This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: "Documentation by paper"


Phil Edwards <phil@codesourcery.com> writes:

> Kenner, nobody is arguing against having a high-level documentation overview.
> Everybody agrees that it's a great idea.  Please, write one.  Those of us who
> cannot keep the source code in our heads use these crutches like API listings
> and cross-reference tools.  One is not a replacement for the other.

Conversely, nobody is arguing against API listings and cross-reference
tools.

The immediate question is whether to add annotations to comments in
the source code.  (Your examples demonstrate that these annotations
are not absolutely required for cross-reference tools.)

The original question was whether to require full descriptions of
algorithms in gcc source files, rather than just references to
academic papers.

Ian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]