gcc archive
date index for December, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

December 31, 2003
23:45 Re: mktime.c fixes (part 4 of 6): verify assumptions at compile-time Richard Henderson
23:41 Re: Request for help performing CVS branch trick Geoff Keating
23:39 Re: mktime.c fixes (part 4 of 6): verify assumptions at compile-time Joseph S. Myers
23:27 Re: mktime.c fixes (part 4 of 6): verify assumptions at compile-time Paul Eggert
22:57 Request for help performing CVS branch trick Nathanael Nerode
22:57 Re: mktime.c fixes (part 4 of 6): verify assumptions at compile-time Florian Weimer
22:33 Re: Altivec discussion summary, future direction Zack Weinberg
21:47 Re: Altivec discussion summary, future direction Aldy Hernandez
21:35 [tree-ssa] Question: going in and out of SSA Devang Patel
21:30 Altivec discussion summary, future direction Geoff Keating
20:47 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Jan Hubicka
19:56 Re: mktime.c fixes (part 4 of 6): verify assumptions at compile-time Joseph S. Myers
19:52 Bogus PPC64 return-colum? Was: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] S/390 DWARF-2 CFIframe support] Andrew Cagney
19:34 Re: mktime.c fixes (part 4 of 6): verify assumptions at compile-time Paul Eggert
19:18 Re: [tree-ssa] 'out_of_ssa_tag' question Devang Patel
19:07 Re: [tree-ssa] vdefs question (to make vectorizer pass verify ssa) Dorit Naishlos
18:51 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC - tree vectorizer Richard Henderson
17:25 Re: [tree-ssa] vdefs question (to make vectorizer pass verify ssa) Diego Novillo
16:55 gcc-ss-3.4-20031231 is now available gccadmin
16:31 Anonymous CVS access to gcc.gnu.org Kelley Cook
16:13 Re: [tree-ssa] 'out_of_ssa_tag' question Diego Novillo
15:27 [tree-ssa-lno] Commit rules for the lno-branch Pop Sébastian
13:19 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC - tree vectorizer Dorit Naishlos
13:03 [tree-ssa] vdefs question (to make vectorizer pass verify ssa) Dorit Naishlos
08:49 Trunk broken for mmix-knuth-mmixware Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:29 Link .o generated by GCC(arm-wince-pe) from Embeded VC ??? Simon Wu
01:52 Current status of Objective-C++ Chevago Runcimonn
01:47 Re: Column number information in 3.4.x? Per Bothner
01:32 Re: Column number information in 3.4.x? Chris Lattner
01:26 Re: Column number information in 3.4.x? Per Bothner
01:05 [tree-ssa] 'out_of_ssa_tag' question Devang Patel
00:05 Re: How to determine access alignment in RTL ? Jim Wilson

December 30, 2003
23:57 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Jim Wilson
20:44 Re: Debug class optimization Zack Weinberg
20:12 Re: trouble with porting architecture Andrew Haley
20:07 Debug class optimization Mad Hatter
19:52 Re: trouble with porting architecture tm_gccmail
19:32 Re: HP-UX and core dumps and PHSS_26559 John David Anglin
19:06 Re: trouble with porting architecture Eric Botcazou
18:14 Re: trouble with porting architecture James Dessart
17:36 Re: trouble with porting architecture Geert Bosch
17:24 Re: trouble with porting architecture Eric Botcazou
15:47 cvs.html not clear about cvs server Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
15:28 trouble with porting architecture James Dessart
05:20 Re: Bug Status (2003-12-23) Andrew Pinski
01:22 Re: Can't build m68k-elf target with gcc-3.3.2 or gcc-3.4-20031224tree Bernardo Innocenti
01:09 Re: Problem with "make" in libjava part for x86-64 Ulrich Weigand
00:52 Problem with "make" in libjava part for x86-64 Richard Kenner

December 29, 2003
23:35 Re: regarding CVS repository on Savannah Tom Lord
23:06 Re: regarding CVS repository on Savannah Bradley M. Kuhn
22:11 Missing documentation for PRINT_REG config macro Richard Kenner
21:02 Re: missed tail-optimization with templates Andrew Pinski
20:52 missed tail-optimization with templates Luca Padovani
20:09 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah Gerald Pfeifer
20:05 Re: Can't build gcc [tree-ssa] 20031222 on cygwin: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c:1618 syntax error for ipc... Frank Ch. Eigler
20:00 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah Rudy Gevaert
19:38 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Denis Zaitsev
19:32 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Denis Zaitsev
19:15 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Zack Weinberg
19:09 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Zack Weinberg
18:52 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Denis Zaitsev
18:38 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Denis Zaitsev
18:22 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Daniel Jacobowitz
18:21 Re: [tree-ssa] i386 bootstrap failure Vladimir Merzliakov
18:07 [tree-ssa] i386 bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
18:06 [tree-ssa] i386 bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
17:22 PATCH for Re: System V PowerPC ABI? Gerald Pfeifer
17:15 gcc-ss-3.3-20031229 is now available gccadmin
16:43 Re: System V PowerPC ABI? Jakub Jelinek
16:35 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah Rudy Gevaert
16:28 System V PowerPC ABI? Gerald Pfeifer
14:57 Re: Can't build m68k-elf target with gcc-3.3.2 or gcc-3.4-20031224tree Andreas Schwab
14:47 Re: Can't build m68k-elf target with gcc-3.3.2 or gcc-3.4-20031224tree Peter Barada
14:14 Re: where are char_traits<wchar_t> instances built ? Paolo Carlini
14:04 where are char_traits<wchar_t> instances built ? Marc Espie
09:38 Trouble with --enable-coverage bootstraps Steven Bosscher
09:04 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Jakub Jelinek
06:16 Re: Can't build m68k-elf target with gcc-3.3.2 or gcc-3.4-20031224tree Paul Cadaret
05:55 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Zack Weinberg
05:32 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Daniel Jacobowitz
04:54 EOF character in parser Gagneet Singh
03:57 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Zack Weinberg
03:55 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Andrew Pinski
03:38 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Ulrich Drepper
02:53 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Denis Zaitsev
02:46 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Zack Weinberg
02:45 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Denis Zaitsev
02:44 Re: const-elim-1.c Zack Weinberg
02:33 const-elim-1.c Mark Mitchell
02:28 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah Daniel Jacobowitz
02:22 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Zack Weinberg
01:24 Re: Can't build m68k-elf target with gcc-3.3.2 or gcc-3.4-20031224tree Bernardo Innocenti

December 28, 2003
22:36 Column number information in 3.4.x? Chris Lattner
22:25 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Denis Zaitsev
20:35 Can't build m68k-elf target with gcc-3.3.2 or gcc-3.4-20031224 tree Paul Cadaret
19:44 Re: Do we still need ggc-simple Steven Bosscher
19:11 Re: bugs fixed on the tree-ssa Mark Mitchell
18:46 Re: bugs fixed on the tree-ssa Daniel Berlin
18:33 Re: Do we still need ggc-simple Mark Mitchell
18:21 Re: bugs fixed on the tree-ssa Mark Mitchell
15:19 Re: What happened to the PPro DFA scheduler description? Toon Moene
14:52 What happened to the PPro DFA scheduler description? Steven Bosscher

December 27, 2003
23:33 #pragma ident Frank Cusack
18:53 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah Zack Weinberg
18:38 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Zack Weinberg
11:47 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Denis Zaitsev
11:47 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Denis Zaitsev
11:25 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah Rudy Gevaert
11:21 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah Gerald Pfeifer
10:50 Re: please update http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html Gerald Pfeifer
10:25 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Zack Weinberg
04:58 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Richard Henderson

December 26, 2003
23:06 Re: ELF instruction for section and branch. Ian Lance Taylor
07:23 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah Rudy Gevaert
04:41 RE: ELF instruction for section and branch. Gagneet Singh
03:40 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Zack Weinberg
01:28 help :: virtual-incoming-args Chin-Hua Chang

December 25, 2003
23:50 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC - tree vectorizer Daniel Berlin
23:11 [tree-ssa] RFC - tree vectorizer Dorit Naishlos
08:57 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah Rudy Gevaert
02:09 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Denis Zaitsev
01:54 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Richard Henderson
01:45 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Denis Zaitsev
01:39 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Denis Zaitsev
01:21 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Zack Weinberg
01:15 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Denis Zaitsev
01:13 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Denis Zaitsev
00:39 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Roland McGrath
00:38 Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Richard Henderson
00:21 i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Denis Zaitsev

December 24, 2003
19:25 Eric Botcazou appointed SPARC maintainer Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:22 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c Michael Elizabeth Chastain
18:17 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c DJ Delorie
18:11 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c Daniel Berlin
17:37 Re: new FAILs on HEAD Laurent GUERBY
17:14 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah Christopher Faylor
17:05 Successful build of 3.3.2 on ia64-hp-hpux11.22 Roger Sayle
16:55 gcc-ss-3.4-20031224 is now available gccadmin
16:45 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c DJ Delorie
16:43 Re: ELF instruction for section and branch. Ian Lance Taylor
16:39 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah Daniel Jacobowitz
16:38 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c Daniel Berlin
16:32 i386 inline asm for string functions chaned with GCC 3.x. Why? Denis Zaitsev
16:07 Re: regarding CVS repostory on Savannah Christopher Faylor
15:48 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c DJ Delorie
15:34 regarding CVS repostory on Savannah Rudy Gevaert
15:20 Re: [Savannah-hackers] Problems at checking gcc with cvs Rudy Gevaert
11:19 please update http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html Rudy Gevaert
11:16 RE: ELF instruction for section and branch. Gagneet Singh
11:15 RE: ELF instruction for section and branch. Gagneet Singh
11:14 RE: ELF instruction for section and branch. Gagneet Singh
06:55 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c Zack Weinberg
06:51 Re: Compiler timeouts in the basic_string tests Andreas Tobler
06:10 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c Michael Elizabeth Chastain
05:22 Re: new FAILs on HEAD Zack Weinberg
05:17 Re: new FAILs on HEAD Daniel Jacobowitz
05:15 Re: new FAILs on HEAD Zack Weinberg
04:37 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build (MORE) Bernardo Innocenti
03:59 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c Zack Weinberg
03:39 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c Michael Elizabeth Chastain
03:00 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build (MORE) Nathanael Nerode
02:44 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c Nathanael Nerode
00:01 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? (tentative patch) Dale Johannesen

December 23, 2003
23:06 The ObjC discussion list is here! Ziemowit Laski
23:05 Re: CVS login hangs Phil Edwards
21:51 CVS login hangs Paul Cadaret
21:42 Re: Compiler timeouts in the basic_string tests Andreas Tobler
21:33 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Joseph S. Myers
21:28 Gratis kamperen en meer.... Recreatie Media
21:28 Gratis kamperen en meer.... Recreatie Media
21:08 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? (tentative patch) Dale Johannesen
19:27 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix PR 13275 Alexandre Oliva
18:01 Re: Compiler timeouts in the basic_string tests Stuart Hastings
17:00 Re: Mainline: make[2]: ada/doctools/xgnatug: Command not found Kelley Cook
14:44 Re: Can I generate debug info without relocations? Carlo Wood
14:42 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c Carlo Wood
14:14 Re: How to determine access alignment in RTL ? Geert Bosch
13:31 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Marc Espie
12:42 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build (MORE) Marc Espie
12:27 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Jan Hubicka
12:14 Can I generate debug info without relocations? Prashanth T
11:33 Re: Bug Status (2003-12-23) Eric Botcazou
10:53 Bug Status (2003-12-23) Andrew Pinski
09:07 Re: How to determine access alignment in RTL ? Yossi Markovich
08:19 Re: Mainline: make[2]: ada/doctools/xgnatug: Command not found Laurent GUERBY
04:40 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Roger Sayle
04:11 Re: Mainline: make[2]: ada/doctools/xgnatug: Command not found Roger Sayle
02:43 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c Ian Lance Taylor
01:47 Mainline: make[2]: ada/doctools/xgnatug: Command not found Toon Moene
01:29 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Dale Johannesen
01:28 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c Daniel Jacobowitz
01:27 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c Mark Mitchell
01:23 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c Ian Lance Taylor
00:52 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c Mark Mitchell
00:47 Re: About to remove dwarfout.c Andrew Pinski
00:44 About to remove dwarfout.c Mark Mitchell

December 22, 2003
23:33 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? law
22:25 insn "type" attribute Maksim
21:51 strasp: a new string "splitter" Erick Bourgeois
19:31 Compiler timeouts in the basic_string tests Matt Austern
17:12 gcc-ss-3.3-20031222 is now available gccadmin
16:59 Re: regular expression Jean-Pierre Radley
15:59 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Nathan Sidwell
15:31 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Daniel Jacobowitz
15:22 Re: gprof cannot find symbols in a MIPS IRIX a.out Ian Lance Taylor
14:37 Re: Optimisation options turned on at a certain level Ian Lance Taylor
14:12 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Nathan Sidwell
13:36 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Etienne Lorrain
13:21 Can't build gcc [tree-ssa] 20031222 on cygwin: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c:1618 syntax error for ipc... Christian Joensson
13:07 Possible bug in floating point comparison Andrew Haley
12:51 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Kai Henningsen
12:03 Possible bug in floating point comparison K S Sreeram
11:00 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Etienne Lorrain
10:54 Re: Porting GCC help/doubts Paul Brook
10:48 Re: Porting GCC help/doubts Nithya Babu
10:33 Re: Porting GCC help/doubts Paul Brook
10:17 RE: Porting GCC help/doubts Nithya Babu
09:59 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Falk Hueffner
09:56 RE: Optimisation options turned on at a certain level jgrant
09:54 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Etienne Lorrain
09:50 How can I get the line number and file name from GCC tree. Matthieu Moy
07:59 Re: [tree-ssa] a tree-ssa beginner question - creating new variables Dorit Naishlos
07:28 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Michael Chamberlain
07:08 Porting GCC help/doubts Nithya Babu
06:56 regular expression Bansidhar Arvind Deshpande -
06:37 Re: Re: help on soft-float Jim Wilson
05:09 Re: Re: help on soft-float Liu Hongming
01:34 Re: gprof cannot find symbols in a MIPS IRIX a.out Anmol Paralkar

December 21, 2003
23:00 Re: RE: RTL Dumps Marty Hauff
22:26 Fix for c++/13387 -> libstdc++ regressions Paolo Carlini
20:51 Re: Rewriting C identifier lookup. Zack Weinberg
20:47 Re: Regression information in Bugzilla Mark Mitchell
20:14 Re: gprof cannot find symbols in a MIPS IRIX a.out Ian Lance Taylor
20:13 Rewriting C identifier lookup. Kazu Hirata
20:07 Re: generic libgcc1? Ian Lance Taylor
20:00 Re: [tree-ssa] a tree-ssa beginner question - creating new variables Daniel Berlin
19:57 Re: Regression information in Bugzilla Daniel Berlin
19:53 gcc install result Attila Sali
18:56 Re: gprof cannot find symbols in a MIPS IRIX a.out Anmol Paralkar
18:53 Re: generic libgcc1? Maksim
18:45 Re: Regression information in Bugzilla Zack Weinberg
18:43 Re: Regression information in Bugzilla Giovanni Bajo
18:36 Re: Regression information in Bugzilla Gabriel Dos Reis
18:30 [tree-ssa] a tree-ssa beginner question - creating new variables Dorit Naishlos
18:27 Regression information in Bugzilla Giovanni Bajo
17:59 Re: gprof cannot find symbols in a MIPS IRIX a.out Daniel Jacobowitz
17:12 Re: gprof cannot find symbols in a MIPS IRIX a.out Anmol Paralkar
14:52 Re: ELF instruction for section and branch. Jamie Lokier
14:47 Re: Optimisation options turned on at a certain level Ian Lance Taylor
14:26 Optimisation options turned on at a certain level jgrant
13:10 Re: gprof cannot find symbols in a MIPS IRIX a.out Ian Lance Taylor
06:47 Re: static const class member is undefined Geoff Keating
06:36 gprof cannot find symbols in a MIPS IRIX a.out Anmol Paralkar
06:35 Re: static const class member is undefined Erdi Chen
00:55 Re: Potential bug in jump optimization? Zack Weinberg
00:44 Potential bug in jump optimization? aspiesrule

December 20, 2003
20:05 Help with fixing weak aliases Roger Sayle
15:38 Re: ELF instruction for section and branch. Ian Lance Taylor
15:33 Re: generic libgcc1? Ian Lance Taylor
15:27 Re: Incorrect DWARF-2 register numbers on PPC64? Mark Kettenis
14:38 RE: ELF instruction for section and branch. Gagneet Singh
08:39 Re: static const class member is undefined Eric Botcazou
07:08 static const class member is undefined Erdi Chen
04:06 generic libgcc1? Maksim

December 19, 2003
22:35 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Zack Weinberg
21:46 Re: alias analysis Robert Dewar
21:19 Re: help on soft-float Jim Wilson
21:12 Re: alias analysis Jim Wilson
20:46 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Matt Austern
20:43 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Matt Austern
20:42 Re: gcov with dynamic c++ libraries Jim Wilson
20:42 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Joseph S. Myers
20:24 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Syd Polk
20:23 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Jim Wilson
20:02 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Joseph S. Myers
20:01 Re: calculate_global_regs_live Jan Hubicka
20:01 Re: calculate_global_regs_live Zdenek Dvorak
19:53 Re: Thread Local Storage David Edelsohn
19:51 Re: calculate_global_regs_live Eric Botcazou
19:49 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Syd Polk
19:39 Thread Local Storage Gilles LEBOURGEOIS
19:33 Re: documentation for augmentations in .eh_frame? David Mosberger
19:12 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Andrew Pinski
19:11 Re: Questions about placement of qualifiers in member functions Ian Lance Taylor
19:09 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Steven Bosscher
19:07 Re: Questions about placement of qualifiers in member functions Giovanni Bajo
18:35 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Matt Austern
18:15 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Jan Hubicka
18:08 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Dale Johannesen
18:07 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Jan Hubicka
17:44 Re: [Fwd: C++ and POSIX Threads Mailing List] Mark Mitchell
17:20 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Joe Buck
17:02 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Andrew MacLeod
17:00 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Andrew MacLeod
16:49 Re: calculate_global_regs_live Jan Hubicka
16:39 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Jan Hubicka
16:25 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion law
16:24 Re: ELF instruction for section and branch. Richard Sandiford
16:18 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? law
16:06 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:49 RE: ELF instruction for section and branch. Gagneet Singh
15:15 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Etienne Lorrain
15:09 Re: Memory Fault in "free" Ian Lance Taylor
15:01 Re: ELF instruction for section and branch. Richard Sandiford
14:56 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Paul Koning
14:44 ELF instruction for section and branch. Gagneet Singh
14:33 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure on x86 Diego Novillo
14:23 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure on x86 Kazu Hirata
14:21 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Jan Hubicka
14:04 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Jan Hubicka
13:57 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited Gabriel Dos Reis
13:14 RE: Mainline bootstrap failure on x86 S. Bosscher
13:14 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure on x86 Andrew Pinski
13:13 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure on x86 Andreas Tobler
13:11 Mainline bootstrap failure on x86 Diego Novillo
12:15 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Kai Henningsen
12:13 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Jan Hubicka
11:59 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Andrew Haley
11:58 Memory Fault in "free" Anjali Sharma
11:43 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Etienne Lorrain
11:21 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited Gabriel Dos Reis
11:00 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Andrew Pinski
10:45 Re: calculate_global_regs_live Eric Botcazou
08:50 Re: Re: RE: RTL Dumps Liu Hongming
08:16 Re: RE: RTL Dumps Petar Penchev
08:05 Re: calculate_global_regs_live Jim Wilson
08:00 Re: [Fwd: C++ and POSIX Threads Mailing List] Mathieu Lacage
07:57 Re: [Fwd: C++ and POSIX Threads Mailing List] Ross Smith
06:50 help on soft-float Liu Hongming
06:48 RE: RTL Dumps Liu Hongming
06:26 RTL Dumps Petar Penchev
05:45 Re: [Fwd: C++ and POSIX Threads Mailing List] Phil Edwards
05:37 Re: [Fwd: C++ and POSIX Threads Mailing List] Ross Smith
02:37 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Andrew MacLeod
02:30 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Andrew Pinski
02:18 [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Dale Johannesen
00:57 [tree-ssa] Removing CALL_PLACEHOLDER mess, when? Jan Hubicka
00:44 [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Jan Hubicka

December 18, 2003
23:10 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Mark Mitchell
23:03 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Joe Buck
22:58 Re: Incorrect DWARF-2 register numbers on PPC64? David Edelsohn
22:49 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Jamie Lokier
22:38 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Mark Mitchell
22:34 [Fwd: C++ and POSIX Threads Mailing List] Mark Mitchell
22:32 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Christopher Eltschka
21:40 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Jonathan Lennox
21:37 Re: Multilib configure failing Phil Edwards
21:20 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Paul Koning
21:04 Multilib configure failing Ulrich Weigand
20:42 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Gabriel Dos Reis
20:42 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Mark Mitchell
20:37 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Joe Buck
19:06 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind David Abrahams
19:02 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Mark Mitchell
18:58 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Jamie Lokier
18:56 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Mark Mitchell
18:53 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Mark Mitchell
18:51 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Jamie Lokier
18:48 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Joe Buck
18:36 Re: subversions.gnu.org down ? Phil Edwards
18:21 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Jamie Lokier
18:14 Re: VMS and VAX support in GCC Douglas B Rupp
18:04 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Matt Austern
17:55 Re: VMS and VAX support in GCC Stanley F. Quayle
17:31 Incorrect DWARF-2 register numbers on PPC64? Ulrich Weigand
17:22 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited Gabriel Dos Reis
17:13 alias analysis Umar Janjua
16:56 Re: VMS and VAX support in GCC Richard Kenner
16:55 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited Tom Tromey
16:48 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Mark Mitchell
16:45 Re: VMS and VAX support in GCC Nathanael Nerode
15:53 Recent regressions in the libstdc++ testsuite Paolo Carlini
15:34 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind David Abrahams
14:32 Re: From beginner: What is the workload of writing a RTL expanderfor a new IR? Diego Novillo
13:39 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Jamie Lokier
13:20 VMS and VAX support in GCC Stanley F. Quayle
11:08 b alias analysis Umar Janjua
10:14 Base class layout in C++ Eric Botcazou
07:18 subversions.gnu.org down ? Cyrille Chepelov
05:18 [tree-ssa] Writing testcases for optimizations Chris Lattner
05:11 Re: version numbers 3.4 or 3.4.0? Mark Mitchell
04:38 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Mark Mitchell
04:28 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Mike Stump
04:23 gcov with dynamic c++ libraries Evan Bigall
04:01 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Mark Mitchell
04:01 Re: version numbers 3.4 or 3.4.0? Dara Hazeghi
03:13 Re: Your assign_parms changes David Edelsohn
02:42 Re: Your assign_parms changes Richard Kenner
02:40 From beginner: What is the workload of writing a RTL expander for a new IR? Chunhua Liao
02:00 Re: Facing problem to make/install gnu GCC2.95 cross compiler. Jim Wilson
01:57 Re: Your assign_parms changes David Edelsohn
01:50 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Mark Mitchell
01:36 Re: TREE & RTL (intermediate code) documentation Jim Wilson
01:21 Re: How to determine access alignment in RTL ? Jim Wilson
00:46 Problem with return register on x86-64 Richard Kenner
00:09 Your assign_parms changes Richard Kenner

December 17, 2003
23:51 LLVM 1.1 Release Chris Lattner
23:39 Re: friend declaration implicitly provides a prototype Giovanni Bajo
23:35 Problem with DECL_RTL in assign_parms Richard Kenner
23:29 Re: version numbers 3.4 or 3.4.0? Joseph S. Myers
23:16 Re: friend declaration implicitly provides a prototype Bernardo Innocenti
23:15 Re: version numbers 3.4 or 3.4.0? Gabriel Dos Reis
23:07 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Geoff Keating
22:59 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Geoff Keating
22:58 version numbers 3.4 or 3.4.0? Dara Hazeghi
22:50 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Andrew Pinski
22:48 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Joe Buck
22:44 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Geoff Keating
22:43 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Mark Mitchell
22:42 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Mark Mitchell
22:10 Re: Removing -frwitable-strings Mike Stump
21:51 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Matt Austern
21:30 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind David Abrahams
21:20 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Mark Mitchell
20:39 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Latchesar Ionkov
20:32 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Richard Henderson
20:26 Re: [tree-ssa] dom1 bug. Andrew MacLeod
20:18 Re: [tree-ssa] dom1 bug. Daniel Berlin
19:48 RE: splits after reload tm_gccmail
19:41 Re: [tree-ssa] dom1 bug. law
19:35 Re: [tree-ssa] dom1 bug. Andrew MacLeod
18:48 Re: calculate_global_regs_live Eric Botcazou
18:36 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Mark Mitchell
18:25 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind David Abrahams
17:48 Re: [tree-ssa] dom1 bug. law
17:40 Re: [tree-ssa] dom1 bug. law
17:19 gcc-ss-3.4-20031217 is now available gccadmin
17:15 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Mark Mitchell
17:02 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Gabriel Dos Reis
16:57 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind David Abrahams
16:45 Merging binutils/gdb bug databases with the gcc bugzilla Wolfgang Bangerth
16:34 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Mark Mitchell
14:33 [tree-ssa] dom1 bug. Andrew MacLeod
14:22 Re: problem with subregs. Tal Agmon
13:29 How to determine access alignment in RTL ? Yossi Markovich
13:26 eyes hitech software most extra low price stop mvm4j88
11:57 Re: [tree-ssa] filter_expr and exc_ptr_expr as gimple ID? Jan Hubicka
11:39 Re: bugs fixed on the tree-ssa Giovanni Bajo
11:33 Re: friend declaration implicitly provides a prototype Giovanni Bajo
11:24 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning Jan Hubicka
11:22 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind David Abrahams
11:22 TREE & RTL (intermediate code) documentation fpuentes
11:14 Re: [tree-ssa] Fix problem with loop notes emitted by targets Pop Sébastian
11:10 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build Nedko Arnaudov
11:09 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build (MORE) John R. Shannon
10:55 Re: [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues Pop Sébastian
10:51 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build John R. Shannon
10:48 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build John R. Shannon
10:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Fix problem with loop notes emitted by targets Zdenek Dvorak
10:28 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build Nedko Arnaudov
09:54 Re: Linking static libraries Zack Weinberg
09:47 Linking static libraries Jean-Eric Cuendet
09:46 Re: bugs fixed on the tree-ssa Richard Guenther
08:47 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Jim Wilson
07:51 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Mark Mitchell
07:04 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Jason Merrill
05:28 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Mark Mitchell
04:56 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix PR 13275 Gabriel Dos Reis
03:59 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information law
03:55 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information law
03:48 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind David Abrahams
03:45 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Jason Merrill
03:30 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands law
03:28 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix PR 13275 Zack Weinberg
03:21 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Jason Merrill
03:19 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning law
03:17 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix PR 13275 Gabriel Dos Reis
03:09 Re: [tree-ssa] filter_expr and exc_ptr_expr as gimple ID? law
03:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands law
02:37 Removing -frwitable-strings Mark Mitchell
02:17 Re: How to share global data in a share library? Mike Stump
02:11 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Mike Stump
01:26 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Mark Mitchell
01:21 How to share global data in a share library? Song Wang
00:43 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix PR 13275 Zack Weinberg
00:32 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Joe Buck
00:21 Re: bugs fixed on the tree-ssa Joe Buck
00:21 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Joseph S. Myers
00:09 Re: C++ PATCH: Fix PR 13275 Gabriel Dos Reis

December 16, 2003
23:55 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind David Abrahams
23:44 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Jason Merrill
23:32 bugs fixed on the tree-ssa Andrew Pinski
22:49 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Andrew MacLeod
22:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Zdenek Dvorak
22:20 Re: [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues Richard Henderson
21:55 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Matt Austern
21:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Andrew MacLeod
21:49 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind David Abrahams
21:49 Re: documentation for augmentations in .eh_frame? Richard Henderson
20:57 friend declaration implicitly provides a prototype Bernardo Innocenti
20:53 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind David Abrahams
20:46 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Matt Austern
20:43 Re: [tree-ssa] filter_expr and exc_ptr_expr as gimple ID? Jan Hubicka
20:42 RE: splits after reload Jim Wilson
20:31 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Jason Merrill
20:18 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) David Edelsohn
20:16 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Phil Edwards
20:07 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Marc Espie
20:06 Re: GIMPLE and datastructures Jan Hubicka
20:05 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind David Abrahams
20:04 Re: Unable to access subversion? Paolo Carlini
19:55 Unable to access subversion? jlquinn
19:50 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Matt Austern
19:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning Bernardo Innocenti
19:33 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Geoff Keating
19:27 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning Jan Hubicka
19:25 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Kelley Cook
19:22 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning Jan Hubicka
19:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning law
19:16 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning Jan Hubicka
19:15 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Michael Elizabeth Chastain
19:13 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning Falk Hueffner
19:12 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning Diego Novillo
19:06 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Zack Weinberg
19:04 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning Jan Hubicka
19:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning Geoff Keating
18:58 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Marc Espie
18:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning Jan Hubicka
18:24 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Mark Mitchell
18:14 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Tom Tromey
18:05 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Mark Mitchell
17:58 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Zack Weinberg
17:55 Re: [tree-ssa] goto <bb x> Diego Novillo
17:48 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Mark Mitchell
17:41 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build Andrew Pinski
17:41 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Richard Earnshaw
17:40 Re: [tree-ssa] goto <bb x> Zdenek Dvorak
17:32 GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16) Mark Mitchell
17:30 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Johan Rydberg
17:29 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited Tom Tromey
17:04 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning law
17:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning Steven Bosscher
16:48 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning law
16:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning Jan Hubicka
15:45 Acovea 3.3, now with even more stuff! Scott Robert Ladd
15:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning Jan Hubicka
15:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning law
14:31 [tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning Jan Hubicka
14:07 Re: [tree-ssa] goto <bb x> Diego Novillo
14:00 [tree-ssa] goto <bb x> Andrew MacLeod
13:27 RE: [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues S. Bosscher
12:56 [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues Dorit Naishlos
12:23 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind David Abrahams
11:55 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind David Abrahams
10:16 RE: splits after reload Rakesh Kumar - Software, Noida
07:46 RE: [SH4] DFmode splits after reload Jim Wilson
06:02 RE: [SH4] DFmode splits after reload Rakesh Kumar - Software, Noida
05:53 Questions about placement of qualifiers in member functions Ian Lance Taylor
04:58 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Ulrich Drepper
04:49 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Nathan Myers
04:23 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Zack Weinberg
03:24 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Andrew MacLeod
03:16 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Jim Wilson
03:10 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler Robert Dewar
02:28 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Jim Wilson
02:18 Re: using9.C failure Mark Mitchell
02:04 Re: Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build Jim Wilson
01:59 documentation for augmentations in .eh_frame? David Mosberger
01:55 Re: using9.C failure Giovanni Bajo
01:52 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Jim Wilson
01:42 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Ulrich Drepper
01:42 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Zack Weinberg
01:23 Re: Porting GCC to new target, branch implementation Jim Wilson
01:18 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Zack Weinberg
01:15 Re: [SH4] DFmode splits after reload Jim Wilson
01:14 documentation for augmentations in .eh_frame? David Mosberger
01:14 Attention All School Staff, Personnel, and Students: Admin
00:52 Re: RTL templates Jim Wilson
00:52 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Jason Merrill
00:37 Re: negating -include on the command line Devang Patel
00:29 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Ulrich Drepper
00:08 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Mark Mitchell
00:04 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Richard Henderson

December 15, 2003
23:59 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Richard Henderson
23:56 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler Richard Kenner
23:46 Re: [tree-ssa] string builtins strikes back Jan Hubicka
23:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Daniel Berlin
23:42 Re: [tree-ssa] string builtins strikes back law
23:41 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler Vladimir Makarov
23:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands law
23:34 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind David Abrahams
23:32 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind David Abrahams
23:32 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Chris Lattner
23:31 Re: [tree-ssa] string builtins strikes back Jan Hubicka
23:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Chris Lattner
23:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information law
23:11 GIMPLE and datastructures Jan Hubicka
23:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Daniel Berlin
23:09 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler Richard Kenner
23:05 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler Vladimir Makarov
22:56 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Benjamin Kosnik
22:54 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler Richard Kenner
22:53 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Richard Henderson
22:52 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler Vladimir Makarov
22:46 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Richard Henderson
22:45 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Andrew MacLeod
22:39 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Benjamin Kosnik
22:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands law
22:24 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler Geert Bosch
22:22 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Richard Henderson
22:21 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler Richard Kenner
22:19 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler Vladimir Makarov
22:18 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Richard Henderson
22:08 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler Geert Bosch
22:08 Re: [tree-ssa] string builtins strikes back Richard Henderson
22:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Chris Lattner
22:05 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler Zack Weinberg
22:04 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Richard Henderson
22:03 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Andrew MacLeod
22:01 using9.C failure Mark Mitchell
21:58 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler Richard Kenner
21:54 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler Zack Weinberg
21:49 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler Geert Bosch
21:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Zdenek Dvorak
21:43 Re: Old K+R compatibility goo in c-decl.c::duplicate_decls - preserve? Geoff Keating
21:40 Re: negating -include on the command line Geoff Keating
21:40 Debugging with stabs on Solaris x86 with GCC and the native as Mark Kettenis
21:39 Re: Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler Zack Weinberg
21:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Andrew MacLeod
21:38 Re: [tree-ssa] filter_expr and exc_ptr_expr as gimple ID? Richard Henderson
21:32 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Daniel Berlin
21:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Daniel Berlin
21:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Andrew MacLeod
21:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Andrew MacLeod
21:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Zdenek Dvorak
21:19 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Diego Novillo
21:16 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Chris Lattner
21:14 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Zdenek Dvorak
21:11 Instruction bundling on IA64 and the Intel Assembler Geert Bosch
21:11 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Zdenek Dvorak
21:11 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Andrew MacLeod
21:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Chris Lattner
21:06 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Andrew MacLeod
21:03 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Zdenek Dvorak
21:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Diego Novillo
20:55 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Zdenek Dvorak
20:52 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Andrew MacLeod
20:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Andrew MacLeod
20:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Chris Lattner
20:29 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Jason Merrill
20:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Diego Novillo
20:26 Re: Old K+R compatibility goo in c-decl.c::duplicate_decls -preserve? Mark Mitchell
20:04 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Chris Lattner
19:43 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Diego Novillo
19:28 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Andrew MacLeod
19:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Diego Novillo
19:19 Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Latchesar Ionkov
19:18 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Zdenek Dvorak
19:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Chris Lattner
19:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Andrew MacLeod
18:49 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited Gabriel Dos Reis
18:29 Re: On inlining in C++ Diego Novillo
18:19 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited Tom Tromey
17:23 negating -include on the command line Benjamin Kosnik
17:17 gcc-ss-3.3-20031215 is now available gccadmin
15:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Andrew MacLeod
13:28 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind David Abrahams
10:16 $PREFIX/lib and Java Gerald Pfeifer
04:46 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Richard Henderson

December 14, 2003
23:22 Re: Compiled code crashes storing to read-only location Waldek Hebisch
22:15 GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited Gerald Pfeifer
18:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
17:18 Re: Newline inside macro expansion Zack Weinberg
16:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
15:33 Newline inside macro expansion Bansidhar Arvind Deshpande -
13:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64-linux-gnu law
10:36 Re: Do we still need ggc-simple Nick Burrett
10:13 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.3.2-hammer on i586-suse-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
09:59 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.3.2-hammer on i586-suse-linux-gnu Robert Schiele
08:27 Re: Compiled code crashes storing to read-only location Geoff Keating
08:15 Re: how to turn off PIE on Fedora? Geoff Keating
08:10 Old K+R compatibility goo in c-decl.c::duplicate_decls - preserve? Zack Weinberg
07:08 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
07:03 Native OpenBSD 3.4 gcc 3.3.2 build Nedko Arnaudov
05:45 Re: Time for a compile server status update? Per Bothner
04:23 Compiled code crashes storing to read-only location Waldek Hebisch
03:59 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Nathan Myers
03:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Chris Lattner
03:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Chris Lattner
03:19 Re: PATCH: Re: sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk mirror out of date Gerald Pfeifer

December 13, 2003
23:56 Re: Do we still need ggc-simple Steven Bosscher
22:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64-linux-gnu law
18:47 [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
18:03 Re: iq2000 port : bit rot already started. Steven Bosscher
17:58 iq2000 port : bit rot already started. Kazu Hirata
17:42 Time for a compile server status update? Dan Kegel
16:02 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla Joel Sherrill
13:46 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Andrew MacLeod
13:46 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Andrew MacLeod
11:58 Re: how to turn off PIE on Fedora? Toon Moene
10:24 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla Andreas Jaeger
10:15 Re: how to turn off PIE on Fedora? Jakub Jelinek
09:26 Re: GCC bootstrap failure on i586 Robert Schiele
08:28 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Nathan Myers
06:55 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Jason Merrill
06:52 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Jason Merrill
05:03 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes law
04:14 Re: how to turn off PIE on Fedora? Per Bothner
03:57 Re: how to turn off PIE on Fedora? Brad Roberts
03:32 Re: how to turn off PIE on Fedora? Per Bothner
02:41 Re: how to turn off PIE on Fedora? Diego Novillo
02:39 Re: how to turn off PIE on Fedora? Daniel Berlin
02:22 how to turn off PIE on Fedora? Per Bothner
00:41 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind Benjamin Kosnik
00:09 [tree-ssa] filter_expr and exc_ptr_expr as gimple ID? Jan Hubicka

December 12, 2003
22:54 Re: catch(...) and forced unwind David Abrahams
22:01 catch(...) and forced unwind Jason Merrill
21:27 Porting GCC to new target, branch implementation Savithri Venkatachalapathy
21:26 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Rainer Orth
20:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Diego Novillo
20:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information Chris Lattner
19:57 Re: DDG - Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC (cont.) Ayal Zaks
19:55 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Chris Lattner
19:54 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Andrew MacLeod
19:45 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Chris Lattner
19:42 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Andrew MacLeod
19:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Zdenek Dvorak
19:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Andrew MacLeod
19:15 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla Daniel Berlin
18:38 RE: Help installing gcc Ramadass, Ramanathan
18:31 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla Gerald Pfeifer
18:29 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla Joseph S. Myers
18:27 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla Daniel Jacobowitz
17:57 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla Carlo Wood
17:17 Re: GCC bootstrap failure on i586 Robert Schiele
16:56 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n"); Gabriel Dos Reis
16:17 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla David Edelsohn
16:13 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla Daniel Berlin
16:11 Re: GCC bootstrap failure on i586 Eric Botcazou
15:04 Re: GCC bootstrap failure on i586 Robert Schiele
13:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage on the rise again Jan Hubicka
13:33 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Andrew MacLeod
13:07 Re: What happened to the GCC 3.3 testsuite? Nathanael Nerode
12:48 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n"); Jan-Benedict Glaw
12:32 Re: [tree-ssa] PATCH: Feedback-based prefetching Richard Kenner
11:44 Re: GCC bootstrap failure on i586 Eric Botcazou
11:29 Re: GCC bootstrap failure on i586 Robert Schiele
11:12 RE: Help installing gcc Rakesh Kumar - Software, Noida
11:08 GCC bootstrap failure on i586 Eric Botcazou
10:41 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage on the rise again Steven Bosscher
10:39 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla Jakub Jelinek
10:16 Re: calculate_global_regs_live Eric Botcazou
09:58 Re: calculate_global_regs_live Jim Wilson
09:14 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla Wolfgang Bangerth
09:08 Re: calculate_global_regs_live Eric Botcazou
08:55 Help installing gcc Josie Ellis
08:53 GCC bugs on SH Eric Botcazou
08:53 RE: RTL templates Rakesh Kumar - Software, Noida
08:52 Re: calculate_global_regs_live Jim Wilson
08:42 [SH4] DFmode splits after reload Rakesh Kumar - Software, Noida
08:35 RTL templates Petar Penchev
08:02 calculate_global_regs_live Eric Botcazou
07:50 Re: Error building for mips variant Jim Wilson
07:19 Re: Error building for mips variant Rama Singh
05:38 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Zack Weinberg
05:30 Re: Overriding DW_AT_comp_dir output? Alexandre Oliva
05:24 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Alexandre Oliva
03:58 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes law
03:42 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Chris Lattner
03:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage on the rise again Daniel Berlin
03:27 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Andrew MacLeod
03:14 [tree-ssa] Memory usage on the rise again law
03:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands law
02:36 Re: Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla Daniel Berlin
02:33 Re: DDG - Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC (cont.) Daniel Berlin
00:58 Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla Alan Modra
00:38 Re: [cs] Merge in tree-ssa-20020619-merge-20031207 Mike Stump
00:21 Re: What happened to the GCC 3.3 testsuite? Gabriel Dos Reis

December 11, 2003
23:34 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes law
23:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Andrew MacLeod
23:13 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Andrew MacLeod
23:08 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Andrew MacLeod
22:36 [cs] Merge in tree-ssa-20020619-merge-20031207 Mike Stump
22:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Zdenek Dvorak
21:15 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Chris Lattner
20:21 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Geoff Keating
19:52 What happened to the GCC 3.3 testsuite? Andreas Jaeger
19:41 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Zdenek Dvorak
19:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands law
19:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands law
19:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands law
19:30 Compiling error Dara Hazeghi
19:30 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes law
19:26 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes law
18:11 [tree-ssa] string builtins strikes back Jan Hubicka
17:55 Wondering if you could help out Eric Atkins
17:39 Compiling error "De Azcárraga, Joaquín"
17:17 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n"); Segher Boessenkool
17:09 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Andrew MacLeod
17:02 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n"); Geoff Keating
17:01 Re: DDG - Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC (cont.) Vladimir Makarov
16:59 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Geoff Keating
16:39 Re: DDG - Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC (cont.) Ayal Zaks
15:43 Re: Compilation time on CSiBE Arpad Beszedes
15:01 Compilation time on CSiBE Arpad Beszedes
14:34 RE: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Andrew MacLeod
14:27 RE: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Andrew MacLeod
14:17 RE: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes S. Bosscher
13:53 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Andrew MacLeod
13:22 Re: Register Spilling Naveen Sharma, Noida
11:11 Re: Register Spilling Hans-Peter Nilsson
09:01 Re: Register Spilling Naveen Sharma, Noida
08:23 RE: Register Spilling Sanjiv Gupta
08:03 Re: Need Help for a new target's assembly code Jim Wilson
07:59 Re: Error building for mips variant Jim Wilson
07:43 Re: Register Spilling Jim Wilson
06:29 Re: DDG - Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC (cont.) David Edelsohn
05:12 Need Help for a new target's assembly code Nitin Jain
01:36 Re: DDG - Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC (cont.) Richard Henderson

December 10, 2003
23:08 Re: [3.5-tree-ssa] off cvs build fails in cgraph.c Jan Hubicka
23:06 Re: [3.5-tree-ssa] off cvs build fails in cgraph.c Eyal Lebedinsky
23:01 [3.5-tree-ssa] off cvs build fails in cgraph.c Eyal Lebedinsky
22:49 Re: [tree-ssa] New g++/libstdc++ regressions with checking disabled. Jan Hubicka
22:16 Re: [RFC] Use accessor macros for the head and end of a basic block Zack Weinberg
21:47 Re: [tree-ssa] New g++/libstdc++ regressions with checkingdisabled. Diego Novillo
19:27 Re: Some GC marking inefficiency with chain_next and chain_prev Geoffrey Keating
17:37 Re: Which gcc is the most stable today ? Joe Buck
17:03 gcc-ss-3.4-20031210 is now available gccadmin
16:17 DDG - Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC (cont.) Mostafa Hagog
15:55 Error building for mips variant Rama Singh
14:19 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n"); Andreas Schwab
14:17 Register Spilling Umar Janjua
14:08 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n"); Segher Boessenkool
13:36 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n"); Joseph S. Myers
13:34 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n"); Gabriel Dos Reis
13:12 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n"); Robert Dewar
12:45 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n"); Segher Boessenkool
12:28 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n"); Robert Dewar
11:48 Re: CFG not taken care Theodore Papadopoulo
11:28 Re: CFG not taken care Jan Hubicka
11:24 Some GC marking inefficiency with chain_next and chain_prev S. Bosscher
10:36 Re: Do we still need ggc-simple Nick Burrett
10:18 CFG not taken care Vimal Kumar
09:53 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n"); Andreas Schwab
08:47 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n"); Eyal Lebedinsky
07:55 Re: [RFC] Use accessor macros for the head and end of a basic block Steven Bosscher
06:04 Re: latency in define_insn_reservation Jim Wilson
05:58 Re: Which gcc is the most stable today ? Jim Wilson
05:54 Re: built gcc Jim Wilson
05:33 Re: cross compiling thoughts Jim Wilson
04:49 Re: web page cvs access snafu? [plus, where is the modules file?] Daniel Jacobowitz
04:46 web page cvs access snafu? [plus, where is the modules file?] Doug Evans
00:38 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Andrew MacLeod
00:18 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Jan Hubicka
00:04 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Andrew MacLeod
00:03 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Paul Eggert

December 09, 2003
23:56 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Jan Hubicka
23:43 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n"); Geoff Keating
23:37 Re: [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Geoff Keating
22:15 Re: [tree-ssa] New g++/libstdc++ regressions with checking disabled. Jan Hubicka
21:45 Re: Minor suggestion Mike Stump
21:12 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC Ghassan Shobaki
21:01 Re: -funroll-loops experimental in gcc-3.3.2 Zdenek Dvorak
21:00 Re: (printf) ("hello world\n"); Dale Johannesen
20:48 Re: -funroll-loops experimental in gcc-3.3.2 Kelley Cook
20:41 Re: GCC ILP instruction scheduling? tm_gccmail
20:40 (printf) ("hello world\n"); Michael Elizabeth Chastain
20:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Zdenek Dvorak
20:31 Re: [tree-ssa] New g++/libstdc++ regressions with checkingdisabled. Diego Novillo
20:26 Re: [tree-ssa] New g++/libstdc++ regressions with checking disabled. Jan Hubicka
20:11 [tree-ssa][ GC, Virtual operands, and GCing between passes Andrew MacLeod
19:09 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Jason Merrill
18:53 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Giovanni Bajo
18:18 Re: optimization Scott Robert Ladd
18:09 Re: optimization Benjamin Kosnik
18:05 [tree-ssa] New g++/libstdc++ regressions with checking disabled. Diego Novillo
17:29 -funroll-loops experimental in gcc-3.3.2 Tal Agmon
16:42 Re: optimization Diego Novillo
16:29 optimization Viktor Przebinda
15:43 Re: in-charge/not-in-charge Ian Lance Taylor
15:37 Re: Which gcc is the most stable today ? Kelley Cook
14:34 Re: Name of front-end Robert Dewar
14:30 Re: Minor suggestion Alex Hornby
14:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Andrew MacLeod
14:04 Re: Name of front-end Victor Maurice Faubert
12:05 in-charge/not-in-charge Joerg Beyer
12:03 Missed optimization in gcc 3.4? Martin Reinecke
11:32 Re: C-programming tutorial and reference Ben Elliston
11:25 Minor suggestion Simon de Hartog
09:46 GCC-3.3.3 release status (2003-12-08) Gabriel Dos Reis
09:28 Which gcc is the most stable today ? The Penguine
06:52 Re: [RFC] Use accessor macros for the head and end of a basic block law
06:46 Re: [RFC] Use accessor macros for the head and end of a basic block Steven Bosscher
06:06 Re: Culprits... (Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)) Andreas Jaeger
06:01 latency in define_insn_reservation ml
05:20 C-programming tutorial and reference Thaddeus H. Black
05:08 Re: [objc] 64-bit failures Eric Botcazou
05:07 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Jason Merrill
05:04 Re: GCC3.3.2: gcc/real.h:67: error: size of array `test_real_width' is negative Eric Botcazou
04:05 Re: [RFC] Use accessor macros for the head and end of a basic block law
01:48 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Giovanni Bajo
01:32 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Gabriel Dos Reis
00:00 Re: Name of front-end Robert Dewar

December 08, 2003
23:59 Re: Name of front-end Daniel Berlin
23:51 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Zack Weinberg
23:48 Re: Name of front-end Laurent GUERBY
23:44 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Rainer Orth
23:31 Re: Name of front-end Robert Dewar
23:17 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Paolo Carlini
23:15 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Jason Merrill
23:04 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Jason Merrill
22:59 GCC3.3.2: gcc/real.h:67: error: size of array `test_real_width' is negative Bruce Korb
22:44 Re: [objc] 64-bit failures John David Anglin
22:35 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Paul Eggert
22:09 Re: [RFC] Use accessor macros for the head and end of a basic block Jan Hubicka
20:47 [RFC] Use accessor macros for the head and end of a basic block Steven Bosscher
20:06 Re: Culprits... (Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)) Andreas Jaeger
19:39 Re: [GCC] Re: Name of front-end Trevor Jenkins
19:25 Culprits... (Re: pthread related breakage (mainline)) Paolo Carlini
19:15 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Janis Johnson
18:59 Re: Name of front-end Felix Lee
18:48 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Paolo Carlini
18:37 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Paolo Carlini
18:24 Re: Name of front-end Dale Johannesen
18:24 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Paolo Carlini
18:19 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Giovanni Bajo
17:42 Re: GCC ILP instruction scheduling? Vladimir Makarov
17:40 Re: alternative to subversions.gnu.org Diego Novillo
17:32 Re: Name of front-end Andrew Haley
17:20 Re: alternative to subversions.gnu.org Christopher Faylor
17:11 Re: alternative to subversions.gnu.org Steve Kargl
17:10 Re: Name of front-end Joe Buck
17:09 gcc-ss-3.3-20031208 is now available gccadmin
17:03 Re: alternative to subversions.gnu.org Joe Buck
16:56 Re: Name of front-end Robert Dewar
16:55 Re: more SIMD operations Dorit Naishlos
16:31 Re: Name of front-end Richard Kenner
15:33 Re: Intermodule constant propagation Diego Novillo
15:28 Why are BLOCK_HEAD/BLOCK_END not used? Steven Bosscher
15:23 Re: Name of front-end Paul Koning
15:06 Re: Intermodule constant propagation Mircea Namolaru
14:58 Re: Another bit of ISO C conversion... Richard Kenner
14:52 Re: Another bit of ISO C conversion... James Lemke
14:43 Thumb in CSiBE benchmark Arpad Beszedes
13:29 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Giovanni Bajo
13:25 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Rainer Orth
13:16 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Paolo Carlini
13:02 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Giovanni Bajo
12:57 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Paolo Carlini
12:47 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Gerald Pfeifer
12:31 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Paolo Carlini
12:12 Re: [objc] 64-bit failures Eric Botcazou
11:40 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Gerald Pfeifer
11:07 [objc] 64-bit failures Richard Henderson
11:02 Re: Ada testsuite Arnaud Charlet
10:51 Re: Ada testsuite Joseph S. Myers
10:42 Re: Ada testsuite Arnaud Charlet
10:34 Ada testsuite Eric Botcazou
10:20 Re: pthread related breakage (mainline) Eric Christopher
10:11 pthread related breakage (mainline) Gerald Pfeifer
06:51 Career Site Linking James A Kirk
06:49 Career Site Linking James A Kirk
04:28 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Gabriel Dos Reis
04:19 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Geoff Keating
03:30 Re: Another bit of ISO C conversion... Zack Weinberg
02:59 Re: Another bit of ISO C conversion... Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:09 Re: Another bit of ISO C conversion... Zack Weinberg
00:39 Re: Another bit of ISO C conversion... Richard Kenner
00:35 Re: Another bit of ISO C conversion... Steven Bosscher
00:27 Another bit of ISO C conversion... Zack Weinberg

December 07, 2003
23:22 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Gabriel Dos Reis
23:04 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Branko Äibej
22:51 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Geoff Keating
22:20 Re: alternative to subversions.gnu.org Andrew Pinski
21:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Steven Bosscher
19:49 Re: Overriding DW_AT_comp_dir output? Nathanael Nerode
19:34 Re: Overriding DW_AT_comp_dir output? Zack Weinberg
19:25 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Gabriel Dos Reis
19:20 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Zack Weinberg
19:19 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Zack Weinberg
19:05 more SIMD operations Mads Lindstrøm
18:30 alternative to subversions.gnu.org Steve Kargl
18:25 Re: PATCH: work-around for bug in -traditional-cpp Marc Espie
18:09 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Gabriel Dos Reis
17:46 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Zdenek Dvorak
17:36 Overriding DW_AT_comp_dir output? Nathanael Nerode
17:30 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Diego Novillo
17:28 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Michael Elizabeth Chastain
17:14 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Zdenek Dvorak
16:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Diego Novillo
16:22 built gcc Gillman, David
16:19 [tree-ssa] Lazy updating of stmt operands Zdenek Dvorak
16:10 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Gabriel Dos Reis
16:05 Re: GCC build failed for native... Nathanael Nerode
16:04 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Carlo Wood
15:45 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Gabriel Dos Reis
15:41 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Carlo Wood
15:29 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Carlo Wood
15:26 cross compiling thoughts Axel Scheepers
09:45 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Eric Botcazou
09:25 cpplib Taras Brodovych
09:15 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Arnaud Charlet
08:49 Re: Name of front-end Henrik Sorensen
06:30 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Zack Weinberg
05:38 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Daniel Jacobowitz
05:25 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Gabriel Dos Reis
05:19 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Daniel Jacobowitz
05:09 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Gabriel Dos Reis
04:58 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Daniel Jacobowitz
04:46 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Ian Lance Taylor
04:42 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Gabriel Dos Reis
04:40 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Ian Lance Taylor
04:36 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Ian Lance Taylor
04:36 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Gabriel Dos Reis
04:31 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Daniel Jacobowitz
04:31 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Daniel Jacobowitz
04:28 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Gabriel Dos Reis
04:17 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Ian Lance Taylor
03:02 Re: [GCC] Re: Name of front-end Phil Edwards
03:00 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Gabriel Dos Reis
02:55 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Gabriel Dos Reis
02:09 Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output Ian Lance Taylor
01:30 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning Ian Lance Taylor
00:03 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning H. J. Lu

December 06, 2003
23:59 [c++] Another question about demangler output Daniel Jacobowitz
22:09 Re: cpplib Eric Christopher
22:00 Re: cpplib Rayson Ho
21:56 Re: cpplib Per Bothner
21:16 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Eric Botcazou
20:57 Re: Run-time noise from fp-bit:df_to_sf (truncdfsf2). Hans-Peter Nilsson
20:45 Re: [GCC] Re: Name of front-end Trevor Jenkins
20:41 Re: Name of front-end Marc Espie
20:37 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Alexandre Oliva
20:19 cpplib Taras Brodovych
19:45 Re: [tree-ssa] c-semantics.c expanders Richard Henderson
18:23 [tree-ssa] c-semantics.c expanders Zdenek Dvorak
17:42 Re: Name of front-end Gerald Pfeifer
16:41 Re: Run-time noise from fp-bit:df_to_sf (truncdfsf2). Daniel Jacobowitz
15:12 Re: Name of front-end Toon Moene
14:39 Run-time noise from fp-bit:df_to_sf (truncdfsf2). Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:31 Re: Name of front-end Henrik Sorensen
14:24 Re: Name of front-end Henrik Sorensen
13:47 Re: Name of front-end Robert Dewar
12:11 Re: Name of front-end Andreas Jaeger
11:31 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Nix
11:25 Name of front-end Andrew Haley
09:57 Re:New Introduce steven
09:49 Name of front-end Henrik Sorensen
08:39 Re:New Introduce steven
07:05 GCC ILP instruction scheduling? Yang Yang
05:20 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Eric Botcazou

December 05, 2003
23:22 Re: subversions access problem. Andrew Pinski
23:20 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Richard Stallman
23:18 subversions access problem. Theodore Papadopoulo
21:30 Re: Question on Makefile.in's program_transform_cross_name Kelley Cook
19:01 Re: Question on Makefile.in's program_transform_cross_name Nathanael Nerode
18:53 Janis Johnson appointed GCC compat testsuite maintainer David Edelsohn
18:43 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Joe Buck
17:53 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Zack Weinberg
17:31 Re: mixing C and assembly. y2bismil
17:27 Re: incredible increase in executable size (AIX) David Edelsohn
17:26 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Richard Stallman
17:02 Re: Question on Makefile.in's program_transform_cross_name Daniel Jacobowitz
16:56 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning Daniel Jacobowitz
16:54 Re: mixing C and assembly. Joel Sherrill
16:45 Question on Makefile.in's program_transform_cross_name Kelley Cook
16:39 mixing C and assembly. Salim Belgroune
14:50 [tree-ssa] Daily x86 RPM snapshots now available Diego Novillo
12:37 Re: [PATCH] GNU/KNetBSD support (with ChangeLog) Robert Millan
11:46 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Alexandre Oliva
11:46 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Gareth McCaughan
11:44 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Alexandre Oliva
10:42 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not) Jakub Jelinek
10:14 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not) Brian Ryner
09:55 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not) Jakub Jelinek
09:41 incredible increase in executable size (AIX) Joerg . Richter
08:52 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not) Jakub Jelinek
08:04 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not) Brian Ryner
07:15 Re: [PATCH] GNU/KNetBSD support (with ChangeLog) Jim Wilson
07:11 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not) Ian Lance Taylor
07:05 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not) Michael Elizabeth Chastain
05:46 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not) Brian Ryner
05:00 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning Carlo Wood
04:50 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Russ Allbery
04:11 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning Ian Lance Taylor
02:52 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning Carlo Wood
02:27 Re: Using the PLT for vtables (or not) Ian Lance Taylor
02:09 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning Ian Lance Taylor
01:50 Using the PLT for vtables (or not) Brian Ryner
01:04 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning Ian Lance Taylor
00:17 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Robert Dewar

December 04, 2003
23:53 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning H. J. Lu
23:42 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning H. J. Lu
23:41 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Zack Weinberg
23:38 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Ben Elliston
23:27 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Zack Weinberg
23:15 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Joe Buck
23:11 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning Ian Lance Taylor
23:04 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Alexandre Oliva
23:04 Re: Compilation Error- Seems a gcc Problem Joe Buck
23:00 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Arnaud Charlet
22:47 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning David Edelsohn
22:45 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning H. J. Lu
22:40 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning Ian Lance Taylor
22:33 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning H. J. Lu
22:22 Compilation Error- Seems a gcc Problem Luis Gonçalves
22:07 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning Ian Lance Taylor
21:53 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Zack Weinberg
21:41 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning Daniel Jacobowitz
21:37 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Paul Eggert
21:11 Re: New target ported Jim Wilson
21:03 RE: Why can't I build a native i686-pc-cygwin compiler? Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)
21:02 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Toon Moene
21:00 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning DJ Delorie
20:59 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning Ian Lance Taylor
20:57 Re: PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning Daniel Jacobowitz
20:50 PATCH: Fix demangler in symbol versioning H. J. Lu
20:48 Re: PR 12828 Jim Wilson
20:26 Re: New target ported Geoff Keating
20:19 Re: Why can't I build a native i686-pc-cygwin compiler? Jim Wilson
20:10 [tree-ssa] C++ parsing bug? Kedar Namjoshi
20:08 Re: GCC help Jim Wilson
20:01 Re: cygwin windows to linux cross compiler issues !! Jim Wilson
19:09 [RFC] C++/Debug : 'using' in DWARF Devang Patel
18:52 constructors in unions Andrew Haley
18:40 constructors in unions Corn Hulio
17:49 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Joe Buck
17:44 Re: Fast operations on floating point numbers? Davide Rossetti
17:43 Re: Fast operations on floating point numbers? Joe Buck
17:40 Re: Is a warning for a==a possible? Joe Buck
15:55 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC Vladimir Makarov
14:52 Re: Fast operations on floating point numbers? Paul Koning
14:43 RE: Fast operations on floating point numbers? Rupert Wood
14:34 Re: Fast operations on floating point numbers? Scott Robert Ladd
14:30 Re: Fast operations on floating point numbers? Falk Hueffner
14:22 Re: Fast operations on floating point numbers? Martin Reinecke
14:16 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Andrew Cagney
13:53 Re: Fast operations on floating point numbers? Peter Barada
13:51 Is a warning for a==a possible? George Garvey
13:45 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Scott Robert Ladd
11:16 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Gabriel Dos Reis
10:49 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Ben Elliston
10:28 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC Jan Hubicka
10:16 New target ported Pablo Huerta
10:11 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Zack Weinberg
10:00 Fast operations on floating point numbers? Martin Reinecke
09:42 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets Eric Botcazou
09:33 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets Richard Henderson
09:25 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets Eric Botcazou
09:19 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets Richard Henderson
09:16 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets Eric Botcazou
09:03 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets Richard Henderson
08:57 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets Eric Botcazou
08:00 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Branko Äibej
07:42 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets Eric Botcazou
07:33 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Richard Stallman
05:44 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Robert Dewar
04:25 Re: cygwin windows to linux cross compiler issues !! mohanlal jangir
02:36 Re: [www-patch] Testing C++ changes Volker Reichelt
01:51 Re: GCC 3.4 optimisation of if (&ptr == NULL) Richard Henderson
01:49 Re: GCC 3.4 optimisation of if (&ptr == NULL) Andrew Pinski
01:44 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Gabriel Dos Reis
01:30 GCC 3.4 optimisation of if (&ptr == NULL) John Neil
01:27 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC Ghassan Shobaki
01:27 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Robert Dewar
01:17 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Mike Stump
01:01 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Gabriel Dos Reis
00:46 Re: PR 12828 Geoffrey Keating
00:35 Re: Obsoleting unmaintained targets Jim Wilson
00:15 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Jan Hubicka
00:13 PR 12828 Dale Johannesen
00:06 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC Jan Hubicka

December 03, 2003
23:39 Re: Obsoleting unmaintained targets Phil Edwards
23:13 Why can't I build a native i686-pc-cygwin compiler? aspiesrule
23:07 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets Richard Henderson
23:07 RE: Obsoleting unmaintained targets Emmanuel R. Matuco
23:03 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets Richard Henderson
22:06 Re: MIPS ABI changes in GCC 3.4 Richard Sandiford
21:35 MIPS ABI changes in GCC 3.4 Daniel Jacobowitz
21:10 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Stephan T. Lavavej
20:45 [tree-ssa] Implement non-call exceptions Andrew Haley
19:48 Cygwin/Ada Tasking Failure Arthur I Schwarz
17:48 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Felix Lee
17:33 GCC help George Ciobanu
17:26 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Arnaud Charlet
17:23 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Nathanael Nerode
17:22 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Zack Weinberg
17:17 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Richard Stallman
17:16 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status (2003-12-01) Nathanael Nerode
17:07 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Robert Dewar
17:06 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Richard Kenner
17:03 gcc-ss-3.4-20031203 is now available gccadmin
16:53 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Ian Lance Taylor
16:46 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Robert Dewar
16:42 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Felix Lee
16:38 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Robert Dewar
16:32 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Felix Lee
16:26 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Scott Robert Ladd
16:19 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Ian Lance Taylor
16:12 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Robert Dewar
16:03 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Robert Dewar
16:02 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Scott Robert Ladd
15:59 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Paul Jarc
15:45 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Scott Robert Ladd
15:44 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Richard Kenner
15:27 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Ian Lance Taylor
15:12 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Robert Dewar
15:07 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Scott Robert Ladd
14:05 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Richard Kenner
14:05 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC Vladimir N. Makarov
13:35 Re: underlying type for enums Jamie Lokier
11:58 Re: Obsoleting unmaintained targets DANIEL NORMAN HARRIS
11:55 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Scott A Crosby
10:29 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Gerald Pfeifer
10:16 Re: underlying type for enums Joseph S. Myers
09:39 Re: Obsoleting unmaintained targets Gerald Pfeifer
09:22 cygwin windows to linux cross compiler issues !! mohanlal jangir
09:21 Re: Why does treelang not support tabs? Tim Josling
09:10 PATCH: lists.html Gerald Pfeifer
08:47 Re: C tree question Jim Wilson
08:47 Re: Obsoleting unmaintained targets Aurélie
08:28 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status (2003-12-01) Hans-Peter Nilsson
08:05 Re: gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets Andrew Pinski
08:01 Re: C tree question Mathieu Lacage
07:07 gcc.dg/debug/debug-[12].c failures on cmov targets Eric Botcazou
06:25 Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC Ghassan Shobaki
06:17 Re: underlying type for enums Zack Weinberg
05:04 Re: Name Mangling Without Return Type? Ranjit Mathew
04:15 Re: Who is the boss here? Scott Robert Ladd
04:06 Re: C tree question Jim Wilson
03:38 Re: /../gcc-3.3.2/boehm-gc/include/private/gcconfig.h Jim Wilson
03:14 Re: underlying type for enums Richard Henderson
02:51 Re: underlying type for enums Jamie Lokier
02:26 Re: Who is the boss here? Mike Stump
02:24 Re: Who is the boss here? DJ Delorie
02:08 Re: Who is the boss here? Andrew Pinski
02:03 Who is the boss here? Carlo Wood
01:56 Re: underlying type for enums Joseph S. Myers
01:54 /../gcc-3.3.2/boehm-gc/include/private/gcconfig.h Arthur I Schwarz
01:25 Re: order of constructors Joe Buck
01:25 Another binary. Vic Gevirtz
01:16 Re: LANG HOOKS Jim Wilson
01:13 Re: order of constructors Peter Barada
01:13 Re: Obsoleting unmaintained targets Jim Wilson
01:08 Re: order of constructors Joe Buck
00:50 Re: Obsoleting unmaintained targets Joel Sherrill
00:11 Re: LANG HOOKS Paul Brook
00:04 Re: order of constructors Jim Wilson

December 02, 2003
23:48 Re: Obsoleting unmaintained targets chewbaccathewookie
23:18 Obsoleting unmaintained targets Jim Wilson
22:58 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119 Roland McGrath
22:47 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Wolfgang Bangerth
22:29 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Ian Lance Taylor
22:26 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Eric Christopher
22:25 Re: underlying type for enums Zack Weinberg
22:21 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Scott Robert Ladd
22:08 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Ben Elliston
22:05 Re: underlying type for enums Richard Henderson
21:45 Re: underlying type for enums Jason Merrill
21:40 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Zack Weinberg
21:29 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Paul Eggert
21:26 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Robert Dewar
21:07 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119 Michael Matz
21:00 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119 Matt Austern
20:55 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Joe Buck
20:39 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119 Daniel Jacobowitz
20:38 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119 Andreas Jaeger
20:37 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Robert Dewar
20:37 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119 Jakub Jelinek
20:36 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119 Gabriel Dos Reis
20:21 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? David Carlton
20:21 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119 Daniel Jacobowitz
20:15 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119 Matt Austern
19:50 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Geoff Keating
19:46 Re: underlying type for enums Richard Earnshaw
19:28 LANG HOOKS gnu c
19:01 Re: underlying type for enums Zack Weinberg
18:54 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Robert Dewar
18:39 Re: underlying type for enums Richard Henderson
18:37 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Steven Bosscher
18:13 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Joe Buck
18:04 Re: How to link in sub-object ganularity Ian Lance Taylor
17:59 Re: How to link in sub-object ganularity Andras Tantos
17:44 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119 Jakub Jelinek
17:36 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? David Carlton
17:35 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot 20031119 Matt Austern
17:31 Re: underlying type for enums Zack Weinberg
17:23 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? David Edelsohn
17:18 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Zack Weinberg
17:14 Re: Import zlib-1.2.1 into 3.5 since 3.4 is at stage 3? Tom Tromey
17:09 Re: How to link in sub-object ganularity Ian Lance Taylor
16:57 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? David Carlton
16:51 How to link in sub-object ganularity Andras Tantos
16:09 Re: Name Mangling Without Return Type? Ian Lance Taylor
16:01 Name Mangling Without Return Type? Corn Hulio
15:40 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Felix Lee
15:31 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Matt Fago
14:40 Re: option for default 64-bit integers on Opteron and itanium Paul Brook
14:24 C tree question Mathieu Lacage
14:22 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Jan Hubicka
14:19 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119 Robert Moss
14:16 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Scott Robert Ladd
14:15 Re: Re: option for default 64-bit integers on Opteron and itanium Jiri Pittner
14:09 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Felix Lee
14:08 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Scott Robert Ladd
14:01 Re: option for default 64-bit integers on Opteron and itanium Paul Brook
13:37 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119 Andreas Jaeger
13:36 option for default 64-bit integers on Opteron and itanium Jiri Pittner
13:01 Re: [RFC] Addressing Mode Selection Issues. Naveen Sharma, Noida
11:38 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Gareth McCaughan
10:28 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs -fno-unit-at-a-time Paolo Carlini
10:25 Re: underlying type for enums Joseph S. Myers
10:19 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs -fno-unit-at-a-time Jan Hubicka
09:45 Re: underlying type for enums Richard Henderson
09:21 Re: underlying type for enums Joseph S. Myers
09:06 underlying type for enums Richard Henderson
08:26 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Zack Weinberg
07:32 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119 Robert Moss
07:05 Import zlib-1.2.1 into 3.5 since 3.4 is at stage 3? rbrown64
05:40 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119 Andreas Jaeger
04:58 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
04:53 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
04:46 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
04:39 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
04:37 Why does treelang not support tabs? James Morrison
04:35 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
04:17 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? law
04:17 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Zack Weinberg
04:02 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Ian Lance Taylor
03:56 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? law
03:51 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? law
03:25 GCC-3.3.3 release status (2003-12-01) Gabriel Dos Reis
02:49 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Robert Dewar
02:02 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
01:58 Re: g++3: Static Initializers occur twice in Binary Mike Stump
01:54 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Zack Weinberg
01:40 Re: g++3: Static Initializers occur twice in Binary Glenn Burkhardt
01:24 Re: Earn $$$ writing free software. Scott Robert Ladd
01:11 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Robert Dewar
01:10 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
01:07 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
01:04 Earn $$$ writing free software. Toon Moene
00:56 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Joe Buck
00:56 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Matt Fago
00:54 Re: g++3: Static Initializers occur twice in Binary Jim Wilson
00:48 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Robert Dewar
00:45 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Robert Dewar
00:44 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG Richard Kenner
00:42 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Toon Moene
00:38 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Robert Dewar
00:23 Re: [RFC] Addressing Mode Selection Issues. tm_gccmail
00:09 Re: constant initialziation (non-gcc) Joe Buck
00:04 Libstdc++-v3 vs -fno-unit-at-a-time Paolo Carlini

December 01, 2003
22:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]? Richard Henderson
22:13 constant initialziation (non-gcc) Attila Csosz
22:09 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Zack Weinberg
21:29 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Zack Weinberg
20:50 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Paul Eggert
20:17 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-30-11 Diego Novillo
19:41 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG Geoff Keating
19:21 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Paul Jarc
18:42 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG Jan Hubicka
18:29 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG Richard Kenner
18:19 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Matt Austern
18:14 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Diego Novillo
18:11 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Steven Bosscher
17:48 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Joe Buck
17:47 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG Jan Hubicka
17:47 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? law
17:40 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG Richard Kenner
17:40 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
17:37 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Joe Buck
17:35 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG Richard Kenner
17:20 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG law
17:19 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Matt Fago
17:18 gcc-ss-3.3-20031201 is now available gccadmin
17:18 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
17:11 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG Jan Hubicka
17:07 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Ian Lance Taylor
17:06 g++3: Static Initializers occur twice in Binary Frank Mehnert
17:05 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
17:02 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
17:00 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
16:56 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
16:52 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Ian Lance Taylor
16:50 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG Richard Kenner
16:49 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
16:49 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
16:43 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
16:42 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Ian Lance Taylor
16:41 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
16:30 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Ian Lance Taylor
16:27 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Ian Lance Taylor
16:20 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Ian Lance Taylor
16:18 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Lars Segerlund
16:14 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Robert Dewar
16:12 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
16:03 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Robert Dewar
15:52 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Gerald Pfeifer
15:52 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG Jan Hubicka
15:51 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Robert Dewar
15:51 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
15:47 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Steven Bosscher
15:46 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Robert Dewar
15:42 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Steven Bosscher
15:39 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Earnshaw
15:32 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
15:27 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Steven Bosscher
15:27 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
15:21 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
15:20 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Mathieu Lacage
15:14 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Steven Bosscher
15:13 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
15:12 Re: cvs->bugzilla bridge bug? Eric Botcazou
15:11 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
15:07 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
15:03 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Steven Bosscher
15:01 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
15:01 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
14:59 Re: cvs->bugzilla bridge bug? Daniel Berlin
14:58 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
14:56 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Michael Matz
14:50 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner
14:46 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
14:38 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Robert Dewar
14:01 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Robert Dewar
13:58 GNU gettext support for GCC internal format strings Bruno Haible
13:55 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
11:39 undefined symbol __pure_virtual Andrew Haley
11:32 undefined symbol __pure_virtual Rakhi Malik
11:23 undefined symbol __pure_virtual Rakhi Malik
09:00 Re: __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) missing Michael Sogtrop
07:45 Re: FORTH, anyone? Segher Boessenkool
07:30 cvs->bugzilla bridge bug? Eric Botcazou
06:28 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Robert Dewar
05:46 Re: Deleting jump tables and CFG Eric Botcazou
05:27 Re: Syntax error... Hans Boehm
05:24 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
04:45 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Robert Dewar
04:05 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Mark Mitchell
03:58 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
02:54 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Mark Mitchell
02:24 Re: [RFC] Addressing Mode Selection Issues. David Edelsohn
01:57 Re: [RFC] Addressing Mode Selection Issues. Jim Wilson
01:50 Deleting jump tables and CFG Richard Kenner
01:29 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Jim Wilson
01:18 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Gabriel Dos Reis
01:14 Re: File extensions for C++ source? Kai Henningsen
01:14 Re: fastjar.info not installed any longer? Jim Wilson
00:47 Re: fastjar.info not installed any longer? Joseph S. Myers
00:30 Re: fastjar.info not installed any longer? Kelley Cook
00:30 Re: What's the point of libbanshee's existance? Ian Lance Taylor
00:28 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Ian Lance Taylor
00:14 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Phil Edwards
00:12 Re: What's the point of libbanshee's existance? Andrew Pinski
00:11 Re: What's the point of libbanshee's existance? Daniel Berlin
00:11 Re: What's the point of libbanshee's existance? Daniel Jacobowitz
00:09 Re: PATCH: Re: sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk mirror out of date Stuart McRobert
00:08 What's the point of libbanshee's existance? aspiesrule
00:01 Re: [rfc] debugging anonymous unions Daniel Jacobowitz


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3