Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning

[Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>]

Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> writes:

> > In message <20031216160527.GN2199@kam.mff.cuni.cz>, Jan Hubicka writes:
> >  >Ignore the comments about non-checking bootstrap.  As I've checked
> >  >Diego's machines did run earlier than I've commited the patch.  Hope
> >  >that all the problems are fixed by now.
> > What I'm far more concerned about is the fact that a patch which didn't
> > bootstrap was checked into the tree to start with.
> 
> I see you don't believe, it, but it really did bootstrap.  As I pointed
> out already, it only reproduce on disabled checking bootstrap, while I
> did bootstrap with checking enabled (the default settings).

Can we fix this?  It would be better if it was impossible to write
code that will build on a compiler with checking enabled but won't
build on a compiler with checking disabled.

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>