gcc archive
author index for February, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Feng Wang

2004-02-11 14:05 [tree-ssa] Can not compile correctly on ia64 with -O1 option.

Sébastien Miguet

2004-02-17 20:26 Filter for warning

embo holic

2004-02-17 14:18 doubt regarding ppc_405-gcc compiler

Etienne Lorrain

2004-02-03 09:33 gcc-3.4-pre ia32, Compound Literals and optimisation, memcpy(20 bytes)
2004-02-03 14:18 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-02-12 14:21 Adding assembly after end of functions in GCC-3.4

Linus Sjöberg

2004-02-05 18:59 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa

mount me

2004-02-05 09:03 gcc for gdl
2004-02-05 09:21 ghdl - gcc version

René Willemink

2004-02-10 15:30 Unable to reload subreg
2004-02-11 08:35 RE: Unable to reload subreg
2004-02-12 09:26 RE: Unable to reload subreg

Sébastien Miguet

2004-02-22 21:09 Re: Filter for warning

Gábor Lóki

2004-02-17 12:14 Factoring algorithms on rtl ?
2004-02-18 10:02 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ?
2004-02-19 08:32 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ?
2004-02-19 08:34 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ?

aaronchiles

2004-02-26 15:35 Problems with Building a Fortran Cross Compiler
2004-02-27 15:34 Building a Fortran Cross Compiler with Gcc-2.95.3

Adam Treat

2004-02-15 22:46 building a basic global function call
2004-02-18 14:10 Re: building a basic global function call

Al Stone

2004-02-02 22:15 linux-ia64 fails to bootstrap on mainline
2004-02-05 21:10 Re: IA64 inline division question
2004-02-29 22:35 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan

Alan Modra

2004-02-01 06:29 Re: split_complex_* flaw
2004-02-01 07:30 Re: split_complex_* flaw
2004-02-02 00:33 Re: split_complex_* flaw
2004-02-06 11:03 Re: INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS change breaks ada
2004-02-19 22:53 Re: Bootstrap failure on gcc-3_4-branch for powerpc-eabisim target.
2004-02-19 23:02 Re: Bootstrap failure on gcc-3_4-branch for powerpc-eabisim target.

Aldy Hernandez

2004-02-24 23:06 testcase question (portability)
2004-02-25 12:23 Re: testcase question (portability)

Alexander Kabaev

2004-02-10 21:11 GCC FP code regressions on i386?

Alexander Malmberg

2004-02-06 22:05 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-06 22:13 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-06 23:00 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-06 23:49 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?

Alexandre E. Kopilovitch

2004-02-02 18:55 Re: "Documentation by paper"

Alexandre Oliva

2004-02-10 05:37 Re: cpp breakage in gcc cvs head
2004-02-11 15:21 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-12 17:45 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-13 18:58 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-14 04:17 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-15 21:28 Re: backport 3.4 <- 3.5 after today's freeze, but prior to ssa merge?
2004-02-18 04:59 using distcc to speed up GCC bootstraps
2004-02-19 01:08 Re: using distcc to speed up GCC bootstraps
2004-02-19 04:31 Re: using distcc to speed up GCC bootstraps
2004-02-24 03:39 Re: Multilibs - how to avoid building the default one twice

Andi Kleen

2004-02-25 10:09 Re: PGO enhancements in GCC

Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci

2004-02-03 09:49 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease

Andreas Jaeger

2004-02-06 10:58 INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS change breaks ada
2004-02-08 12:31 Re: GCC, Opteron and IA64
2004-02-15 17:11 Re: backport 3.4 <- 3.5 after today's freeze, but prior to ssamerge?
2004-02-15 18:51 Re: backport 3.4 <- 3.5 after today's freeze, but prior to ssamerge?

Andreas Krebbel

2004-02-02 12:20 Invalid alias info through crossjumping

Andreas Schwab

2004-02-06 18:11 Re: restrict in c99

Andrew Cagney

2004-02-05 19:34 Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release

Andrew Haley

2004-02-10 11:06 gcj vs. SIGSEGV
2004-02-25 16:37 Lots of testsuite failures in optimized 3.3.3 bootstrap build

Andrew MacLeod

2004-02-26 17:36 [tree-ssa] testsuite runs with a new pass
2004-02-26 17:54 Re: [tree-ssa] testsuite runs with a new pass

Andrew Morton

2004-02-08 10:56 cpp breakage in gcc cvs head
2004-02-09 03:22 Re: cpp breakage in gcc cvs head
2004-02-10 06:58 Possibly bogus `invalid operands to binary &'

Andrew Pinski

2004-02-01 02:18 Re: bootstrap failure "sorry, unimplemented:"
2004-02-01 23:00 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-01 23:05 Re: FP negation optimization
2004-02-04 14:31 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 14:44 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 20:22 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-06 21:11 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-06 22:19 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-06 23:24 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-08 03:18 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-10 20:52 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-10 23:29 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-10 23:48 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-11 16:15 Re: [tree-ssa] ccp/aliasing problem
2004-02-14 04:51 Re: GCC feature request: warn on "if (function_name)"
2004-02-15 08:04 [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE
2004-02-16 13:01 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-17 22:38 Re: 3.4 does not bootstrap on fedora
2004-02-19 05:40 Re: aggregate alias anomaly
2004-02-19 16:13 Re: Bootstrap failure on gcc-3_4-branch for powerpc-eabisim target.
2004-02-23 15:49 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness?
2004-02-24 06:25 Re: ICE in gcc-3.4-20040218 for arm-iwmmxt-linux-gcc with -M and -include
2004-02-24 17:27 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan

Andrew Sutton

2004-02-01 06:08 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-01 06:19 Re: "Documentation by paper"

Andrew Walrond

2004-02-02 00:04 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-02 10:06 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-02 13:10 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease

Arnaud Charlet

2004-02-04 14:43 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-06 00:09 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC)
2004-02-06 13:58 Integrating libada branch
2004-02-08 12:01 Re: Integrating libada branch
2004-02-10 10:36 Re: Integrating libada branch
2004-02-10 23:46 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-11 00:08 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-11 00:10 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-11 07:32 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-12 15:51 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC)
2004-02-13 00:08 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel
2004-02-13 08:20 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC)
2004-02-13 10:36 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC)
2004-02-20 13:36 Re: [Ada] ACATS progress between 3.3.3 and 3.4
2004-02-20 14:19 Re: [Ada] ACATS progress between 3.3.3 and 3.4
2004-02-27 22:04 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?

Arpad Beszedes

2004-02-11 10:38 Disable checking in CSiBE

Ayal Zaks

2004-02-01 23:41 [RFC] Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC

Balint Cristian

2004-02-26 18:03 gcc/binutils or glibc ? RELOC problem while build glibc for alpha.
2004-02-26 19:01 Re: gcc/binutils or glibc ? RELOC problem while build glibc for alpha.

Balou Aggeliki

2004-02-05 10:13 gcc on superdome

Bauke van Dijk

2004-02-23 17:23 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: Nosuch file or directory

Ben Elliston

2004-02-05 20:38 Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release
2004-02-24 22:45 Re: What's wrong with mips-elf on gcc3.4.x branch?

Bernardo Innocenti

2004-02-09 01:47 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-02-15 18:34 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken

Bernd Jendrissek

2004-02-05 08:53 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-25 06:10 Re: 3.3.3 release and pgp signature

Bernd Schmidt

2004-02-17 14:00 Re: ifcvt compile-time performance issue

Bhaskara Narasimha Raju Dantuluri

2004-02-11 11:45 setjmp() and longjmp() from threads

Bob Proulx

2004-02-05 16:16 Re: gcc on superdome

Bonzini

2004-02-10 09:29 Re: Possibly bogus `invalid operands to binary &'
2004-02-10 15:54 Useless test in gen_binary

Bradley Lucier

2004-02-22 18:55 Re: Does running a parallel "make -jN check" work safely?

Brian Gough

2004-02-02 18:21 preparing a list of companies providing support for GCC

Brian Ryner

2004-02-04 11:28 non-virtual thunk functions

Bud Davis

2004-02-07 18:56 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa

Canqun Yang

2004-02-02 10:40 Re: [RFC] Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC

cgd

2004-02-19 18:58 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file

Chris Lattner

2004-02-01 01:01 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-01 02:42 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-01 03:08 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-01 04:59 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-01 05:27 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-01 08:30 FP negation optimization
2004-02-01 22:45 Re: FP negation optimization
2004-02-02 07:15 Re: Anonymous Namespaces

Christian Joensson

2004-02-05 11:25 Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory
2004-02-10 09:37 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory
2004-02-12 09:11 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory
2004-02-13 12:01 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory
2004-02-14 13:24 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory
2004-02-14 13:30 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory
2004-02-15 08:09 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory
2004-02-19 07:42 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory
2004-02-22 20:11 Can't build gcc 3.{4,5}.0 on cygwin: gcc.c:5930: undefined reference to `_mingw_scan'
2004-02-29 09:24 Re: Can't build gcc 3.{4,5}.0 on cygwin: gcc.c:5930: undefined reference to `_mingw_scan'
2004-02-29 09:26 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory

Christoph Hellwig

2004-02-27 22:08 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?

Christopher Faylor

2004-02-05 02:28 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32
2004-02-20 17:08 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory
2004-02-20 17:09 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory
2004-02-20 18:36 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory
2004-02-20 18:37 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory

Coulter, Scott

2004-02-05 15:12 AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem
2004-02-05 18:07 RE: AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem
2004-02-06 15:41 RE: AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem

Dale Johannesen

2004-02-03 22:20 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-19 21:49 Re: Split edge fails when performed on a doloop jump on x86 port
2004-02-25 01:54 Re: newbie: RTL syntax
2004-02-26 22:23 IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-02-26 23:08 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-02-26 23:20 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-02-26 23:30 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-02-27 00:12 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-02-27 01:05 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-02-27 18:38 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa

Dan Kegel

2004-02-01 17:01 Re: Complicated dg test cases
2004-02-09 11:24 Re: Complicated dg test cases
2004-02-09 11:55 Re: Complicated dg test cases
2004-02-11 07:43 Re: Retargetting GCC - Document
2004-02-13 06:44 re: Exception Handling Bug with Purify
2004-02-24 06:19 ICE in gcc-3.4-20040218 for arm-iwmmxt-linux-gcc with -M and -include

Dan Nicolaescu

2004-02-01 06:12 template functions not inlined
2004-02-02 22:10 Re: template functions not inlined
2004-02-04 19:59 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-19 07:21 Re: aggregate alias anomaly
2004-02-28 00:21 Re: cutting the size of CONST_DECLs

Dana, Eric

2004-02-13 14:35 RE: Exception Handling Bug with Purify

Daniel Bayer

2004-02-11 10:04 problem with call clobbered regs
2004-02-12 10:04 Re: problem with call clobbered regs
2004-02-13 12:03 Re: problem with call clobbered regs
2004-02-17 14:32 Re: problem with call clobbered regs

Daniel Berlin

2004-02-03 17:09 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 17:28 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 22:16 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 15:56 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 20:35 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-04 21:38 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-05 14:44 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA
2004-02-05 15:51 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA
2004-02-05 20:35 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-02-05)
2004-02-06 18:55 Re: [tree-ssa] -fgcse and friends useless
2004-02-06 19:58 Re: Bugzilla
2004-02-09 18:07 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-09 18:26 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-10 20:31 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-11 03:10 Re: Going on vacation
2004-02-11 15:42 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-11 15:51 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-11 15:56 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-13 01:03 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5}
2004-02-13 04:35 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5}
2004-02-13 22:00 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-13 22:16 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-14 21:48 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-14 21:48 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-16 16:14 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-16 16:20 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-18 04:32 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization
2004-02-18 18:53 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization
2004-02-18 19:29 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization
2004-02-18 20:40 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ?
2004-02-19 15:26 Re: [lno] Reuse analysis?
2004-02-20 17:50 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 17:54 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 18:13 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 23:38 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 23:45 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 23:49 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 23:51 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-21 00:02 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-21 00:10 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-21 00:56 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-21 02:44 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-21 04:19 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-25 03:01 Re: newbie: RTL syntax
2004-02-27 18:41 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?

Daniel Jacobowitz

2004-02-03 00:35 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-02-10 20:00 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-10 22:30 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-24 01:15 Re: Multilibs - how to avoid building the default one twice
2004-02-24 22:44 Re: Does running a parallel "make -jN check" work safely?

Daniel Kegel

2004-02-05 22:04 Elegant way to make -no-integrated-cpp the default?

Danny Angelo

2004-02-11 16:10 compiler performance

Dara Hazeghi

2004-02-11 17:22 Re: compiler performance

Dave Murphy

2004-02-06 07:55 global constructors
2004-02-19 15:40 RE: gcc-3.3.3 status?
2004-02-29 05:05 building gcc-3.4 with mingw/msys

David Ayers

2004-02-05 09:51 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog
2004-02-18 13:31 [Steering] ObjC Maintainership

David Daney

2004-02-16 21:34 Possible new[] regression in 3.4 WRT 3.3.[12]
2004-02-16 22:01 Re: Possible new[] regression in 3.4 WRT 3.3.[12]
2004-02-17 17:41 Re: Possible new[] regression in 3.4 WRT 3.3.[12]
2004-02-18 02:14 Who has the authority to set the target milestone on a bug?

David Edelsohn

2004-02-01 03:44 Re: split_complex_* flaw
2004-02-01 06:48 Re: split_complex_* flaw
2004-02-01 21:47 Re: split_complex_* flaw
2004-02-01 21:52 Re: split_complex_* flaw
2004-02-04 22:59 Re: ICE building on darwin
2004-02-05 15:16 Re: AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem
2004-02-05 17:25 Re: AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem
2004-02-05 19:00 Re: AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem
2004-02-19 17:35 AIX Tree-SSA bootstrap failure
2004-02-20 21:06 Re: AIX Tree-SSA bootstrap failure
2004-02-20 23:07 Re: PCH vs. type canonicalization
2004-02-25 15:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan

David O'Brien

2004-02-26 02:20 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Branch Created

David Ronis

2004-02-25 16:27 Lots of testsuite failures in optimized 3.3.3 bootstrap build

Davy Durham

2004-02-11 17:14 RTTI Enhancement Feature

Denis Zaitsev

2004-02-12 20:30 GCC 3.3.2: Some bug in the preprocessor?
2004-02-12 20:44 Re: GCC 3.3.2: Some bug in the preprocessor?

Devang Patel

2004-02-18 04:16 [lno] copy header and vectorization
2004-02-18 18:43 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization
2004-02-18 18:44 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization
2004-02-18 19:03 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization
2004-02-19 16:59 Re: Bugzilla and LNO

Diego Novillo

2004-02-01 16:09 Re: Using tree-ssa
2004-02-03 15:22 Re: Using tree-ssa
2004-02-04 13:30 [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-04 14:07 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-04 14:10 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-04 16:40 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-04 20:19 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-05 14:37 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA
2004-02-11 01:18 [tree-ssa] Heads up. Branch will freeze Feb/15.
2004-02-11 13:00 Re: [tree-ssa] ccp/aliasing problem
2004-02-12 01:21 Re: Generating object files from translation unit dumps?
2004-02-12 02:11 Re: Generating object files from translation unit dumps?
2004-02-12 12:40 Re: [tree-ssa] Heads up. Branch will freeze Feb/15.
2004-02-12 13:02 Re: Generating object files from translation unit dumps?
2004-02-12 19:37 Re: [tree-ssa] Heads up. Branch will freeze Feb/15.
2004-02-13 13:20 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-02-11
2004-02-15 16:29 Re: [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE
2004-02-15 20:07 Re: [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE
2004-02-15 22:01 Re: [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE
2004-02-15 23:48 Re: [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE
2004-02-20 18:55 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 19:07 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 19:45 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 19:56 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 20:03 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 20:08 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 20:13 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 20:31 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 20:40 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 20:50 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 23:44 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-21 00:00 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-21 00:03 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-23 15:02 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?)
2004-02-23 15:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?),huge compile time regression
2004-02-23 15:28 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?),huge compile time regression
2004-02-23 16:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?),huge compile time regression
2004-02-24 16:18 Re: [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer
2004-02-24 17:07 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-02-24 17:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-02-24 18:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-02-24 23:29 Re: [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer
2004-02-25 00:42 Re: [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer
2004-02-25 12:42 [tree-ssa] Branch is closed
2004-02-25 13:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-02-26 17:21 Re: [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer
2004-02-26 17:43 Re: [tree-ssa] testsuite runs with a new pass
2004-02-27 16:52 gcc.c-torture/unsorted/pass.c: what is it supposed to test?
2004-02-27 17:28 Re: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/pass.c: what is it supposed to test?
2004-02-27 17:50 Re: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/pass.c: what is it supposed to test?
2004-02-27 18:25 Re: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/pass.c: what is it supposed to test?

DJ Delorie

2004-02-09 22:35 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c

Dorit Naishlos

2004-02-24 15:49 [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer
2004-02-26 17:33 [lno] loop-optimize2 ICE

Douglas Gregor

2004-02-05 03:19 Re: RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator
2004-02-13 16:01 Re: RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator

Dr. Franz Fehringer

2004-02-10 07:48 gcj vs. SIGSEGV
2004-02-10 20:43 Re: gcj vs. SIGSEGV

Edward S. Peschko

2004-02-02 19:57 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32
2004-02-20 07:26 Re: A request for GCC 3.5 snapshots

Eric Botcazou

2004-02-01 22:34 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-01 23:09 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-04 14:37 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-05 20:46 GCC vs Sun CC on SPARC
2004-02-05 22:18 Re: GCC vs Sun CC on SPARC
2004-02-05 22:24 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere.
2004-02-14 07:53 Re: GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease
2004-02-15 07:02 Re: GCC vs Sun CC on SPARC
2004-02-15 10:04 Re: GCC vs Sun CC on SPARC

Eric Christopher

2004-02-03 19:10 Re: VMA different from LMA
2004-02-03 23:26 Re: Getting rid of GET_RTX_CLASS?
2004-02-10 19:40 Re: C++ Language Lawyer Question
2004-02-13 00:52 Re: Using precompiled headers with gcc?
2004-02-13 01:00 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5}
2004-02-16 19:56 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-17 10:47 Re: What's wrong with mips-elf on gcc3.4.x branch?
2004-02-18 02:49 Re: Who has the authority to set the target milestone on a bug?
2004-02-18 23:09 Re: ICE with -M and -include
2004-02-21 08:36 Re: ObjC++
2004-02-21 09:14 Re: ObjC++
2004-02-22 08:38 Re: GNU configure breaks on 3.4-20040218
2004-02-24 22:29 Re: What's wrong with mips-elf on gcc3.4.x branch?
2004-02-24 23:05 Re: What's wrong with mips-elf on gcc3.4.x branch?

Erik Vaughn

2004-02-26 21:39 GCC 3.3 Release Series Web Page Update
2004-02-26 23:57 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Branch Created

Eyal Lebedinsky

2004-02-01 02:11 bootstrap failure "sorry, unimplemented:"
2004-02-01 02:35 Re: bootstrap failure "sorry, unimplemented:"

Falk Hueffner

2004-02-23 15:55 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness?
2004-02-24 11:36 Re: Support for restrict

Fariborz Jahanian

2004-02-05 21:47 [tree-ssa] Is this a known bug (It prevents gap to build with IMI)

Felix Lee

2004-02-03 16:44 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 16:46 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 00:00 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-05 19:57 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-11 19:16 Re: compiler performance
2004-02-11 23:15 Re: compiler performance

Florian Weimer

2004-02-14 23:07 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-16 21:53 Re: Possible new[] regression in 3.4 WRT 3.3.[12]
2004-02-16 22:06 Re: Possible new[] regression in 3.4 WRT 3.3.[12]

Florian Weitling

2004-02-02 19:26 Re: gcj and handling own packages question

Frank Ch. Eigler

2004-02-25 22:04 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan

Gabriel Dos Reis

2004-02-01 00:28 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-01 01:54 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-01 04:05 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-01 04:15 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-01 05:25 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-01 12:19 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-01 14:21 GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-01 22:00 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-01 23:26 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-01 23:27 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-03 01:56 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-02-04 15:00 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-04 15:08 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related
2004-02-04 21:22 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-05 01:28 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related
2004-02-06 19:09 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related
2004-02-06 23:43 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-06 23:44 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-09 13:55 Re: Can PR c++/3905 (sizeof on function call in template) be done on 3.2.x?
2004-02-10 15:13 GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease
2004-02-10 15:31 Re: GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease
2004-02-10 20:09 Re: C++ Language Lawyer Question
2004-02-10 20:11 Re: C++ Language Lawyer Question
2004-02-11 10:07 Re: GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease
2004-02-11 15:51 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-11 20:56 Re: File permissions in GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease
2004-02-11 21:54 Re: File permissions in GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease
2004-02-11 22:14 Re: File permissions in GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease
2004-02-12 17:53 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-12 17:55 Re: Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch?
2004-02-13 14:23 Re: RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator
2004-02-13 14:25 Re: RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator
2004-02-13 14:26 Re: RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator
2004-02-13 19:31 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-13 19:41 Re: typedefs and attribute aligned in gcc-3.3.3
2004-02-13 20:17 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5}
2004-02-13 22:21 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-13 22:22 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-13 22:22 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-14 21:28 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-15 17:07 Re: backport 3.4 <- 3.5 after today's freeze, but prior to ssa merge?
2004-02-15 18:09 Re: [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE
2004-02-17 15:21 Re: gcc-3.3.3 status?
2004-02-17 16:05 Re: gcc-3.3.3 status?
2004-02-20 15:21 RFC: release script and ftp.gnu.org
2004-02-20 18:22 Re: RFC: release script and ftp.gnu.org
2004-02-20 18:24 Re: RFC: release script and ftp.gnu.org
2004-02-21 23:29 Re: build results for gcc-3.3.3
2004-02-21 23:38 gcc-3_3-branch unfrozen
2004-02-21 23:44 GCC-3.3.4 Release Status
2004-02-24 10:23 Re: two-element struct performance (was: strict-aliasing and typedefs)
2004-02-24 12:31 Re: GCC3.3.3 announcement
2004-02-24 19:33 Re: 3.3.3 release and pgp signature
2004-02-24 19:35 GCC-3.3.3 is released
2004-02-25 16:36 Re: 3.3.3 release and pgp signature
2004-02-29 23:26 Re: Naming of functions

Gabriel Paubert

2004-02-02 09:39 Re: FP negation optimization

Gabriele Inghirami

2004-02-28 14:25 Successfully built gcc 3.3.3 on Pentium (i586) running Linux 2.6.3,Slackware 9.1, glibc 2.3.2 using gcc 3.3.2

Gagneet Singh

2004-02-26 04:46 Relocatable Symbols in Expression

Gareth McCaughan

2004-02-12 14:30 Re: compiler performance

gcc

2004-02-06 19:38 Bugzilla

gccadmin

2004-02-02 17:22 gcc-ss-3.3-20040202 is now available
2004-02-04 17:37 gcc-ss-3.4-20040204 is now available
2004-02-06 02:50 gcc-ss-3.4-20040206 is now available
2004-02-09 17:17 gcc-ss-3.3-20040209 is now available
2004-02-11 17:22 gcc-ss-3.4-20040211 is now available
2004-02-16 17:37 gcc-ss-3.3-20040216 is now available
2004-02-18 17:52 gcc-ss-3.4-20040218 is now available
2004-02-23 17:19 gcc-ss-3.3-20040223 is now available
2004-02-25 17:17 gcc-ss-3.4-20040225 is now available

gdr

2004-02-01 22:52 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-02 12:46 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-04 14:57 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease

Geert Bosch

2004-02-05 05:50 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?

Geoff Keating

2004-02-01 03:01 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-02 01:13 Re: FP negation optimization
2004-02-03 21:15 Re: Getting rid of GET_RTX_CLASS?
2004-02-04 21:39 Re: ICE building on darwin
2004-02-04 22:52 Re: Removing REG_OK_STRICT
2004-02-12 19:27 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel
2004-02-13 00:01 Re: Using precompiled headers with gcc?
2004-02-13 19:44 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-16 04:40 Re: backport 3.4 <- 3.5 after today's freeze, but prior to ssa merge?
2004-02-16 18:40 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-17 22:20 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC
2004-02-19 21:49 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-20 23:12 Re: PCH vs. type canonicalization
2004-02-26 23:34 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-02-27 21:45 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa

George Russell

2004-02-29 17:27 3.3.3 Build on MacOS X 10.2.8

Gerald Pfeifer

2004-02-05 20:04 Re: IA64 inline division question
2004-02-05 20:50 Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release
2004-02-09 16:31 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-02-11 21:54 Re: GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease
2004-02-12 15:41 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC)
2004-02-12 19:15 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related
2004-02-12 20:05 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-12 20:34 Re: Mention intermodule in changes.html
2004-02-12 23:00 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC)
2004-02-13 09:41 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-13 10:52 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-13 11:16 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-13 20:56 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-13 22:05 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-13 23:09 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages
2004-02-14 21:37 Re: GCC vs Sun CC on SPARC
2004-02-14 23:27 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.4.0 20040113 (experimental) oni586-suse-linux-gnu
2004-02-16 16:11 Re: New branch (tree-profling-branch)
2004-02-18 17:44 Re: [Steering] ObjC Maintainership
2004-02-20 16:40 Announcing new libobjc maintainers
2004-02-24 22:26 Re: 3.3.3 release and pgp signature
2004-02-25 21:46 Re: RFC: release script and ftp.gnu.org
2004-02-26 23:20 Re: GCC 3.3 Release Series Web Page Update
2004-02-26 23:50 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-29 19:40 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?

Ghassan Shobaki

2004-02-01 18:19 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4
2004-02-02 05:54 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4
2004-02-10 18:58 Superblock Scheduling Alg in GCC

Giovanni Bajo

2004-02-06 03:05 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-02-05)
2004-02-09 14:44 Re: Can PR c++/3905 (sizeof on function call in template) be done on 3.2.x?
2004-02-10 15:27 Re: GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease
2004-02-10 19:43 Re: C++ Language Lawyer Question
2004-02-11 02:26 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-12 00:51 Re: Should the patch for PR inline-asm/6162 go into 3.4?
2004-02-12 16:55 Re: Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch?
2004-02-12 19:30 Re: Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch?
2004-02-12 19:30 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-02-05)
2004-02-13 00:41 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5}
2004-02-13 01:02 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5}
2004-02-13 14:28 Using bugzilla to track XFAILs
2004-02-13 17:30 Re: Using bugzilla to track XFAILs
2004-02-13 19:22 Re: typedefs and attribute aligned in gcc-3.3.3
2004-02-16 12:44 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-16 22:10 Re: Possible new[] regression in 3.4 WRT 3.3.[12]
2004-02-18 07:58 Re: Who has the authority to set the target milestone on a bug?
2004-02-19 16:25 Bugzilla and LNO
2004-02-20 02:51 Deprecate -fpack-struct for C++?
2004-02-23 16:56 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness?
2004-02-25 01:53 Re: derivation problems with templates

2004-02-19 19:43 RS6000_MCOUNT and -fpic
2004-02-22 19:41 Re: RS6000_MCOUNT and -fpic

Graeme Peterson

2004-02-13 19:06 typedefs and attribute aligned in gcc-3.3.3
2004-02-13 20:03 Re: typedefs and attribute aligned in gcc-3.3.3

Greg Parker

2004-02-06 23:32 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?

Guillermo Ballester Valor

2004-02-27 19:10 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?

Gunther Nikl

2004-02-26 12:40 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k.
2004-02-27 09:08 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k.
2004-02-27 09:14 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k.
2004-02-27 16:12 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k.

H. J. Lu

2004-02-04 20:53 A problem with aligment attribute
2004-02-05 01:11 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related
2004-02-06 17:41 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related
2004-02-06 20:01 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related
2004-02-21 22:09 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related
2004-02-23 23:18 PATCH: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.4
2004-02-24 00:24 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related
2004-02-27 17:34 What to call Intel ia32e processor?
2004-02-27 18:52 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?

Hee Jeong

2004-02-12 10:28 How can I release every memory that gcc holds?

herny_so6688

2004-02-25 10:23 cartridge

Hiroaki Etoh

2004-02-05 01:32 question about the usage of DECL_INCOMING_RTL in a stack-smashing protector
2004-02-09 06:29 Re: question about the usage of DECL_INCOMING_RTL in a stack-smashingprotector

hostup . 24

2004-02-11 10:16 Ihre Zukunft ??
2004-02-11 10:22 Ihre Zukunft ??

Ian Lance Taylor

2004-02-01 14:25 Re: split_complex_* flaw
2004-02-02 15:05 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-02 19:59 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-04 22:40 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog
2004-02-04 23:07 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog
2004-02-05 04:19 Re: question on how to experiment with register pressure
2004-02-06 21:00 Re: ARM condition code register handling
2004-02-10 20:49 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-11 21:06 Re: File permissions in GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease
2004-02-11 21:42 Should the patch for PR inline-asm/6162 go into 3.4?
2004-02-11 22:01 Re: File permissions in GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease
2004-02-11 23:59 Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch?
2004-02-12 00:54 Re: Should the patch for PR inline-asm/6162 go into 3.4?
2004-02-12 01:21 Re: Generating object files from translation unit dumps?
2004-02-12 03:05 Mention intermodule in changes.html
2004-02-12 15:41 Re: Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch?
2004-02-12 17:28 Re: Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch?
2004-02-12 19:41 Re: Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch?
2004-02-12 20:06 -ffixed-di vs. strlen
2004-02-13 15:59 Re: Using bugzilla to track XFAILs
2004-02-13 16:25 Re: Using bugzilla to track XFAILs
2004-02-13 19:40 Re: -ffixed-di vs. strlen
2004-02-13 20:04 Re: -ffixed-di vs. strlen
2004-02-14 04:15 Re: How aggressive is CSE about removing redundant CC sets?
2004-02-19 04:50 Re: Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function?
2004-02-19 14:43 Re: Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function?
2004-02-19 15:13 Re: Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function?
2004-02-25 16:51 Re: Multilibs - how to avoid building the default one twice
2004-02-26 16:23 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k.

Iman Narasamdya

2004-02-23 19:40 newbie: RTL syntax

Ingo Krabbe

2004-02-11 07:50 va_start still... [and again] with test case:

Ivan Warren

2004-02-02 12:18 RE: A Case to maintain target i370-*-mvs as a live target
2004-02-02 15:23 RE: A Case to maintain target i370-*-mvs as a live target

Jakub Jelinek

2004-02-16 15:05 Re: __attribute__((naked) on x86 would be useful
2004-02-27 18:55 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?

James Morrison

2004-02-05 21:59 Re: GCC vs Sun CC on SPARC
2004-02-16 03:33 Re: [PATCH] GCC Warning Options Documentation

Jamie Lokier

2004-02-01 21:13 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-02 15:40 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-02 17:10 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-02 17:51 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-08 06:23 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-09 17:53 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-11 12:31 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-11 12:38 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-14 04:47 GCC feature request: warn on "if (function_name)"
2004-02-16 17:14 Re: __attribute__((naked) on x86 would be useful
2004-02-16 17:38 Re: __attribute__((naked) on x86 would be useful
2004-02-21 22:01 Re: A request for GCC 3.5 snapshots

Jan Hoogerbrugge

2004-02-03 12:25 Efficient 64b operations
2004-02-17 15:38 Basic block counts?
2004-02-23 09:30 If-conversion misses many cases
2004-02-25 12:06 Re: If-conversion misses many cases

Jan Hubicka

2004-02-01 12:01 Re: template functions not inlined
2004-02-01 12:03 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-01 14:16 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-01 21:56 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4
2004-02-03 16:54 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-05 10:27 Re: [tree-ssa] cfg.texi needs reviewing by a native speaker (Was: Re: "Documentation by paper")
2004-02-05 11:45 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA
2004-02-05 12:24 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA
2004-02-05 15:32 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA
2004-02-05 15:55 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA
2004-02-05 19:23 Re: linux-ia64 fails to bootstrap on mainline
2004-02-05 23:24 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-05 23:44 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-06 07:25 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-10 16:44 Re: Move rest_of_handle_ branch)prob before GCSE
2004-02-10 20:28 Re: Superblock Scheduling Alg in GCC
2004-02-12 09:02 Re: profile-guided optimization
2004-02-12 10:43 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ??
2004-02-12 11:35 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ??
2004-02-12 16:18 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ??
2004-02-12 16:29 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ??
2004-02-13 11:26 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5}
2004-02-13 19:53 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5}
2004-02-16 11:15 New branch (tree-profling-branch)
2004-02-17 22:00 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ?
2004-02-25 10:36 Re: PGO enhancements in GCC

Janis Johnson

2004-02-01 04:26 Re: Complicated dg test cases
2004-02-01 04:44 Re: Complicated dg test cases
2004-02-09 17:44 Re: Complicated dg test cases
2004-02-25 00:42 Re: testcase question (portability)

Jason Merrill

2004-02-02 18:47 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin
2004-02-02 19:12 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin
2004-02-02 23:40 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin
2004-02-20 23:04 PCH vs. type canonicalization
2004-02-20 23:56 Re: PCH vs. type canonicalization

Jason Molenda

2004-02-21 15:57 A problem with the gcc-patches web archives -- please read

Jeff Sturm

2004-02-13 02:54 Re: gcj vs. SIGSEGV
2004-02-19 05:15 aggregate alias anomaly
2004-02-25 13:48 Re: aggregate alias anomaly
2004-02-25 13:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan

Jeffery Franklin

2004-02-01 07:37 get it up in a hurry

Jim Wilson

2004-02-05 08:35 Re: multilib default dir.
2004-02-05 08:55 Re: About different compile address
2004-02-05 08:56 Re: documentation regarding gcc
2004-02-05 08:58 Re: preparing a list of companies providing support for GCC
2004-02-05 09:02 Re: gcc-3.4-pre ia32, Compound Literals and optimisation, memcpy(20bytes)
2004-02-05 09:14 Re: Efficient 64b operations
2004-02-05 09:26 Re: Function section
2004-02-05 09:36 Re: pdp11-g77
2004-02-05 09:48 Re: A problem with aligment attribute
2004-02-05 09:57 Re: question about the usage of DECL_INCOMING_RTL in a stack-smashingprotector
2004-02-05 18:04 Re: gcc for gdl
2004-02-05 19:03 Re: linux-ia64 fails to bootstrap on mainline
2004-02-05 19:20 Re: IA64 inline division question
2004-02-05 19:38 Re: A problem with aligment attribute
2004-02-05 23:25 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere.
2004-02-05 23:42 Re: IA64 inline division question
2004-02-07 06:46 Re: global constructors
2004-02-07 06:57 Re: Integrating libada branch
2004-02-09 23:12 Re: Integrating libada branch
2004-02-10 23:31 Re: Retargetting GCC - Document
2004-02-10 23:33 Re: How to disanle optimizations
2004-02-10 23:43 Re: Unable to reload subreg
2004-02-11 18:51 RE: Unable to reload subreg
2004-02-12 02:24 Re: IA64 inline division question
2004-02-12 02:53 Re: Generating object files from translation unit dumps?
2004-02-12 03:01 Re: problem with call clobbered regs
2004-02-12 23:31 Re: problem with call clobbered regs
2004-02-12 23:47 Re: setjmp() and longjmp() from threads
2004-02-12 23:49 Re: Exception Handling Bug with Purify
2004-02-12 23:52 Re: Adding assembly after end of functions in GCC-3.4
2004-02-17 19:34 Re: problem with call clobbered regs
2004-02-17 21:18 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ?
2004-02-17 21:30 Re: c-torture/execute/990208-1.c XPASSes - remove XFAIL?
2004-02-17 21:49 Re: building a basic global function call
2004-02-17 21:59 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC
2004-02-17 23:31 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC
2004-02-17 23:39 Re: doubt regarding ppc_405-gcc compiler
2004-02-18 00:18 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC
2004-02-18 02:21 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC
2004-02-18 19:58 Re: Split edge fails when performed on a doloop jump on x86 port
2004-02-18 20:05 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ?
2004-02-18 21:08 Re: Basic block counts?
2004-02-19 21:45 Re: Split edge fails when performed on a doloop jump on x86 port
2004-02-20 00:43 Re: Filter for warning
2004-02-20 00:48 Re: compilation error
2004-02-20 01:23 Re: Split edge fails when performed on a doloop jump on x86 port
2004-02-20 01:30 Re: gcc-3.3.x compiling bug
2004-02-20 01:58 Re: IA64 compilation failure
2004-02-20 19:43 Re: Split edge fails when performed on a doloop jump on x86 port
2004-02-20 23:44 Re: RS6000_MCOUNT and -fpic
2004-02-20 23:50 Re: Bootstrap failure on gcc-3_4-branch for powerpc-eabisim target.
2004-02-21 01:11 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related
2004-02-21 08:33 Re: IA64 compilation failure
2004-02-23 19:45 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related
2004-02-24 02:30 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related
2004-02-24 08:15 Re: GNU configure breaks on 3.4-20040218
2004-02-24 08:27 Re: Does running a parallel "make -jN check" work safely?
2004-02-24 08:36 Re: Documentation of ".tu" file format
2004-02-24 08:39 Re: getting non-global variable names from RTL
2004-02-24 08:49 Re: Can't build gcc 3.{4,5}.0 on cygwin: gcc.c:5930: undefined referenceto `_mingw_scan'
2004-02-24 21:48 Re: getting non-global variable names from RTL
2004-02-25 01:29 Re: If-conversion misses many cases
2004-02-25 01:38 Re: newbie: RTL syntax
2004-02-25 01:47 Re: PGO enhancements in GCC
2004-02-25 01:53 Re: Problem with post_modify
2004-02-25 21:01 Re: If-conversion misses many cases
2004-02-25 23:50 Re: 3.3.3: libstdc++ regression on ia64-hpux - messy EH problem -need help
2004-02-26 00:18 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k.
2004-02-26 00:27 Re: Error compiling gcc 3.4-20040218 on alpha ev68 osf
2004-02-27 03:13 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k.
2004-02-27 07:26 Re: Relocatable Symbols in Expression
2004-02-27 07:51 Re: Problems with Building a Fortran Cross Compiler
2004-02-27 08:28 Re: propagating mem expressions
2004-02-28 02:13 Re: recount_dominator
2004-02-28 02:38 Re: Building a Fortran Cross Compiler with Gcc-2.95.3
2004-02-28 02:41 Re: Ada, gnat1 and gcc-3.4

Joe Buck

2004-02-02 16:59 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-02 17:30 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-02 17:57 Re: template functions not inlined
2004-02-02 23:19 Re: Installing and working with gcc
2004-02-02 23:26 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-02-02 23:34 Re: C99 usage in gcc
2004-02-02 23:45 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-02-02 23:50 Re: C99 usage in gcc
2004-02-03 17:52 Re: C99 usage in gcc
2004-02-04 17:50 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 18:58 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 22:58 Re: [tree-ssa] cfg.texi needs reviewing by a native speaker (Was: Re: "Documentation by paper")
2004-02-04 23:03 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog
2004-02-05 00:06 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-02-05 17:22 Re: AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem
2004-02-05 17:34 Re: AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem
2004-02-05 23:01 Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release
2004-02-09 18:14 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-10 23:45 Re: Retargetting GCC - Document
2004-02-17 17:08 Re: Possible new[] regression in 3.4 WRT 3.3.[12]
2004-02-18 02:50 Re: Who has the authority to set the target milestone on a bug?
2004-02-19 17:37 Re: A request for GCC 3.5 snapshots
2004-02-19 18:23 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-20 18:04 build results for gcc-3.3.3
2004-02-20 18:06 Re: RFC: release script and ftp.gnu.org
2004-02-23 19:21 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness?
2004-02-23 22:26 two more test results for 3.3.3
2004-02-24 18:08 Re: GCC3.3.3 announcement
2004-02-24 18:15 Re: 3.3.3 release and pgp signature
2004-02-24 18:23 Re: Using gcc to parse C++ sources
2004-02-26 22:49 Re: GCC 3.3 Release Series Web Page Update
2004-02-26 23:06 Re: GCC 3.3 Release Series Web Page Update

Joe Landman

2004-02-05 02:11 question on how to experiment with register pressure

Joel Sherrill

2004-02-10 19:34 C++ Language Lawyer Question
2004-02-10 20:39 Re: C++ Language Lawyer Question
2004-02-10 23:27 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch

Joerg . Richter

2004-02-06 08:38 Re: AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem
2004-02-24 11:55 GCC3.3.3 announcement

Joern Rennecke

2004-02-02 22:02 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 12:17 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 13:35 Re: A Case to maintain target i370-*-mvs as a live target
2004-02-04 16:07 Glossary (Was: Re: "Documentation by paper")
2004-02-09 14:35 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-10 16:03 RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 16:09 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 16:55 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 17:59 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 18:23 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 18:44 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 18:45 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 19:34 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 19:42 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 19:57 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 20:06 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 20:41 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 20:49 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-10 20:51 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 21:00 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-12 21:56 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-12 22:15 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ??
2004-02-16 16:22 Re: A thought about cc0 migration. (Re: How aggressive is CSE about
2004-02-17 23:05 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ?
2004-02-18 16:43 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ?
2004-02-24 13:01 Re: multilibs and gcc 3.x for SuperHitachi SH
2004-02-24 13:24 Re: Rif: Re: multilibs and gcc 3.x for SuperHitachi SH
2004-02-27 15:03 recount_dominator

John Marshall

2004-02-11 20:06 File permissions in GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease

John R. Shannon

2004-02-27 18:06 Ada, gnat1 and gcc-3.4

John Vickers

2004-02-12 21:56 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5}
2004-02-13 00:56 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5}
2004-02-13 01:05 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5}
2004-02-13 09:36 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5}

Jon Beniston

2004-02-24 10:44 Support for restrict
2004-02-24 12:08 Problem with post_modify

Jonathan Thornburg

2004-02-09 14:45 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa

Jonathan Wilson

2004-02-04 02:57 Re: ICE building on darwin

Joost VandeVondele

2004-02-05 16:09 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa

Jose Quiroga

2004-02-28 13:51 GCC bootstrap.

Josef Zlomek

2004-02-07 15:37 Bootstrap failure on powerpc64
2004-02-09 17:49 Another bootstrap failure on powerpc64
2004-02-22 20:34 Re: getting non-global variable names from RTL

Joseph S. Myers

2004-02-02 23:45 Re: C99 usage in gcc
2004-02-04 20:09 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-05 11:41 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-05 22:04 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere.
2004-02-06 02:57 Re: gcc-ss-3.4-20040206 is now available
2004-02-06 18:18 Re: restrict in c99
2004-02-10 20:16 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-10 23:38 Re: Retargetting GCC - Document
2004-02-11 00:19 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-12 01:54 Re: Generating object files from translation unit dumps?
2004-02-12 19:51 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-13 10:36 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-13 11:13 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-13 15:55 Re: Using bugzilla to track XFAILs
2004-02-13 23:13 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages
2004-02-19 10:07 Re: Ada multilib (was: committed: merge with libada-branch)
2004-02-27 17:19 Re: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/pass.c: what is it supposed to test?
2004-02-27 17:41 Re: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/pass.c: what is it supposed to test?
2004-02-29 11:20 Re: Turning off tree checking by default for releases
2004-02-29 13:43 Re: Turning off tree checking by default for releases

Joshua Michael Root

2004-02-22 08:08 Successful bootstrap of gcc 3.3.3 on powerpc-yellowdog-linux-gnu

Juergen Graf

2004-02-24 17:58 Using gcc to parse C++ sources

Kaelin Colclasure

2004-02-07 01:05 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-07 16:19 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?

Kai Henningsen

2004-02-01 14:43 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32
2004-02-07 00:14 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-07 00:15 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-10 19:51 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-10 19:51 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-10 19:51 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-12 22:33 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-17 08:25 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-20 09:06 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file

Karel Gardas

2004-02-04 14:05 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-04 16:54 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-17 10:27 What's wrong with mips-elf on gcc3.4.x branch?
2004-02-19 16:00 Bootstrap failure on gcc-3_4-branch for powerpc-eabisim target.
2004-02-19 21:49 Re: Bootstrap failure on gcc-3_4-branch for powerpc-eabisim target.
2004-02-21 18:26 Re: Bootstrap failure on gcc-3_4-branch for powerpc-eabisim target.
2004-02-24 22:28 Re: What's wrong with mips-elf on gcc3.4.x branch?
2004-02-27 18:16 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?

Karl Vogel

2004-02-05 08:47 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease -- bootstrap failure
2004-02-05 11:13 RE: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease -- bootstrap failure

Kaveh R. Ghazi

2004-02-11 22:47 Re: compiler performance
2004-02-14 17:33 Re: Including GMP as an upstream package (was problems building fortran)
2004-02-15 14:54 Failure linking gengtype when using non-GCC stage1 compiler
2004-02-22 13:20 Does running a parallel "make -jN check" work safely?
2004-02-24 21:52 Re: Does running a parallel "make -jN check" work safely?

Kazu Hirata

2004-02-02 04:36 Re: A Case to maintain target i370-*-mvs as a live target
2004-02-02 16:19 Re: A Case to maintain target i370-*-mvs as a live target
2004-02-04 22:28 Removing REG_OK_STRICT
2004-02-04 23:03 Re: Removing REG_OK_STRICT
2004-02-04 23:10 Re: Removing REG_OK_STRICT
2004-02-05 16:16 Re: Removing REG_OK_STRICT
2004-02-05 21:55 Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere.
2004-02-05 22:35 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere.
2004-02-05 22:39 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere.
2004-02-12 07:19 How do we run autoconf for the top-level configure.in?
2004-02-14 02:55 How aggressive is CSE about removing redundant CC sets?
2004-02-14 05:16 Re: How aggressive is CSE about removing redundant CC sets?
2004-02-15 01:58 Re: How aggressive is CSE about removing redundant CC sets?
2004-02-15 03:12 Re: How aggressive is CSE about removing redundant CC sets?
2004-02-16 14:46 A thought about cc0 migration. (Re: How aggressive is CSE aboutremoving redundant CC sets?)
2004-02-18 22:30 Re: CC_MODE and cc0
2004-02-20 03:06 Re: A thought about cc0 migration. (Re: How aggressive is CSE about
2004-02-23 18:08 MODE_CC migration experience on h8300 port
2004-02-23 23:24 Re: CC_MODE and cc0

Kelley Cook

2004-02-03 22:00 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related
2004-02-03 22:25 [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related
2004-02-04 15:09 [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog
2004-02-07 14:57 Re: Integrating libada branch
2004-02-09 23:09 Re: Integrating libada branch
2004-02-09 23:11 Re: Integrating libada branch
2004-02-19 15:33 A request for GCC 3.5 snapshots
2004-02-26 15:38 [tree-ssa] intermodule bootstrap failure under cygwin

Kevin Atkinson

2004-02-01 03:17 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-01 14:09 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-01 14:24 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-29 02:40 RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-02-29 06:48 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final

kitiku

2004-02-02 21:12 Installing and working with gcc

Konark Goel, Noida

2004-02-12 10:30 gcc loop unrolling problem ??
2004-02-12 11:23 RE: gcc loop unrolling problem ??
2004-02-12 11:58 RE: gcc loop unrolling problem ??

Kostadin Dabov

2004-02-02 10:45 Re: C++/altivec issue on 3.4 branch

Kriang Lerdsuwanakij

2004-02-09 14:40 Re: Can PR c++/3905 (sizeof on function call in template) be doneon 3.2.x?

kripa shankar

2004-02-23 21:09 Fwd: Re: your mail

Lars Segerlund

2004-02-02 11:02 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 17:13 Re: "Documentation by paper"

Lasse Kliemann

2004-02-24 17:57 3.3.3 release and pgp signature

Laurent GUERBY

2004-02-08 11:56 GCC, Opteron and IA64 (was [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa)
2004-02-10 19:36 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-10 20:41 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-10 21:35 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-11 18:37 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-12 20:37 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel
2004-02-19 08:32 Ada multilib (was: committed: merge with libada-branch)

law

2004-02-03 08:09 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 16:35 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 16:38 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 16:40 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 17:07 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-05 19:28 Re: [tree-ssa] Bug in jump threading
2004-02-09 16:25 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-09 16:28 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-09 17:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Bug in jump threading
2004-02-09 18:39 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-10 23:14 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-13 03:34 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5}
2004-02-16 09:02 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-16 19:34 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-16 23:27 ifcvt compile-time performance issue
2004-02-16 23:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Too conservative optimization with global variables??
2004-02-17 16:26 Re: ifcvt compile-time performance issue
2004-02-18 21:30 Re: using distcc to speed up GCC bootstraps
2004-02-19 03:11 Re: using distcc to speed up GCC bootstraps
2004-02-19 17:51 Re: AIX Tree-SSA bootstrap failure
2004-02-19 23:17 Re: two-element struct performance (was: strict-aliasing and typedefs)
2004-02-20 15:02 Re: two-element struct performance (was: strict-aliasing and typedefs)
2004-02-20 17:44 [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 18:07 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 18:18 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 18:33 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 19:05 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 19:24 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 19:47 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 19:57 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 19:59 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 20:06 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 20:28 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 20:31 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 21:09 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 21:33 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-20 22:14 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-21 00:49 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-21 01:36 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-21 03:26 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem
2004-02-23 15:53 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?), huge compile time regression
2004-02-24 04:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?)
2004-02-24 05:39 Re: two-element struct performance (was: strict-aliasing and typedefs)
2004-02-24 16:51 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?)
2004-02-26 19:33 Re: [tree-ssa] testsuite runs with a new pass
2004-02-26 19:43 Re: [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer
2004-02-26 20:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-02-26 20:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-02-26 20:40 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-02-26 22:42 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-02-26 22:52 Re: [tree-ssa] count-branch-reg optimization
2004-02-26 23:26 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-02-26 23:47 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-02-27 00:21 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-02-27 18:10 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?
2004-02-27 18:17 Re: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/pass.c: what is it supposed to test?
2004-02-27 18:35 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?
2004-02-27 18:44 Re: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/pass.c: what is it supposed to test?
2004-02-28 01:06 Re: [tree-ssa] string builtins strikes back

Loren James Rittle

2004-02-02 22:02 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-04 03:13 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease

Luca Saiu

2004-02-18 20:19 GCC 3.3.3: Successful build and installation on GNU/Linux PowerPC

Marc Espie

2004-02-01 02:33 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-10 23:52 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-11 01:48 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-14 14:59 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines

Marian Krivos

2004-02-21 08:22 ObjC++

Mark Hahn

2004-02-08 00:53 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa

Mark Mielke

2004-02-29 05:50 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final

Mark Mitchell

2004-02-01 03:18 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch
2004-02-05 20:24 GCC Status Report (2004-02-05)
2004-02-12 03:24 Re: Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch?
2004-02-12 05:03 Re: Should the patch for PR inline-asm/6162 go into 3.4?
2004-02-12 16:51 Re: Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch?
2004-02-12 18:23 Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-12 19:58 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-13 18:51 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-02-05)
2004-02-13 21:07 Re: Using bugzilla to track XFAILs
2004-02-23 04:43 Re: Deprecate -fpack-struct for C++?

Markus Hitter

2004-02-07 11:58 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?

Mat Hostetter

2004-02-16 03:05 __attribute__((naked) on x86 would be useful
2004-02-16 14:56 Re: __attribute__((naked) on x86 would be useful
2004-02-16 16:30 Re: __attribute__((naked) on x86 would be useful

Matt Austern

2004-02-01 00:27 Complicated dg test cases
2004-02-01 05:53 [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin
2004-02-02 19:00 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin
2004-02-02 22:55 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin
2004-02-02 23:30 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin
2004-02-03 22:11 -fhidden-one-only and the EH runtime
2004-02-04 17:57 RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator
2004-02-05 04:49 Re: RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator
2004-02-13 06:05 [Darwin] enable linkonce support
2004-02-13 19:34 -shared-libgcc vs -static-libgcc
2004-02-13 19:52 Re: -shared-libgcc vs -static-libgcc
2004-02-13 23:18 LIBGCC_SPEC
2004-02-17 23:06 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC
2004-02-17 23:47 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC
2004-02-18 00:50 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC

Matt Fago

2004-02-12 15:23 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ??
2004-02-12 15:46 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ??
2004-02-12 16:26 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ??

Matt Kraai

2004-02-03 02:26 move-if-change dependencies

Matthew Wilcox

2004-02-25 21:35 Re: 3.3.3 release and pgp signature

Matthias Klose

2004-02-17 21:59 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages

Meg Abyte

2004-02-28 21:40 Why is my executabel in DOS file format?

Michael Elizabeth Chastain

2004-02-01 02:01 Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release
2004-02-04 02:07 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-05 23:21 Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release

Michael Matz

2004-02-02 08:35 Re: bootstrap failure "sorry, unimplemented:"
2004-02-02 13:10 Re: Invalid alias info through crossjumping
2004-02-04 13:49 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 14:04 RE: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 14:30 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 15:15 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 15:31 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 16:10 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 16:39 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-09 11:05 Can PR c++/3905 (sizeof on function call in template) be done on3.2.x?
2004-02-09 14:18 Re: Can PR c++/3905 (sizeof on function call in template) be doneon 3.2.x?
2004-02-09 14:57 Re: Can PR c++/3905 (sizeof on function call in template) be doneon 3.2.x?
2004-02-09 19:44 Re: Complicated dg test cases
2004-02-23 16:44 Re: your mail
2004-02-25 04:55 Re: newbie: RTL syntax

Mihai Burcea

2004-02-21 00:06 getting non-global variable names from RTL
2004-02-24 20:28 Re: getting non-global variable names from RTL
2004-02-27 00:18 propagating mem expressions

Mike Stump

2004-02-02 19:58 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-02-02 22:39 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin
2004-02-02 23:26 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin
2004-02-02 23:37 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-02-03 00:31 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-02-03 01:16 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-02-03 21:54 Re: ICE building on darwin
2004-02-04 18:18 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-02-04 19:56 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog
2004-02-04 20:28 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-04 20:31 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-04 20:56 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog
2004-02-04 21:58 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-05 02:15 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog
2004-02-06 17:40 restrict in c99
2004-02-06 23:05 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-07 00:39 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-13 00:27 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5}
2004-02-13 00:33 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5}
2004-02-18 01:01 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC
2004-02-24 21:40 Re: Does running a parallel "make -jN check" work safely?
2004-02-25 01:43 Re: newbie: RTL syntax
2004-02-28 19:55 Re: How to get C++ type from tree
2004-02-28 20:09 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?

Mostafa Hagog

2004-02-17 17:43 Split edge fails when performed on a doloop jump on x86 port
2004-02-19 08:43 Re: Split edge fails when performed on a doloop jump on x86 port

Nathan Sidwell

2004-02-06 17:52 Re: restrict in c99

Nathanael Nerode

2004-02-06 13:55 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-02-05)
2004-02-11 03:01 Going on vacation
2004-02-19 02:13 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-19 02:22 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-19 05:01 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-19 18:08 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-19 18:33 [attn Steering Committee] proposed message to assign@gnu.org
2004-02-28 23:25 RFC: Simplifying translate_name in prefix.c

Neil Booth

2004-02-03 07:13 Re: C99 usage in gcc
2004-02-03 19:51 Re: C99 usage in gcc
2004-02-08 11:10 Re: cpp breakage in gcc cvs head
2004-02-27 21:15 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-02-27 22:00 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa

Nicholas Nethercote

2004-02-29 22:17 Re: __attribute__ ((regparm(...))) in function declaration and gcc3.4.0

Nicola Pero

2004-02-06 23:46 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-06 23:59 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-07 04:28 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?

Nicolas Wiest-Daesslé

2004-02-28 13:00 How to get C++ type from tree

Olivier Hainque

2004-02-13 08:59 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel

Oscar Fuentes

2004-02-24 20:00 Re: Using gcc to parse C++ sources

Paolo Bonzini

2004-02-03 15:40 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 16:07 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 16:37 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 16:55 Getting rid of GET_RTX_CLASS?
2004-02-03 16:58 What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-03 23:16 Re: Getting rid of GET_RTX_CLASS?
2004-02-04 16:22 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-12 15:29 [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel
2004-02-12 19:01 Fw: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-12 19:03 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel
2004-02-15 12:19 Re: RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator
2004-02-29 23:05 Naming of functions

Paolo Carlini

2004-02-03 14:21 Re: Using tree-ssa
2004-02-03 14:50 Re: Using tree-ssa
2004-02-04 18:18 Re: RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator
2004-02-13 20:20 What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-13 22:23 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-14 21:22 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-24 10:29 Re: two-element struct performance (was: strict-aliasing and typedefs)
2004-02-27 18:17 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?

Paul Brook

2004-02-04 13:49 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 18:39 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 19:49 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 21:21 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 21:51 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-09 15:25 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa

Paul Koning

2004-02-03 17:03 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 20:08 pdp11-g77
2004-02-05 15:03 Re: pdp11-g77
2004-02-09 18:59 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-18 22:07 Re: CC_MODE and cc0

Paul Schlie

2004-02-06 23:46 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-15 16:47 backport 3.4 <- 3.5 after today's freeze, but prior to ssa merge?
2004-02-15 17:19 Re: backport 3.4 <- 3.5 after today's freeze, but prior to ssamerge?
2004-02-15 17:30 Re: backport 3.4 <- 3.5 after today's freeze, but prior to ssamerge?
2004-02-24 17:18 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness?

Per Bothner

2004-02-09 02:29 Re: cpp breakage in gcc cvs head
2004-02-11 17:08 PATCH: for cpp breakage in gcc cvs head
2004-02-11 20:11 Re: PATCH: for cpp breakage in gcc cvs head
2004-02-17 22:35 3.4 does not bootstrap on fedora

Petar Penchev

2004-02-04 14:10 Function section
2004-02-10 08:58 How to disanle optimizations

Peter Barada

2004-02-03 16:48 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 17:28 Re: "Documentation by paper"

Petter Reinholdtsen

2004-02-08 12:10 Re: Programs compiled with "-fPIE" + "-pie" seg fault on sparc-linux [testcase].

Phil Edwards

2004-02-01 19:22 Re: Complicated dg test cases
2004-02-04 17:26 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 20:36 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-04 22:58 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-11 14:59 Re: Going on vacation
2004-02-13 20:11 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-16 07:36 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages
2004-02-16 09:13 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-19 08:58 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-20 18:11 Re: RFC: release script and ftp.gnu.org
2004-02-23 22:47 Re: Multilibs - how to avoid building the default one twice
2004-02-29 06:51 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-02-29 06:56 Turning off tree checking by default for releases
2004-02-29 12:12 Re: Turning off tree checking by default for releases

Philip S. Brown

2004-02-06 19:19 Retargetting GCC - Document
2004-02-06 19:31 Email Problems

Pop Sebastian

2004-02-03 09:33 Re: [RFC] Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC

Praveen kumar Jonnalagadda

2004-02-06 11:17 subscribe for gcc mailing list

Qiong Cai

2004-02-10 03:53 Move rest_of_handle_ branch)prob before GCSE
2004-02-12 03:04 profile-guided optimization
2004-02-23 02:06 RE: Move rest_of_handle_ branch_prob before GCSE

Quarantine

2004-02-20 10:25 VIRUS in message to DAVY quarantined

RAFFAELE COTZA

2004-02-02 19:03 help for the use of G95 compiler

Rainer Orth

2004-02-05 11:03 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease -- bootstrap failure
2004-02-05 11:18 RE: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease -- bootstrap failure
2004-02-05 23:43 GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC)
2004-02-12 22:56 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC)
2004-02-12 23:01 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC)
2004-02-13 21:59 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC)
2004-02-17 14:35 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory
2004-02-19 13:41 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory
2004-02-20 18:17 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory
2004-02-20 18:25 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory

Rajeev Joshi

2004-02-12 01:11 Generating object files from translation unit dumps?
2004-02-12 03:08 Re: Generating object files from translation unit dumps?

Randy.Dunlap

2004-02-27 17:53 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?
2004-02-27 18:15 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?

Ranjit Mathew

2004-02-20 06:05 Re: A request for GCC 3.5 snapshots

Ray Whitmer

2004-02-25 15:12 Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k.
2004-02-26 15:29 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k.
2004-02-27 14:58 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k.

RFC-INFO Server

2004-02-29 22:04 Re: information (segment 1/2)

Richard Brooksby

2004-02-20 19:45 Documentation of ".tu" file format

Richard Earnshaw

2004-02-03 11:19 Re: ARM condition code register handling
2004-02-06 11:44 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere.
2004-02-12 10:22 [tree-ssa] problems building fortran
2004-02-13 16:13 Re: Using bugzilla to track XFAILs
2004-02-16 11:20 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-16 11:44 Re: __attribute__((naked) on x86 would be useful
2004-02-16 13:37 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!?
2004-02-17 13:32 gcc-3.3.3 status?
2004-02-17 13:33 gcc-3.3.3 status?
2004-02-17 13:33 gcc-3.3.3 status?
2004-02-17 13:36 Re: gcc-3.3.3 status?
2004-02-17 15:27 Re: gcc-3.3.3 status?
2004-02-19 11:17 Re: Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function?
2004-02-19 15:06 Re: Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function?
2004-02-19 15:43 Re: gcc-3.3.3 status?
2004-02-24 10:00 Re: CC_MODE and cc0
2004-02-24 18:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-02-25 10:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-02-25 14:07 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-02-25 15:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-02-25 16:46 [tree-ssa] ARM regressions with respect to trunk
2004-02-27 09:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-02-27 09:52 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-02-27 10:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-02-27 11:52 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan

Richard Guenther

2004-02-01 23:11 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-04 22:53 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa
2004-02-05 10:57 Tree-ssa status with POOMA
2004-02-05 12:14 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA
2004-02-05 13:51 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA
2004-02-05 15:43 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA
2004-02-06 12:25 [tree-ssa] -fgcse and friends useless
2004-02-06 12:41 Re: [tree-ssa] -fgcse and friends useless
2004-02-10 15:41 [lno] ICE in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:545
2004-02-10 15:55 Re: [lno] ICE in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:545
2004-02-11 19:13 Re: compiler performance
2004-02-12 19:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Heads up. Branch will freeze Feb/15.
2004-02-19 17:52 Re: A request for GCC 3.5 snapshots
2004-02-23 14:34 [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?)
2004-02-23 15:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?), hugecompile time regression
2004-02-23 15:42 unsigned / double propagation weirdness?
2004-02-23 15:48 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness?
2004-02-23 16:03 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?), hugecompile time regression
2004-02-23 16:06 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness?
2004-02-23 18:00 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness?
2004-02-23 18:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?)
2004-02-25 18:09 Peeling of once rolling loops limited?
2004-02-26 17:06 [lno] internal compiler error: in record_dependences_for_modify_expr,at tree-scalar-evolution.c:3236
2004-02-26 17:12 Re: [lno] internal compiler error: in record_dependences_for_modify_expr,at tree-scalar-evolution.c:3236
2004-02-27 15:18 Re: [lno] internal compiler error: in record_dependences_for_modify_expr,at tree-scalar-evolution.c:3236

Richard Henderson

2004-02-01 00:49 Re: split_complex_* flaw
2004-02-01 05:38 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-01 19:46 Re: split_complex_* flaw
2004-02-01 19:54 Re: FP negation optimization
2004-02-02 23:56 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-02-03 00:39 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-02-03 21:14 Re: Getting rid of GET_RTX_CLASS?
2004-02-04 20:15 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-05 05:32 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-05 23:59 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-10 18:14 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 18:35 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 20:50 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-13 19:17 Re: -ffixed-di vs. strlen
2004-02-13 19:47 Re: -shared-libgcc vs -static-libgcc
2004-02-13 19:57 Re: -ffixed-di vs. strlen
2004-02-13 22:46 Re: -ffixed-di vs. strlen
2004-02-15 02:28 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines
2004-02-15 17:42 Re: [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE
2004-02-15 23:43 Re: [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE
2004-02-16 03:45 Re: [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE
2004-02-16 06:04 Re: __attribute__((naked) on x86 would be useful
2004-02-17 23:44 Re: c-torture/execute/990208-1.c XPASSes - remove XFAIL?
2004-02-18 05:29 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization
2004-02-18 18:59 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization
2004-02-19 01:45 Re: Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function?
2004-02-19 04:45 Re: Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function?
2004-02-20 08:03 Re: two-element struct performance (was: strict-aliasing and typedefs)
2004-02-20 22:10 Re: AIX Tree-SSA bootstrap failure
2004-02-23 23:23 Re: PATCH: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.4
2004-02-23 23:45 Re: CC_MODE and cc0
2004-02-25 00:59 Re: testcase question (portability)
2004-02-26 18:34 Re: [tree-ssa] testsuite runs with a new pass
2004-02-26 18:36 Re: gcc/binutils or glibc ? RELOC problem while build glibc for alpha.
2004-02-26 23:08 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-02-26 23:12 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-02-27 07:52 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-02-27 08:00 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-02-27 10:14 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-02-27 11:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan

Richard Kenner

2004-02-01 12:17 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 00:59 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 12:12 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 12:20 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 15:48 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 16:16 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 16:20 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 16:28 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 16:56 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 16:57 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 12:30 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 13:10 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 13:20 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 13:52 RE: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 13:55 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-04 14:08 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 14:35 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 14:36 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 14:48 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 15:19 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 15:21 RE: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 15:49 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 16:14 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 17:54 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 18:05 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 18:43 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 20:55 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 21:06 Re: [tree-ssa] cfg.texi needs reviewing by a native speaker (Was: Re: "Documentation by paper")
2004-02-04 21:09 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 21:25 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 21:55 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-05 20:09 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-09 17:19 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-09 18:37 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-09 18:52 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-09 18:55 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-09 19:05 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-10 16:28 Re: Useless test in gen_binary
2004-02-10 16:30 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 17:47 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 18:06 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 18:26 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 18:48 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 18:49 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 19:46 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 19:49 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 20:07 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 20:09 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-10 20:44 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS
2004-02-15 13:58 Your change to sdbout.c
2004-02-19 04:36 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file

Richard Sandiford

2004-02-07 09:37 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere.

Richard Zidlicky

2004-02-09 14:57 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken
2004-02-16 20:40 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken

Robert Bowdidge

2004-02-27 22:49 cutting the size of CONST_DECLs
2004-02-27 23:57 Logging data structure field accesses
2004-02-28 01:09 Re: cutting the size of CONST_DECLs

Robert Dewar

2004-02-01 00:43 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-01 11:51 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-01 12:08 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-01 23:05 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-01 23:05 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-02 00:53 Re: FP negation optimization
2004-02-02 02:13 Re: FP negation optimization
2004-02-02 15:56 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-02 17:16 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-02 17:19 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-02 19:28 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 21:21 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 21:27 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 22:06 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 22:18 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 22:20 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 22:22 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 13:48 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 14:11 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 14:19 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 14:46 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 14:53 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 17:25 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 19:10 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-05 02:29 Re: [tree-ssa] cfg.texi needs reviewing by a native speaker (Was:Re: "Documentation by paper")
2004-02-05 10:48 Re: A problem with aligment attribute
2004-02-06 10:51 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-06 11:15 Re: IA64 inline division question
2004-02-08 02:22 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-08 10:51 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-09 16:45 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-09 18:14 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-09 18:20 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-09 18:28 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-09 19:12 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-11 17:02 Re: compiler performance
2004-02-11 17:34 Re: compiler performance
2004-02-11 17:35 Re: compiler performance
2004-02-11 19:27 Re: compiler performance
2004-02-12 02:55 Re: Generating object files from translation unit dumps?
2004-02-12 15:40 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ??
2004-02-12 16:14 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ??
2004-02-12 16:38 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ??
2004-02-12 16:52 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ??
2004-02-13 11:04 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-18 16:21 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file
2004-02-23 16:48 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness?
2004-02-23 17:23 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness?
2004-02-24 12:23 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness?

Robert M. Stockmann

2004-02-04 20:01 C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-04 21:29 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-04 21:55 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-04 23:04 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-11 00:45 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x

Robert McNulty Junior

2004-02-03 05:31 segment fault on GCC 3.5

Robert Schweikert

2004-02-24 20:58 derivation problems with templates

Roger Sayle

2004-02-02 14:04 Re: FP negation optimization
2004-02-04 02:42 Re: ICE building on darwin
2004-02-12 15:11 Re: Including GMP as an upstream package (was problems buildingfortran)

Rolf Ebert

2004-02-20 12:27 [Ada] ACATS progress between 3.3.3 and 3.4
2004-02-20 14:05 Re: [Ada] ACATS progress between 3.3.3 and 3.4

Ronald Oussoren

2004-02-06 11:58 (objective-C runtime) dynamicly creating new classes

Rupert Wood

2004-02-20 10:08 RE: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file

Russ Allbery

2004-02-04 02:56 Re: "Documentation by paper"

S. Bosscher

2004-02-04 13:29 RE: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
2004-02-04 15:16 RE: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?

sandeep

2004-02-18 05:03 compilation error

Sanjiv Gupta

2004-02-02 04:14 RE: multilib default dir.
2004-02-24 04:43 RE: Multilibs - how to avoid building the default one twice

sean darcy

2004-02-22 02:58 GNU configure breaks on 3.4-20040218
2004-02-22 16:49 Re: GNU configure breaks on 3.4-20040218
2004-02-26 17:05 Re: GNU configure breaks on 3.4-20040218

Sebastian Pop

2004-02-27 22:41 Re: [lno] internal compiler error: in record_dependences_for_modify_expr, at tree-scalar-evolution.c:3236

Segher Boessenkool

2004-02-09 11:46 Re: Complicated dg test cases
2004-02-09 11:58 Re: Complicated dg test cases
2004-02-09 17:19 Re: Complicated dg test cases
2004-02-11 17:21 Re: Complicated dg test cases
2004-02-24 19:09 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness?

Serge Belyshev

2004-02-18 23:01 ICE with -M and -include
2004-02-19 00:20 Re: ICE with -M and -include
2004-02-29 14:25 __attribute__ ((regparm(...))) in function declaration and gcc3.4.0

Seymour Marsh

2004-02-01 03:03 Hello!

silverio . di

2004-02-19 15:16 gcc-3.3.x compiling bug
2004-02-24 10:07 multilibs and gcc 3.x for SuperHitachi SH
2004-02-24 13:07 Rif: Re: multilibs and gcc 3.x for SuperHitachi SH

Simon G Best

2004-02-04 16:35 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?
2004-02-04 16:56 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword?

Srinivasa Kanduru

2004-02-03 19:03 VMA different from LMA

Stan Shebs

2004-02-13 21:41 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file

Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.

2004-02-19 17:18 gcc 3.3.2 build on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1
2004-02-20 21:35 gcc 3.4.0 20040218 build on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1
2004-02-23 00:00 3.3.4 20040216 (prerelease) build on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1
2004-02-24 22:13 gcc 3.3.3 build on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1
2004-02-25 01:16 Error compiling gcc 3.4-20040218 on alpha ev68 osf
2004-02-26 02:46 Re: Error compiling gcc 3.4-20040218 on alpha ev68 osf
2004-02-26 02:54 gcc 3.3.4 20040223 (prerelease) build on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1

Stephan T. Lavavej

2004-02-16 02:27 [PATCH] GCC Warning Options Documentation

Steve Ellcey

2004-02-05 18:41 IA64 inline division question
2004-02-12 00:39 Re: IA64 inline division question
2004-02-19 01:02 IA64 compilation failure

Steve Kargl

2004-02-05 20:58 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa

Steven Bosscher

2004-02-02 13:53 Re: A Case to maintain target i370-*-mvs as a live target
2004-02-03 16:00 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-03 16:23 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-04 21:32 Re: [tree-ssa] cfg.texi needs reviewing by a native speaker (Was: Re: "Documentation by paper")
2004-02-04 22:02 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-05 23:37 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa
2004-02-24 09:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?)

Support Staff

2004-02-25 17:55 Re: does it belong to you?

Syd Polk

2004-02-02 23:44 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-02-03 00:29 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function
2004-02-03 21:45 ICE building on darwin
2004-02-03 22:07 Re: ICE building on darwin
2004-02-05 21:32 Re: ICE building on darwin

Theodore Papadopoulo

2004-02-05 13:10 Re: Getting rid of GET_RTX_CLASS?

Timothy J. Wood

2004-02-02 06:01 C++/altivec issue on 3.4 branch
2004-02-09 02:30 PR 14042: C++ abstraction penalty (tree-ssa regression/opportunity)

Tom Crick

2004-02-01 12:26 Using tree-ssa
2004-02-03 14:15 Re: Using tree-ssa
2004-02-03 14:41 Re: Using tree-ssa

Tom Tromey

2004-02-02 19:06 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-13 18:27 Re: Using bugzilla to track XFAILs
2004-02-19 16:50 Re: using distcc to speed up GCC bootstraps

Toon Moene

2004-02-10 22:54 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa

Totte Karlsson

2004-02-12 22:50 Using precompiled headers with gcc?
2004-02-13 00:43 Re: Using precompiled headers with gcc?

Ulrich Weigand

2004-02-01 21:35 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease
2004-02-05 23:55 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere.
2004-02-11 09:59 Re: GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease
2004-02-14 19:19 Re: How aggressive is CSE about removing redundant CC sets?
2004-02-15 02:27 Re: How aggressive is CSE about removing redundant CC sets?
2004-02-19 00:29 Re: A thought about cc0 migration. (Re: How aggressive is CSE about

Vas Litvinov

2004-02-20 03:03 implicit type casts in C front end

Vikram Anantha

2004-02-11 19:25 re: Exception Handling Bug with Purify

Vincent Diepeveen

2004-02-24 01:42 PGO enhancements in GCC

Vladimir Makarov

2004-02-05 19:32 Re: IA64 inline division question
2004-02-10 20:10 Re: Superblock Scheduling Alg in GCC
2004-02-10 20:18 Re: Superblock Scheduling Alg in GCC

Volker Reichelt

2004-02-16 15:35 Bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu on 3.4 branch

Wolfgang Bangerth

2004-02-04 22:50 Readiness of tree-ssa

yuvalk

2004-02-29 07:18 GCC 3.2 runs with glibc-2.2, crashes with glibc-2.3?

Zack Weinberg

2004-02-02 03:52 Re: Anonymous Namespaces
2004-02-02 19:07 Re: help for the use of G95 compiler
2004-02-02 23:40 Re: C99 usage in gcc
2004-02-03 00:43 Re: C99 usage in gcc
2004-02-03 02:40 Re: move-if-change dependencies
2004-02-03 07:22 Re: C99 usage in gcc
2004-02-03 20:13 Re: C99 usage in gcc
2004-02-03 21:28 Re: Getting rid of GET_RTX_CLASS?
2004-02-04 20:31 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog
2004-02-04 21:04 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog
2004-02-04 23:01 Re: Removing REG_OK_STRICT
2004-02-06 01:36 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere.
2004-02-09 17:00 Re: Complicated dg test cases
2004-02-09 18:34 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-09 18:45 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-09 18:54 Re: "Documentation by paper"
2004-02-10 19:56 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-10 20:05 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-10 21:15 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-10 22:42 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-11 00:26 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch
2004-02-11 08:15 Re: va_start still... [and again] with test case:
2004-02-11 18:01 Re: PATCH: for cpp breakage in gcc cvs head
2004-02-12 07:49 Re: How do we run autoconf for the top-level configure.in?
2004-02-12 18:18 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel
2004-02-12 18:22 Re: How can I release every memory that gcc holds?
2004-02-12 19:11 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel
2004-02-12 20:34 Re: GCC 3.3.2: Some bug in the preprocessor?
2004-02-12 23:37 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x
2004-02-13 00:23 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel
2004-02-13 00:41 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5}
2004-02-13 18:42 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel
2004-02-13 19:31 Criteria for performing Ada-included bootstraps
2004-02-13 19:33 Re: Using bugzilla to track XFAILs
2004-02-13 19:48 Re: -shared-libgcc vs -static-libgcc
2004-02-13 20:04 Re: -shared-libgcc vs -static-libgcc
2004-02-16 08:29 Re: Your change to sdbout.c
2004-02-17 07:12 c-torture/execute/990208-1.c XPASSes - remove XFAIL?
2004-02-18 23:00 Re: CC_MODE and cc0
2004-02-18 23:16 Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function?
2004-02-19 02:44 Re: Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function?
2004-02-23 21:32 Multilibs - how to avoid building the default one twice
2004-02-23 22:57 Re: Multilibs - how to avoid building the default one twice
2004-02-23 23:43 Re: CC_MODE and cc0
2004-02-24 04:28 Re: Multilibs - how to avoid building the default one twice
2004-02-25 09:10 3.3.3: libstdc++ regression on ia64-hpux - messy EH problem - needhelp
2004-02-25 23:54 Re: 3.3.3: libstdc++ regression on ia64-hpux - messy EH problem -need help

Zdenek Dvorak

2004-02-05 10:00 [tree-ssa] Bug in jump threading
2004-02-06 18:30 Re: [tree-ssa] -fgcse and friends useless
2004-02-10 20:00 Re: [lno] ICE in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:545
2004-02-18 18:47 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization
2004-02-19 14:11 [lno] Reuse analysis?
2004-02-23 07:08 Re: Move rest_of_handle_ branch_prob before GCSE
2004-02-24 22:03 Re: [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer
2004-02-24 23:44 Re: [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer
2004-02-25 07:23 Re: [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer
2004-02-25 18:43 Re: Peeling of once rolling loops limited?
2004-02-26 21:12 Re: [lno] loop-optimize2 ICE
2004-02-27 00:47 Re: [lno] loop-optimize2 ICE
2004-02-28 20:07 [patch] Re: recount_dominator

Ziemowit Laski

2004-02-04 19:59 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog
2004-02-04 22:51 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog
2004-02-04 23:07 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog
2004-02-04 23:16 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog
2004-02-06 20:52 [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-06 22:01 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-06 22:08 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-06 22:14 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-06 22:20 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-06 22:24 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-06 23:50 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?
2004-02-21 09:06 Re: ObjC++

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3

gcc archiveauthor index for February, 2004

gcc archive
author index for February, 2004