This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Redeclaration of used symbols
jakub@redhat.com (Jakub Jelinek) wrote on 07.09.03 in <20030907172556.GF12344@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 07:44:35PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > extern inline int t()
> > {
> > something...
> > }
> > int t()
> > {
> > something else...
> > }
>
> This is needed, so that you can include the headers with extern inlines
> when you provide definition which will be used when inlining fails.
> Having to add magic defines around each extern inline which will then
> be only used in the module providing the definition would be
> non-maintainable.
Is that one of the places where traditional gcc inline differs from C99
inline?
MfG Kai