This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 07:51:19 -0400
- Subject: Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
On Thursday, Jul 10, 2003, at 06:42 US/Eastern, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
My nightly GCC builder succeeded, kind of surprisingly, because I
noticed
no patch on gcc-patches announcing a fix.
That is because it was discussed in the regression mail list:
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2003-07/msg00206.html>.
However, gcc/cp/ChangeLog has the following entry
2003-07-09 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
* typeck.c (build_x_unary_op): Take note of the fact that
PREINCREMENT_EXPR and POSTINCREMENT_EXPR are binary operations
on
trees.
* parser.c (cp_parser_primary_expression): Preserve the form of
qualified expressions in templates, even if they are not
dependent.
* pt.c (convert_nontype_argument): Handle non-dependent
SCOPE_REFs.
(tsubst_qualified_id): Likewise.
* search.c (accessible_p): Treat everything in the body of a
template as accessible.
whereas http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-07/msg00993.html does
not
mention the first hunk (to typeck.c). Is this the fix for the
bootstrap
failure?
Yes.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2003-07/msg00206.html> for
the patch.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski