This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only.

On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:20:57PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Please name such a place.  I'm asking for specifics here and
> getting nothing from yall.

get_callee_fndecl is one.

It says:

   if (TREE_CODE (call) != CALL_EXPR)
        abort ();

... it did abort.

> Have yall *tried* WFL

yes

> and have experimental evidence for how much
> of a performance hit you get?

I never said it would be a performance hit, the whole WFL is
just a ugly "solution" that isn't used much yet; when using
it more it will cause exceptions all over the code.

I'll write the patch nevertheless, then you can see what I mean.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]