This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code

From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 11:47:21 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code
References: <20030804093143.A24974@synopsys.com> <8380D110-C708-11D7-A9D4-003065A77310@apple.com><20030805182353.C27614@synopsys.com> <Pine.BSF.4.56.0308061044060.68082@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at><20030807131134.GB3396@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz><Pine.BSF.4.56.0308140043110.12895@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at><ho1xvoka6n.fsf@byrd.suse.de>

On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> But other than that, it looks really good.  We just had to change half
> a dozen packages were we had to add an attribute ((used)) since
> functions/variables where used only via inline assembly.

Couldn't/shouldn't the compiler detect this kind of use as well, or
are these cases where the name of the function/variable actually never
was used?

Gerald

Follow-Ups:
- Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Re: On inlining in C++
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: On inlining in C++
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: On inlining in C++
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: On inlining in C++
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]