This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?

From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>
To: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch dot com>
Cc: gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 01 Dec 2003 11:27:01 -0500
Subject: Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
References: <3FC8E44F.3050105@coyotegulch.com><3FCAD063.6020200@coyotegulch.com> <3FCADF69.5030704@gnat.com><200312010917.25287.s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl><3FCB4994.4090403@gnat.com> <3FCB53DF.40602@coyotegulch.com>

Scott Robert Ladd <coyote@coyotegulch.com> writes:

> Am I to imply from the above that the FSF and GCC developers are
> incapable of working on mission critical projects with specific
> schedules? Now I understand why you have problems finding financial
> support...

I believe you are correct that the FSF is incapable of working on
mission critical projects with specific schedules.

I believe you are also correct when you imply that ``gcc developers''
as a whole group are incapable of working on mission critical projects
with specific schedules.

However, there are several companies which invest in gcc development
which are entirely capable of working on mission critical projects
with specific schedules, and have in fact done so many times.

Ian

References:
- Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]