This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C99 usage in gcc
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
- Cc: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>, Bruce Stephens <bruce at cenderis dot demon dot co dot uk>, GCC List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 23:21:49 -0800
- Subject: Re: C99 usage in gcc
- References: <877jzal3rz.fsf@wasabisystems.com><C02436AE-52C3-11D8-9D26-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu><16410.14766.949435.377839@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><Pine.LNX.4.58.0401301433440.3429@wotan.suse.de><87wu79zcos.fsf@cenderis.demon.co.uk><873c9wt23o.fsf@codesourcery.com> <20040202153402.C7898@synopsys.com><87brohcap1.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><20040203071427.GA22210@daikokuya.co.uk>
Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk> writes:
> In 3.4 we permit the unmatched ' because of many complaints, so
> perhaps we should conditionalize the // warnings on !skipping.
> I'd be OK with that.
I'd be OK with that too. I can think of cases where the meaning of
the program silently changes but they're all pretty pathological.
zw