Re: std::pow implementation

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>]

Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:

[...]

| because it goes against your theory, why should I expect you to be
| reasonable when tagging functions as inline?

Because it is not you who write my programs.

| If you won't listen to me, why should I listen to you?

Obviously, if you could you have already.

|  Why do you insist on making claims
| that `old is good' while all the evidence we have is that, when using

I'm not claiming "old is good" against all the evidence.  I'm claiming
the "new" is not mature enough to replace the "old".  That is not
speculation. Obviously, if the new were mature enough to replace the
"old", we would not have been having all this discussion.

-- Gaby