This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: On inlining in C++

From: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
To: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 18:23:53 -0700
Subject: Re: On inlining in C++
References: <20030804093143.A24974@synopsys.com> <8380D110-C708-11D7-A9D4-003065A77310@apple.com>

On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:49:01PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 09:31 AM, Joe Buck wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 03:06:43PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> >> 	  Give C++ "inline" its original and obvious meaning
> >>
> >> 	     Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions>
> >
> > Excellent article.
> 
> This is a complete waste of time.  inlining is an optimization.  
> Optimizations are always subject to improvement.  Therefore, inlining 
> is subject to improvement.

Fine.  Then accept Gaby's proposal as a stopgap solution until we can
produce an automatic inliner that is any good.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: On inlining in C++
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

References:
- Re: On inlining in C++
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: On inlining in C++
  - From: Mike Stump

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]