This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
ColdFire/uClinux status update
- From: Bernardo Innocenti <bernie at develer dot com>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Peter Barada <peter at baradas dot org>,Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 04:54:33 +0200
- Subject: ColdFire/uClinux status update
- Organization: Develer S.r.l.
Hello,
All approved patches are already in CVS:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg00579.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg00633.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg00634.html
These are still pending approval:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg00752.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg00549.html
I've also submitted this new patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg01222.html
This was to be redone using the ctx patterns:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg00814.html
This one is somewhat controversial, but needed for ColdFire
targets until a better fix is found:
http://www.develer.com/uclinux/uclinux-elf-tools/gcc-3.4-coldfire-reload.patch
Question: Is it ok to convert the m68k back-end to use ANSI
function argument declarations?
And what about ANSI preprocessor features such as defined()
and #elif?
--
// Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/ http://www.develer.com/
Please don't send Word attachments - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html