Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021

[Marcus Meissner <meissner at suse dot de>]

On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:43:08AM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > I am concerned about my ability to work on this problem, since I don't
> > have access to the hardware involved, and I am finding it very time
> > consuming.  Time I spend on this problem is time I can't spend on
> > reviewing patches sent to gcc-patches.
> > 
> > I think the next step here is testing of my latest patch.  We need
> > performance testing which I can't do.  We also need some execution
> > testing to see if it fixes the bugs 9745 and 10021.  I could do 9745 by
> > building an uberbaum cross compiler, but that will take a lot of time. 
> > It would be faster if someone else could do this for me.  If this patch
> > works, then I think this is safe for the 3.3.1 branch and then we can
> > close the two PRs.  We still have long term issues with
> > loop_regs_update/record_base_value which will effect performance and
> > possibly also correctness.
> 
> I tested it against my testcase for 10021 on powerpc-linux with current
> gcc 3.3 branch + your loop patch.
> 
> The loop patch attached to your mail compiled with -O2 does not change
> the assembler output and does not fix the testcase in 10021.

Err, I mean the 9745 testcase, sorry.

Ciao, Marcus

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature