This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Cc: law at redhat dot com, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:50:48 -0700
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions
References: <20031017071926.GT6212@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <200310171553.h9HFr00J010528@speedy.slc.redhat.com> <20031017165301.GB15904@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20031017165747.GD15904@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:57:47PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Also can I ask about the status of your changes in tree-ssa?  (it looks
> like they are responsible for the new misscompilations I am seeing with
> unit-at-a-time enabled.  I will look into these in case you don't have
> something ready already)

It's looking generally good.  I'm sure there are bugs, but they're
not overwhelming.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions
  - From: law
- Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]