This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: fold_const.c/tree_swap_operands_p change from Oct 11 breaks m68k

From: Gunther Nikl <gni at gecko dot de>
To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Bernado Innocenti <bernie at develer dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 14:48:44 +0100
Subject: Re: fold_const.c/tree_swap_operands_p change from Oct 11 breaks m68k
References: <20031025202157.GC30827@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310251453150.1543-100000@www.eyesopen.com>

On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 03:06:19PM -0600, Roger Sayle wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Richard Henderson wrote:
> 
> > Incidentally, it's not your bug.
> 
> Indeed, but my responsibility to atleast analyse the true source of
> the latent bug that I unwittingly exposed.

  Thank you for looking that quickly! I feared that its actually a backend
  bug.

> I guess the m68k maintainers can take it from here, as I'd be unable to
> test the impact of tweaking m68k.c's notice_update_cc.

  There is no maintainer for m68k. The entry in MAINTAINERS has a "?".

  Gunther

References:
- Re: fold_const.c/tree_swap_operands_p change from Oct 11 breaks m68k
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: fold_const.c/tree_swap_operands_p change from Oct 11 breaks m68k
  - From: Roger Sayle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]