This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:
| On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:43:19PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > | Anyway, what would you suggest? If the dependencies are so
| > | complex you can't express them as a DAG, then your project
| > | is Just Broken, IMNSHO.
| >
| > From compiler implementors point of view, it might be fine to try to
| > phrase things that way. However, from application developers point of
| > view, the solution you outilined earlier with its requirements are
| > just plain too complex to be effective. And that is not speculation.
|
| This is nonsense.
Saying that does not make it so. It helps handwing on the issue, but
no more.
-- Gaby
- References:
- Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
- Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
- Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
- Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
- Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
- Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors