This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: std::pow implementation
- From: Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
- To: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>
- Cc: aoliva at redhat dot com, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:14:02 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: std::pow implementation
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Robert Dewar wrote:
> > Also portability is not only about different targets, but also about
> > different compilers! Declaring something inline for one compiler doesnt
> > necessary have the same desired semantics for inline for another one.
>
> good point ...
>
Which equals to the point that gcc should be able to produce equally good
code for any inline semantics the code was written for.
Richard.