This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Testing -fnew-ra (and GCC in general)
- From: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch dot com>
- To: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
- Cc: gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:57:19 -0400
- Subject: Re: Testing -fnew-ra (and GCC in general)
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310161643450.26524-100000@wotan.suse.de>
Michael Matz wrote:
I've logged into bugzilla (#12619) details of a gcc 3.4 (and g++) bug
Only broken on mainline. The new-ra branch compiles this.
Is new-ra targeted for 3.4 or 3.5?
It's a relatively small matter for me to download a given branch and
compile it for my own use -- and certainly, for the matter of testing,
this is expected and reasonable.
For 99% or more of gcc's users, the version of gcc available is whatever
the last stable release was, or the version of gcc provided by their OS.
So, when I publish my results in the next few days, I'll be publishing
numbers for gcc-3.4 20031015; I may also do numbers for 3.3.2, and
perhaps (time permitting) 2.95.3. But I think covering any of the
development branches -- new-ra or tree-ssa -- is only valid for
discussion here, among gcc developers. Most "users" aren't going to be
working with branches, for whatever reason.
--
Scott Robert Ladd
Coyote Gulch Productions (http://www.coyotegulch.com)
Software Invention for High-Performance Computing