This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?

From: Felix Lee <felix dot 1 at canids dot net>
To: gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 08:42:18 -0800
Subject: Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
References: <10312031406.AA12282@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <3FCDFA77.6060309@coyotegulch.com> <m3llptopsn.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>

prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc):
> Scott Robert Ladd <coyote@coyotegulch.com> wrote:
> >    * compilation speed (-Ospeed)
> I think "time" might be less confusing than "speed".

I think saying what direction you're going is less confusing than
saying what axis you're moving on.  "quickly", "small", "fast"
instead of "speed", "size", "time".  use words that will fit the
sentence, "I want my code ____".
--

References:
- Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
  - From: Paul Jarc

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]