This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, stuart at apple dot com, dalej at apple dot com
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:11:04 -0500
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion
- Organization: Red Hat Canada
- References: <20031219004441.GD6211@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <1071801428.21456.162.camel@p4> <20031219121356.GG6211@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <1071853205.21456.367.camel@p4> <20031231204744.GA491@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20040120183224.GG21361@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <1074700677.14945.2487.camel@p4>
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 10:57, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> Since I am not offering you a viable alternative, you can take that as a
> removal of my opposition to your plan :-). It may very well turn out to
> have other positive benefits as well. You've clearly thought about it a
> lot more than I have.
>
I also have no major issues with this approach, but we should watch out
for breakage and, particularly, performance regressions. I would very
interested in any benefits we could derive by doing RTL expansion using
a domwalk, for instance.
Diego.