pull on 05-Apr-04 Christian Ehrhardt
07:13 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-04-05) Mark Mitchell
07:02 Re: Tasks? Jim Wilson
06:50 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-04-05) Eric Botcazou
06:49 Re: regmove pass with x87 sincos() instruction Jim Wilson
06:32 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Ben Elliston
06:23 Re: IA64 assembler can't handle constant org offsets Jim Wilson
06:17 Re: [RTL] emit_insn_before() -- got error Jim Wilson
06:02 Re: user-guided speculative precomputation? (my wacky ia64 idea) Jim Wilson
05:52 Re: About get_insns() Jim Wilson
05:32 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Chris Lattner
05:24 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Chris Lattner
05:24 RE: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Stephan T. Lavavej
05:06 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Alexandre Oliva
04:12 RE: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Stephan T. Lavavej
04:03 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Scott Robert Ladd
03:23 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Andrew Pinski
03:18 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Tom Lord
03:13 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Daniel Berlin
03:09 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Stephan T. Lavavej
02:48 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Ben Elliston
02:20 Re: Darwin Contributor Andrew Pinski
02:10 cygwin version of gcc Edward S. Peschko
02:07 Darwin Contributor Andrew Reynolds
01:42 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-04-05) Mark Mitchell
01:26 Re: does 3.4 truncate include paths? sean darcy
01:17 How does the configure process decide to create shared libraries? David Daney
00:39 Re: [Bug pch/14400] Cannot compile qt-x11-free-3.3.0 Ian Lance Taylor

April 05, 2004
23:57 RE: Ping : H8/300 ABI Document Jim Wilson
22:50 Re: [Bug pch/14400] Cannot compile qt-x11-free-3.3.0 Geoff Keating
22:47 Re: Fixing struct-by-value-[567] on solaris2 with -fpic Janis Johnson
22:35 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-04-05) Benjamin Kosnik
21:59 gcc-ss-3.3-20040405 is now available gccadmin
21:22 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-04-05) Matthias Klose
20:54 Re: [Bug pch/14400] Cannot compile qt-x11-free-3.3.0 Mike Stump
20:46 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Mike Stump
19:41 g++, pthread.h, and -ansi Graeme Peterson
18:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Problem with CVS pull on 05-Apr-04 Phil Edwards
18:20 [tree-ssa] Problem with CVS pull on 05-Apr-04 Scott Robert Ladd
17:45 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-04-05) Richard Guenther
17:43 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-04-05) Richard Guenther
17:39 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-04-05) Paolo Carlini
17:38 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-04-05) Daniel Jacobowitz
17:30 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-04-05) Richard Guenther
17:10 GCC Status Report (2004-04-05) Mark Mitchell
16:53 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-04-05 Andrew Pinski
16:50 Re: IA64 assembler can't handle constant org offsets H. J. Lu
16:30 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-04-05 Diego Novillo
16:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-04-05 Scott Robert Ladd
15:54 [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-04-05 Diego Novillo
15:34 Re: dwarf2 loclist question Daniel Jacobowitz
14:36 Re: gcc's PowerPC FP exception model? Kumar Gala
10:22 GCC on AMD64? Andrew Haley
10:18 GCC on AMD64? Andrew Haley
10:01 Re: [RTL] emit_insn_before() -- got error Jie Zhang
09:21 Re: 3.4 / 3.5 / tree-ssa comparisons Richard Guenther
05:36 Re: dwarf2 loclist question Josef Zlomek
05:15 RE: dwarf2 loclist question Dhananjay R. Deshpande
02:40 Re: does 3.4 truncate include paths? Zack Weinberg
02:13 Re: does 3.4 truncate include paths? sean darcy
01:25 Re: What happened to __FUNCTION__ in 3.4 ?? Zack Weinberg
01:23 Re: does 3.4 truncate include paths? Zack Weinberg
01:18 Re: Tasks? The Thodes
01:12 Re: What happened to __FUNCTION__ in 3.4 ?? David Daney
01:03 Re: What happened to __FUNCTION__ in 3.4 ?? Daniel Jacobowitz
00:23 What happened to __FUNCTION__ in 3.4 ?? David Daney

April 04, 2004
23:01 gcc's PowerPC FP exception model? Matt Thomas
20:00 Re: [tree-ssa] A pass to remove a large number of casts in C++ code Nathanael Nerode
18:37 Re: does 3.4 truncate include paths? sean darcy
17:56 Re: does 3.4 truncate include paths? Daniel Jacobowitz
17:30 does 3.4 truncate include paths? sean darcy
16:54 Re: [tree-ssa] Alpha bootstrap failure Steven Bosscher
16:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Alpha bootstrap failure Diego Novillo
16:47 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Kai Henningsen
16:45 Re: 3.4 / 3.5 / tree-ssa comparisons Andrew Pinski
16:11 GCC on AMD64? nick
15:21 Re: Performance testing of c-decl rewrite Daniel Jacobowitz
13:57 Re: 3.4 / 3.5 / tree-ssa comparisons Richard Guenther
12:12 [tree-ssa] Alpha bootstrap failure Steven Bosscher
11:27 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Robert Dewar
11:18 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Alexandre Oliva
08:09 Performance testing of c-decl rewrite Zack Weinberg
07:43 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Stephan T. Lavavej
06:53 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Nathanael Nerode
03:38 Re: [Bug pch/14400] Cannot compile qt-x11-free-3.3.0 Ian Lance Taylor
03:01 Re: Tasks? llewelly
00:52 Re: How to declare tiny varaiable Bill Cox
00:32 Re: where is IDENTIFIER_NODE_CHECK #defined? Richard Kenner
00:30 where is IDENTIFIER_NODE_CHECK #defined? sashan

April 03, 2004
23:57 Re: tree-ssa vs. tree-ssa comparison Diego Novillo
23:39 Re: VU#540517 Richard Stallman
23:30 tree-ssa vs. tree-ssa comparison Steven Bosscher
22:27 Re: Tasks? Jean-Pierre Radley
22:25 Re: Conmpile speed vs Runtime speed Robert Dewar
22:25 Tasks? The Thodes
20:54 Re: 3.4 / 3.5 / tree-ssa comparisons Andrew Pinski
20:52 Re: 3.4 / 3.5 / tree-ssa comparisons Richard Guenther
20:50 3.4 / 3.5 / tree-ssa comparisons Richard Guenther
20:06 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Mark Hahn
18:37 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Dan Kegel
16:50 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Tom Lord
15:40 Conmpile speed vs Runtime speed Jonathan Wilson
15:37 Re: [tree-ssa] gcc/fortran and libgfortran directories are open Scott Robert Ladd
15:33 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Scott Robert Ladd
15:33 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Bud Davis
15:24 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Scott Robert Ladd
15:16 [tree-ssa] gcc/fortran and libgfortran directories are open Diego Novillo
15:00 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Richard Kenner
14:46 [RTL] emit_insn_before() -- got error 王 逸
14:37 Fixing struct-by-value-[567] on solaris2 with -fpic Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:29 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Robert Dewar
14:27 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Robert Dewar
14:15 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Toon Moene
13:53 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Stelios Xanthakis
04:59 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Andrew Pimlott
01:56 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Joe Buck
01:17 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Geoff Keating
00:52 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Scott Robert Ladd
00:49 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Scott Robert Ladd
00:17 Re: bugzilla voting Robert Dewar

April 02, 2004
23:26 Re: a contentious configure idea: --quiet Joe Buck
23:22 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Nathanael Nerode
23:20 Re: a contentious configure idea: --quiet Nathanael Nerode
22:56 Re: bugzilla voting Robert Dewar
21:30 Re: bugzilla voting Robert Dewar
20:34 Re: Exception handling HowTO?? Stelios Xanthakis
20:24 Re: bugzilla voting Phil Edwards
19:47 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Toon Moene
19:41 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Dale Johannesen
19:16 Re: [Bug pch/14400] Cannot compile qt-x11-free-3.3.0 Geoffrey Keating
19:03 Re: bugzilla voting Joe Buck
18:57 Re: [tree-ssa] performance regression after yesterdays mainline merge Janis Johnson
18:32 Re: [tree-ssa] performance regression after yesterdays mainline merge Richard Guenther
18:25 Re: [tree-ssa] performance regression after yesterdays mainline merge Fariborz Jahanian
18:18 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Geoff Keating
17:50 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Tom Lord
17:28 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Alexandre Oliva
17:05 Re: VU#540517 Bruno Haible
16:48 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Ian Lance Taylor
16:47 RE: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Dave Korn
16:40 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Scott Robert Ladd
16:37 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Scott Robert Ladd
16:32 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Daniel Berlin
16:26 Re: bugzilla voting Scott Robert Ladd
16:21 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Richard Kenner
16:17 Re: bugzilla voting Daniel Berlin
16:14 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Ian Lance Taylor
16:12 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Scott Robert Ladd
16:06 RE: VU#540517 Dave Korn
16:03 Re: Of Bounties and Mercenaries Michael Matz
16:03 Re: VU#540517 Ian Lance Taylor
15:55 RE: VU#540517 Dave Korn
15:54 Re: bugzilla voting Ian Lance Taylor
15:37 Of Bounties and Mercenaries Scott Robert Ladd
15:33 Re: VU#540517 Giovanni Bajo
15:24 Re: dwarf2 loclist question Daniel Jacobowitz
15:18 Re: [Bug pch/14400] Cannot compile qt-x11-free-3.3.0 Ian Lance Taylor
15:07 Re: bugzilla voting Scott Robert Ladd
14:59 Re: VU#540517 Robert C. Seacord
14:19 Re: bugzilla voting Joel Sherrill
13:56 [C++] DR 295 & co Giovanni Bajo
13:55 Re: dwarf2 loclist question Josef Zlomek
13:45 Re: bugzilla voting Per Abrahamsen
13:03 An Immodest Proposal for GCC Voting Scott Robert Ladd
13:00 Re: Bugzilla lobbying Scott Robert Ladd
12:49 Re: Bugzilla lobbying Scott Robert Ladd
12:46 Re: bugzilla voting Scott Robert Ladd
12:38 Re: Bugzilla lobbying Phil Edwards
12:37 Re: bugzilla voting Richard Earnshaw
12:33 Re: a contentious configure idea: --quiet Phil Edwards
12:22 dwarf2 loclist question Dhananjay R. Deshpande
09:46 Re: cc1 of nonexistent file still segfaults Per Bothner
09:10 [tree-ssa] performance regression after yesterdays mainline merge Richard Guenther
09:09 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build P
09:09 Re: bugzilla voting Per Abrahamsen
09:06 Re: loop unroll question Zdenek Dvorak
08:50 Re: bugzilla voting Per Abrahamsen
08:44 RE: Ping : H8/300 ABI Document Anil Paranjape
07:58 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build James H. Cloos Jr.
07:13 regmove pass with x87 sincos() instruction Uros Bizjak
06:04 Re: a contentious configure idea: --quiet Eric Christopher
05:54 a contentious configure idea: --quiet Ben Elliston
05:34 Re: [darwin] linkonce patch troubles Matt Austern
03:51 Re: unobsoleting m88k llewelly
03:14 Re: GNU C++ for Mac OSX Mike Stump
02:28 Re: [patch-newbie-test] Insert instructions into functions. Eric Christopher
02:23 [patch-newbie-test] Insert instructions into functions. 王 逸
02:17 About get_insns() wu chunmei
02:14 [patch-newbie-test] Insert instructions into functions. ? ?
02:07 Successfull GCC Installation on SCO OSR5 v5.0.6 Pete M. Wilson
02:00 Re: Bugzilla lobbying Jamie Lokier
01:36 Re: Acovea 4, with Pentium 4 and Opteron results Scott Robert Ladd
01:25 Re: Bugzilla lobbying Robert Dewar
01:19 Re: Acovea 4, with Pentium 4 and Opteron results Scott Robert Ladd
01:16 Re: bugzilla voting Jamie Lokier
01:16 Bugzilla lobbying R. D. Flowers
01:14 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Jamie Lokier
01:07 Re: bugzilla voting Robert Dewar
00:54 Re: bugzilla voting Jamie Lokier
00:53 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Dale Johannesen
00:38 GNU C++ for Mac OSX Gloria Reiss
00:38 Re: bugzilla voting Joe Buck
00:35 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Andrew Morton
00:35 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Geoff Keating
00:35 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Paul Eggert
00:32 Re: bugzilla voting Jamie Lokier
00:30 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Alan Modra
00:22 Re: Question on valid transformations for cbrt Geoff Keating
00:13 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Daniel Jacobowitz
00:02 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Jamie Lokier

April 01, 2004
23:58 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Joe Buck
23:58 Re: bugzilla voting Tom Tromey
23:53 sucessful bootstrap of gcc-3.3.3 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.3.0 Richard W Gilbert, P.E.
22:49 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Ulrich Weigand
22:45 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Paul Jarc
22:39 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Joe Buck
22:33 Re: bugzilla voting Joe Buck
21:44 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Andi Kleen
21:41 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Ulrich Weigand
21:15 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Janis Johnson
21:10 Re: Should ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN honor __attribute__((packed))? Jim Wilson
21:03 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Ulrich Weigand
21:01 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Ulrich Weigand
20:58 Re: Ping : H8/300 ABI Document Jim Wilson
20:57 bugzilla voting Matt Hargett
20:51 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Michael Elizabeth Chastain
20:46 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Andi Kleen
20:44 Re: Handling DWARF call frame labels in the middle of VLIW packets Jim Wilson
20:40 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Daniel Jacobowitz
20:38 Re: RFC: [tree ssa] DSE extension Diego Novillo
20:29 Re: unobsoleting m88k Jim Wilson
20:25 Re: RFC: [tree ssa] DSE extension Dale Johannesen
20:09 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Andi Kleen
20:05 Re: Understanding gcc source Jim Wilson
19:56 Re: RFC: [tree ssa] DSE extension Joe Buck
19:56 Re: RFC: [tree ssa] DSE extension Andrew Pinski
19:54 Re: [RTL] -- How to insert code into functions? Jim Wilson
19:49 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Kelley Cook
19:48 Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses Jim Wilson
19:28 Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Ulrich Weigand
19:24 Re: [tree-ssa] Can't build gcc 20040328 on cygwin: libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pool_allocator.h:299: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed David Edelsohn
19:23 RFC: [tree ssa] DSE extension Dale Johannesen
19:20 [darwin] linkonce patch troubles Andreas Tobler
18:21 Understanding gcc source Hari
18:09 Understanding gcc source Hari
18:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-31 law
18:00 Re: Acovea 4, with Pentium 4 and Opteron results Laurent GUERBY
17:48 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin) David Edelsohn
17:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Can't build gcc 20040328 on cygwin: libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pool_allocator.h:299: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed law
17:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-31 David Edelsohn
17:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-31 Diego Novillo
17:28 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-31 David Edelsohn
17:24 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-31 Diego Novillo
17:13 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin) Benjamin Kosnik
16:45 Re: Acovea 4, with Pentium 4 and Opteron results Andi Kleen
15:11 Acovea 4, with Pentium 4 and Opteron results Scott Robert Ladd
14:53 loop unroll question Revital Eres
13:13 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin) Mostafa Hagog
08:29 Re: No Subject Nathanael Nerode
08:00 How to declare tiny varaiable K. Ahmed Feroz
06:37 Re: problems with subversions.gcc.org Andris Pavenis
05:59 Re: problems with subversions.gcc.org Ian Lance Taylor
04:03 Re: [RTL] -- How to insert code into functions? 王 逸
03:18 Ada users: please try libada-branch Nathanael Nerode
01:17 Re: [Bug pch/14400] Cannot compile qt-x11-free-3.3.0 Geoff Keating
01:00 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Eric Christopher
00:07 user-guided speculative precomputation? (my wacky ia64 idea) Duraid Madina


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3