This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures onsparc[64]

From: Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: Bradley Lucier <lucier at math dot purdue dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 08:38:35 +0200
Subject: Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures onsparc[64]
References: <1C811038-FB59-11D7-AA5F-003065B239F6@math.purdue.edu> <200310110806.46864.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <3F879EEC.5000702@pop.agri.ch> <200310110838.50074.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

Eric Botcazou wrote:

With the patchlet we (mostly Pétur) found, the situation improves:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00450.html

It's far better, indeed.

I have a multilib test running which shows better. I post as it finished.

See also the follow up thread from this one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2003-10/msg00170.html
and back.

Thanks for your effort in sorting this out!

It was mostly learning for me, but quite useful.

Andreas

References:
- Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64]
  - From: Bradley Lucier
- Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64]
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures onsparc[64]
  - From: Andreas Tobler
- Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64]
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]