This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations
- From: Jamie Lokier <jamie at shareable dot org>
- To: "Loisel, Sebastien" <loisel at amazon dot com>
- Cc: Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot OZ dot AU>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc at gnu dot org, loisel at math dot mcgill dot ca
- Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 02:32:24 +0100
- Subject: Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations
- References: <F86C00264102F24B80D4BD792CB1C5C40452C767@ex-mail-02.ant.amazon.com>
Loisel, Sebastien wrote:
> > 2) Is there a way to do this already? I know you can already specify
> > dependencies of asm blocks on variables and such, and I presume this
> > is used in the optimizer to prevent foul-ups. What's the best way of
> > convincing gcc not to move my asm blocks around?
>
> Nothing to see here, move along. I just found out about asm volatile. Sorry for the noise.
Does it fix your problem?
-- Jamie