This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands


In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312111514190.2582-100000@nondot.org>, Chris Lattner 
writes:
 >
 >Jeff Law wrote:
 >
 >> While it's nice to think about a world where you always have immediate
 >> uses, you end up with FUD chains if you do that -- with ultimately a
 >> tangled nest of pointers that is bloody impossible to work with in the
 >> real world.
 >
 >Uh, no.  Here's a counter-example:
 >http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
 >
 >Having efficient, transparently & efficiently updated immediate use
 >information is extremely valuable for a wide variety of optimizations.
OK.  Maybe it was just Diego implementation that was an unmaintainable
mess :-)

jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]