This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: current_function_decl or cfun->decl?

From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 15:59:19 -0700
Subject: Re: current_function_decl or cfun->decl?
References: <200308012010.h71KApv21266@greed.delorie.com><878yqd15c5.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><200308012212.h71MCmP23103@greed.delorie.com>

DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:

>> current_function_decl is a #define for cfun->decl, so there is no
>> functional difference.
>
> Er, no...
>
> tree.h:extern GTY(()) tree current_function_decl;
> toplev.c:tree current_function_decl;

Bleah.  I really thought they were a #define.  I don't know what the
difference is, then.

zw

References:
- current_function_decl or cfun->decl?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: current_function_decl or cfun->decl?
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: current_function_decl or cfun->decl?
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]