This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
Cc: poschmid at lbl dot gov, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:10:36 +0100
Subject: Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403150134120.32640@peem.als.lbl.gov> <4055C14D.2050008@suse.de> <026201c40a9e$6a73eff0$074e2a97@bagio>

Giovanni Bajo wrote:

Well, it looks like a serious regression...

Yes :(

is there an open bug report with an
analysys/reduction for it?

I don't think there is one. Something I noticed 1 year ago is that in general P4 is doing much worse than my old PII on this test: perhaps an hint for someone...

If nodoby more knowledgeable than me volunteer to prepare a detailed PR I will before the end of this week.

Even if it's too late for 3.4.x, maybe something can be done for 3.4.1...

Agreed.

Paolo.

References:
- Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu
  - From: poschmid
- Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu
  - From: Giovanni Bajo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]