gcc archive
date index for October, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

October 31, 2003
23:47 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers Richard Henderson
23:05 Re: Change in employment Per Bothner
22:46 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers Dale Johannesen
21:29 Re: Change in employment Toon Moene
21:25 Re: anyone know the origin of the word 'insn' Robert Dewar
21:21 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Bernardo Innocenti
20:40 Re: C++: INHERITED_VALUE_BINDING_P Alexandre Oliva
19:45 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers David Golub
19:42 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Matthias Klose
19:39 Re: Is this a bug in libffi testsuite on solaris2.8? Robert Dewar
19:26 Re: The need for a libobjc maintainer Ziemowit Laski
17:27 Re: The need for a libobjc maintainer Adam Fedor
17:14 Re: Is this a bug in libffi testsuite on solaris2.8? Jeff Sturm
17:09 Re: mainline with ada doesn't bootstrap Richard Kenner
17:03 Re: mainline with ada doesn't bootstrap Kelley Cook
16:44 Re: Is this a bug in libffi testsuite on solaris2.8? Zack Weinberg
16:40 Re: Is this a bug in libffi testsuite on solaris2.8? David Taylor
15:53 Re: attribute((leafify)) for 3.4 Jan Hubicka
15:47 Re: powerpc & unaligned block moves with fp registers David Edelsohn
15:43 Re: Using GCC 2.95 as a bootstrap compiler Kelley Cook
14:57 Re: Using GCC 2.95 as a bootstrap compiler Richard Earnshaw
14:53 Re: Using GCC 2.95 as a bootstrap compiler Gerald Pfeifer
14:38 from Katerina Tsironi (WSEAS) Katerina Tsironi
14:10 Comments on mode_for_size in stor-layout.c Richard Kenner
13:39 mainline with ada doesn't bootstrap Per Bothner
12:50 Re: attribute((leafify)) for 3.4 Richard Guenther
12:28 Re: Is this a bug in libffi testsuite on solaris2.8? Andrew Haley
12:17 Re: attribute((leafify)) for 3.4 Jan Hubicka
11:55 Re: Using GCC 2.95 as a bootstrap compiler John Marshall
11:47 Re: Using GCC 2.95 as a bootstrap compiler Richard Earnshaw
11:41 Re: Using GCC 2.95 as a bootstrap compiler Joseph S. Myers
11:17 Re: Using GCC 2.95 as a bootstrap compiler Richard Earnshaw
11:09 Using GCC 2.95 as a bootstrap compiler Gerald Pfeifer
11:05 Re: Change in employment Yves Rutschle
10:56 Re: Calculation of displacement of a variable. Joern Rennecke
10:47 Re: attribute((leafify)) for 3.4 Richard Guenther
08:42 Re: anyone know the origin of the word 'insn' Nathan Sidwell
07:52 Re: Unaligned floating point access generation for powerpc Olivier Hainque
02:37 Re: IA64 bootstrap problem for Ada Zack Weinberg
02:28 Re: Need advice with store_bit_field and its call chain Zack Weinberg
02:04 Re: [tree-ssa] diagnosing switch errors David Daney
01:23 Re: Bug 12536 Joe Buck
01:10 Re: IA64 bootstrap problem for Ada Jim Wilson
01:03 Re: [tree-ssa] diagnosing switch errors Richard Henderson
00:51 Re: [tree-ssa] diagnosing switch errors Paul Brook
00:39 Re: Need advice with store_bit_field and its call chain Jim Wilson
00:27 Matt Thomas co-maintainer of vax port Gerald Pfeifer
00:21 Re: [tree-ssa] diagnosing switch errors Richard Henderson
00:14 Re: [tree-ssa] diagnosing switch errors Paul Brook
00:07 Re: [tree-ssa] diagnosing switch errors Richard Henderson

October 30, 2003
23:58 Re: anyone know the origin of the word 'insn' Joseph S. Myers
23:58 Re: IA64 bootstrap problem for Ada Richard Henderson
23:44 Re: anyone know the origin of the word 'insn' Colin Douglas Howell
23:44 Re: IA64 bootstrap problem for Ada Zack Weinberg
23:38 Re: IA64 bootstrap problem for Ada Geert Bosch
23:31 Re: anyone know the origin of the word 'insn' Richard Henderson
23:22 Re: anyone know the origin of the word 'insn' Phil Edwards
23:13 anyone know the origin of the word 'insn' Marty Hauff
23:00 Bug 12536 Joerg Walter
22:39 Re: IA64 bootstrap problem for Ada Zack Weinberg
22:31 Re: [tree-ssa] diagnosing switch errors Jeff Sturm
22:18 Re: IA64 bootstrap problem for Ada Richard Kenner
22:13 Re: IA64 bootstrap problem for Ada Zack Weinberg
22:09 [Ada] Re: Results for 3.4 20031030 (experimental) testsuite on ia64-suse-linux-gnu Bernd Trog
21:50 Re: IA64 bootstrap problem for Ada Richard Kenner
21:40 Re: IA64 bootstrap problem for Ada Zack Weinberg
21:30 Re: Change in employment Toon Moene
21:21 Re: IA64 bootstrap problem for Ada Richard Kenner
21:16 Re: Is this a bug in libffi testsuite on solaris2.8? Zack Weinberg
21:13 Re: Is this a bug in libffi testsuite on solaris2.8? Andreas Tobler
21:10 Re: IA64 bootstrap problem for Ada Zack Weinberg
20:54 Change in employment Peter Barada
20:49 Re: IA64 bootstrap problem for Ada Richard Kenner
20:44 Is this a bug in libffi testsuite on solaris2.8? Bradley Lucier
20:41 Re: IA64 bootstrap problem for Ada Zack Weinberg
20:35 Re: [tree-ssa] diagnosing switch errors Paul Brook
20:32 is this a g++ bug or an obscure ISO rule? Josh Fryman
20:24 IA64 bootstrap problem for Ada Richard Kenner
19:50 Re: [tree-ssa] diagnosing switch errors Jeff Sturm
19:45 darwin gcc rs6000 backend question spundun
19:43 Re: compile server status? Jan Hubicka
19:22 Re: Calculation of displacement of a variable. Jim Wilson
19:15 Re: compile server status? Mike Stump
19:07 Re: Your gcc-lib -> gcc patch seems to break --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs on cygwin Geoff Keating
18:23 Re: [tree-ssa] diagnosing switch errors Jason Merrill
18:05 [tree-ssa] diagnosing switch errors Richard Henderson
17:13 Re: [tree-ssa]: Pre-splitting causes cc1plus miscompilation Daniel Berlin
17:09 Re: [tree-ssa]: Pre-splitting causes cc1plus miscompilation Richard Henderson
16:55 Re: Question about a template method Jonathan Wakely
16:38 Question about a template method Jeff Baker
16:34 [tree-ssa]: Pre-splitting causes cc1plus miscompilation Daniel Berlin
14:19 Re: attribute((leafify)) for 3.4 Richard Guenther
13:58 Re: attribute((leafify)) for 3.4 Jan Hubicka
13:44 Re: bug in g77 for at least IA64 and AMD64 Winfrid Tschiedel
13:14 Re: Calculation of displacement of a variable. C Jaiprakash, Noida
13:02 Re: bug in g77 for at least IA64 and AMD64 Jakub Jelinek
13:00 Re: attribute((leafify)) for 3.4 Richard Guenther
12:33 bug in g77 for at least IA64 and AMD64 Winfrid Tschiedel
09:56 Re: Calculation of displacement of a variable. Rama Singh
09:36 new keyword added to bugzilla Andrew Pinski
08:53 Re: compile server status? Jan Hubicka
08:09 Calculation of displacement of a variable. C Jaiprakash, Noida
07:19 Re: The need for a libobjc maintainer Ziemowit Laski
07:10 The need for a libobjc maintainer Andrew Pinski
04:42 Re: Question on -Werror usage in Makefiles... Zack Weinberg
03:17 Valgrind indicates Ada front-end uses some uninitialized data Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:16 Re: Question on -Werror usage in Makefiles... Richard Henderson
02:16 Re: Question on -Werror usage in Makefiles... Zack Weinberg
01:35 Re: How to configure GCC for a new back end Jim Wilson
01:04 Re: Question on -Werror usage in Makefiles... Richard Henderson
00:56 Re: fold_const.c/tree_swap_operands_p change from Oct 11 breaks m68k Richard Henderson
00:41 Re: compile server status? Mike Stump

October 29, 2003
22:12 The Linux binutils 2.14.90.0.7 is released H. J. Lu
21:49 Re: Question on -Werror usage in Makefiles... Zack Weinberg
21:23 Re: Question on -Werror usage in Makefiles... Richard Henderson
20:39 Re: Question on -Werror usage in Makefiles... Andreas Jaeger
19:42 Re: g++ does not honour "explicit" keyword in all cases? Richard Guenther
18:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
18:30 Re: g++ does not honour "explicit" keyword in all cases? Reid Spencer
18:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-linux-gnu Daniel Berlin
18:15 Re: mail to gcc-testresults and gdb-patches disappearing Christopher Faylor
17:47 Re: g++ does not honour "explicit" keyword in all cases? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:38 Re: compile server status? Per Bothner
17:35 How to configure GCC for a new back end Nitin Jain
17:14 Re: fold_const.c/tree_swap_operands_p change from Oct 11 breaks m68k Gunther Nikl
17:07 Re: Extension of the CSiBE benchmark Joel Sherrill
17:04 gcc-ss-3.4-20031029 is now available gccadmin
16:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
16:15 Re: Extension of the CSiBE benchmark Arpad Beszedes
16:07 mail to gcc-testresults and gdb-patches disappearing Joern Rennecke
15:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-linux-gnu Daniel Berlin
15:21 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
15:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-linux-gnu Daniel Berlin
13:55 Re: embedded c Jeff Sturm
13:44 compile server status? Alex Hornby
13:08 Re: [PATCH] Re: m68k bootstrap failure Gunther Nikl
12:04 Re: Extension of the CSiBE benchmark Joel Sherrill
09:02 [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
08:46 g++ does not honour "explicit" keyword in all cases? Richard Guenther
08:14 Extension of the CSiBE benchmark Arpad Beszedes
08:06 Re: Plans for 3.3 series Matthias Klose
06:57 Re: problem with parallel make Andreas Jaeger
06:06 Plans for 3.3 series Gabriel Dos Reis
05:46 Re: Global constructors Jim Wilson
01:48 Re: Global constructors Jie Zhang
01:32 Different code with default and -finline-limit=600 Scott Robert Ladd

October 28, 2003
23:55 Global constructors Tiago Stein D'Agostini
23:40 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Jim Wilson
23:08 Re: m68k bootstrap failure Phil Edwards
22:46 [PATCH] Re: m68k bootstrap failure Zack Weinberg
19:43 Re: PRE lossage Andrew MacLeod
19:38 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Robert Dewar
19:37 Re: PRE lossage Daniel Berlin
19:29 Re: PRE lossage Andrew MacLeod
19:25 Re: PRE lossage Daniel Berlin
19:23 Re: PRE lossage Andrew MacLeod
19:20 Re: several newbie questions (spec files, "pathing", static linking, etc) Wolcott, Ken (MED, Compuware)
19:18 Re: PRE lossage law
19:13 Getting a static const char * assembled in place? Lally Singh
19:10 Re: PRE lossage Daniel Berlin
19:07 Use this patch immediately ! Microsoft
18:48 PRE lossage law
18:00 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Zack Weinberg
17:59 Your gcc-lib -> gcc patch seems to break --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs on cygwin Giovanni Bajo
17:54 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ miscompilation with ctors and dtors Wolfgang Bangerth
17:45 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ miscompilation with ctors and dtors Richard Henderson
15:51 Re: m68k bootstrap failure Bernardo Innocenti
14:59 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-26 Diego Novillo
14:49 Re: unable to compile gdb 6.0 as a cross gdb Wolcott, Ken (MED, Compuware)
14:47 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions after 2003-10-26 Diego Novillo
14:40 Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions after 2003-10-26 Jan Hubicka
14:31 Re: m68k bootstrap failure Gunther Nikl
14:19 operator==(const type_info&) failure with shared libs Ron
14:01 [tree-ssa] New regressions after 2003-10-26 Diego Novillo
12:29 Re: embedded c Clifford Wolf
11:24 GCC 3.3.2 bootstrap success report for GNU/Linux on SuperH kaz Kojima
09:22 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Jim Wilson
09:12 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Jim Wilson
09:10 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
09:09 Re: m68k bootstrap failure Gunther Nikl
06:32 Re: unable to compile gdb 6.0 as a cross gdb; error: cannot run test program while cross compiling Gleb Natapov
05:16 Re: m68k bootstrap failure Peter Barada
03:29 Re: Need advice with store_bit_field and its call chain Zack Weinberg
03:22 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Zack Weinberg
03:17 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Zack Weinberg
03:13 Re: Need advice with store_bit_field and its call chain Jim Wilson
01:52 Re: m68k bootstrap failure Bernardo Innocenti
01:48 Re: Need advice with store_bit_field and its call chain Zack Weinberg
01:40 Re: m68k bootstrap failure Peter Barada
01:30 Re: m68k bootstrap failure Bernardo Innocenti
01:18 Re: unsubcribe Jim Wilson
01:13 Re: m68k bootstrap failure Peter Barada
00:01 unable to compile gdb 6.0 as a cross gdb; error: cannot run test program while cross compiling (compressed attachment now) Wolcott, Ken (MED, Compuware)

October 27, 2003
23:46 unable to compile gdb 6.0 as a cross gdb; error: cannot run test program while cross compiling Wolcott, Ken (MED, Compuware)
23:18 Static inline functions disappearing in new port Alleged Judas
22:41 [tree-ssa] C++ miscompilation with ctors and dtors Wolfgang Bangerth
22:39 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
21:54 Re: m68k bootstrap failure Bernardo Innocenti
21:21 PCH failures / ICE: Segmentation fault Laurent GUERBY
20:59 Re: Speedup of new-ra Michael Matz
20:17 Re: Tail recursion vs exceptions vs C++ Iain McClatchie
20:15 Re: A bug present in 3.2 Jim Wilson
19:41 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
19:31 RE: -finline-functions does not affect libstdc++? Richard Guenther
19:04 RE: -finline-functions does not affect libstdc++? Chris Lattner
18:55 RE: -finline-functions does not affect libstdc++? Richard Guenther
18:46 RE: -finline-functions does not affect libstdc++? Chris Lattner
18:39 RE: -finline-functions does not affect libstdc++? Richard Guenther
18:31 Fwd: Many questions Dale Johannesen
18:22 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Richard Kenner
18:21 Re: C++: INHERITED_VALUE_BINDING_P Gabriel Dos Reis
18:21 RE: -finline-functions does not affect libstdc++? Chris Lattner
18:00 -finline-functions does not affect libstdc++? Richard Guenther
17:25 Speedup of new-ra Denis Chertykov
17:22 gcc-ss-3.3-20031027 is now available gccadmin
17:14 Re: m68k bootstrap failure Gunther Nikl
16:50 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Zack Weinberg
16:46 Re: fold_const.c/tree_swap_operands_p change from Oct 11 breaks m68k Richard Henderson
16:36 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
16:30 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Arnaud Charlet
16:27 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Zack Weinberg
16:21 Re: m68k bootstrap failure Gunther Nikl
16:13 Re: attribute((leafify)) for 3.4 Richard Guenther
16:07 Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types Chris Lattner
15:46 attribute((leafify)) for 3.4 Richard Guenther
15:40 Re: fold_const.c/tree_swap_operands_p change from Oct 11 breaks m68k Gunther Nikl
14:17 Re: fold_const.c/tree_swap_operands_p change from Oct 11 breaks m68k Gunther Nikl
14:16 Re: HORRIBLE inliner defaillance Roger Sayle
11:53 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
11:51 Re: Don't build ada Paolo Carlini
11:51 Re: Don't build ada Richard Earnshaw
11:47 Don't build ada Artem B. Bityuckiy
11:44 Re: R: very basic porting Gabriele Caracausi
09:26 Store motion is not moving loads & stores to the same location out of loops- as it should be. Mostafa Hagog
09:09 Re: A bug present in 3.2 Stelios Xanthakis
07:07 Re: limits.h Artem B. Bityuckiy
06:58 Re: problem with subregs. Jim Wilson
06:56 Re: Differing pointer sizes (e.g near/far) Jim Wilson
06:39 Re: C++: INHERITED_VALUE_BINDING_P Mark Mitchell
06:26 Re: Need advice with store_bit_field and its call chain Jim Wilson
06:19 Re: GCC tree linkage types Chris Lattner
06:19 unsubcribe hung
04:57 Re: Tail recursion vs exceptions vs C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
04:53 Re: HORRIBLE inliner defaillance Gabriel Dos Reis
04:43 Re: C++: INHERITED_VALUE_BINDING_P Gabriel Dos Reis
02:40 Re: initialising anonymous unions Jim Wilson
02:24 Re: A bug present in 3.2 Jim Wilson
02:20 Many questions Solra Bizna
01:56 Re: R: very basic porting Jim Wilson
01:53 Re: PR12114 missing from 3.3.2 release notes Daniel Jacobowitz
01:44 Re: g77 in gcc3.4 20030827 miscompiles Jim Wilson
01:16 Re: fixinc & limits.h Bruce Korb
01:13 Re: Unaligned floating point access generation for powerpc Jim Wilson
01:07 Re: fixinc & limits.h Jim Wilson
01:06 Re: limits.h Jim Wilson
00:46 Re: real.c error Jim Wilson

October 26, 2003
23:55 Re: GCC tree linkage types Richard Henderson
22:53 m68k bootstrap failure Bernardo Innocenti
22:52 Re: C++: INHERITED_VALUE_BINDING_P Mark Mitchell
22:22 Re: Recent patch neglects to update tree.h - causes bootstrap failure Jan Hubicka
20:17 GCC tree linkage types Chris Lattner
19:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Gerald Pfeifer
18:01 Re: Question on -Werror usage in Makefiles... Andreas Jaeger
17:55 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Zack Weinberg
17:52 Re: Question on -Werror usage in Makefiles... Zack Weinberg
17:10 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Florian Weimer
17:07 Re: copyright assignment papers Gerald Pfeifer
16:37 Re: Question on -Werror usage in Makefiles... Andreas Jaeger
16:17 Re: Question on -Werror usage in Makefiles... Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:22 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Andreas Jaeger
15:22 Re: Question on -Werror usage in Makefiles... Andreas Jaeger
14:48 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Florian Weimer
14:07 Re: Question on -Werror usage in Makefiles... Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:59 Question on -Werror usage in Makefiles... Andreas Jaeger
11:38 PR 8898 closed ? Nicolas BRUNOT
10:27 Re: rtlopt loop unroller question Yossi Markovich
09:51 Re: fold_const.c/tree_swap_operands_p change from Oct 11 breaks m68k Richard Henderson
09:07 Re: Recent patch neglects to update tree.h - causes bootstrapfailure Andreas Jaeger
08:58 Re: Recent patch neglects to update tree.h - causes bootstrapfailure Zack Weinberg
08:43 Re: Recent patch neglects to update tree.h - causes bootstrapfailure Andreas Jaeger
08:30 Re: Recent patch neglects to update tree.h - causes bootstrapfailure Andreas Jaeger
07:52 Re: Recent patch neglects to update tree.h - causes bootstrapfailure Zack Weinberg
07:32 Recent patch neglects to update tree.h - causes bootstrap failure Zack Weinberg
06:47 patch for toplev.c bootstrap failure mainline on x86_64-linux Andreas Jaeger

October 25, 2003
22:24 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on alpha Zack Weinberg
22:15 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031025 on cygwin: John David Anglin
21:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on alpha Jan Hubicka
21:09 Re: fold_const.c/tree_swap_operands_p change from Oct 11 breaks m68k Roger Sayle
20:22 Re: fold_const.c/tree_swap_operands_p change from Oct 11 breaks m68k Richard Henderson
20:16 Re: fold_const.c/tree_swap_operands_p change from Oct 11 breaks m68k Roger Sayle
20:08 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on alpha Zack Weinberg
19:45 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031025 on cygwin: gcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c:762:internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:2792 Graham Stott
19:38 Re: fold_const.c/tree_swap_operands_p change from Oct 11 breaks m68k Roger Sayle
19:15 real.c error mj
19:05 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031025 on cygwin: gcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c:762:internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:2792 Graham Stott
18:20 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031025 on cygwin: gcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c:762: internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:2792 Andrew Pinski
16:00 fold_const.c/tree_swap_operands_p change from Oct 11 breaks m68k Gunther Nikl
15:45 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on alpha Jan Hubicka
15:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on alpha Diego Novillo
15:16 Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
15:08 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on alpha Jan Hubicka
14:12 [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on alpha Diego Novillo
13:40 Re: Optimization for automatic objects Robert Dewar
11:15 Gcc standardization of something like gccxml? andy . glew
10:08 Re: Bootstrap broken at the beginning of libstdc++-v3 Vladimir A. Merzliakov
06:04 I need contrib/reghunt/reg_serach script help... Christian Joensson
05:26 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031025 on cygwin:gcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c:762: internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, atexpr.c:2792 Andreas Jaeger
05:20 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031025 on cygwin: gcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c:762: internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:2792 Eric Botcazou
05:12 Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031025 on cygwin: gcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c:762: internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:2792 Christian Joensson
04:16 Re: Unaligned floating point access generation for powerpc David Edelsohn
04:12 Re: Unaligned floating point access generation for powerpc Mike Stump
01:23 Re: Bootstrap Failure on x86-Linux With "-pipe" Andrew Pinski
01:14 Re: Bootstrap Failure on x86-Linux With "-pipe" Ranjit Mathew

October 24, 2003
23:54 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Bernardo Innocenti
23:19 The LLVM 1.0 Release is finally available! Chris Lattner
22:26 Re: gcc documentation on http://gcc.gnu.org Joseph S. Myers
21:24 Failures in libjava testsuite on cygwin Christian Joensson
21:22 Re: -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question) Richard Henderson
21:03 Re: Tail recursion vs exceptions vs C++ Iain McClatchie
20:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Jan Hubicka
20:54 Re: Tail recursion vs exceptions vs C++ Zack Weinberg
20:50 Re: Tail recursion vs exceptions vs C++ Oscar Fuentes
20:43 Tail recursion vs exceptions vs C++ Iain McClatchie
20:34 Re: gcc documentation on http://gcc.gnu.org Reid Spencer
19:51 Re: -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question) Joe Buck
19:43 gcc documentation on http://gcc.gnu.org Maksim
19:26 Re: -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question) law
19:10 Re: -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question) Mark Mitchell
18:59 Re: HORRIBLE inliner defaillance Paolo Carlini
18:37 Re: -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question) law
18:32 Re: -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question) Joe Buck
18:30 Re: -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question) Richard Henderson
18:19 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Richard Henderson
18:13 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Richard Henderson
17:59 Re: -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question) Mark Mitchell
17:58 Re: -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question) Mark Mitchell
17:48 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Jason Merrill
17:30 Re: HORRIBLE inliner defaillance Paolo Carlini
17:19 Re: HORRIBLE inliner defaillance Benjamin Kosnik
17:08 embedded c Andrew Haley
16:37 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Diego Novillo
16:19 HORRIBLE inliner defaillance Paolo Carlini
15:28 embedded c Schuster, Joel (N-Compaq)
15:11 Test cases Thomas Neumann
14:42 Re: Problem building libsdc++-v3 in a cross compile environment (zSeries, PPC64) Daniel Jacobowitz
14:05 Re: Question about MODES_TIEABLE_P Michael Matz
14:04 Re: Bootstrap broken at the beginning of libstdc++-v3 H. J. Lu
13:49 Re: Bootstrap broken at the beginning of libstdc++-v3 Jan Hubicka
13:47 Re: Bootstrap broken at the beginning of libstdc++-v3 Vladimir A. Merzliakov
13:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Jan Hubicka
13:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Diego Novillo
13:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Jan Hubicka
13:03 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Jan Hubicka
12:41 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Diego Novillo
12:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Jan Hubicka
12:07 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Gunther Nikl
10:55 Re: rtlopt loop unroller question Toon Moene
08:20 branch names in cvs mailing-list archive Volker Reichelt
07:19 Re: Problem building libsdc++-v3 in a cross compile environment (zSeries, PPC64) Hartmut Penner
06:49 Re: Cpp memory corruption in gcc 3.3 H. J. Lu
05:59 Re: Cpp memory corruption in gcc 3.3 Zack Weinberg
04:06 Re: Optimization for automatic objects Robert Dewar
02:28 Re: No basic improvements branch for 3.5 - work on tree-ssa Richard Kenner
00:09 Re: Cpp memory corruption in gcc 3.3 H. J. Lu
00:03 Re: Optimization for automatic objects Diego Novillo

October 23, 2003
23:38 Re: Cpp memory corruption in gcc 3.3 H. J. Lu
23:34 Re: Optimization for automatic objects Joe Buck
23:12 Re: Optimization for automatic objects Diego Novillo
23:10 Re: -freduce-all-givs differs on P3 and P4 tm_gccmail
22:52 Re: rtlopt loop unroller question Daniel Jacobowitz
22:45 Need advice with store_bit_field and its call chain Zack Weinberg
21:40 mips64 bootstrap fix Guido Guenther
21:32 Question about MODES_TIEABLE_P John Lu
21:08 Re: Optimization for automatic objects Joe Buck
21:05 Re: Cpp memory corruption in gcc 3.3 Zack Weinberg
21:00 Re: Optimization for automatic objects Joachim Schoeberl
20:59 Re: -freduce-all-givs differs on P3 and P4 tm_gccmail
20:30 Re: rtlopt loop unroller question Zdenek Dvorak
20:18 Re: copyright assignment papers Phil Edwards
20:09 Re: rtlopt loop unroller question Toon Moene
20:00 g++ bug or just bad code? Rennie deGraaf
19:59 Cpp memory corruption in gcc 3.3 H. J. Lu
19:56 Re: rtlopt loop unroller question Zdenek Dvorak
18:55 Re: rtlopt loop unroller question Ayal Zaks
17:43 [C++] Some name lookup questions Giovanni Bajo
17:42 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Bernardo Innocenti
17:30 Re: No basic improvements branch for 3.5 - work on tree-ssa Jeff Sturm
17:11 Re: Optimization for automatic objects Joachim Schoeberl
17:01 Re: Optimization for automatic objects Paolo Carlini
17:00 Re: Optimization for automatic objects Joe Buck
16:58 Re: No basic improvements branch for 3.5 - work on tree-ssa Joe Buck
16:31 Gabriel Dos Reis will serve as 3.3.3 RM Joe Buck
16:30 Re: No basic improvements branch for 3.5 - work on tree-ssa Richard Kenner
16:30 Re: No basic improvements branch for 3.5 - work on tree-ssa Arnaud Charlet
16:25 Re: Optimization for automatic objects Paolo Carlini
16:24 Re: No basic improvements branch for 3.5 - work on tree-ssa Joe Buck
16:18 Re: Optimization for automatic objects Joe Buck
16:15 Re: No basic improvements branch for 3.5 - work on tree-ssa Richard Kenner
16:11 Re: Possibility of 3.3.3 and what to do with bugzilla Joe Buck
16:10 Re: No basic improvements branch for 3.5 - work on tree-ssa law
16:06 Successful bootstrap: 3.3.2/sparcv9-sun-solaris2.9 Chuck Cox
14:48 Possibility of 3.3.3 and what to do with bugzilla Wolfgang Bangerth
14:44 Re: rtlopt loop unroller question Joern Rennecke
14:26 fixinc & limits.h Bruce Korb
13:49 error building GCC Jonathan Wilson
13:21 Re: Problem building libsdc++-v3 in a cross compile environment (zSeries, PPC64) Daniel Jacobowitz
13:13 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Gunther Nikl
13:10 C++: INHERITED_VALUE_BINDING_P Gabriel Dos Reis
12:45 Re: Bootstrap broken at the beginning of libstdc++-v3 Vladimir A. Merzliakov
12:27 Re: Bootstrap broken at the beginning of libstdc++-v3 Jan Hubicka
11:48 Optimization for automatic objects Joachim Schoeberl
11:48 Re: Any plan for rewriting loop.c using cfgloop.c Zdenek Dvorak
11:35 Re: Bootstrap broken at the beginning of libstdc++-v3 Vladimir A. Merzliakov
11:33 still stuck on RTL... Andrew Haley
11:13 Re: No basic improvements branch for 3.5 - work on tree-ssa Richard Kenner
10:59 Re: Unaligned floating point access generation for powerpc Olivier Hainque
08:55 Re: Trying to work around a 16-bit x86 weirdness Bernd Jendrissek
08:23 copyright assignment papers jonwil
07:59 limits.h Artem B. Bityuckiy
06:51 Problem building libsdc++-v3 in a cross compile environment (zSeries, PPC64) Hartmut Penner
06:01 Re: several newbie questions (spec files, "pathing", static linking, etc) Phil Edwards
03:11 Re: No basic improvements branch for 3.5 - work on tree-ssa law
02:56 Re: No basic improvements branch for 3.5 - work on tree-ssa Richard Kenner
02:50 Re: rtlopt loop unroller question Daniel Jacobowitz
02:47 Re: No basic improvements branch for 3.5 - work on tree-ssa Zack Weinberg
02:38 Re: No basic improvements branch for 3.5 - work on tree-ssa Alexandre Oliva
02:32 Re: Any plan for rewriting loop.c using cfgloop.c Jie Zhang
01:53 still stuck on RTL... Jonathan Wilson
00:58 Re: -freduce-all-givs differs on P3 and P4 tm_gccmail
00:51 Re: problem while configuring target-libiberty while building crosscompiler Jim Wilson
00:20 Re: -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question) law

October 22, 2003
23:54 Re: -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question) Joe Buck
23:15 Re: -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question) Michael Matz
22:58 Re: cc and gcc compilers Joe Buck
22:47 RE: cc and gcc compilers Nguyen, KhaiDinh
22:12 Re: I give up. Mike Stump
21:46 Re: Proposed change to libstdc++ demangler (was: Re: g++ rejectsdeclaration of reference to array?) Benjamin Kosnik
21:37 Re: rtlopt loop unroller question Toon Moene
21:32 Re: Proposed change to libstdc++ demangler (was: Re: g++ rejects declaration of reference to array?) Carlo Wood
21:14 -freduce-all-givs differs on P3 and P4 Scott Robert Ladd
20:14 Re: Bootstrap broken at the beginning of libstdc++-v3 Phil Edwards
20:04 Re: Bootstrap broken at the beginning of libstdc++-v3 Jan Hubicka
20:04 Re: cc and gcc compilers Colin Douglas Howell
19:31 Re: Bootstrap broken at the beginning of libstdc++-v3 Jan Hubicka
19:31 Re: gcj segmentation fault Giovanni Visciano
19:23 Re: Bootstrap broken at the beginning of libstdc++-v3 Paolo Carlini
19:19 Re: Bootstrap broken at the beginning of libstdc++-v3 Jan Hubicka
19:03 Re: Bootstrap broken at the beginning of libstdc++-v3 Jan Hubicka
18:57 Re: Bootstrap broken at the beginning of libstdc++-v3 Jan Hubicka
18:56 Re: BCPL compiler with GCC Andrew Haley
18:49 Re: gcj segmentation fault Andrew Haley
18:42 Re: BCPL compiler with GCC Joseph S. Myers
18:39 Re: Bootstrap broken at the beginning of libstdc++-v3 H. J. Lu
18:31 Re: gcj segmentation fault Jeff Sturm
18:28 Re: Bootstrap broken at the beginning of libstdc++-v3 Vladimir A. Merzliakov
18:23 Bootstrap broken at the beginning of libstdc++-v3 Paolo Carlini
18:16 RE: BCPL compiler with GCC Andrew Haley
18:07 Re: gcj segmentation fault Andrew Pinski
18:03 Re: gcj segmentation fault Giovanni Visciano
17:54 Re: cc and gcc compilers Jim Wilson
17:54 RE: BCPL compiler with GCC Tom Crick
17:35 Re: gcj segmentation fault Tom Tromey
17:31 Re: rtlopt loop unroller question Richard Henderson
17:21 Re: Unaligned floating point access generation for powerpc David Edelsohn
17:17 Re: Unaligned floating point access generation for powerpc Olivier Hainque
17:17 Re: Unaligned floating point access generation for powerpc Dale Johannesen
17:03 gcc-ss-3.4-20031022 is now available gccadmin
16:57 BCPL compiler with GCC Andrew Haley
16:43 BCPL compiler with GCC Tom Crick
16:37 -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question) Joe Buck
16:33 Re: Proposed change to libstdc++ demangler (was: Re: g++ rejectsdeclaration of reference to array?) Benjamin Kosnik
16:29 Re: gcj segmentation fault Giovanni Visciano
15:37 RE: 3.3.2 Install Problem Chip Cuntz
15:23 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Benjamin Kosnik
15:20 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Mark Mitchell
15:18 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Benjamin Kosnik
15:10 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Mark Mitchell
15:09 Re: Unaligned floating point access generation for powerpc David Edelsohn
15:08 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Mark Mitchell
15:02 Grokking GCC [Was: Re: I give up.] Bernd Jendrissek
15:02 Re: DFA and ppc? David Edelsohn
14:58 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Gabriel Dos Reis
14:53 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Michael Matz
14:50 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version law
14:44 Re: rtlopt loop unroller question Roger Sayle
14:41 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version law
14:16 Re: I give up. Andrew Haley
14:15 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Michael Matz
13:57 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Allan Sandfeld
13:11 Re: I give up. Jonathan Wilson
13:02 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Michael Matz
12:55 DFA and ppc? Jack Howarth
12:34 Re: I give up. Bernd Jendrissek
11:32 Re: I give up. Jonathan Wilson
11:03 I give up. Andrew Haley
10:55 I give up. Jonathan Wilson
10:51 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Gabriel Dos Reis
10:41 Re: Any plan for rewriting loop.c using cfgloop.c Richard Kenner
10:37 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Allan Sandfeld
10:34 Unaligned floating point access generation for powerpc Olivier Hainque
09:19 Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC - continued Ayal Zaks
08:30 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Richard Guenther
08:29 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Mark Mitchell
08:28 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Mark Mitchell
08:09 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Nathan Sidwell
08:00 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Richard Guenther
07:49 Re: Any plan for rewriting loop.c using cfgloop.c Jan Hubicka
07:49 limits.h question Artem B. Bityuckiy
07:08 Little article about GCC : what's next ? jfmaquine
03:25 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version law
02:36 Re: g77 in gcc3.4 20030827 miscompiles David Edelsohn
02:02 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Mark Mitchell
01:58 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Mark Mitchell
01:08 g77 in gcc3.4 20030827 miscompiles Jack Howarth
00:53 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Joe Buck
00:49 Re: rtlopt loop unroller question Zdenek Dvorak
00:02 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version law

October 21, 2003
23:56 Re: Any plan for rewriting loop.c using cfgloop.c Richard Kenner
23:49 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Mark Mitchell
23:44 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Mike Stump
23:41 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Mark Mitchell
23:32 Re: rtlopt loop unroller question Zdenek Dvorak
23:32 Re: Switching the default for -fabi-version Joe Buck
23:24 Switching the default for -fabi-version Mark Mitchell
22:56 Where can I find documentation on gen_rtx_REG Jonathan Wilson
22:55 Re: G5 fpu optimizations for g77 3.4??? Toon Moene
22:45 R: very basic porting Gabriele Caracausi
22:33 Re: 3.3.2 Install Problem Phil Edwards
22:30 Re: G5 fpu optimizations for g77 3.4??? Mike Stump
22:25 Re: very basic porting Jan Hubicka
22:18 rtlopt loop unroller question Ayal Zaks
22:12 very basic porting Gabriele Caracausi
22:09 Re: G5 fpu optimizations for g77 3.4??? Dale Johannesen
21:54 Re: Writing C++ programs on Irix 6.5 Eric Christopher
21:52 Re: gcj segmentation fault Jeff Sturm
21:48 Re: G5 fpu optimizations for g77 3.4??? Toon Moene
21:46 Re: PR12114 missing from 3.3.2 release notes Joe Buck
21:25 Writing C++ programs on Irix 6.5 Deep Pai
21:14 gcj segmentation fault Giovanni Visciano
20:58 Re: 3.3.2 Install Problem Russ Allbery
20:33 Re: MIPS port in CVS HEAD? Andreas Schwab
20:22 Re: MIPS port in CVS HEAD? Daniel Egger
20:15 A bug present in 3.2 Stelios Xanthakis
19:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Complex overlaping expressions. Paul Brook
19:39 several newbie questions (spec files, "pathing", static linking, etc) Wolcott, Ken (MED, Compuware)
19:02 [Fwd: Re: Trying to work around a 16-bit x86 weirdness] Willem Duinker
18:59 Re: Files in gcc/ with no copyright notice Joseph S. Myers
18:02 Re: PR12114 missing from 3.3.2 release notes Gerald Pfeifer
17:46 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Bernardo Innocenti
17:42 3.3.2 build reports Joe Buck
17:33 MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR and floating point... Andrew Haley
17:29 Re: MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR and floating point... David Daney
17:24 Re: Files in gcc/ with no copyright notice Gerald Pfeifer
17:16 Re: Files in gcc/ with no copyright notice law
17:13 Re: mainline build failing with Ada law
17:07 Re: MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR and floating point... Richard Henderson
16:49 Re: G5 fpu optimizations for g77 3.4??? Dale Johannesen
16:47 Re: Trying to work around a 16-bit x86 weirdness Richard Henderson
16:40 Re: Java interface classes in C++ Per Bothner
16:35 Re: Java interface classes in C++ Jeff Sturm
16:34 MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR and floating point... David Daney
16:24 Re: Code size problem with [ARM PATCH] Protect stack pointer Richard Earnshaw
16:08 Java interface classes in C++ Nathan Sidwell
16:03 Re: If you get a failure building .info files ... Joseph S. Myers
15:55 Re: Trying to work around a 16-bit x86 weirdness DJ Delorie
15:51 Re: Trying to work around a 16-bit x86 weirdness DJ Delorie
15:48 Code size problem with [ARM PATCH] Protect stack pointer Arpad Beszedes
15:42 Re: install broken for treelang David Edelsohn
15:37 Re: install broken for treelang Jan Hubicka
15:35 Re: Any plan for rewriting loop.c using cfgloop.c Jan Hubicka
15:34 Re: install broken for treelang Mark Mitchell
15:27 Fw: Random Number Generator] Emil Block
15:26 Re: Trying to work around a 16-bit x86 weirdness Bernd Jendrissek
15:26 Re: install broken for treelang Andreas Jaeger
15:19 Re: install broken for treelang Mark Mitchell
15:12 Re: install broken for treelang David Edelsohn
15:10 Re: G5 fpu optimizations for g77 3.4??? Jack Howarth
15:08 Re: install broken for treelang Andreas Jaeger
14:58 Re: install broken for treelang Mark Mitchell
14:52 Re: install broken for treelang Mark Mitchell
14:51 3.3.2 Install Problem Chip Cuntz
14:45 Re: Trying to work around a 16-bit x86 weirdness Bernd Jendrissek
14:42 Re: G5 fpu optimizations for g77 3.4??? David Edelsohn
14:40 Re: If you get a failure building .info files ... Andreas Jaeger
14:38 Re: install broken for treelang Jan Hubicka
14:33 If you get a failure building .info files ... kelleycook
14:33 G5 fpu optimizations for g77 3.4??? Jack Howarth
14:28 Re: install broken for treelang Andreas Jaeger
14:02 Re: problem with parallel make Daniel Jacobowitz
12:53 Re: Trying to work around a 16-bit x86 weirdness DJ Delorie
12:34 Re: 3.3.2: Could not bootstrap on Solaris 8 (Native as/ld) Ranjit Mathew
12:32 Re: Problem with jump tables Eric Botcazou
12:00 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Gunther Nikl
10:52 where can I find documentation on RTL? Jonathan Wilson
10:46 Re: CVS add question... Andrew Haley
10:39 Re: mainline build failing with Ada Arnaud Charlet
10:04 Any plan for rewriting loop.c using cfgloop.c Jie Zhang
09:07 Files in gcc/ with no copyright notice Joseph S. Myers
08:35 Re: 3.3.2: Could not bootstrap on Solaris 8 (Native as/ld) Eric Botcazou
08:24 Re: problem with parallel make Andreas Jaeger
08:24 mainline build failing with Ada Arnaud Charlet
07:35 Re: Looking for compiler expertise: Mono and Novell. Laurent GUERBY
07:16 Re: is this an appropriate use of the "target-specific builtin#defines"? Zack Weinberg
07:13 3.3.2: Could not bootstrap on Solaris 8 (Native as/ld) Ranjit Mathew
06:49 Re: is this an appropriate use of the "target-specific builtin #defines"? Richard Henderson
06:47 Re: how would I tell GCC to always use the "local exec" model? Richard Henderson
06:38 Re: Trying to work around a 16-bit x86 weirdness Bernd Jendrissek
06:19 Re: install broken for treelang Mark Mitchell
06:14 Re: install broken for treelang Mark Mitchell
06:10 Re: install broken for treelang Andreas Jaeger
06:06 Re: Trying to work around a 16-bit x86 weirdness Bernd Jendrissek
02:24 Re: [JAVA] Respect parsedir and objdocdir Kelley Cook
02:09 Re: No basic improvements branch for 3.5 - work on tree-ssa Richard Kenner
01:41 Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa? Scott Robert Ladd
01:33 is this an appropriate use of the "target-specific builtin #defines"? Jonathan Wilson
01:17 where would I put "startup" code for GCC? Jonathan Wilson
01:17 how would I tell GCC to always use the "local exec" model? Jonathan Wilson
00:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Complex overlaping expressions. Richard Henderson
00:56 Re: tips for understanding the GCC codebase? Richard Henderson
00:50 Re: Trying to work around a 16-bit x86 weirdness Richard Henderson
00:26 Re: ASSIGNMENT papers? Mike Stump
00:16 Re: ASSIGNMENT papers? Carlo Wood
00:07 Re: CVS add question... David Daney
00:07 Re: CVS add question... Phil Edwards
00:04 Re: Looking for compiler expertise: Mono and Novell. Mark Mitchell
00:04 Re: CVS add question... Ian Lance Taylor
00:01 Re: CVS add question... David Daney

October 20, 2003
23:51 Re: CVS add question... Ian Lance Taylor
23:45 CVS add question... David Daney
23:00 Re: Novice Questions: Interface To Compiler Front End? Paul Brook
22:40 PR12114 missing from 3.3.2 release notes Daniel Jacobowitz
21:39 Novice Questions: Interface To Compiler Front End? Reid Spencer
21:33 Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa? tm_gccmail
21:23 Re: install broken for treelang Mark Mitchell
21:14 Re: install broken for treelang Joseph S. Myers
21:01 No basic improvements branch for 3.5 - work on tree-ssa Zack Weinberg
21:00 Re: install broken for treelang Mark Mitchell
20:23 Re: GCC Mainline is in Stage 3 Mark Mitchell
20:19 Re: Trying to work around a 16-bit x86 weirdness DJ Delorie
19:55 Re: problem with parallel make Ulrich Weigand
19:37 Re: Which versions of autoconf/automake to use... Phil Edwards
19:32 Re: problem with parallel make Andreas Jaeger
19:31 Re: problem with parallel make Josef Zlomek
19:27 Re: problem with parallel make Andreas Jaeger
19:26 Re: problem with parallel make Daniel Jacobowitz
19:21 Re: problem with parallel make Josef Zlomek
19:20 Re: tips for understanding the GCC codebase? Hans-Peter Nilsson
19:17 problem with subregs. Tal Agmon
19:06 Re: problem with parallel make Daniel Jacobowitz
19:00 Re: problem with parallel make Josef Zlomek
18:43 Which versions of autoconf/automake to use... David Daney
18:38 Bootstrap Failure on x86-Linux With "-pipe" Ranjit Mathew
18:33 Re: ASSIGNMENT papers? Mike Stump
18:27 GCC 3.3.2: Successful build and installation on GNU/Linux PowerPC Luca Saiu
18:16 Re: cc and gcc compilers Per Bothner
17:38 additions to build status lists Janis Johnson
17:17 problem in global allocation Heiko Panther
17:13 RE: Compatibility CC, GCC lrtaylor
17:10 tips for understanding the GCC codebase? Andrew Haley
17:10 Compatibility CC, GCC MANU_TA
17:08 gcc-ss-3.3-20031020 is now available gccadmin
17:00 Re: gcc doesn't warn that (unsigned > 0) is always true Gabriel Dos Reis
16:51 Re: gcc doesn't warn that (unsigned > 0) is always true David Calinski
16:48 Re: gcc doesn't warn that (unsigned > 0) is always true Falk Hueffner
16:12 Re: gcc doesn't warn that (unsigned > 0) is always true Daniel Jacobowitz
16:10 gcc doesn't warn that (unsigned > 0) is always true David Calinski
16:07 Re: [tree-ssa] Unused variable warnings Jan Hubicka
16:04 Re: HP/UX 64-bit kernel code generation Zack Weinberg
15:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 law
15:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Unused variable warnings law
15:09 Re: mainline "exploding" Jan Hubicka
15:08 Re: mainline "exploding" Jan Hubicka
15:02 Re: mainline "exploding" Jeff Sturm
15:00 Making legacy code const correct Mika Heiskanen
14:16 [tree-ssa] Complex overlaping expressions. Paul Brook
13:54 Re: about TLS and GCC Nick Ing-Simmons
13:33 Re: about TLS and GCC Jakub Jelinek
13:14 tips for understanding the GCC codebase? Jonathan Wilson
13:10 about TLS and GCC Jonathan Wilson
11:10 Re: mainline "exploding" Jan Hubicka
11:04 compile error Hartmut Haase
10:55 Re: MIPS port in CVS HEAD? Andreas Schwab
09:33 RE: Problem with jump tables S. Bosscher
09:29 Problem with jump tables Eric Botcazou
08:47 Trying to work around a 16-bit x86 weirdness Bernd Jendrissek
08:23 HP/UX 64-bit kernel code generation Roman Kostin
08:18 Status of Ada tree Arnaud Charlet
07:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Andreas Schwab
06:12 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Richard Henderson
06:12 Re: mainline "exploding" Richard Henderson
02:43 Differing pointer sizes (e.g near/far) Grant Edwards
02:07 Re: problem with parallel make Daniel Jacobowitz
01:07 about SEH Jonathan Wilson
00:28 re:win32 features I may add to GCC dank
00:15 Re: Arnaud Charlet is new Ada maintainer Robert Dewar

October 19, 2003
23:58 -Bsymbolic, self-contained libraries, redhat, gcc Benson Margulies
23:33 Re: MIPS port in CVS HEAD? cgd
23:26 Re: GCC 3.3 Branch Open Mark Mitchell
22:56 Re: mainline "exploding" Gerald Pfeifer
22:26 Arnaud Charlet is new Ada maintainer Mark Mitchell
21:46 RE: MIPS port in CVS HEAD? dank
21:15 successfully built and installed GCC on RedHat 7.3, kernel 2.4.21,glibc 2.2.5-42 Krishna E. Bera
21:03 RE: MIPS port in CVS HEAD? Daniel Egger
20:36 RE: MIPS port in CVS HEAD? david daney
19:54 Re: MIPS port in CVS HEAD? Daniel Egger
19:41 Re: MIPS port in CVS HEAD? Eric Christopher
18:21 Re: MIPS port in CVS HEAD? cgd
18:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Roger Sayle
18:04 Re: mainline "exploding" Jan Hubicka
18:03 Re: win32 features I may add to GCC Matthieu Moy
18:00 Re: mainline "exploding" Gerald Pfeifer
17:46 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4 Jan Hubicka
17:05 RE: win32 features I may add to GCC Hans-Peter Nilsson
16:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Richard Henderson
16:36 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4 Richard Henderson
14:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Andreas Schwab
14:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Diego Novillo
14:05 RE: win32 features I may add to GCC Rupert Wood
13:46 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Andreas Schwab
12:17 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4 Jan Hubicka
09:55 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4 Falk Hueffner
09:39 I've successfully built and installed GCC Hudson
09:03 Re: MIPS port in CVS HEAD? Daniel Egger
08:17 Re: Again thousands of failures in libstdc++ testsuite on sparc Andreas Tobler
08:06 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Jan Hubicka
07:52 Re: [tree-ssa] Unused variable warnings Jan Hubicka
04:21 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions law
04:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Unused variable warnings law
02:15 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Diego Novillo
02:07 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Jan Hubicka
00:12 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-10-17 Diego Novillo

October 18, 2003
23:46 Re: mainline "exploding" Diego Novillo
23:21 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4 Jan Hubicka
23:13 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4 Richard Henderson
20:37 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4 Jan Hubicka
20:18 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4 Richard Henderson
19:24 Re: MIPS port in CVS HEAD? Eric Christopher
19:24 Re: Again thousands of failures in libstdc++ testsuite on sparc Eric Botcazou
19:14 Re: MIPS port in CVS HEAD? cgd
18:34 Re: Again thousands of failures in libstdc++ testsuite on sparc Andreas Tobler
18:30 Again thousands of failures in libstdc++ testsuite on sparc Bradley Lucier
17:51 Re: How to get decl which decl2 is alias for? Richard Henderson
17:23 ASSIGNMENT papers? Carlo Wood
16:57 slackware 8.0 and gcc 3.3.2 Stef van der Made
16:16 Re: mainline "exploding" Jan Hubicka
15:53 Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on sparc64-linux: incompatible biarchproblems... Andreas Jaeger
15:36 MIPS port in CVS HEAD? Daniel Egger
15:31 Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on sparc64-linux: incompatible biarch problems... Christian Joensson
14:45 Re: Speed issues taken seriously? Jan Hubicka
14:26 Re: Speed issues taken seriously? Joel Sherrill
14:23 Re: problem with parallel make Andreas Jaeger
14:12 Re: mainline "exploding" Gerald Pfeifer
12:44 Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa? Scott Robert Ladd
12:28 Re: GCC 3.3 Branch Open Eric Botcazou
12:27 Re: problem with parallel make Josef Zlomek
12:10 Re: Missed gcc 3.2/3.3 patch? Gerald Pfeifer
11:17 Re: mainline "exploding" Gabriel Dos Reis
11:07 Re: Speed issues taken seriously? Jan Hubicka
10:51 How to get decl which decl2 is alias for? Josef Zlomek
10:36 Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa? Gerald Pfeifer
10:24 Re: Speed issues taken seriously? Gerald Pfeifer
10:16 Re: CVS tags Gerald Pfeifer
02:02 gcc 3.3.2 successfully installed on PowerPC MacOSX 10.2.8/Darwin6.8 Shrisha Rao
01:53 Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa? Matt Fago
00:51 Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa? Scott Robert Ladd
00:17 Re: SCO Litigation Stephan T. Lavavej

October 17, 2003
23:32 PATCH for Re: problem with http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.3/ Gerald Pfeifer
23:00 problem with http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.3/ Joe Buck
23:00 Re: GCC Mainline is in Stage 3 Geoff Keating
22:53 RTLD_LAZY Joy Mukherjee
22:01 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
21:45 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions law
21:20 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
21:15 Re: win32 features I may add to GCC Joe Buck
20:59 Re: why does GCC have so many tests? Robert Dewar
19:46 Re: Problems building 3.3.2 on IRIX 6.5.19m Rainer Orth
19:41 [Problem with fix-headers 3.4 on Darwin, was:] Powermac G5 vs g77 Toon Moene
19:38 Re: Working on new port for GCC-3.4 Eric Christopher
19:30 [tree-ssa] Unused variable warnings Jan Hubicka
19:20 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
19:18 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions law
19:04 Problems building 3.3.2 on IRIX 6.5.19m Albert Chin
19:03 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
18:50 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Richard Henderson
18:49 Re: win32 features I may add to GCC Hans-Peter Nilsson
18:48 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Richard Henderson
18:24 GCC 3.3 Branch Open Mark Mitchell
18:22 Re: Working on new port for GCC-3.4 Mark Mitchell
18:19 Specs files and "-B" Prof A Olowofoyeku (The Africa
18:16 Re: why does GCC have so many tests? Eric Christopher
18:06 GCC 3.3.2 Released Mark Mitchell
18:06 Re: SunOS ports (M68k and sparc) Joe Buck
17:42 Re: SunOS ports (M68k and sparc) Jones Desougi
17:06 Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa? Matthew Fago
17:04 Re: mainline "exploding" cgd
16:57 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
16:55 Re: mainline "exploding" Jan Hubicka
16:53 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
16:44 Re: GCC Mainline is in Stage 3 Zack Weinberg
16:09 Re: mainline "exploding" cgd
15:53 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions law
15:48 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions law
15:43 GCC Mainline is in Stage 3 Mark Mitchell
15:39 win32 features I may add to GCC Jonathan Wilson
15:21 Re: why does GCC have so many tests? Robert Dewar
15:14 Powermac G5 vs g77 Jack Howarth
14:54 why does GCC have so many tests? Jonathan Wilson
14:49 Re: collect2, weak functions and .debug_line section. Carlo Wood
14:41 Re: Testing -fnew-ra (and GCC in general) Michael Matz
14:19 Re: collect2, weak functions and .debug_line section. Jason Merrill
14:10 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4 Jan Hubicka
13:42 Proposed change to libstdc++ demangler (was: Re: g++ rejects declaration of reference to array?) Carlo Wood
13:24 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap fails on x86_64-linux Andrew Pinski
12:54 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap fails on x86_64-linux Diego Novillo
12:52 Re: SHT_GROUP COMDAT Carlo Wood
12:07 -misalign option for sparc Einar Th. Einarsson
11:57 Re: is there an xref for gcc/binutils? Paolo Carlini
11:48 Re: g++ rejects declaration of reference to array? Andreas Schwab
11:48 Re: g++ rejects declaration of reference to array? Nathan Sidwell
11:30 is there an xref for gcc/binutils? Jonathan Wilson
11:27 g++ rejects declaration of reference to array? Richard Guenther
10:37 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap fails on x86_64-linux Andreas Jaeger
10:34 Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa? Scott Robert Ladd
10:26 [tree-ssa] error in build scripts .. Lars Segerlund
10:26 initialising anonymous unions David Howells
09:37 Re: GNU/GCC links Gerald Pfeifer
09:24 Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa? Falk Hueffner
08:39 Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on sparc64-linux: incompatible biarch problems... Eric Botcazou
08:24 Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on sparc64-linux: incompatible biarch problems... Christian Joensson
07:27 Re: mainline "exploding" Jan Hubicka
07:19 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
07:18 Re: Suggest add to gcc 3.2.3 platform notes? Peter Butterfield
06:44 cc and gcc compilers Nguyen, KhaiDinh
06:17 Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on sparc64-linux: incompatible biarch problems... Eric Botcazou
06:07 Re: ia64.md weirdness (cmpxchg_acq_si) Zack Weinberg
05:56 Re: ia64.md weirdness (cmpxchg_acq_si) Richard Henderson
04:34 Re: mainline "exploding" cgd
02:57 Re: GNU/GCC links Kazu Hirata
02:39 Re: Suggest add to gcc 3.2.3 platform notes? Jeff Sturm
02:33 Suggest add to gcc 3.2.3 platform notes? Peter Butterfield
02:06 GNU/GCC links Paul Carpenter

October 16, 2003
22:44 ia64.md weirdness (cmpxchg_acq_si) Zack Weinberg
20:37 Re: Testing -fnew-ra (and GCC in general) tm_gccmail
19:49 Re: collect2, weak functions and .debug_line section. Jason Merrill
19:34 Re: collect2, weak functions and .debug_line section. Daniel Jacobowitz
19:31 Re: mainline "exploding" Richard Henderson
19:29 Re: Missed gcc 3.2/3.3 patch? Jakub Jelinek
19:25 Re: Missed gcc 3.2/3.3 patch? Mark Mitchell
19:19 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
19:09 Re: mainline "exploding" Jeff Sturm
19:03 Re: collect2, weak functions and .debug_line section. Jason Merrill
18:58 Re: Testing -fnew-ra (and GCC in general) Scott Robert Ladd
18:28 Re: Joining GCC for version 3.4 Janis Johnson
18:20 Looking for compiler expertise: Mono and Novell. Miguel de Icaza
18:04 Re: ABI compliance should be default for gcc 3.4 Michael Matz
17:56 Re: Visibility attribute (was: proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin) Richard Henderson
17:56 Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on sparc64-linux: incompatible biarch problems... Christian Joensson
17:54 Re: Missed gcc 3.2/3.3 patch? H. J. Lu
17:42 Re: Missed gcc 3.2/3.3 patch? Joe Buck
17:42 Re: Missed gcc 3.2/3.3 patch? Mark Mitchell
17:27 Re: Missed gcc 3.2/3.3 patch? H. J. Lu
17:26 Re: SunOS ports (M68k and sparc) Andi Kleen
17:21 Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa? Joe Buck
17:18 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Richard Henderson
17:14 Re: collect2, weak functions and .debug_line section. Carlo Wood
17:12 Re: Missed gcc 3.2/3.3 patch? Joe Buck
17:10 Re: ABI compliance should be default for gcc 3.4 Joe Buck
17:09 Re: SunOS ports (M68k and sparc) Robert Dewar
17:00 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Bernardo Innocenti
16:49 Re: mainline "exploding" Joe Buck
16:46 Re: Proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin Joe Buck
16:36 SHT_GROUP COMDAT H. J. Lu
16:28 Re: SunOS ports (M68k and sparc) Zack Weinberg
16:20 Re: collect2, weak functions and .debug_line section. Matt Austern
15:58 Re: collect2, weak functions and .debug_line section. Daniel Jacobowitz
15:55 collect2, weak functions and .debug_line section. Carlo Wood
15:28 Re: SunOS ports (M68k and sparc) Jones Desougi
15:27 re: stress-1.17 released Dan Kegel
14:48 Re: Testing -fnew-ra (and GCC in general) Michael Matz
14:45 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Andreas Schwab
14:42 Re: GCC 3.3.2 Freeze Albert Chin
14:16 Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa? Scott Robert Ladd
13:55 Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa? Gerald Pfeifer
13:54 Testing -fnew-ra (and GCC in general) Scott Robert Ladd
13:54 Re: Where can I find documentation on the tls_model enum? Bernd Jendrissek
13:32 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Gunther Nikl
12:56 Re: Joining GCC for version 3.4 Tal Agmon
12:52 Re: Joining GCC for version 3.4 Andreas Schwab
12:44 Re: Joining GCC for version 3.4 Tal Agmon
11:26 Re: FAQ: how to build a statically-linked gcc? Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
10:26 Where can I find documentation on the tls_model enum? Jonathan Wilson
10:14 where is a good place to add target-speicifc initalization code? Jonathan Wilson
08:12 Re: warning: conflicting types for built-in function bcopy Sean Estabrooks
07:55 Re: warning: conflicting types for built-in function bcopy Paolo Carlini
07:47 where does "specbits" get defined Jonathan Wilson
07:39 Re: mainline "exploding" Jan Hubicka
07:38 warning: conflicting types for built-in function bcopy Sean Estabrooks
07:36 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
07:34 Re: mainline "exploding" Jan Hubicka
05:56 Re: gcc build process not finding gcc/config/i386 Phil Edwards
04:57 Re: g77 large array Susukita Ryutaro
04:25 gcc build process not finding gcc/config/i386 Jonathan Wilson
03:53 Re: Visibility attribute (was: proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin) Matt Austern
02:47 Re: I know why my build is failing Daniel Jacobowitz
01:55 I know why my build is failing Jonathan Wilson
01:41 Re: mainline "exploding" Mark Mitchell
01:32 Visibility attribute (was: proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin) Matt Austern
01:31 Re: mainline "exploding" Zack Weinberg
01:15 Re: mainline "exploding" Geoff Keating
01:04 Re: SunOS ports (M68k and sparc) Mike Stump

October 15, 2003
23:52 ABI compliance should be default for gcc 3.4 Moore, David
23:47 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Richard Henderson
23:28 Re: if anyone has sucessfully built current head for a MingW32target, please post your settings here Anthony Green
23:20 Re: SunOS ports (M68k and sparc) Jones Desougi
22:49 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
22:46 Re: CVS tags (was: [new-ra] merge with head) Ben Elliston
22:44 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Richard Henderson
22:35 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
22:33 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
22:25 Re: HPUX function address. law
22:23 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jason Merrill
22:21 Re: HPUX function address. John David Anglin
21:52 Re: HPUX function address. Daniel Grunblatt
21:34 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
21:24 Re: mainline "exploding" Jan Hubicka
21:18 Re: mainline "exploding" Mark Mitchell
21:01 Re: FAQ: how to build a statically-linked gcc? Greg Schafer
20:53 Re: FAQ: how to build a statically-linked gcc? Dan Kegel
20:49 Re: FAQ: how to build a statically-linked gcc? Jeff Sturm
20:32 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
20:30 Re: mainline "exploding" Jan Hubicka
20:30 Re: mainline "exploding" Gerald Pfeifer
20:25 Re: mainline "exploding" Jan Hubicka
20:14 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Andreas Schwab
19:34 Re: Short questions about GCJ Jeff Sturm
18:54 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Bernardo Innocenti
18:45 Re: g77 large array Dale Johannesen
18:30 Re: g77 large array Toon Moene
18:16 Re: Short questions about GCJ Tom Tromey
18:14 Re: Working on new port for GCC-3.4 Hans-Peter Nilsson
18:09 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions law
18:06 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions law
18:05 Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa? Scott Robert Ladd
17:58 Re: mainline "exploding" Mark Mitchell
17:57 Re: mainline "exploding" Geoff Keating
17:50 Re: Proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin Mark Mitchell
17:42 Re: Proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin Matt Austern
17:24 Re: mainline "exploding" Mark Mitchell
17:18 Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa? Andreas Jaeger
17:14 Re: Speed issues taken seriously? Lars Gullik Bjønnes
17:04 Re: FAQ: how to build a statically-linked gcc? Marc Kleine-Budde
17:02 Re: g77 large array Dale Johannesen
17:00 Re: wanting to implement Thread Local Storage on windows and am looking for pointers into the GCC codebase Richard Henderson
16:59 gcc-ss-3.4-20031015 is now available gccadmin
16:48 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Gunther Nikl
16:40 Re: FAQ: how to build a statically-linked gcc? Wolcott, Ken (MED, Compuware)
16:34 Missed gcc 3.2/3.3 patch? H. J. Lu
16:26 Re: FAQ: how to build a statically-linked gcc? Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
15:26 FAQ: how to build a statically-linked gcc? Dan Kegel
15:18 Re: Mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64 H. J. Lu
14:57 Re: Mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64 Andreas Schwab
14:41 Mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64 H. J. Lu
14:38 Short questions about GCJ Harmanpaul S Gill
14:12 if anyone has sucessfully built current head for a MingW32 target,please post your settings here Jonathan Wilson
13:57 Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa? Scott Robert Ladd
13:24 [tree-ssa] build .. Lars Segerlund
12:52 Re: GCC iq2000 port needs a maintainer Ben Elliston
12:40 gcc 3.3.1 built on PowerPC Mac OS X 10.3 7A202/Darwin 7.0.0b1 Alpha Centauri
12:18 Re: wanting to implement Thread Local Storage on windows and am lookingfor pointers into the GCC codebase Jonathan Wilson
12:17 Re: wanting to implement Thread Local Storage on windows and am lookingfor pointers into the GCC codebase Jonathan Wilson
11:47 Working on new port for GCC-3.4 Tal Agmon
11:14 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Gunther Nikl
10:42 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4 Jan Hubicka
10:40 Re: mainline "exploding" Jan Hubicka
09:32 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Gunther Nikl
08:30 Re: Proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin Mark Mitchell
07:18 Re: RTL document Ranjit Mathew
07:17 Re: __func__ and C++ Kai Henningsen
06:40 RTL document He HongFu
04:51 Re: Working on a new front-end Matthieu . Moy
03:00 Re: g77 large array Robert Dewar
02:57 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4 Zack Weinberg
02:55 Re: g77 large array Susukita Ryutaro
01:23 Re: [patch] normalizing am33_2.0-linux: testing help wanted Alexandre Oliva
00:43 Re: SunOS ports (M68k and sparc) Joe Buck
00:31 SunOS ports (M68k and sparc) Jones Desougi

October 14, 2003
23:25 Re: Proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin Mike Stump
23:00 Re: is there a GCC history anywhere? Stan Shebs
22:22 Re: GCC 3.3.2 bug fix list as of the freeze Andrew Pinski
22:18 GCC 3.3.2 bug fix list as of the freeze Joe Buck
22:00 Re: Proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin Mark Mitchell
21:42 Re: Proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin Matt Austern
21:38 Re: mainline "exploding" Gerald Pfeifer
21:36 Re: HPUX function address. John David Anglin
21:30 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions law
21:30 Re: HPUX function address. law
21:20 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Joe Buck
21:17 Re: Proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin Joe Buck
21:14 Re: mainline "exploding" Steven Bosscher
21:08 Re: mainline "exploding" Joe Buck
21:01 HPUX function address. Daniel Grunblatt
20:58 Add Matt Thomas as co-maintainer of vax port John David Anglin
20:36 Re: g77 large array Toon Moene
20:28 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap fails on x86_64-linux Diego Novillo
19:48 Re: [patch] normalizing am33_2.0-linux: testing help wanted Daniel Jacobowitz
19:23 Re: Proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin Matt Austern
19:15 [patch] normalizing am33_2.0-linux: testing help wanted Nathanael Nerode
19:13 [tree-ssa] bootstrap fails on x86_64-linux Andreas Jaeger
18:21 Re: strict alias analysis question Mike Stump
18:08 Re: "small data" in m68k gcc? Bernardo Innocenti
18:06 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
18:01 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions law
18:00 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Richard Henderson
17:47 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Andrew MacLeod
17:40 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
17:33 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions law
17:31 Working on a new front-end Jack, Paul
17:14 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Andrew MacLeod
17:11 Re: "small data" in m68k gcc? Richard Henderson
17:05 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Andrew MacLeod
17:02 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions law
17:00 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions law
17:00 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Andrew MacLeod
16:58 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Diego Novillo
16:57 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions law
16:54 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions law
16:52 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
16:52 strict alias analysis question Manfred Spraul
16:47 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Bernardo Innocenti
16:47 Re: mainline "exploding" Zack Weinberg
16:46 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
16:44 Re: [tree-ssa] bug analysis for 20000603-1.c Richard Henderson
16:42 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Andrew MacLeod
16:37 Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Diego Novillo
16:10 [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions Jan Hubicka
14:01 Re: "small data" in m68k gcc? Gunther Nikl
13:59 Re: "small data" in m68k gcc? Gunther Nikl
13:56 Re: [tree-ssa] bug analysis for 20000603-1.c law
13:36 Re: Symbol table Robert Dewar
13:32 Re: Roger Sayle appointed "middle-end" maintainer Roger Sayle
12:40 problems building GCC HEAD on MingW32 Jonathan Wilson
12:28 Re: mainline "exploding" Michael Matz
12:01 Re: mainline "exploding" Jan Hubicka
11:37 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Gunther Nikl
10:16 Re: mainline "exploding" Gerald Pfeifer
08:30 Re: mainline "exploding" Jan Hubicka
08:07 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Bernardo Innocenti
08:01 mainline "exploding" Gerald Pfeifer
07:41 Re: [tree-ssa] bug analysis for 20000603-1.c Steven Bosscher
07:30 Re: [tree-ssa] bug analysis for 20000603-1.c Richard Henderson
07:22 GCC 3.3.2 Freeze Mark Mitchell
07:18 g77 large array Susukita Ryutaro
05:54 Re: Symbol table Jim Wilson
04:05 Re: is there a GCC history anywhere? Tom Lord
04:04 Symbol table SRUTHY C.N.
03:59 Re: is there a GCC history anywhere? Phil Edwards
03:46 is there a GCC history anywhere? Jonathan Wilson
03:44 Re: CVS tags Christopher Faylor
01:44 Re: [tree-ssa] bug analysis for 20000603-1.c law
01:26 Re: Proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin Matt Austern
00:47 Re: Proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin Alexandre Oliva
00:46 Re: Proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin Andrew Pinski
00:40 Re: Proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin Joe Buck
00:12 Re: Proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin Zack Weinberg

October 13, 2003
23:06 Re: [tree-ssa] bug analysis for 20000603-1.c law
22:52 Re: [tree-ssa] bug analysis for 20000603-1.c Steven Bosscher
22:46 Re: [tree-ssa] bug analysis for 20000603-1.c law
22:31 Proposed change: weak symbol support for Darwin Matt Austern
22:17 [tree-ssa] bug analysis for 20000603-1.c Steven Bosscher
22:09 Re: CVS tags (was: [new-ra] merge with head) Mike Stump
21:54 Forthcoming ARM changes Mark Mitchell
20:56 Re: is the iostream library tthread safe? Steven Bosscher
20:25 Re: GCC iq2000 port needs a maintainer Zack Weinberg
19:56 Re: GCC iq2000 port needs a maintainer Alexandre Oliva
19:51 is the iostream library tthread safe? Hickerson, David A
19:51 Re: CVS tags (was: [new-ra] merge with head) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:38 Re: GCC iq2000 port needs a maintainer Zack Weinberg
19:24 Roger Sayle appointed "middle-end" maintainer Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:24 Re: GCC iq2000 port needs a maintainer Alexandre Oliva
19:09 Re: CVS tags (was: [new-ra] merge with head) Mike Stump
18:03 Re: GCC iq2000 port needs a maintainer Zack Weinberg
17:34 Re: GCC iq2000 port needs a maintainer Joe Buck
17:24 GCC iq2000 port needs a maintainer Nathanael Nerode
17:08 gcc-ss-3.3-20031013 is now available gccadmin
17:01 Re: Joining GCC for version 3.4 Tal Agmon
16:35 Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures onsparc[64] Andreas Tobler
15:21 Re: Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Gunther Nikl
15:02 Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures onsparc[64] Benjamin Kosnik
13:03 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4 Jan Hubicka
12:25 Re: Question about ARM -mapcs-frame documentation Richard Earnshaw
12:19 Re: Question about ARM -mapcs-frame documentation Richard Earnshaw
09:41 Re: NULL_TREE as RETURN_EXPR, but the "return" statement has anargument ... Matthieu Moy
06:09 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4 Zack Weinberg
05:44 Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4 Zack Weinberg
03:29 gcc SRUTHY C.N.
02:20 Re: Status of tree-ssa merge from mainline? Andrew Pinski
02:15 Re: Status of tree-ssa merge from mainline? Jeff Sturm
01:14 Status of tree-ssa merge from mainline? Nathanael Nerode
00:46 Re: "small data" in m68k gcc? Richard Henderson

October 12, 2003
23:58 Re: switch question in recog.c Nix
23:14 Re: "small data" in m68k gcc? Bernardo Innocenti
18:38 Re: warning when a function's address is tested? Gabriel Dos Reis
18:32 Re: warning when a function's address is tested? Zack Weinberg
18:27 Re: warning when a function's address is tested? Gabriel Dos Reis
18:13 Re: warning when a function's address is tested? Zack Weinberg
18:06 Re: CVS tags Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:53 Re: CVS tags Andreas Schwab
17:48 Re: CVS tags (was: [new-ra] merge with head) Gerald Pfeifer
17:37 Re: CVS tags (was: [new-ra] merge with head) Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:05 Re: How to add a new operand to an expression? law
16:57 Bug in 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 20031009: any workaround? Roberto Bagnara
16:56 Re: warning when a function's address is tested? Jeff Sturm
16:46 Re: CVS tags (was: [new-ra] merge with head) Gerald Pfeifer
16:27 Re: warning when a function's address is tested? Steven Bosscher
16:08 Re: warning when a function's address is tested? Falk Hueffner
16:04 Re: warning when a function's address is tested? John Levon
16:00 Re: warning when a function's address is tested? Jeff Sturm
12:38 Re: warning when a function's address is tested? Falk Hueffner
12:02 warning when a function's address is tested? Andrew Morton
05:49 successfully built and installation of GCC 3.3.1 on Slackware 9.0 r s
04:32 Re: Question about ARM -mapcs-frame documentation Ian Lance Taylor
04:07 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Daniel Berlin
03:20 Re: Why does gcc suck at switch()? law
03:11 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. law
02:26 Testing m68k changes on AmigaOS and Linux/m68k Bernardo Innocenti
01:21 Question about ARM -mapcs-frame documentation Ian Lance Taylor
00:29 gcc on windows ce Vitaliy

October 11, 2003
22:55 beyond treelang... Jason House
21:12 Re: CVS tags (was: [new-ra] merge with head) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:38 Re: make profiledbootstrap broken? Jan Hubicka
19:26 CVS tags (was: [new-ra] merge with head) Gerald Pfeifer
18:29 Re: handling -march=invalidarch option in GCC driver Zack Weinberg
18:17 handling -march=invalidarch option in GCC driver Marcus Binny
11:08 Re: install broken for treelang Andreas Jaeger
10:19 install broken for treelang Matthias Klose
10:11 Re: I would like to help implement stdint.h Joseph S. Myers
06:44 Re: make profiledbootstrap broken? Bernardo Innocenti
06:38 Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures onsparc[64] Andreas Tobler
06:36 Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] Eric Botcazou
06:11 Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures onsparc[64] Andreas Tobler
06:05 Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] Eric Botcazou
04:56 RE: -freduce-all-givs code slowdown Matt Luckett
03:20 Re: make profiledbootstrap broken? Andrew Pinski
03:17 make profiledbootstrap broken? Bernardo Innocenti
01:14 I would like to help implement stdint.h Jason Catena

October 10, 2003
20:45 Re: using void variables as linker-script symbol refs Richard Henderson
20:35 Re: NULL_TREE as RETURN_EXPR, but the "return" statement has an argument ... Richard Henderson
20:32 Re: wanting to implement Thread Local Storage on windows and am looking for pointers into the GCC codebase Richard Henderson
20:25 TARGET_EXPR question... Chris Lattner
19:37 Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] Bradley Lucier
17:49 Help debugging failure in dwarfout.c on DYNIX/ptx Nathanael Nerode
17:49 using void variables as linker-script symbol refs David Howells
17:04 Re: Speed issues taken seriously? Daniel Berlin
17:03 Re: Speed issues taken seriously? Andreas Jaeger
16:52 Re: Speed issues taken seriously? Jan Hubicka
16:33 Re: Speed issues taken seriously? Lars Gullik Bjønnes
15:57 Re: Speed issues taken seriously? Andreas Jaeger
15:42 Re: [tree-ssa] Example in tree-dfa for computing alias setsdoesn't match actual results Diego Novillo
15:21 Re: Speed issues taken seriously? Lars Gullik Bjønnes
15:21 Re: Speed issues taken seriously? Lars Gullik Bjønnes
15:06 Re: Speed issues taken seriously? Andreas Jaeger
15:05 Re: Speed issues taken seriously? Steven Bosscher
15:00 Speed issues taken seriously? Lars Gullik Bjønnes
14:43 NULL_TREE as RETURN_EXPR, but the "return" statement has anargument ... Matthieu Moy
13:02 wanting to implement Thread Local Storage on windows and am lookingfor pointers into the GCC codebase Jonathan Wilson
12:11 Re: gcc-3.3.1 build problem MAXHOSTNAMELEN undeclared Becky Sander
10:34 Re: Request for gcc copyright assignment forms Gerald Pfeifer
08:11 Re: please update config.guess and libtool Robert Millan
08:00 Re: please update config.guess and libtool Robert Millan
06:14 Re: gcc-3.3.1 build problem MAXHOSTNAMELEN undeclared Eric Botcazou
06:12 re: gcc-3.3.1 build problem MAXHOSTNAMELEN undeclared Dan Kegel
05:54 Re: Floating point Representation Ranjit Mathew
05:48 Re: Questions about GCJ Ranjit Mathew
05:43 Floating point Representation SRUTHY C.N.
03:53 Re: please update config.guess and libtool Loren James Rittle
03:45 Re: please update config.guess and libtool Daniel Jacobowitz
03:39 Re: please update config.guess and libtool Bernardo Innocenti

October 09, 2003
23:34 Questions about GCJ Harmanpaul S Gill
21:39 Re: am33_2.0-*-linux* -- why no t-slibgcc-elf-ver ? Alexandre Oliva
21:25 Re: please update config.guess and libtool Alexandre Oliva
21:21 problem while configuring target-libiberty while building cross compiler Gabor Greif
20:48 Re: please update config.guess and libtool Bernardo Innocenti
20:41 Re: Really, really const Diego Novillo
20:15 Request for gcc copyright assignment forms Fred Fish
20:12 Re: verson numbers (was: gcc-ss-3.4-20031008 is now available) Joe Buck
19:25 Re: verson numbers (was: gcc-ss-3.4-20031008 is now available) Gabriel Dos Reis
18:52 Re: verson numbers (was: gcc-ss-3.4-20031008 is now available) Mark Mitchell
18:43 Re: Warnings on kernel compiles with latest gcc-3_3-branch andgcc-3_3-rhl-branch. Martin Schlemmer
18:00 gcc-3.3.1 build problem MAXHOSTNAMELEN undeclared Becky Sander
17:41 Re: GCC, GDB v6 and -fomit-frame-pointer Jakub Jelinek
16:34 Re: How to add a new operand to an expression? Daniel Berlin
16:07 Re: How to add a new operand to an expression? Carlo Wood
16:05 am33_2.0-*-linux* -- why no t-slibgcc-elf-ver ? Nathanael Nerode
16:04 RE: bug in search engine Lee Manickum
15:47 Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] Eric Botcazou
15:37 Re: bug in search engine Aldy Hernandez
15:32 Re: bug in search engine Gerald Pfeifer
15:25 Re: bug in search engine Paolo Carlini
15:21 bug in search engine Aldy Hernandez
14:48 Re: How to add a new operand to an expression? Diego Novillo
14:42 How to add a new operand to an expression? Carlo Wood
14:24 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Zdenek Dvorak
13:36 Create function in RTL? Gábor Lóki
12:55 Re: verson numbers (was: gcc-ss-3.4-20031008 is now available) Gerald Pfeifer
12:55 please update config.guess and libtool Robert Millan
12:42 Re: GCC, GDB v6 and -fomit-frame-pointer Daniel Jacobowitz
12:39 Re: GCC, GDB v6 and -fomit-frame-pointer Jakub Jelinek
12:33 Re: GCC, GDB v6 and -fomit-frame-pointer Daniel Jacobowitz
11:21 sparc-linux gcc-3.3.1/c++ build abnormaly huge binaries ! Balint Cristian
09:51 Re: Joining GCC for version 3.4 Tal Agmon
09:43 GCC, GDB v6 and -fomit-frame-pointer Alex Hornby
09:32 Re: [tree-ssa] Libjava-failure with latest tree-ssa Gerald Pfeifer
08:25 parser/lex yyunput() problem Bansidhar Arvind Deshpande -
07:53 [tree-ssa] Libjava-failure with latest tree-ssa Linus Sjöberg
07:44 GCC SRUTHY C.N.
07:20 Re: Warnings on kernel compiles with latest gcc-3_3-branch andgcc-3_3-rhl-branch. Alan Modra
06:22 Re: how do the -fvolatile- switches work? Zack Weinberg
05:46 Re: how do the -fvolatile- switches work? Marcus Binny
05:02 Re: how do the -fvolatile- switches work? Zack Weinberg
05:00 Re: [gcc] Re: GCC low-level runtime library Petar Penchev
04:59 Re: how do the -fvolatile- switches work? Richard Henderson
04:34 how do the -fvolatile- switches work? Marcus Binny
03:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Jeff Sturm
03:02 Re: Someone broke bootstrap Roger Sayle
00:03 2 Projects with gcc Salman Khilji
00:03 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations David Edelsohn

October 08, 2003
23:18 Re: Proposed targets to obsolete for 3.4, first pass Adam Nemet
23:12 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Zdenek Dvorak
23:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Daniel Berlin
23:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Zdenek Dvorak
23:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Daniel Berlin
22:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Geoff Keating
22:49 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Geoff Keating
22:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Daniel Berlin
22:28 RE: GCC 3.3 - GNU binutils 2.14 lrtaylor
22:17 Re: Suggestion for a new Bugzilla keyword: "meta-bug" Volker Reichelt
21:37 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Zdenek Dvorak
21:32 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Geoff Keating
21:32 Itanium inlined square root Mark Mitchell
21:30 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Geoff Keating
20:58 Re: Suggestion for a new Bugzilla keyword: "meta-bug" Falk Hueffner
20:44 Suggestion for a new Bugzilla keyword: "meta-bug" Volker Reichelt
19:13 3.3.2 bug fix list, 2nd draft Joe Buck
17:27 Re: GCC low-level runtime library Joe Buck
17:26 Re: Someone broke bootstrap John David Anglin
17:06 verson numbers (was: gcc-ss-3.4-20031008 is now available) Paul Jarc
17:02 gcc-ss-3.4-20031008 is now available gccadmin
15:42 Version 3.2.2 vs Version 2.95.3 smandala
15:13 Which targets are described by *-*-chorusos* ? Gabor Greif
14:19 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Daniel Berlin
14:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Daniel Berlin
14:12 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031008 sparc-linux: gcc/function.c:5525: parse error before `int' Carlo Wood
14:03 RE: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Diego Novillo
14:03 Re: Someone broke bootstrap Kelley Cook
14:03 RE: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations S. Bosscher
14:02 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Diego Novillo
13:58 RE: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations S. Bosscher
13:57 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031008 sparc-linux: gcc/function.c:5525: parse error before `int' Eric Botcazou
13:54 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031008 sparc-linux: gcc/function.c:5525: parse error before `int' Christian Joensson
13:53 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Zdenek Dvorak
13:37 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031008 sparc-linux: gcc/function.c:5525: parse error before `int' Christian Joensson
13:31 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031008 sparc-linux: gcc/function.c:5525: parse error before `int' Carlo Wood
13:27 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Diego Novillo
13:07 Can't bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031008 sparc-linux: gcc/function.c:5525: parse error before `int' Christian Joensson
13:02 Solved! (was: Re: Someone broke bootstrap) Carlo Wood
12:57 Re: [PATCH] Re: Someone broke bootstrap Carlo Wood
12:43 Re: [PATCH] Re: Someone broke bootstrap Eric Botcazou
12:32 Thanks for fixing my patch that caused the flex regression Kelley Cook
12:29 [PATCH] Re: Someone broke bootstrap Carlo Wood
12:15 GCC 3.3 - GNU binutils 2.14 Ahu Unalan
12:12 Re: wrapper Ben Elliston
11:57 Re: Someone broke bootstrap Carlo Wood
11:24 Note: web-related patches need to be sent to gcc-patches Gerald Pfeifer
10:15 Re: Someone broke bootstrap David Ayers
09:18 Re: 3.4: --enable-softfloat float <--> double conversions not implemented yet Richard Earnshaw
08:44 Regarding _start error in gcc smandala
07:25 Re: Someone broke bootstrap Eric Christopher
07:19 Re: [PATCH] AmigaOS 4 port contribution Kai Henningsen
07:11 Re: Moving to GNU Compiler from CAD-UL Bernd Jendrissek
06:47 Re: GCC low-level runtime library Phil Edwards
06:18 GCC low-level runtime library Petar Penchev
06:17 3.4: --enable-softfloat float <--> double conversions not implementedyet Gabor Greif
05:49 Re: GCC 3.3.2 Prerelease & Branch Freeze Mark Mitchell
03:11 Re: Someone broke bootstrap John David Anglin
02:47 Re: Someone broke bootstrap John David Anglin
02:11 Someone broke bootstrap Carlo Wood
01:18 Jadilah Wirausaha sedini mungkin Citra

October 07, 2003
23:43 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Carlo Wood
23:03 Re: switch question in recog.c Michael Matz
22:46 Re: switch question in recog.c Erik Trulsson
22:38 Re: switch question in recog.c Michael Matz
22:34 Re: switch question in recog.c Zack Weinberg
22:33 Re: switch question in recog.c DJ Delorie
22:27 Re: switch question in recog.c Michael Matz
21:35 Re: GCC 3.3.2 Prerelease & Branch Freeze Joe Buck
21:19 Re: caddr_t undefined Phil Edwards
21:12 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Carlo Wood
21:08 Re: switch question in recog.c Richard Henderson
21:02 Re: Building shared library with g77 on HP-UX Toon Moene
20:49 Re: Building shared library with g77 on HP-UX Albert Chin
20:42 Re: Building shared library with g77 on HP-UX Albert Chin
20:28 Re: Fortran web pages Toon Moene
20:13 Fortran web pages Gerald Pfeifer
20:10 Re: Inline asm constraint Andreas Schwab
19:54 Re: Building shared library with g77 on HP-UX Toon Moene
19:46 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Richard Henderson
19:41 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Carlo Wood
19:32 Re: switch question in recog.c Joe Buck
19:31 Re: switch question in recog.c Chris Lattner
19:17 Re: Joining GCC for version 3.4 Joe Buck
19:16 Re: switch question in recog.c Andrew MacLeod
19:09 Re: switch question in recog.c Dale Johannesen
19:08 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Carlo Wood
18:59 Re: switch question in recog.c Daniel Jacobowitz
18:57 Re: first draft 3.3.2 release notes Toon Moene
18:54 switch question in recog.c Andrew MacLeod
18:39 Re: Warnings on kernel compiles with latest gcc-3_3-branch and gcc-3_3-rhl-branch. Olaf Hering
18:35 Re: caddr_t undefined y2bismil
18:32 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Carlo Wood
18:19 Inline asm constraint Markus Engel
18:16 Re: Joining GCC for version 3.4 Daniel Jacobowitz
18:10 caddr_t undefined y2bismil
16:34 Joining GCC for version 3.4 Tal Agmon
15:14 GCC 3.3.2 Prerelease & Branch Freeze Mark Mitchell
11:08 Building shared library with g77 on HP-UX Albert Chin
09:58 Re: Ordering of splitting passes Eric Botcazou
09:55 Re: Ordering of splitting passes Eric Botcazou
09:39 Re: Ordering of splitting passes Jan Hubicka
09:32 Re: Ordering of splitting passes Jakub Jelinek
09:24 Re: Ordering of splitting passes Jan Hubicka
08:55 Re: Ordering of splitting passes Eric Botcazou
08:31 Re: RFD: C pointer conversions that differ in unsignedness Joseph S. Myers
08:27 Re: Ordering of splitting passes Jan Hubicka
08:09 Moving to GNU Compiler from CAD-UL Ahu Unalan
07:31 Ordering of splitting passes Eric Botcazou
05:26 Re: RFD: C pointer conversions that differ in unsignedness Gabriel Dos Reis
05:13 Re: Disabling fixproto: OS-less embedded targets? Per Bothner
04:34 Re: first draft 3.3.2 release notes Eric Botcazou
02:53 Re: [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Daniel Berlin
02:40 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Carlo Wood
00:46 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Richard Henderson
00:43 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Carlo Wood
00:07 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Richard Henderson

October 06, 2003
23:49 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Carlo Wood
23:35 Re: first draft 3.3.2 release notes Joe Buck
23:27 Re: RTL Jim Wilson
23:17 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Richard Henderson
23:08 Re: first draft 3.3.2 release notes Toon Moene
22:41 RFD: C pointer conversions that differ in unsignedness Mike Stump
22:31 [tree-ssa] Garbage collector x bb annotations Zdenek Dvorak
22:30 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Carlo Wood
21:55 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Richard Henderson
21:54 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Richard Henderson
21:53 Re: [tree-ssa]: Darwin bootstrap broken between last week and this week Daniel Berlin
21:53 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Carlo Wood
20:52 Re: [tree-ssa]: Darwin bootstrap broken between last week and this week Andrew Pinski
20:48 Re: PA-RISC: Reserving a "thread context" register. John David Anglin
20:24 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Daniel Jacobowitz
20:20 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Richard Henderson
20:14 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Daniel Jacobowitz
20:11 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Richard Henderson
20:04 [tree-ssa]: Darwin bootstrap broken between last week and this week Daniel Berlin
19:20 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Carlo Wood
19:08 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Carlo Wood
19:02 Re: first draft 3.3.2 release notes Andrew Pinski
18:44 first draft 3.3.2 release notes Joe Buck
18:39 Re: Suggested warning: "./include/pch.h.gch: not used because -save-temps specified" Devang Patel
18:03 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Daniel Berlin
17:52 Re: Suggested warning: "negating an expression of unsigned type does not yield a negative value" Falk Hueffner
17:51 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Daniel Jacobowitz
17:48 Re: Suggested warning: "negating an expression of unsigned type does not yield a negative value" Joe Buck
17:41 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Richard Henderson
17:23 Re: Suggested warning: "negating an expression of unsigned type does not yield a negative value" Jamie Lokier
17:21 gcc-ss-3.3-20031006 is now available gccadmin
16:19 Re: Several tree-ssa issues Gerald Pfeifer
16:11 Re: Suggested warning: "negating an expression of unsigned type does not yield a negative value" Falk Hueffner
16:00 Re: Suggested warning: "negating an expression of unsigned type does not yield a negative value" Joe Buck
15:45 Re: Suggested warning: "./include/pch.h.gch: not used because-save-temps specified" Zack Weinberg
13:31 Suggested warning: "./include/pch.h.gch: not used because -save-temps specified" Carlo Wood
12:58 Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:46 Suggested warning: "negating an expression of unsigned type does not yield a negative value" Falk Hueffner
07:27 Unsubsribe MUTHUKUMAR KANDASAMY
07:02 Re: Status of -fnew-ra in 3.4? Michael Matz

October 05, 2003
21:30 RE: PATCH for: Lots of suggestions for the gcc manual Gerald Pfeifer
20:02 [cxx-reflection] Merge from trunk Gabriel Dos Reis
19:55 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-10-03) Mark Mitchell
19:52 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-10-03) Mark Mitchell
17:10 Re: PA-RISC: Reserving a "thread context" register. Thierry Moreau
16:53 Re: [ACPI] Why does gcc suck at switch()? Pavel Machek
16:43 Proposed targets to obsolete for 3.4, first pass Nathanael Nerode
09:54 Re: Really, really const Andrew Haley
05:00 Warnings on kernel compiles with latest gcc-3_3-branch andgcc-3_3-rhl-branch. Martin Schlemmer
01:12 Re: [PATCH] Re: strcat and config/darwin.c Andrew Pinski

October 04, 2003
22:29 Re: __builtin_apply questions Hans-Peter Nilsson
18:38 RE: PATCH for: Lots of suggestions for the gcc manual Stephan T. Lavavej
16:41 Dear Portal Administration edlavent
15:20 gcc 3.3.1 installation problems djekels
09:34 __builtin_apply questions Eric Botcazou
08:45 Re: Documentation Buglet (Broken Link) Gerald Pfeifer
08:44 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-10-03) Jakub Jelinek
08:12 Re: Documentation Buglet (Broken Link) Kai Henningsen
07:32 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-10-03) Gerald Pfeifer
06:19 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-10-03) Eric Botcazou
04:56 Re: Strange line in ltconfig H. J. Lu
04:54 PA-RISC: Reserving a "thread context" register. Matt Thomas
04:27 Re: RFC: Improve MIPS code generation. Alexandre Oliva
04:13 Re: Strange line in ltconfig Alexandre Oliva
03:56 Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] Bradley Lucier
02:26 Status of -fnew-ra in 3.4? Bradley Lucier
02:25 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-10-03) Michael Elizabeth Chastain
00:23 ping, RFA (try 2). DEBUG mainainters: Where to put location_t info? Carlo Wood

October 03, 2003
23:13 Re: Documentation Buglet (Broken Link) Joseph S. Myers
22:59 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-10-03) Gerald Pfeifer
22:51 GCC Release Status (2003-10-03) Mark Mitchell
22:31 Re: RFC: Improve MIPS code generation. Daniel Jacobowitz
22:23 Re: RFC: Improve MIPS code generation. David Daney
22:17 Re: RFC: Improve MIPS code generation. Daniel Jacobowitz
22:13 RFC: Improve MIPS code generation. David Daney
21:47 Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] Gabriel Dos Reis
21:36 Re: Documentation Buglet (Broken Link) Gerald Pfeifer
21:32 Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures onsparc[64] Zack Weinberg
20:56 Re: New langhook: lang_get_callee_fndecl Richard Henderson
20:18 successful build on AIX 4.1 Stuart_Yarus
18:54 PATCH for: Lots of suggestions for the gcc manual Gerald Pfeifer
18:03 Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures onsparc[64] Andreas Tobler
17:59 Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] Gabriel Dos Reis
17:53 Type Information for better Optimization Kevin Atkinson
17:11 Re: [tree-ssa] -fdisable-gimple Gerald Pfeifer
17:05 Re: S/390 nonlocal goto patch Frank Heckenbach
17:02 Re: [tree-ssa] -fdisable-gimple Diego Novillo
16:27 Re: [tree-ssa] -fdisable-gimple Jeff Sturm
16:18 New langhook: lang_get_callee_fndecl Andrew Haley
16:05 Re: [tree-ssa mudflap] Frank Ch. Eigler
16:00 Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures onsparc[64] Andreas Tobler
15:42 Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] Bradley Lucier
15:41 Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures onsparc[64] Benjamin Kosnik
15:04 Re: [tree-ssa] -fdisable-gimple Steven Bosscher
14:56 Why does gcc suck at switch()? Matthew Wilcox
14:51 Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] Eric Botcazou
14:23 Re: [tree-ssa] -fdisable-gimple Daniel Berlin
14:23 Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64] Bradley Lucier
14:17 Away from email Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
13:21 [tree-ssa] -fdisable-gimple Jeff Sturm
12:10 [tree-ssa mudflap] Eyal Lebedinsky
06:15 Re: __alignof__(T) not compile time constant? Jamie Lokier
00:59 Re: gcc-3.4 requires 'typename' to use map in a template? Dan Kegel
00:51 Re: gcc-3.4 requires 'typename' to use map in a template? David Carlton
00:39 Re: gcc-3.4 requires 'typename' to use map in a template? Dan Kegel
00:10 Re: Strange line in ltconfig Carlo Wood

October 02, 2003
23:56 gcc-3.4 requires 'typename' to use map in a template? Dan Kegel
23:21 Re: deriving template classes: gcc 3.4 complains Matt Austern
22:14 PR 11878, 11885, 12223, 11063 Mark Mitchell
21:02 Re: C++ language lawyer question Gerald Pfeifer
19:32 Documentation Buglet (Broken Link) Stephan T. Lavavej
19:13 Re: Forcing a core dump Mike Stump
18:38 Re: Building 3.3.1 cygwin -> sh cross fails tm_gccmail
18:25 Strange line in ltconfig H. J. Lu
18:14 Re: Help with gmp-4.0.1 and gcc-3.3.1 on sparcv9? Bradley Lucier
18:00 Re: Help with gmp-4.0.1 and gcc-3.3.1 on sparcv9? Bradley Lucier
17:15 Re: Help with gmp-4.0.1 and gcc-3.3.1 on sparcv9? Eric Botcazou
17:11 Re: Help with gmp-4.0.1 and gcc-3.3.1 on sparcv9? Jakub Jelinek
17:04 Re: Help with gmp-4.0.1 and gcc-3.3.1 on sparcv9? Bradley Lucier
15:21 gcc compilation problems on 11.23 djekels
15:02 gcc 3.2.3 compilation problems on hpux 11.23 djekels
14:16 Weak optimzation for x86 for some small constants Gunther Piez
14:00 Forcing a core dump Mark Rowe
11:43 Re: -O2 and volatile Eljay Love-Jensen
11:43 [tree-ssa] Example in tree-dfa for computing alias sets doesn'tmatch actual results Steven Bosscher
08:23 Re: -O2 and volatile Joseph D. Wagner
08:22 Observations with CSiBE benchmark Arpad Beszedes
08:06 Fw: Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC Ayal Zaks
08:00 Re: deriving template classes: gcc 3.4 complains Gabriel Dos Reis
07:46 -O2 and volatile Marcus Binny
07:28 Building 3.3.1 cygwin -> sh cross fails hartmut . schirmer
03:37 Re: deriving template classes: gcc 3.4 complains George Garvey
03:00 Re: deriving template classes: gcc 3.4 complains Andrew Pinski
02:48 Re: deriving template classes: gcc 3.4 complains George Garvey
01:00 Re: Why do gcc and src have different config-ml.in? DJ Delorie
00:57 Re: Optimization Inquiry Zack Weinberg
00:29 Optimization Inquiry Joseph D. Wagner
00:28 Re: Help with gmp-4.0.1 and gcc-3.3.1 on sparcv9? Bradley Lucier
00:23 Why do gcc and src have different config-ml.in? H. J. Lu

October 01, 2003
23:01 Re: Extra blank line in diagnostic output Gabriel Dos Reis
22:57 Re: Extra email address support for bugzilla Daniel Berlin
22:55 Extra blank line in diagnostic output Richard Kenner
22:54 Re: Extra email address support for bugzilla Hans-Peter Nilsson
22:31 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Hans-Peter Nilsson
22:26 Re: Help with gmp-4.0.1 and gcc-3.3.1 on sparcv9? Jakub Jelinek
22:18 Help with gmp-4.0.1 and gcc-3.3.1 on sparcv9? Bradley Lucier
22:16 Re: __alignof__(T) not compile time constant? Paolo Carlini
22:13 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Hans-Peter Nilsson
22:00 Re: __alignof__(T) not compile time constant? Gabriel Dos Reis
21:57 Re: __alignof__(T) not compile time constant? Gabriel Dos Reis
21:50 Re: __alignof__(T) not compile time constant? Paolo Carlini
21:43 Re: __alignof__(T) not compile time constant? Paolo Carlini
20:51 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Wolfgang Bangerth
18:59 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Gerald Pfeifer
18:52 Re: deriving template classes: gcc 3.4 complains Gerald Pfeifer
18:23 Re: I broke CVS.... :-( law
18:05 Re: I broke CVS.... :-( Zack Weinberg
18:01 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Zack Weinberg
18:00 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Zack Weinberg
17:35 deriving template classes: gcc 3.4 complains Joachim Schoeberl
17:05 Re: Sibcall arguments passed on the stack Dale Johannesen
17:03 gcc-ss-3.4-20031001 is now available gccadmin
16:58 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 E. Weddington
16:53 Re: Sibcall arguments passed on the stack Richard Henderson
16:48 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Richard Henderson
16:46 Re: RFA: Objective-c prototype search cleanups Alexander Malmberg
16:29 Extra email address support for bugzilla Daniel Berlin
16:22 Re: Sibcall arguments passed on the stack John David Anglin
16:18 Re: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030924 on sparc64-linux: LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC redefined Eric Botcazou
15:58 Re: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030924 on sparc64-linux: LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC redefined Jakub Jelinek
15:06 Re: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030924 on sparc64-linux: LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC redefined Eric Botcazou
15:03 Re: I broke CVS.... :-( David Edelsohn
12:47 Re: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030924 on sparc64-linux: LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC redefined Christian Joensson
12:29 Re: I broke CVS.... :-( Robert Schiele
11:18 I broke CVS.... :-( Nathanael Nerode
10:07 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Eric Botcazou
08:52 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Richard Earnshaw
08:17 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Hans-Peter Nilsson
08:06 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Zack Weinberg
07:11 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Hans-Peter Nilsson
06:09 wrapper Siddharth
06:04 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Zack Weinberg
05:47 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:12 undefined refrences to Apache symbols Gagan Puri
05:06 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Ranjit Mathew
03:54 Re: Sibcall arguments passed on the stack Richard Henderson
03:11 Re: Sibcall arguments passed on the stack John David Anglin
01:15 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Zack Weinberg
00:58 Re: DWARF debugging format implementation Daniel Berlin
00:34 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Kazu Hirata


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3