This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: tm_gccmail at mail dot kloo dot net
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:04:50 -0700
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions
References: <20030926213651.GC21887@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0309291316230.7327-100000@mail.kloo.net>

On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 01:19:20PM -0700, tm_gccmail@mail.kloo.net wrote:
> Can we avoid these problems by deferring the frame pointer generation
> until register allocation?

No, it's still rtl-level state, so we still have compilation order
problems and inlining problems.


r~

References:
- [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions
  - From: tm_gccmail

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]