Re: __declspec(selectany)

[Boaz Harrosh <boaz at hishome dot net>]

Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:

> On August 6, 2003 01:14 am, Dan Kegel wrote:
>  
>
> > I looked at
> > http://cvs.winehq.com/cvsweb/wine/tools/winegcc.c?rev=1.16
> > and see you don't have
> >
> > #define selectany weak
> >    
>
> That's right, it doesn't.
>
>  
>
> > Think winegcc should do -Dselectany=weak?
> >    
>
> I don't know -- it's easy enough to add, but it's also
> quite dangerous it seems. It would seem that a gcc
> patch to teach it to recognize selectany as an attribute
> is the way to go. I think people that need selectany to
> work should explicitly define it, so they are aware of
> the potential problems, no?
>
>  
Thank you all for the help. It works like charm. ( needed both defines )

I agree with Dimitrie. “selectany” should only be defined on a “per 
project”. In the MS compiler it is only reserved when used inside a 
declspec . It can freely be used as an Identifier. So is weak in GCC. 
Above define will break that.

Save from a GCC patch, the only right solution is to enhance winemaker, 
so just as it changes the #pragma( pack ) things it can also change the 
__declespec( selectany ) to something like __declespec__selectany__ and 
now a global define is less dangerous.



Sorry for the late response, the time difference, when you type a way I 
was already in the pub.