This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcj segmentation fault

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <apinski at apple dot com>, Giovanni Visciano <giovannivisciano at virgilio dot it>, <tromey at redhat dot com>, <gcc at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:46:59 +0100
Subject: Re: gcj segmentation fault
References: <ABAA6E62-04BA-11D8-8826-0003939F15BE@apple.com><Pine.LNX.4.44.0310221429390.18959-100000@ops2.one-point.com>

Jeff Sturm writes:
 > On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Andrew Pinski wrote:
 > > > my binutils:
 > > > binutils       2.12.90.0.1-4
 > >
 > >  From <http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#ix86-*-linux*>:
 > > As of GCC 3.3, binutils 2.13.1 or later is required for this platform.
 > > See bug 10877 for more information.
 > 
 > The backtrace doesn't look right for 10877, which is related to
 > relocations, not EH.

Yeah, but one truly evil binutils bug *is* related to EH.

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-02/msg00352.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-02/msg00471.html

Andrew.

References:
- Re: gcj segmentation fault
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: gcj segmentation fault
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]