This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

[tree-ssa] New regressions after 2003-10-26

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:01:25 -0500
Subject: [tree-ssa] New regressions after 2003-10-26
Organization: Red Hat Canada

Richard, Zdenek,

One of the attached changes introduced new regressions in the C, C++ and
libmudflap testsuites.

The libmudflap failures are all the same:

<src>/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.c/fail5-frag.c:10:
internal compiler error: in insn_locators_initialize, at cfglayout.c:314
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Testsuite differences between 20031026/gcc.sum.gz and 20031028/gcc.sum.gz
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

New regressions in 20031028/gcc.sum.gz:
         FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/debug-6.c scan-assembler xyzzy
         FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/debug-6.c scan-assembler xyzzy
         FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/debug-6.c scan-assembler xyzzy
         FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/debug-6.c scan-assembler xyzzy
         FAIL: 37:is 2:should be 1
         FAIL: 93:is 3:should be 2
         FAIL: 140:is 10:should be 5
         FAIL: 142:is 10:should be 5
         FAIL: 143:is 6:should be 1
         FAIL: 152:is 12:should be 6
         FAIL: 154:is 12:should be 6
         FAIL: 156:is 12:should be 6
         FAIL: 158:is 10:should be 6
         FAIL: 160:is 8:should be 4
         FAIL: 169:is 22:should be 11
         FAIL: 171:is 22:should be 11
         FAIL: 172:is 16:should be 5
         FAIL: 173:is 13:should be 2
         FAIL: 228:is 5:should be 3
         FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-4.c gcov: 15 failures in line counts
         FAIL: 15:is 9:should be 5
         FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-6.c gcov: 1 failures in line counts

Fixed regressions in 20031028/gcc.sum.gz:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Testsuite differences between 20031026/g++.sum.gz and 20031028/g++.sum.gz
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

New regressions in 20031028/g++.sum.gz:
         FAIL: 200:is 15:should be 11
         FAIL: 202:is 23:should be 1
         FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C gcov: 3 failures in line counts

Fixed regressions in 20031028/g++.sum.gz:
         FAIL: 200:is 4:should be 11
         FAIL: 202:is 12:should be 1
         FAIL: 212:is -:should be 11
         FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C gcov: 4 failures in line counts
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Testsuite differences between 20031026/libjava.sum.gz and 20031028/libjava.sum.gz
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

New regressions in 20031028/libjava.sum.gz:
         FAIL: Thread_Join execution - gij test

Fixed regressions in 20031028/libjava.sum.gz:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Testsuite differences between 20031026/libmudflap.sum.gz and 20031028/libmudflap.sum.gz
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

New regressions in 20031028/libmudflap.sum.gz:
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail1-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail10-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail13-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail14-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail15-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail2-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail21-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail27-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail3-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail4-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail5-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass10-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass14-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass15-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass18-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass25-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass32-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass33-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass4-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass5-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail1-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail10-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail13-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail14-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail15-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail2-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail21-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail27-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail3-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail4-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail5-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass10-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass14-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass15-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass18-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass25-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass32-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass4-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass5-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass27-frag.cxx (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass27-frag.cxx (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass37-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass39-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass37-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
         FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass39-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)

Fixed regressions in 20031028/libmudflap.sum.gz:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Thanks.  Diego.

Attachment: gcc-20031027.diff
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions after 2003-10-26
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]